Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

22:30 work call - completely unacceptable?

1000 replies

shortbreadconsumer · 05/05/2026 11:21

I received a work call from someone in my organisation at 22:30 last night. I answered, thinking it was an emergency. The colleague was completely hysterical and impossible to understand. In the end I had no choice but to end the call with 'we can discuss this in the morning.'

This morning I spoke to the persons line manager about it, who said that it was 'unfortunate, but not unreasonable' for this individual to have called me as I had not answered any emails from said colleague over the weekend. They had sent me over 50 emails this weekend. I did not see the emails as seniors within the organisation take an 'if it's urgent, they have my number' approach.

I am more senior than both of of these colleagues and I was 'on call' all weekend as the most senior point of contact in the organisation. However, this was not an issue that required weekend working and, more importantly, it was not an issue that I needed to be consulted on. It was very simple and should have easily been resolved in working hours by this individual alone - her direct line manager would not have needed to input either.

AIBU to think that this was unprofessional and unacceptable from both of them?After no sleep, I've reached that 'was it really that bad' point where I am so sleep deprived that I am not sure whether I am overreacting in my annoyance or not!

OP posts:
Moodibags · 06/05/2026 18:43

Witchonenowbob · 06/05/2026 18:39

So why didn’t she read the 50 emails??

Runs and hides!

LOL 🤣🥰

MMAS · 06/05/2026 18:45

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

loislovesstewie · 06/05/2026 18:45

If there is something this thread has shown it's that people don't read instructions.
It also shows that people don't understand that each organization has a way to do things that works for them.
I don't recall getting so frustrated by people who comment without actually reading everything.

godmum56 · 06/05/2026 18:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

and again FFS RTFT

loislovesstewie · 06/05/2026 18:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Oh FFS!! RTFT.
You are talking absolute bollox.

ChillingWithMySnowmies · 06/05/2026 18:46

Bookaholicwithwine · 06/05/2026 18:38

Actually I do . I never said the OP was wrong . I replied to her original post and it didnt clarify what sort of organisation she worked in so I said that would be helpful . Jeez god

The line of work matters not one jot.

Two tier on -call system

Tier 1 - junior manager who monitors emails/fields phonecalls, who's email and phonenumber was issued to EVERYONE with explicit instructions to phone/email them. Their job is to deal with it or escalate to tier 2.

Tier 2 - The OP. Who's number WAS NOT shared. Who's only responsibility is to answer the phone if the tier 1 junior manager phones her.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:46

Bookaholicwithwine · 06/05/2026 18:38

Actually I do . I never said the OP was wrong . I replied to her original post and it didnt clarify what sort of organisation she worked in so I said that would be helpful . Jeez god

You had very obviously failed to read the thread. Just admit that you got it wrong.

godmum56 · 06/05/2026 18:47

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:34

There are so many of them though.

yup....and they are BREEDING

godmum56 · 06/05/2026 18:48

RosyDaysAhead · 06/05/2026 18:00

I work out of hours nights/weekends and if I were trying to get hold of my manager who was standby by at home for that period I would expect them to answer the phone and be professional and reassuring. Especially at 22.30. When I work standby (which I do on occasions as I have 20+ years experience) I have had colleague call me at 3 am to ask me a question. I’m being paid to stand by. I don’t care if that question is “where do we keep…..” if they feel impacted by something that they cannot resolve, and it’s my job to support them at that time, then that’s my responsibility and I take it seriously.

did I already quote you? well if I did have another one
FFS RTFT

Megifer · 06/05/2026 18:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You tried way too hard there. 2/10.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:49

godmum56 · 06/05/2026 18:47

yup....and they are BREEDING

😂I miss that laugh emoji badly.

shortbreadconsumer · 06/05/2026 18:49

I feel like I need to say one more time for the people at the back of the room who cannot read the full thread or understand what happened: the bar for which my input is required during the weekend is incredibly high. We have someone paid to triage anything that comes in and decide if it does need action, if it does not, and whether I am needed. They are the only person who should contact me. Only once in five years have I been contacted and that was because someone had died. And I mean died. No heart beat. Actually dead.

'Big boss' very much takes the view that on-call staff, who have no mental health first aid training, should not be there to administer pastoral care. So do HR. Why? Because it would be an absolute disaster should something terrible happen as a result of staff giving incorrect and/or insufficient advice to someone who needs professional help and/or the samaritans.

I'm also not a Civil Servant - I just used the grades as an example😀I also don't get paid for being on call. Why would I get paid? The whole point of me being there is in case of emergency not to monitor my emails.

If all the people who didn't read the full thread gave me a £ I'd be able to pay for some MHFA training for the whole company and maybe this would never happen again!

OP posts:
godmum56 · 06/05/2026 18:49

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:49

😂I miss that laugh emoji badly.

oh me too

Jorge14 · 06/05/2026 18:50

I don’t think you did anything wrong, you followed protocol, this member of staff didn’t. I do however understand the level of anxiety when you feel unsupported at work, I’ve been there. It can escalate anxiety so that you start to act irrationally, it’s not healthy, this person is clearly very conscientious so I think they need a bit of support.

Usernamenotav · 06/05/2026 18:51

shortbreadconsumer · 05/05/2026 12:02

To be clear, we have formal 'on-call' procedures. They are written down and kept in a shared online area everyone can access. They are even stated in an email we sent at 18:00 every Friday to all stakeholders detailing who is on call and what their email is.

So Friday's email said:

'Department X is closed for the bank holiday weekend.

If your query is urgent, please contact 'A': 'insert email address and phone number'.

If necessary, 'A' will escalate it to the duty senior point of contact who will be in touch.'

The 'junior' person on call is expected to monitor emails all weekend and reply to anything that needs actioning. They are very generously compensated for this.
The expectation is everything urgent goes to the 'junior' person who will escalate to the senior person, via phone call, if their input is needed. Juniors are any grade up to Deputy Director.

The 'senior' person on call is expected to only answer the phone and not to monitor emails. In five years, averaging being on call once every two months, I have only had to be rung once on the weekend and that was due to a death on the premises. That is how high the bar is for contacting my level.

This colleague who called me and emailed me, was not on call and nor was her query urgent. She should not even have been working. She did not, in any way, attempt to contact the junior colleague on call. She emailed me directly, multiple times, on a non-urgent query knowing that I would not be checking emails. She then rang me in utter hysterics making no sense because I had not replied to emails she knew I would not be monitoring.

I honestly cannot stress how non-urgent her issue was.

For those of you who understand civil service structures...think of it as a HEO ringing a SCS3 to ask for guidance on something very routine (say, an email to an internal colleague about a meeting). That's the closest comparison I can make. Or think of it as a trainee lawyer ringing the managing partner.

So a managing partner is too good to interact with a trainee are they 😂😂

Wooky073 · 06/05/2026 18:51

Under the health and safety at work act you have a responsibility for colleagues wellbeing / welfare. So you had a responsibility by law to support the distressed less experienced colleague - as you were the on call person.

That you with all your experience didn’t consider it an urgent matter is not how it was perceived by the more junior colleague. Therefore this indicates a possible training need for the more Junior colleagues and a chance to expand their experience.

You have handled this very unprofessionally and in an uncompassionate way.

I think you should probably apologise to them and offer training or support so that next time they are better equipped for the situation. They probably have grounds for complaint against you.

Hace a look at compassionate leadership

Megifer · 06/05/2026 18:51

shortbreadconsumer · 06/05/2026 18:49

I feel like I need to say one more time for the people at the back of the room who cannot read the full thread or understand what happened: the bar for which my input is required during the weekend is incredibly high. We have someone paid to triage anything that comes in and decide if it does need action, if it does not, and whether I am needed. They are the only person who should contact me. Only once in five years have I been contacted and that was because someone had died. And I mean died. No heart beat. Actually dead.

'Big boss' very much takes the view that on-call staff, who have no mental health first aid training, should not be there to administer pastoral care. So do HR. Why? Because it would be an absolute disaster should something terrible happen as a result of staff giving incorrect and/or insufficient advice to someone who needs professional help and/or the samaritans.

I'm also not a Civil Servant - I just used the grades as an example😀I also don't get paid for being on call. Why would I get paid? The whole point of me being there is in case of emergency not to monitor my emails.

If all the people who didn't read the full thread gave me a £ I'd be able to pay for some MHFA training for the whole company and maybe this would never happen again!

So op what exactly did you do to cause that person's death?

Moodibags · 06/05/2026 18:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Given all of the information now available on this thread about the actual situation, I’d say posters are going out of their way to bully the OP

Bookaholicwithwine · 06/05/2026 18:52

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:46

You had very obviously failed to read the thread. Just admit that you got it wrong.

I very clearly told you that I had just responded to the OPs original post . So I responded with an opinion of what they said in original post . Sorry I gave an opinion on what they said

Bookaholicwithwine · 06/05/2026 18:54

ChillingWithMySnowmies · 06/05/2026 18:46

The line of work matters not one jot.

Two tier on -call system

Tier 1 - junior manager who monitors emails/fields phonecalls, who's email and phonenumber was issued to EVERYONE with explicit instructions to phone/email them. Their job is to deal with it or escalate to tier 2.

Tier 2 - The OP. Who's number WAS NOT shared. Who's only responsibility is to answer the phone if the tier 1 junior manager phones her.

Edited

again I just went by the details shared in original post .

godmum56 · 06/05/2026 18:55

shortbreadconsumer · 06/05/2026 18:49

I feel like I need to say one more time for the people at the back of the room who cannot read the full thread or understand what happened: the bar for which my input is required during the weekend is incredibly high. We have someone paid to triage anything that comes in and decide if it does need action, if it does not, and whether I am needed. They are the only person who should contact me. Only once in five years have I been contacted and that was because someone had died. And I mean died. No heart beat. Actually dead.

'Big boss' very much takes the view that on-call staff, who have no mental health first aid training, should not be there to administer pastoral care. So do HR. Why? Because it would be an absolute disaster should something terrible happen as a result of staff giving incorrect and/or insufficient advice to someone who needs professional help and/or the samaritans.

I'm also not a Civil Servant - I just used the grades as an example😀I also don't get paid for being on call. Why would I get paid? The whole point of me being there is in case of emergency not to monitor my emails.

If all the people who didn't read the full thread gave me a £ I'd be able to pay for some MHFA training for the whole company and maybe this would never happen again!

yup, my late husband used to work within a similar on call system. Whoever was on call (24/7 1 week in 6) was actually the senior on call cover for several departments as well as the one he actually managed. And yes he was only contacted for the sort of thing that would end up on the national news...and no, not civil service or public service.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:56

shortbreadconsumer · 06/05/2026 18:49

I feel like I need to say one more time for the people at the back of the room who cannot read the full thread or understand what happened: the bar for which my input is required during the weekend is incredibly high. We have someone paid to triage anything that comes in and decide if it does need action, if it does not, and whether I am needed. They are the only person who should contact me. Only once in five years have I been contacted and that was because someone had died. And I mean died. No heart beat. Actually dead.

'Big boss' very much takes the view that on-call staff, who have no mental health first aid training, should not be there to administer pastoral care. So do HR. Why? Because it would be an absolute disaster should something terrible happen as a result of staff giving incorrect and/or insufficient advice to someone who needs professional help and/or the samaritans.

I'm also not a Civil Servant - I just used the grades as an example😀I also don't get paid for being on call. Why would I get paid? The whole point of me being there is in case of emergency not to monitor my emails.

If all the people who didn't read the full thread gave me a £ I'd be able to pay for some MHFA training for the whole company and maybe this would never happen again!

I admire your patience, OP. Sadly, it seems that many posters are utterly incapable of comprehending very basic explanations.

It is utterly terrifying to think that many of these people may be voting in elections tomorrow. I have no confidence in democracy if our collective future is left in the hands of people who can't comprehend such simple facts even when they are clearly articulated. We are all fucked!!

Wooky073 · 06/05/2026 18:57

shortbreadconsumer · 06/05/2026 18:49

I feel like I need to say one more time for the people at the back of the room who cannot read the full thread or understand what happened: the bar for which my input is required during the weekend is incredibly high. We have someone paid to triage anything that comes in and decide if it does need action, if it does not, and whether I am needed. They are the only person who should contact me. Only once in five years have I been contacted and that was because someone had died. And I mean died. No heart beat. Actually dead.

'Big boss' very much takes the view that on-call staff, who have no mental health first aid training, should not be there to administer pastoral care. So do HR. Why? Because it would be an absolute disaster should something terrible happen as a result of staff giving incorrect and/or insufficient advice to someone who needs professional help and/or the samaritans.

I'm also not a Civil Servant - I just used the grades as an example😀I also don't get paid for being on call. Why would I get paid? The whole point of me being there is in case of emergency not to monitor my emails.

If all the people who didn't read the full thread gave me a £ I'd be able to pay for some MHFA training for the whole company and maybe this would never happen again!

Ok so it sounds like the process and triage needs revision or the policies and guidance for contacting the on call manager needs revision. That should be looked at,

but blaming the junior individual is not the right thing to do. They need support and the system may need review or guilines clarified.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:58

Bookaholicwithwine · 06/05/2026 18:54

again I just went by the details shared in original post .

Yes, which is really fucking annoying for everyone else on the thread. At least read all of the OP's posts, or if you can't be arsed to do that, don't comment at all.

ChillingWithMySnowmies · 06/05/2026 18:58

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/05/2026 18:56

I admire your patience, OP. Sadly, it seems that many posters are utterly incapable of comprehending very basic explanations.

It is utterly terrifying to think that many of these people may be voting in elections tomorrow. I have no confidence in democracy if our collective future is left in the hands of people who can't comprehend such simple facts even when they are clearly articulated. We are all fucked!!

Hopefully they're also too thick to read and comprehend the voting instructions.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.