Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

In a country where savings don’t seem to matter….

116 replies

Unap100 · 17/04/2026 16:04

Do you really blame anyone for squandering their retirement fund and expecting the government to pick up the tab?

I’ve been an avid saver. I am not hugely wealthy but through my savings I’ve recently paid my house off of 450k and I’m 39. I have 34k in the bank.

But to what end?

YES of course there are benefits personally and NO I don’t want to be on the bones of my arse with no choices in life.

But seriously… I’ve worked in care homes etc and why the hell should one person have that funded and the next person have worked all their life to fund it? You might get a slightly nicer care home for a bit but they’re all underfunded and barely satisfactory anyway.

Genuinely, where’s the fairness in that? Where’s the incentive to work? It then either goes to a care home or taxed away.

I never thought I’d say this but spending it all while you can doesn’t seem a bad idea. AIBU? What’s your view on this?!

OP posts:
GeneralPeter · 18/04/2026 18:01

AgnesX · 18/04/2026 09:51

£450k - not hugely wealthy? Don't kid yourself, compared to a fair percentage of the population you are and it's disgenuous to suggest otherwise.

What are your suggestions btw? I'm not sure there's a reasonable alternative.

Edited as clicked too soon.

Edited

This sent me down a rabbit hole.

A 39 year old with £450k can spend £18k/yr to get down to zero by death (using typical annuity assumptions).

Average benefits cost per benefits-receiving adult is about £13,500/yr.

So having the money makes OP better off than benefits but not massively.

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 19/04/2026 00:33

Lougle · 17/04/2026 18:12

Two scenarios for you:

Beryl has saved and has a nice little nest egg. She needs a care home and her family can peruse the glossy brochures of the local offerings, then choose a home that aligns with her needs and preferences. Once in the home, she can have her nails done, have her hair done, wear nice clothing, and go on trips, all paid for with her nest egg.

Gladys was unable to save, or perhaps she's just a bit feckless and didn't consider the future. She needs a care home and Social Services glance down their list of available homes, make a few calls and find the one that has a LA space. She is moved there. She is allowed to keep £31.60 per week of her income for personal spends. So she has choices. Does she get her nails done, or does she buy new knickers, or does she have her hair cut? She can't do it all.

Beryl will need more than a little nest egg. Average yearly costs are apparently £67,000 a year.

Melancholyflower · 19/04/2026 00:49

How many more of these threads do we need? There seems to be at least one every day - the OP can't even be bothered to come back because they only started the thread to get people ranting.
OP, if you do come back, I'm interested in how you managed to pay off 450K for a house, and save another 34K, whilst working in care homes, which is notoriously underpaid, and you're not even 40.

NameChangeAgain48 · 19/04/2026 00:59

I think you are asking the wrong question. Why isn't the state paying for its elderly care. Why are people paying taxes their whole lives and then left to fund themselves? Why are care homes allowed to charge such obscene amounts of money? Why aren't care homes owned by the public?

In London, the average weekly costs often exceeding £1,500–£1,700+ per week for self-funders as of early 2026. My name pays over £2k a week. It's obscene.

lovealieinortwo · 19/04/2026 05:32

Why isn't the state paying for its elderly care. Why are people paying taxes their whole lives and then left to fund themselves?

People don’t pay anywhere near enough tax for this level of support @NameChangeAgain48

AnnaQuayRules · 19/04/2026 06:19

@EilonwyWithRedGoldHair but most people who own a house would have far more than that. My house is worth £800k which would pay for a care home for years. The reality is that most people die within a few months of moving into a care home. The exception is people with cognitive issues such as dementia, where their physical health can be good for many years.

TheLivelyAzureHedgehog · 19/04/2026 06:59

i think part of the problem is that the numbers involved for those that do end up in care are so eye-wateringly high. MIL was costing the tax payer £1800 a week in her care home. She worked on and off through her life but was off a generation where women stopped work to have children, and ran the household. That’s not the kind of money that most people are used to shelling out for anything and she certainly didn’t have the opportunity to save that.

Healthcare and education are provided free at the point of use in the UK. The public service is available for everyone, including those that can afford to go elsewhere. If you want to pay more for a ‘luxury’ version, you can go private to do so. But everyone pays taxes to maintain the public service.

Social care is treated so differently. It’s the other way round. It’s not free at the point of use. Users are expected to purchase / pay out of their pocket for care privately right from day one, and only when their money runs out can they access the free at point of use public service. Of course, these two levels of service are often being provided in the same place, same facilities, same carers etc so it’s not even as if you are buying into a ‘luxury’ version by going private.

Lincslady53 · 19/04/2026 07:04

DH and I are in our early 70s and have managed to save a small pot to make life reasonably comfortable. We could spend it on more exotic holidays, more expensive home improvements etc, but, having lived through all 4 of our parents getting frailer, we are aware it is not just the cost of care homes you need to think about. Stair lifts. hearing aids, mobility scooters, home help, adjustment to the house to make it safer. One friend spent £1000s converting a downstairs room into a walk in shower as they couldn't get uo stairs. Another diagnosed with terminal liver cancer spent even more on an.operation the NHS wouldn't do, and then died in a few weeks. Only 1 of our 4 parents ended up in a care home. All the other 3 ended up spending most of their savings helping them to live. That is what it is there for. None had a lot, but it helped make their last few years a little more comfortable.

Ginmonkeyagain · 19/04/2026 07:15

@NameChangeAgain48 it costs a lot of care for frail elderly people. People don't want to pay enough tax to support the current NHS and benefits system, how on earth do we find free social care for all as well.

Or put a other way, what do you want to country to stop funding in order to pay for social care?

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 19/04/2026 11:06

AnnaQuayRules · 19/04/2026 06:19

@EilonwyWithRedGoldHair but most people who own a house would have far more than that. My house is worth £800k which would pay for a care home for years. The reality is that most people die within a few months of moving into a care home. The exception is people with cognitive issues such as dementia, where their physical health can be good for many years.

You can't rely on that, my DGM was in a care home for more like 6 or 7 years due to physical issues, no dementia. Fortunately care homes were cheaper then, and the one she was in was in a cheaper area, relatively speaking. She had a good NHS pension as well, which covered a good chunk of the monthly costs.

And most houses aren't worth 800k.

AnnaQuayRules · 19/04/2026 11:35

@EilonwyWithRedGoldHair I know that most homes are not worth £800k, but almost every house is worth more than a years care home fees. As I said, the vast majority of people who go into care homes die within a few months. I appreciate it was different for your mum, and I really hope that she had a good quality of life there.

Nevertheless the reality is that most people never go into a care home, and of those who do, most die very quickly.

ScrambledEggs12 · 19/04/2026 13:14

Biker47 · 18/04/2026 11:16

Planning on not needing care, either by; the MP's and House of Lord's joining the 21st century and allowing me to die peacefully on my terms with a needle, or if they don't, needs be by swallowing a bottle of nice rum then the barrel of one of my shotguns.

In the interim time between then, I will spend the time when I retire, removing money from my private pension in the most tax efficient way possible, and either blow it enjoying it myself, or spend on my children/grandchildren or ultimately hide it as best I can. I already currently have about £70k worth of silver and gold Britannias/Sovereigns, that exist nowhere on paper, the council will certainly never know about them, which if I haven't cashed it in before my death, will never pay for care fee's and will go straight to my children.

That's a bit risky if you're burgled and they're not insured.

Aluna · 19/04/2026 13:27

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 19/04/2026 00:33

Beryl will need more than a little nest egg. Average yearly costs are apparently £67,000 a year.

Care homes in London & SE start at £1600 pw, many are £1800-1900pw.

16% of 85+ are in care homes, but significant numbers are paying for equivalent care at home at similar cost.

The threshold to qualify for state care is very low - savings of £23,250. Everyone with assets above that have to fund their own care.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 19/04/2026 13:37

Isekaied · 17/04/2026 16:51

I see elderly people struggling in their own home because they don't want to pay for care/ or will struggle financially once they pay for it.

While others get the same care for free.

The system is broken.

Lots of old people refuse to pay for care no matter how badly they need it. Apparently it would seem to go against the grain.

A childless elderly aunt of dh (with plenty of money) absolutely hated paying for care, although she really needed it. She would send away anyone dh arranged for her - ‘too loud, too common’ etc.
She thought her neighbours should do it ‘for love’. They were nearly all very elderly and decrepit themselves - at one point I had one of them on the phone almost in tears, saying they couldn’t do it any more.

We lived over a 2 hour drive away, so that was a non starter.
At one point the aunt expected a much younger woman, one of her bridge cronies, to drive 20 minutes each way every night to fill her hot water bottles!!
Dh had offered to buy her an electric blanket but she ‘didn’t trust’ those things not to electrocute her in the night. 😩

So much worry and hassle for my poor hdh - until he finally managed, with great difficulty, to get her into a nearby care home.

And even then she insisted on dh paying the fees every month (and she would repay him) since ‘If they know I’ve got money they’ll find a way to steal it!’
You could hardly make it up.

sequin2000 · 19/04/2026 13:44

It baffles me that people think they should not pay for their own care in a nursing home. Should the state pay my rent even if I have lots of savings when I'm 80? Isn't this the same thing? I also disagree with inheritance as a concept as it allows the rich to stay rich and the poor to stay poor. It would be far fairer if all money went to the state after death and would also encourage the elderly to spend while alive which helps the economy.

JeannetteBlue · 22/04/2026 20:48

Error404FucksNotFound · 18/04/2026 14:42

Thats just what we need criminals thinking - older people are gathering huge amounts of silver and gold that nobody knows about.
Can't imagine that resulting in anything fucking terrifying.

Sometimes people do stash valuables. I'm not saying it's a good idea but I am advising the previous poster to at least tell their family they are doing it, so it doesn't just get lost.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread