Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why do we put animals out of their misery but let humans suffer?

289 replies

Freshton · 16/05/2026 11:06

A relative is currently dying a slow and horrible death from terminal cancer. In palliative phase and last few days now as can't swallow or take any liquids.

It's truly opened my eyes. I had no idea how medieval things were still when it comes to death. I've been truly horrified at what people are expected to endure in their final weeks and what their relatives have to witness.

I can't understand why we put animals to sleep to spare them suffering but humans still have to deal with this slow and undignified end.

I've never been much in favour of assisted dying as not had to think about it but after seeing what I've seen, I really hope something can change. I'll be haunted for the rest of my life by what I've seen in last few weeks.

OP posts:
EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/05/2026 11:50

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:46

The act of choice is significant here. Currently we do not have choice. If the law was changed, it would allow choice. Those who are against it, are making their own choice for themselves but taking my choice away from me.

You can end your life whenever you choose. There is no right to have a state funded death with assistance from a state funded doctor.

Argh I hate this argument about having the choice to commit suicide, but not the choice to do it peacefully. Gross.

UncannyFanny · 16/05/2026 11:50

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:45

I don’t agree.
And these kinds of arguments show that people are backing assisted dying out of self interest. It isn’t for the benefit of the elderly person living the last weeks or days.

So you’ve witnessed someone dying a slow and painful death?

HoskinsChoice · 16/05/2026 11:50

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:47

You have the choice.

Not in the UK we don't. People could choose to take their own lives but to ensure they had the physical capability to do it, they will have to do it much earlier than if we had assisted dying and it would be with considerably less dignified. That is not a choice.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:50

HoskinsChoice · 16/05/2026 11:47

Of course it is. It's about giving EVERYONE not just me or you the choice. By not backing the assisted dying law, you are protecting your own choice but taking my choice away from me. How is that fair?

No it isn’t. You have the choice to die, anytime you want to. No one is taking any choice away from you. You don’t need the state to pay for your choice or pay for help. I object to funding suicide or euthanasia with tax payer money,

FlayOtters · 16/05/2026 11:50

RaspberryFeet · 16/05/2026 11:39

I suppose it’s because it’s a slippery slope. How do you have the right to choose without it becoming like Canada?

It's not a slippery slope. Canada is the exception, not the rule. Also, the bill that the HoL have just filibustered out of existence would have been the most tightly regulated assisted dying law in the world (far too tightly in my opinion as it would not have helped the incurably suffering)

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:51

HoskinsChoice · 16/05/2026 11:50

Not in the UK we don't. People could choose to take their own lives but to ensure they had the physical capability to do it, they will have to do it much earlier than if we had assisted dying and it would be with considerably less dignified. That is not a choice.

The law you are backing requires the physical ability to overdose on oral medication. It’s not going to buy anyone any extra time.

In addition, death cannot be made dignified. Any death by overdose has the same side effects, risk of failure, disturbing things are still witnessed, it’s not painless or serene.

hattie43 · 16/05/2026 11:52

Totally agree OP.

UncannyFanny · 16/05/2026 11:52

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:50

No it isn’t. You have the choice to die, anytime you want to. No one is taking any choice away from you. You don’t need the state to pay for your choice or pay for help. I object to funding suicide or euthanasia with tax payer money,

Objection overruled.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:53

UncannyFanny · 16/05/2026 11:52

Objection overruled.

😆

HoskinsChoice · 16/05/2026 11:54

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:51

The law you are backing requires the physical ability to overdose on oral medication. It’s not going to buy anyone any extra time.

In addition, death cannot be made dignified. Any death by overdose has the same side effects, risk of failure, disturbing things are still witnessed, it’s not painless or serene.

Edited

OK. Maybe go and read up about it. You clearly don't understand.

I hope you never have to go through what so many of us have. Although perhaps only then will you understand.

GreenHay · 16/05/2026 11:55

Blame Harold Shipman. Hope he’s rotting in hell.

Twoshoesnewshoes · 16/05/2026 11:55

Awww OP, I feel the same.
my uncle is in a care home, absolutely addled with dementia- can’t walk or speak now. Some time ago he asked if he could ‘go,end’ and then said ‘but I don’t know how’
i know what he wanted.
my DDog was prs two years ago, it was peaceful and sweet - I so wanted to do this for my uncle.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/05/2026 11:56

‘object to funding suicide or euthanasia with tax payer money‘

😵‍💫🙈🤦🏼‍♀️. My god every time I think i’ve read some nonsense on here I log back in and there’s more of it! If I think of how our tax pounds are wasted every second of every minute of every day, and this poster wants to make the argument that allowing people a peaceful death is objectionable to the tax payer 🤣. Good lord.

thefloorislavayes · 16/05/2026 11:58

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:45

I don’t agree.
And these kinds of arguments show that people are backing assisted dying out of self interest. It isn’t for the benefit of the elderly person living the last weeks or days.

Unfortunately, people who haven’t experienced something personally often can’t fully grasp the amount of pain and suffering that dying can involve. I once cared for a 106-year-old lady who couldn’t walk, could barely swallow, and only saw her carers for 30 minutes at a time, four times a day. Whenever she was lucid and not hallucinating, she would either ask to die or ask to be carried into the garden because she wanted to feel the sun on her cheeks. We weren’t allowed to carry her anywhere. For six years, all she saw were the walls of her bedroom; she couldn’t even tolerate watching television. Much of the time she spoke to people who weren’t there, though occasionally she would come through and say things like, “Oh, I’m being fed soup.” During the last five months of her life, she screamed in pain whenever she was awake.
Ask yourself honestly whether you would want to spend your final years living like that. Then ask yourself: for whose benefit are you of the opinion that we should force people to endure a final few years like this lady’s?

Summerhillsquare · 16/05/2026 12:00

Because there is no way to implement safeguards that would prevent horrific abuse bring inflicted on elderly and disabled people.

DilettanteRedRagger · 16/05/2026 12:01

Sadly, there’s a post like this on here once a week @Freshton . You’re not alone. I hoped the government (like dying people give a fuck who let them down - Parliament or House of Lords; when you’re dying or watching a loved one die horribly, it’s just governmental bullshit) wouldn’t be a bunch of political fuckwits over assisted dying but OF COURSE they were.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 12:01

HoskinsChoice · 16/05/2026 11:54

OK. Maybe go and read up about it. You clearly don't understand.

I hope you never have to go through what so many of us have. Although perhaps only then will you understand.

I do understand and it is because I have researched it extensively that I am against assisted dying.

It is pure naivety to believe that the UK won’t go the way of the other nations that have passed these laws and within a decade fall into widespread abuse with state sanctioned murder of the elderly and disabled.

editing- naivety or nationalist arrogance

EMDRwife · 16/05/2026 12:02

As a cancer nurse I have seen wonderful peaceful deaths, and awful traumatic ones. I can’t support assisted dying until public services are sorted in this country- properly funded palliative care and mental health services which are not reliant on charity funding

Twoshoesnewshoes · 16/05/2026 12:03

Does a living will help with this? Can we consent whilst we have capacity to be used further down the line if we lose capacity?

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 12:04

thefloorislavayes · 16/05/2026 11:58

Unfortunately, people who haven’t experienced something personally often can’t fully grasp the amount of pain and suffering that dying can involve. I once cared for a 106-year-old lady who couldn’t walk, could barely swallow, and only saw her carers for 30 minutes at a time, four times a day. Whenever she was lucid and not hallucinating, she would either ask to die or ask to be carried into the garden because she wanted to feel the sun on her cheeks. We weren’t allowed to carry her anywhere. For six years, all she saw were the walls of her bedroom; she couldn’t even tolerate watching television. Much of the time she spoke to people who weren’t there, though occasionally she would come through and say things like, “Oh, I’m being fed soup.” During the last five months of her life, she screamed in pain whenever she was awake.
Ask yourself honestly whether you would want to spend your final years living like that. Then ask yourself: for whose benefit are you of the opinion that we should force people to endure a final few years like this lady’s?

I have experienced it. But ask yourself would 5.5yrs of suffering be much different from 6yrs? And ask yourself why was her care so bad that she was suffering that much pain and even the simplest request for something as going into a garden was denied to her?

What you have described is horrible palliative care and the solution to that is not to kill people as soon as they need palliative care.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 16/05/2026 12:05

FlayOtters · 16/05/2026 11:50

It's not a slippery slope. Canada is the exception, not the rule. Also, the bill that the HoL have just filibustered out of existence would have been the most tightly regulated assisted dying law in the world (far too tightly in my opinion as it would not have helped the incurably suffering)

Oh come on. All the safeguarding that they promised was being eroded before the bill even passed. The slippery slope concerns came true right from the start. That’s why it failed.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 12:05

EMDRwife · 16/05/2026 12:02

As a cancer nurse I have seen wonderful peaceful deaths, and awful traumatic ones. I can’t support assisted dying until public services are sorted in this country- properly funded palliative care and mental health services which are not reliant on charity funding

I completely agree.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 12:07

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/05/2026 11:56

‘object to funding suicide or euthanasia with tax payer money‘

😵‍💫🙈🤦🏼‍♀️. My god every time I think i’ve read some nonsense on here I log back in and there’s more of it! If I think of how our tax pounds are wasted every second of every minute of every day, and this poster wants to make the argument that allowing people a peaceful death is objectionable to the tax payer 🤣. Good lord.

Edited

It’s not a guaranteed peaceful death. Assisted dying is being romanticised.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 12:08

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 16/05/2026 12:05

Oh come on. All the safeguarding that they promised was being eroded before the bill even passed. The slippery slope concerns came true right from the start. That’s why it failed.

Not to mention that Canada isn’t the exception. Every other country has gone or is following the same trajectory.

Catterbat · 16/05/2026 12:09

AmberTigerEyes · 16/05/2026 11:50

No it isn’t. You have the choice to die, anytime you want to. No one is taking any choice away from you. You don’t need the state to pay for your choice or pay for help. I object to funding suicide or euthanasia with tax payer money,

Wtf?!! I’ve seen it all now.