Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
carnivalqueenthethird · 09/04/2026 18:21

hazelnutvanillalatte · 09/04/2026 18:14

I agree honestly...a friend transferred savings to family, went on UC and doesn't work and takes kids to the zoo, gymnastics, soft play, cinema, meals out etc every day of the week - I could never afford to do this with my kids even once or twice. Plus holiday food vouchers, free prescription, free after school clubs, free council tax, free dental...

Wondering if we have the same friend 🤔

RudolphTheReindeer · 09/04/2026 18:21

Igottissues · 09/04/2026 18:17

Do you actually believe that most people on UC “get their rent paid” though OP?
If they are lucky enough to be in social housing then maybe their housing allowance would cover it, but for the majority of people in private rented accommodation I doubt UC comes anywhere close - or at least ut doesn’t in my area.
I am a single parent, have worked all my life and now receive UC top ups. Even with maximum housing allowance for my area (£695 for a 2 bed requirement) a privately rented 2 bed flat is around £1300+ a month and competition for these is fierce - so it’s still a hefty amount of rent to find for someone with a single low household income 🤔

I note op didn't mention those on UC with a mortgage. That wouldn't be so dramatic though I suppose, acknowledging some people on UC also work hard and have a mortgage to pay.

hazelnutvanillalatte · 09/04/2026 18:22

youalright · 09/04/2026 18:17

I'm on uc and pay full council tax, pay dental as don't have an NHS one and I got free prescriptions anyone as I have a medical exemption. I also live absolutely no where near London so am not getting free entry into anywhere. Not everyone on uc is getting what you think they are.

This is a personal friend I'm talking about so this is the situation. One of many - so many people hide savings, or pretend to be made homeless. Someone I know was complaining to me that it took the council 10 years to give them a 4-bedroom house with a garden - most working people would never be able to afford a private property like that where we live, they have to move out.

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:22

Chaibiscuits · 09/04/2026 18:19

If you resent children from lower income families getting access to zoos and cathedrals then you might want to reflect on yourself a little bit

And what about children from families who don’t receive benefits but cannot afford the zoo? Because they’ve spent all their money on rising rent and mortgages, energy prices and food?

ohwtf · 09/04/2026 18:22

Oh lovely, another benefits bashing thread.

monday1983 · 09/04/2026 18:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

You cant get Kew gardens for £1 anywhere unless on UC. I would love to go but cant afford it after working full time . Its a luxury and shouldn't be allowed . I know you can't leave people starving and thats what benefits are for, but other extras ordinary working people can't afford are unfair.

PyongyangKipperbang · 09/04/2026 18:22

RudolphTheReindeer · 09/04/2026 18:09

How would stopping families on UC from having these experiences improve your life exactly?

What benefit would come from preventing children from having these opportunities vs them having such opportunities?

Exactly.

Its the mentality of "I cant have it so no one should" that is so fucking depressing!

It isnt going to improve @happybug1234 's life anyway whatsoever, it isnt going make sure she pays less tax, can go on more and fancier holidays or feel justified in her anger.

Punching down at its finest, Farage would be proud.

LilyBunch25 · 09/04/2026 18:23

Bemyclementine · 09/04/2026 17:58

Well, at least get your facts right before posting.

I will admit to being surprised when I discovered that these discounts existed.

That said, I am a single parent, 2 children, I work, and I recieve Universal Credit. I have childcare costs (because you know, I work....) I pay my mortgage, and I dont know what you mean by "social tariffs".

Sooo. Yes. Yabu.

Social tariffs for broadband, phone etc, lower rates on certain means tested benefits

nocoolnamesleft · 09/04/2026 18:23

ohwtf · 09/04/2026 18:22

Oh lovely, another benefits bashing thread.

I know. We hadn't had one of those in....ohhhh...must be at least 5 minutes.

Ochtawa · 09/04/2026 18:23

Dweetfidilove · 09/04/2026 18:10

Has the government nationalised theme parks? I've been off the news for too long.

Yes they have. Keir starmer personally nationalised all the theme parks and passed a law so that the only people who could access them were the Disabled, the Trans and the Woke. If you can get yourself a rainbow lanyard and a mobility scooter you might be able to sneak in, but they will ask you trick questions in a misleadingly conversational way (eg :"how was your vegan breakfast this morning?") at the entrance gates, so stay alert.

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:23

monday1983 · 09/04/2026 18:22

You cant get Kew gardens for £1 anywhere unless on UC. I would love to go but cant afford it after working full time . Its a luxury and shouldn't be allowed . I know you can't leave people starving and thats what benefits are for, but other extras ordinary working people can't afford are unfair.

Exactly. My husband and I were looking to go to a National Trust place last week, it would’ve set us back £90 after tickets and parking!!! We didn’t go as we couldn’t afford it!!!!

BigYellowBus · 09/04/2026 18:24

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 18:06

Yes they can afford holidays. I know lots of families on universal credit that go on more and better quality holidays than us!

I can honestly say I have no idea whether anyone I know claims benefits (and if they did, I would assume it was their right). How come everyone else seems to know their friends' incomes in such detail

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 18:24

monday1983 · 09/04/2026 18:22

You cant get Kew gardens for £1 anywhere unless on UC. I would love to go but cant afford it after working full time . Its a luxury and shouldn't be allowed . I know you can't leave people starving and thats what benefits are for, but other extras ordinary working people can't afford are unfair.

I agree. We must never allow children growing up in poverty to experience culture they would otherwise be priced out of. It's just not fair to the rest of us - if they can't afford to leave their council estates without massive discounts then they should just stay put.

PurpleLovecats · 09/04/2026 18:24

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:00

I agree with OP. These are luxuries that you should work hard for, not be given for free.

You’re assuming they don’t work.

Plenty of people on UC work hard, you are very unreasonable to suggest otherwise.

FKAT · 09/04/2026 18:25

For a start these are not 'attractions' - they are charities who run heritage sites, many of which are important from a historical, scientific and cultural point of view. It is important that UK children, regardless of their ability to pay, can visit them.

As charities regulated by the Charity Commission must do everything in line with their charitable purpose - which usually includes ensuring access to those on low incomes or other disadvantaged groups.

Many get little to no government money. Historic Royal Palaces for example which runs Kew, Hampton Court, Tower of London gets no public subsidy at all and makes all its own money. So you can stop whining about tax payers subsidising them.

They can set their own pricing strategy, as long as it is in line with the Equality Act.

And good news, if you don't want to visit and support this approach YOU DON'T HAVE TO. It's not compulsory.

I don't know why this needs explaining. Almost all museums and heritage sites worldwide give discounted entry to low income or local residents.

previouslyknownas · 09/04/2026 18:25

Don’t forget historical palaces inc the Tower of London
up to 6 people can get in for 1 each if you get UC
and if your lucky enough to be disabled and get PIP / then you can get your carer in free to a lot of places like the London Eye longleat and discounts on traveling by rail

Dweetfidilove · 09/04/2026 18:25

carnivalqueenthethird · 09/04/2026 18:16

people on benefits are having their income subsided by the state because they can’t afford to live. They absolutely should not be able to afford luxuries. I am fully aware that some people claiming UC are also working, but the principle still applies. If you can’t afford to pay your own bills and keep a roof over your head so the government has to do it for you, what are you doing going out for a jolly up to the museum or the zoo?!

No it’s not the childrens fault, but their parents should be bearing that responsibility. I work, and I have to say no to a trip to the zoo because we can’t afford it. Why should it be different for parents who claim UC?

The beautiful thing about capitalism is that companies do not discriminate in the manner you do. They'll adjust their prices in anyway that allows them access to everyone's dime - the rich, the poor and the in between.

Jellycatspyjamas · 09/04/2026 18:25

You’ve been scanning Robert Jenricks social media @happybug1234 - literally copied word for word. Nothing better to do than shit stir?

Dentalmum2 · 09/04/2026 18:25

Tryingtryingandtrying · 09/04/2026 18:01

Families on UC do have more disposable income, and more time to enjoy it. They also get access to cheaper healthcare, and if they have pets then cheaper care for them. Just wait for dynamic pricing on the supermarkets, people free 10.30am.on a Tuesday will get their shopping 30% cheaper than you.

Approx 40% of people on UC work full time. They aren't all sitting on a sofa in their front garden drinking white lightning whilst watching Jeremy Kyle.
OP why don't you cut back your hours and experience the joys of UC yourself? You could sell your home, spend it all on takeaways and cider and then your DC would get free admission to Kew Gardens and you'll get a free nursing home.

Teaforthetotal · 09/04/2026 18:25

LuxuryWoman2020 · 09/04/2026 18:05

I wonder how many people actually use these subsided entries. It's not just the cost of entry that's prohibitive but travel there and back and people would probably have to take a pack lunch and avoid the gift shop which is fine I guess but not the full experience.

Lots of museums and galleries are free anyway but if you live far out from these things , being on UC would still put places out of reach. Trains are expensive.

I can't imagine begrudging kids a day out at a castle or the Cuttysark tbh.

I agree with this. I believe they are offered to widen participation.
There are so many barriers to this type of experience for low income families, I hope it gives the kids a chance to try them.
At the age OPs kids are, a lot of the attractions are less or nil anyway.

wotuthinkinbout · 09/04/2026 18:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:26

PurpleLovecats · 09/04/2026 18:24

You’re assuming they don’t work.

Plenty of people on UC work hard, you are very unreasonable to suggest otherwise.

That doesn’t mean they should get something subsidised. They already get so many other hand outs. Meanwhile those of us who have sacrificed a lot for education and working very difficult and demanding jobs get no free hand outs. Read up on the squeezed middle. Labour have f*cked this country.

purpleygrey · 09/04/2026 18:26

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:00

I agree with OP. These are luxuries that you should work hard for, not be given for free.

Completely agree.

inickedthisname · 09/04/2026 18:27

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 18:01

Those in benefits will get pension credit to top them up and also my property will be used for care fees where as someone with no home will get theirs paid for. So at the end of the day no better off….

Quit your job and go on UC then 🤷‍♀️

youalright · 09/04/2026 18:27

hazelnutvanillalatte · 09/04/2026 18:22

This is a personal friend I'm talking about so this is the situation. One of many - so many people hide savings, or pretend to be made homeless. Someone I know was complaining to me that it took the council 10 years to give them a 4-bedroom house with a garden - most working people would never be able to afford a private property like that where we live, they have to move out.

Don't believe everything you are told unless you have full access to a person's bank accounts and medical records you have no clue. Just for e.g. i have bpd and not one family member or friends or colleagues have a clue. Don't ever think you truly know the details of people's lives even the ones closest to you because you just don't

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.