Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Council Elections

1001 replies

OneTealShaker · 08/05/2026 00:35

The first declared seats going to Reform.

Reform +2
Labour -1

Buckle up people.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
caringcarer · 08/05/2026 15:51

BIossomtoes · 08/05/2026 15:14

They’re not allowed to work. They get £49 a week.

Who pays to process their claim? Who pays their legal bill when they contest deportation? Who pays for their accommodation? Who pays to educate their DC? Who pays for their health care? Or do you suppose none of these cost exist? You are very naive if you genuinely believe each immigrant only cost £49 per week.

Nat6999 · 08/05/2026 15:52

BIossomtoes · 08/05/2026 15:33

Brilliant. Congratulate him from me. How old is he?

He is 22, I'm so proud of him, he has worked so hard for this & it's for the area our family & us have lived in all our lives.

DrasticAction · 08/05/2026 15:52

@SapphOhNo but at least we would have some. .we absolutly need to use our own supplies whilst there is. Global supply issue and we are totally reliant and vulnerable on others.

It's not for ever we are moving to other greener ways but it's not there yet

Walkyrie · 08/05/2026 15:52

caringcarer · 08/05/2026 15:51

Who pays to process their claim? Who pays their legal bill when they contest deportation? Who pays for their accommodation? Who pays to educate their DC? Who pays for their health care? Or do you suppose none of these cost exist? You are very naive if you genuinely believe each immigrant only cost £49 per week.

I’ve seen asylum claims from EU criminals where we are forced to house and feed them while paying for the processing of their claim and legal fees, even when it’s patently obvious they have zero right to asylum. They do it to kick the deportation can down the road.

Walkyrie · 08/05/2026 15:53

Nat6999 · 08/05/2026 15:52

He is 22, I'm so proud of him, he has worked so hard for this & it's for the area our family & us have lived in all our lives.

Let’s hope he isn’t scrutinised for his age like George Finch! Well done to him.

DrBlackbird · 08/05/2026 15:54

amicisimma · 08/05/2026 15:30

And yet no other country has an NHS run like ours and many have health systems with much better outcomes.

Canada has nationalised healthcare but that does not include medication. Shall we all pay for our own meds now? That would save the NHS quite a bit. Apart from when people couldn’t afford the medication and require expensive tertiary care as a result.

If Reform further privatises the NHS (which already has many internal markets thanks to Thatcher and successive Tory govts), we would not get a Nordic or German or French model. We would get an American model. US healthcare companies are already here. We are a very tasty market for them. I wouldn’t be surprised if Farage had not already met with US CEOs.

But, be careful what you wish for:

In a comparative 2024 study on the health systems of 10 countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The United States ranks last overall.

The three top-performing countries in 2024 are Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. …

Yet, the U.S. spends more than 16% of its GDP on health care in 2022. That figure is predicted to exceed 20% by 2035. From to 2023, the other countries healthcare went from between 4 percent and 8 percent to between 8 percent and 12 percent by 2023.

https://images.jifo.co/25471861724097511158.svg

Edited to add that healthcare in the UK is affordable to the poorest person. Free at the point of need. Yes, there are long waitlists. Same as in most countries.

Granted, with insurance in the US, you get fast access (subject to your provider’s restrictions). You pay in excess of $20,000 a year for your insurance mind you. And if you’re a 17 year old boy with covid but no insurance, you die in a taxi being sent from the for profit hospital emergency to the free for the poor hospital emergency. I’m so glad that is not the UK… currently.

https://images.jifo.co/2547186_1724097511158.svg

DrasticAction · 08/05/2026 15:54

@Q2C4 what are stable coins ?

Whysnothingsimple · 08/05/2026 15:55

DrBlackbird · 08/05/2026 15:54

Canada has nationalised healthcare but that does not include medication. Shall we all pay for our own meds now? That would save the NHS quite a bit. Apart from when people couldn’t afford the medication and require expensive tertiary care as a result.

If Reform further privatises the NHS (which already has many internal markets thanks to Thatcher and successive Tory govts), we would not get a Nordic or German or French model. We would get an American model. US healthcare companies are already here. We are a very tasty market for them. I wouldn’t be surprised if Farage had not already met with US CEOs.

But, be careful what you wish for:

In a comparative 2024 study on the health systems of 10 countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The United States ranks last overall.

The three top-performing countries in 2024 are Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. …

Yet, the U.S. spends more than 16% of its GDP on health care in 2022. That figure is predicted to exceed 20% by 2035. From to 2023, the other countries healthcare went from between 4 percent and 8 percent to between 8 percent and 12 percent by 2023.

https://images.jifo.co/25471861724097511158.svg

Edited to add that healthcare in the UK is affordable to the poorest person. Free at the point of need. Yes, there are long waitlists. Same as in most countries.

Granted, with insurance in the US, you get fast access (subject to your provider’s restrictions). You pay in excess of $20,000 a year for your insurance mind you. And if you’re a 17 year old boy with covid but no insurance, you die in a taxi being sent from the for profit hospital emergency to the free for the poor hospital emergency. I’m so glad that is not the UK… currently.

Edited

It’s likely we wouldn’t get an American system at all. Honestly!!!

FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 15:57

DrasticAction · 08/05/2026 15:54

@Q2C4 what are stable coins ?

A cryptocurrency which is designed to be more stable than the likes of bitcoin or ethereum.

Q2C4 · 08/05/2026 15:57

DrasticAction · 08/05/2026 15:54

@Q2C4 what are stable coins ?

A type of crypto asset backed by fiat money, gold or other secure assets eg gilts.

“The UK government is actively integrating stablecoins into its regulated payment framework by 2026-2027 to foster financial innovation while ensuring stability. The strategy focuses on regulating fiat-backed stablecoins as a secure payment method, with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) overseeing issuance and the Bank of England managing systemic risks.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/policy-note-draft-statutory-instrument-amending-the-cryptoasset-regulations/draft-statutory-instrument-amending-the-financial-services-and-markets-act-2000-cryptoassets-regulations-2026-policy-note

Bloozie · 08/05/2026 15:57

They'll also have fuck all say over healthcare and how it's funded.

The councillors that have been elected to local council.

Do Reform voters take pens because they can injure themselves with pointy pencils?

caringcarer · 08/05/2026 15:58

Happyjoe · 08/05/2026 15:32

Where?
Who's health systems are better for all?

The French have a good system.

AImportantMermaid · 08/05/2026 15:58

I don’t think this is the bloodbath people are expecting at all. Labour have suffered losses but they still hold by far the most councils, and most of those they’ve lost have gone to no overall control. Reforms gains have not really turned into control - with the exception of Essex and 2 of the districts. The BBC is reporting change not absolute numbers. There are about 15000 council seats in the UK. Labour have about 5,600 of them. They’ve only lost about 300 so far.

Council Elections
Whysnothingsimple · 08/05/2026 15:59

Polanski Is saying the new politics is Green v Reform. He’s completely deluded isn’t he? Green are still bottom party by a considerable margin. Their numbers plus Labour or the Lib Dem’s don’t even match Reform and the Tories

OneTealShaker · 08/05/2026 15:59

AImportantMermaid · 08/05/2026 15:58

I don’t think this is the bloodbath people are expecting at all. Labour have suffered losses but they still hold by far the most councils, and most of those they’ve lost have gone to no overall control. Reforms gains have not really turned into control - with the exception of Essex and 2 of the districts. The BBC is reporting change not absolute numbers. There are about 15000 council seats in the UK. Labour have about 5,600 of them. They’ve only lost about 300 so far.

You do know that not all seats were being contested? So they have lost a large share of what was being contested.

OP posts:
FernandoSor · 08/05/2026 15:59

Heh, I should have known my post answering @Q2C4 's post would get insta-banned! Not sure how I can answer it without using bad words. I'll try again:

"A form of secret money that is a lot more stable than the more well-known forms of secret money that you will have heard about but I can't mention here."

FinallyGotToo · 08/05/2026 15:59

Bloozie · 08/05/2026 15:37

Reform took control of my county council in 2025.

It has been a shit show.

8 care homes are closing, along with 5 dementia day care centres. We're paying more in council tax here - the maximum increase - for fewer services. Services for vulnerable adults including adult education and bus transport to take older/vulnerable people to appointments and day centres has been cut.

Councillors have been stood down from committees because they didn't realise that they were being paid £12k to actually attend the meetings and they don't have time or inclination.

We don't have an adult education and SEND lead at the moment because he stood down, not realising what the job entails. He had no experience in additional educational needs, so it's no bad thing, but ffs.

Ten of our councillors resigned in protest against Nigel Farage.

They've voted to give themselves pay rises while cutting the salary of the leader of the opposition.

We've become the worst county for potholes under their watch.

My socials are full of local TV and radio clips of councillors being asked basic questions about local issues and just having not a single clue.

"What are your thoughts on the proposed traffic management plans on the Townley bypass? There's been heavy opposition from residents and some heated exchanges in council - what's your view...?"

Tumbleweed as you see the two brain cells try and connect

All council meetings are public welcome and if like my LA all recorded and available to view live or online afterwards.

There is going to be some ‘interesting’ viewing as all of these new and many inexperienced councillors attend public Overview and Scrutiny meetings.
The councillors role is to question senior LA employees with many years of knowledge and experience. To hold them to account, to ensure policy and strategy is followed, targets met.

The councillors where the newly appointed, inexperienced, 19 year old Reform councillor was the elected member responsible for the Children and Young People’s Service springs to mind.
In my LA, the staff member who is the (employed) Director of Children and Young People’s Service is an ex social worker, 33 years service safeguarding vulnerable children, setting strategy during his career, in other LA’s, for schools, early years, social care, safeguarding etc etc.
How on earth is an inexperienced lay person going to fulfill his role?

Some great viewing coming.

hihelenhi · 08/05/2026 16:00

Yuasa · 08/05/2026 15:24

Sneering liberals warned Brexit couldn’t be a success.

The country got the hardest Brexit available.

It hasn’t been a success.

And ten years later that is the fault of the people who predicted it?

I guess everyone on here being ‘superior’ and saying Reform isn’t going to improve all our lives is going to be to blame when that transpires too.

I'm well aware Brexit was a disaster, thanks. I'm on the left myself and didn't vote for it.

What's pissing me off is the complete and utter failure of Reform's opponents to comprehend WHY people are voting the way they are and doing anything effective in any way to change it. A decade of sneering and calling people stupid has been proven a completely failed strategy for changing people's minds. What are you not getting about this? I'm talking about the left's complete failure of political strategy in getting the population onside, not the brilliance of Reform or Brexit, ffs. And yes, I think continuing to follow the same bloody failed, out of touch, sneery and classist political strategy is likely to continue achieving the same result. A lot of people who are not voting for leftist parties see this as a kind of class war. Perhaps do some self reflection and start changing the approach? Is this too hard for you to understand?

KillerWail · 08/05/2026 16:00

southerngirl10 · 08/05/2026 15:47

Committing fraud? They declared themselves an asylum seeker at Heathrow airport. A month later, after staying with a relative at a known address, they were vetted and given a place at a care home. All legal and above board at the cost of the UK tax payer.

I have a good idea. The UK population should give their postcode and whether they are happy with asylum seekers and illegal immigrants coming here. In the postcode's with the most 'yes's' they should build the facilities to house them. That's a fair way to did. I'm sure a lot of people would soon stop blowing the immigrant trumpet then!!

A lot of people want them but not in their backyard.

We will never agree . I just don't think immigration is the cause of the decline of this country. Why do you think the right wing billionaires are buying up the media, and are so keen to channel our anger towards people with nothing? Does the concentration of assets, wealth and power not even bother you?

BIossomtoes · 08/05/2026 16:00

Unphased · 08/05/2026 15:39

Yes, mostly men, but once settled can bring there family in,
but the women get maternity benefits and extra payments

In which case they’re not illegal, are they?

BIossomtoes · 08/05/2026 16:03

caringcarer · 08/05/2026 15:58

The French have a good system.

Which costs the taxpayer more than ours.

Abhannmor · 08/05/2026 16:04

SapphOhNo · 08/05/2026 15:34

Drilling more North Sea oil won’t magically lower UK energy bills because oil and gas are sold on global markets at global prices. We already produce oil here and still got hammered by energy prices after Russia invaded Ukraine. The UK isn’t a self contained petrol station.

Most North Sea reserves are declining, expensive to extract, and too small to meaningfully affect prices anyway. The real way to reduce bills is insulation, renewables, and reducing dependence on volatile fossil fuel markets.

And the “everyone on benefits is living it up” line ignores reality. Most welfare spending goes on pensions, disability support, and people who are already in work but paid too little to live on. Slashing support while housing, food and energy costs soar just pushes more working people into poverty

Thanks @SapphOhNo . Spot on. Trouble is real common sense is hard and not very exciting. Nevermind. Things are about to get very exciting in some local authorities.

On the subject of oil and gas , it might be worth drilling in the North Sea if petrol stays above $130 a gallon for an extended period I suppose. Might be worth planting a few spuds come to that. If things get to that stage I think cooperation with the EU would be more helpful than Nigel's Trump tribute act.

OneTealShaker · 08/05/2026 16:05

KillerWail · 08/05/2026 16:00

We will never agree . I just don't think immigration is the cause of the decline of this country. Why do you think the right wing billionaires are buying up the media, and are so keen to channel our anger towards people with nothing? Does the concentration of assets, wealth and power not even bother you?

I don’t think PP needs you to agree. She knows her own experience better than you.

OP posts:
DrBlackbird · 08/05/2026 16:05

Whysnothingsimple · 08/05/2026 15:55

It’s likely we wouldn’t get an American system at all. Honestly!!!

Of course we would. We already have elements of it.

GP Practices:
US health insurance giant, Centene, through its UK subsidiary, Operose Health, has been taking over GP surgeries and practices in London and across the country for many years. Centene has recently taken over AT Medics, a primary care provider responsible for 49 GP surgeries and over 370,000 patients in the Greater London area. With a total of 70 GP surgeries and practices, Centene is almost certainly the largest single provider of NHS primary care in England.

Hospitals:
The Ohio-based Cleveland Clinic is launching its first UK medical centre in an eight-storey, 325,000 sq ft building that overlooks Buckingham Palace in the wealthy neighbourhood of Belgravia. This is the first big push into the paid-for UK healthcare industry with an investment of £1 billion by the company.

It will also be the biggest private hospital in central London after the 206-bed HCA-owned (also American) Wellington when it opens on Tuesday. The Wellington Hospital in St John’s Wood, London is the largest private hospital in the United Kingdom and is owned by the American company, HCA Healthcare.

HCA Healthcare, a major US-based healthcare provider, has a significant presence in the UK with over 30 facilities

US company's subsidiary to hold nearly 1% of GP contracts in England

A subsidiary of a giant US healthcare company is set to hold nearly 1% of GP contracts in England - making it the country's largest provider of NHS primary care with around half a million patients.

https://www.gponline.com/us-companys-subsidiary-hold-nearly-1-gp-contracts-england/article/1707557

Winter2020 · 08/05/2026 16:08

StandFirm · 08/05/2026 14:44

Apart from the fact that those schemes are in fact very expensive to implement in any significant way - and that they're a legal nightmare- that's only 5% of annual arrivals. That leaves 95%.
An issue that represents a total of 5% of all immigration to the UK is mobilising close to 100% of the attention. That's populism in a nutshell.

That's the difficult to control 5% the other 95% is entirely within our control - how we set the rules and whether we stamp the visa "approved" or "decined". The other 95% is relatively easy.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.