Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder why people choose to live in London?

1000 replies

Cantbloodyrememberthenameonthread · 12/05/2026 09:36

I always wonder. And reading a recent thread prompted me to ask the question. Why do people do it by choice? People complain about the house prices (rightly), ulez, nursery fees, cost of everything being more expensive, commutes, tubes etc.

if you’re not absolutely tied to London for work or health or I guess family. Why do you choose to live there when there are so many cheaper easier lifestyle options in the country?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:33

x2boys · 13/05/2026 08:29

Peoole are giving reasons sbout why they love living in London that are not Unique to London
Im sure London is a fabulous place for some
But manyvof the reasons given apply to other areas of the UK too.

I agree with this.

I love London but it's not as if many of the things mentioned in this thread can ONLY be found in London.

If you just love London and want to live there, then go for it, I am all for people living where they love. But to act like London is the only place in existence with things to do or see or that involve variety or choice is a bit daft and quite ignorant

Almakarlinsghost · 13/05/2026 08:34

IrisApril · 12/05/2026 10:04

We left London and now live in a (lovely) smaller city. You absolutely cannot compare the museums and parks in other parts of the country to those in London. It shows you’re a bit clueless.

Yes, our nice small city has stunning parks, but they aren’t Greenwich Park. We have a great little museum, but it’s not the same as having the Natural History Museum, the Science Museum, the V&A, Postal Museum, National Portrait Gallery, Greenwich Maritime Museum…. Get real!

If you can afford to live comfortably in London, it’s a fantastic place to live. Lots of beautiful neighbourhoods. People visit Oxford street once a year then declare they could never live in London.

In fact, other cities have national museums and huge parks in them. It's not a binary choice between London and a small city with a local museum. Telling people to "get real" is pretty insulting when you are the one that's incorrect.

IbizaToTheNorfolkBroads · 13/05/2026 08:40

UnPetitDunPetit · 12/05/2026 09:54

helps ensure they’re not growing up to be narrow minded bigots

So everyone who doesn't go to Grange Hill is a narrow-minded bigot then? How open-minded of you 🙄

@AbundantFlowers - I’m also a born and bred and I always said that my big inner city comp gave us the best grounding in racial, religious and socioeconomic understanding possible (exam results, not so much). They It was known for being very liberal at the time.

I couldn’t wait to leave London (for many other reasons) and have settled in rural West Yorks. I am acutely aware that my DC are not growing up with this. We do take them to cities though - London included !

Almakarlinsghost · 13/05/2026 08:41

A lot of people in the Uk have very parochial attitudes in thinking - whether they love it or hate it - that London is the only multicultural city in the UK, the only one with jobs, and the only one with world class museums or theatre. I grew up outside the Uk and I am neither over-impressed or intimidated by London. I don't live there because my employer relocated elsewhere to a very nice city with good quality of life. With my experience of the larger world I don't feel I am losing my not being in London, though I enjoy it too and visit frequently.

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:42

Also, although museums are nice to look around, I wouldnt say they're essential for my quality of life. In general conversation with others, I think museums would be something people visit maybe once a year at most, not once a week or on a daily basis 😆

Ginmonkeyagain · 13/05/2026 08:43

I go to the Tate and British museum at least once or twice a month, sometimes more. I accept I may not be normal though.

Aluna · 13/05/2026 08:45

Almakarlinsghost · 13/05/2026 08:34

In fact, other cities have national museums and huge parks in them. It's not a binary choice between London and a small city with a local museum. Telling people to "get real" is pretty insulting when you are the one that's incorrect.

But it’s true - other cities have nice, rather small museums - but they’re nothing like the number and scale of museums in London. The best city for museums outside London is Edinburgh.

Aluna · 13/05/2026 08:51

Ginmonkeyagain · 13/05/2026 08:43

I go to the Tate and British museum at least once or twice a month, sometimes more. I accept I may not be normal though.

You’re normal round my way. I’m a friend of V&A, RA, Tate Britain and I also love the National and Dulwich Picture gallery. I like hanging out at the British Museum looking at ancient stuff.

ConstanzeMozart · 13/05/2026 08:54

x2boys · 13/05/2026 08:29

Peoole are giving reasons sbout why they love living in London that are not Unique to London
Im sure London is a fabulous place for some
But manyvof the reasons given apply to other areas of the UK too.

Again, a major point being made is that it's specifically the quantity, variety and ease of getting to these things that appeals about London, not their existence per se.

Flamingojune · 13/05/2026 08:55

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 07:31

I mean, I totally get why people love it - its a wonderful city and I always love visiting (its fairly near me).

That said, I certainly wouldnt want to live there due to the crowds and pollution.

I live by the beach and I cant imagine anywhere I'd rather be than near the sea so we are all different.

Pollution is going down in london thanks to schemes promoting active travel. Lowest car ownership in the country.

ConstanzeMozart · 13/05/2026 08:57

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:33

I agree with this.

I love London but it's not as if many of the things mentioned in this thread can ONLY be found in London.

If you just love London and want to live there, then go for it, I am all for people living where they love. But to act like London is the only place in existence with things to do or see or that involve variety or choice is a bit daft and quite ignorant

But to act like London is the only place in existence with things to do or see or that involve variety or choice is a bit daft and quite ignorant

People aren't saying London is the only place in existence with things to do or see Hmm
And there just IS more choice and variety of things in London, due to its size/history/make-up. You don't have to care about that, but it is true, and for a lot of people on this thread it's an upside.

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:59

Flamingojune · 13/05/2026 08:55

Pollution is going down in london thanks to schemes promoting active travel. Lowest car ownership in the country.

Personally I still find it quite polluted and fumey but I live in a place with fresh sea air and lots of green fields so compared to that it probably seems much worse. Air quality is one thing I really love about where I live

ConstanzeMozart · 13/05/2026 08:59

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:42

Also, although museums are nice to look around, I wouldnt say they're essential for my quality of life. In general conversation with others, I think museums would be something people visit maybe once a year at most, not once a week or on a daily basis 😆

Well, that depends on who you talk to, doesn't it? I generally do a fair bit of my socialising at museums or galleries, and have phases where I go to one at least once a week. Perhaps people who like London and cite museums etc as a reason for it DO find that they enhance their quality of life?

ConstanzeMozart · 13/05/2026 09:01

Aluna · 13/05/2026 08:51

You’re normal round my way. I’m a friend of V&A, RA, Tate Britain and I also love the National and Dulwich Picture gallery. I like hanging out at the British Museum looking at ancient stuff.

I love that if I feel like it I can just hop on a bus and go to see a small display in one room of the V&A or the British Museum and then go home, and it doesn't have to be a massive excursion.

LovelyAnd · 13/05/2026 09:01

Aluna · 13/05/2026 08:45

But it’s true - other cities have nice, rather small museums - but they’re nothing like the number and scale of museums in London. The best city for museums outside London is Edinburgh.

Yes. Nowhere else (understandably) has anywhere near the same scope.

I suspect the people saying ‘But other cities also have galleries/museums/music venues/theatre!’ are people who don’t go to them often. When I lived in London, I was a member of the Tate and the RA, and went to one art gallery or other at least weekly, if not more often, and I probably went to a classical concert (sometimes free lunchtime ones) or a play (especially when the NT did £10 tickets) or an opera or something at the BFI every weekend. I would drop into the NG or the NPG to look at a favourite painting on my way to or from work. That couldn’t have happened elsewhere.,

LovelyAnd · 13/05/2026 09:02

ConstanzeMozart · 13/05/2026 09:01

I love that if I feel like it I can just hop on a bus and go to see a small display in one room of the V&A or the British Museum and then go home, and it doesn't have to be a massive excursion.

Yes, exactly!

Flamingojune · 13/05/2026 09:03

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:59

Personally I still find it quite polluted and fumey but I live in a place with fresh sea air and lots of green fields so compared to that it probably seems much worse. Air quality is one thing I really love about where I live

Edited

Agree it will never compare to wonderful sea air but it is improving

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 09:05

ClayPotaLot · 13/05/2026 05:01

There not assuming they have no facilities, they're just well aware they don't have anything like the same range or quality.

But an awful lot of people do t do all this stuff in London. I have a work colleague from tower hamlets. He's lived there over 30 years. Did his first visit to the Tower of London this year. Never been to a theatre

He says most of his community stay firmly within tower hamlets ( especially the women)

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 09:08

ConstanzeMozart · 13/05/2026 08:54

Again, a major point being made is that it's specifically the quantity, variety and ease of getting to these things that appeals about London, not their existence per se.

So what's the difference between going into London from Essex ( 3 or 4 stops to Liv st on fast train) or say going from East Ham to central London on a slow tube with a change or very slow buses?

LovelyAnd · 13/05/2026 09:09

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 09:05

But an awful lot of people do t do all this stuff in London. I have a work colleague from tower hamlets. He's lived there over 30 years. Did his first visit to the Tower of London this year. Never been to a theatre

He says most of his community stay firmly within tower hamlets ( especially the women)

Sure, but it’s there should he want to access it, much of it free. I was living in a squat in Kilburn when I first moved to London, a foreigner from a poor WC background who had no clue about anything, I hadn’t grown up with theatre- or museum-going being normal.

(Come to that, I lived in London for many years and have never been to the Tower of London.)

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 09:10

Sartre · 13/05/2026 07:08

Most jobs are clustered in and around London so why even question this when it’s obvious. If you want to work in government, for example, good luck getting a job up north. Things are shifting in some areas I.e the media is increasing up north like Salford but yeah…

It’s fairly obvious why someone would choose to live there really. Way better job prospects, a lot more to actually see and do, it’s convenient in the sense they have a more than functioning PT system with great links across the country, diverse number of people to meet and (not) greet, ULEZ has hugely cleaned up the air etc etc.

My dad lives there so I spent a lot of my childhood down there and I like it. I always feel more free.

And if you want a job in government what stops you commuting in like thousands of others.

Why does it have to be London or up north?

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 09:11

LovelyAnd · 13/05/2026 09:09

Sure, but it’s there should he want to access it, much of it free. I was living in a squat in Kilburn when I first moved to London, a foreigner from a poor WC background who had no clue about anything, I hadn’t grown up with theatre- or museum-going being normal.

(Come to that, I lived in London for many years and have never been to the Tower of London.)

It's there if I want to access it as well living just down the train line. So why would I need to live in London?

MrsShawnHatosy · 13/05/2026 09:12

velvetrope · 13/05/2026 08:33

I agree with this.

I love London but it's not as if many of the things mentioned in this thread can ONLY be found in London.

If you just love London and want to live there, then go for it, I am all for people living where they love. But to act like London is the only place in existence with things to do or see or that involve variety or choice is a bit daft and quite ignorant

This. Great if you love living in London, it’s a great place, but that’s not a reason to dismiss the rest of the UK.

user73654823 · 13/05/2026 09:12

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 09:10

And if you want a job in government what stops you commuting in like thousands of others.

Why does it have to be London or up north?

And if you want a job in government what stops you commuting in like thousands of others.

Not wanting to commute is the short answer.

Aluna · 13/05/2026 09:16

MrsShawnHatosy · 13/05/2026 09:12

This. Great if you love living in London, it’s a great place, but that’s not a reason to dismiss the rest of the UK.

No-one’s dismissing it though.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread