Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be worried about the low school intake this Sept?

47 replies

FurierTransform · Today 19:33

My daughter starts year R later this year
The school typically has an intake of circa 60 children, split between 2 classes. All pretty normal.
I've just been told that this coming year it is going to be nearer 40.
They are still running 2 classes.

On the surface it sounds great, smaller class sizes is what everyone wants right?
But i'm worried what the unseen impacts will be - on staffing levels, school funding etc, whether the teachers are equipped to capitalise on it as it seems abnormal, & the knock-on effect to the school for the next few years. Are any teachers or school staff reading who can comment?

Is this a nationwide demographic issue this year? was circa 2022 a low birth year?

OP posts:
chargingdock · Today 20:47

MsGreying · Today 20:31

Until the impact of the lifting of the 2 child cap kicks in again

@MsGreying No country has seen an increase in birth rates once below replacement rate, why do you think it will be different for here?

Mumstheword1983 · Today 20:48

Small village school here. Average class size has been 18 for my 3 children all the way through. Composite classes mostly. They've all had a great experience.

School rolls have dropped nationwide as others have said and schools/staff have been expecting this and will adapt.

chargingdock · Today 20:49

It’s a nationwide trend @FurierTransform &
particularly acute in inner London. You are right to be concerned because headcount’s impact funding.

User79853257976 · Today 20:49

I think it is a low birth year (2021/2022), due to Covid putting some people off trying in 2020/202.

Schools might do some mixed classes like a year 1 class, a year 1/2 and a year 2 class.

chargingdock · Today 20:51

Birth rates were declining long before Covid

schoolsweek.co.uk/how-falling-school-rolls-are-not-just-londons-crisis/

PonkyPonky · Today 20:54

DS started reception in a class of 48, previous year was the full 60. They managed as 2 separate classes for reception and year 1 but the intake the year after him was much smaller so they had to start doing mixed years once DS got to year 2.
I honestly don’t know how the school manage to figure it all out to be honest. Looks like a logistical nightmare to me, not to mention lower funding.
Our personal experience is that the seemed to manage it well and everyone still got a good education as far as I could tell.

ByNimbleGreenFinch · Today 20:55

Very interesting to read this thread as it’s not my experience at all. DD goes to a south east London primary school, 3 form entry, always at 90 in her year. Her class lost a couple after reception due to house moves of the families and they were instantly replaced by two newcomers in year 1. None of the children who applied to the primary school from my second child’s nursery got a place and some have ended up at their third or fourth choice!

No idea why we seem to be an outlier compared to the rest of the country!

Yellowsubmarine55 · Today 20:58

Our school is jam packed every year group and new intake of 90 in September with a waiting list.

Probably depends on area and school.

Bloodorangekangaroo · Today 21:12

My son is starting reception and there is only 28 children in his year group. 130 in the whole school. They cater for 4 to 11 year olds. I’m not too worried since the staff levels are high. The school can cater for 140. It’s never full but has an excellent ofstead report.

staringatthedoor · Today 21:19

Potentially depends on the area. Most of the schools around us have huge waitlists. Dds school had 95 applications for 30 places. But that could be where a lot of people have moved out of London to where we are (North Hampshire) and the infrastructure still hasn’t caught up.

Redlocks28 · Today 21:19

What do you mean by ‘whether the teachers are equipped to capitalise on it’?

The budget will probably really struggle with so few children. They obviously still need a teacher in front of them whose salary needs to be paid, whether there’s the money brought by 30 children or the money brought by just 20. Next year will probably go to mixed classes so they may be in a class with 20 year 1 and 10 year 2s. I would say expect lots of complaining from some parents of both Y2 children (who don’t want their child held back with the babies) and y1 children (who think they will struggle socially with the y2s)!

padampada · Today 21:23

Its nationwide and not good for schools. Funding is allocated based on places taken. If the pattern continued your school will likely mix year groups. Lots of schools near us have a year 1, a year 2 and then a mixed year1/2 class when they were once 2 formed entry. Some good news for parents though as there will be more options and more competition between schools to attracted applicants.

Bakingandmaking · Today 21:26

My eldest is currently in reception in a normally full 3 form entry school. There are 21 children in his class and the other classes are similar. I am very interested to find out how many new children will be starting in reception this year, especially as my middle child will start next September. The smaller class size has worked well for now, but I’m concerned about the impact on funding and whether they will close a class before the next child starts school.

ACynicalDad · Today 21:28

It is a major issue, in a city you can close a small, poorly performing school, a couple have closed near us in the last couple of years, and whilst it's upsetting for those involved, it's not a major issue. The problem is in rural areas. They won't have a class of 40 in year 3, but if numbers drop to say 34, they may do that, but mixed-aged classes are much more likely. If you try to fund a teacher for a 20-child class, they will eat up any savings and leave nothing for anything beyond salaries. The head where I'm a governor is quite purposeful about making sure we are full, which is good for us, but to the detriment of those around us. Another will close within the next 2-3 years, some that are closing have modern buildings, it's such a waste.

padampada · Today 21:34

Just to add, parents in over subscribed popular schools might not notice any difference but birth rates are falling significantly. If you look closely at the data, you might start to notice catchment areas increasing slightly and neighbouring less popular schools not being full. An outstanding school near us which normally has waiting lists was advertising this year.

tttigress · Today 21:44

chargingdock · Today 20:47

@MsGreying No country has seen an increase in birth rates once below replacement rate, why do you think it will be different for here?

Exactly this. Countries are actually giving financial insensitives to have more children, only to see the birthrate fall further.

This could have a real impact on teaching. I believe some schools are now making teachers redundant.

BeOchreDog · Today 22:04

One of the schools close to us that is very poor only filled 10/60 spaces and most of those seemed to have been allocated them because they didn’t get into their choices.

Our DC’s school has always been massively oversubscribed but this year only managed 25/30 although they are expecting to pick up some who have been allocated schools in town they don’t want.

MigGirl · Today 22:07

DaffodilsInAJamjar · Today 19:42

The Covid years saw fewer births I think. I believe the current reception cohort is a smaller group too?

You here this a lot but it had little to do with covid.

I read an article recently showing how birth rates have been dropping for some time and that the government has failed to forward plan in education.

For the first year ever we are compeating to fill year 7 in September. This reflects the drop in birth rates. These students would have been in year 1 during covid, yes coivd didn't help but it was already a downward trend.

The problem with school funding is that schools are funded mainly on a per pupil rate. So less pupil = less funding, it's of course going to vary greatly by area. But the reality is student numbers are dropping.

chargingdock · Today 22:07

padampada · Today 21:34

Just to add, parents in over subscribed popular schools might not notice any difference but birth rates are falling significantly. If you look closely at the data, you might start to notice catchment areas increasing slightly and neighbouring less popular schools not being full. An outstanding school near us which normally has waiting lists was advertising this year.

I think it will cause more division between schools. The good ones will still be popular but the back up options will lose pupils & funding, performance and offering may be impacted and you will end up with a wider gulf.

chargingdock · Today 22:08

I read an article recently showing how birth rates have been dropping for some time and that the government has failed to forward plan in education.

Our ageing population is a huge part of our economic strife but no government wants to address it.

Nushi21 · Today 22:14

We changed prep school in year 4.
the school my child was at is in year 6 now. His current school has 36 kids in two forms and his past school has zero year 6 kids.
There were only 7 kids when he left in year 4. Or started in reception with 14 kids.
I can’t believe they all left before year 6.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread