Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
PyongyangKipperbang · 09/04/2026 22:54

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:47

You can agree people shouldn't be left to starve to death (as any sane person would) but also agree that people dont necessarily need a discount to the fucking cutty sark because they're on benefits

And how do you think that the next generation will manage to get themselves out of the poverty trap without education?

Because a poor family can have an exceptional child who escapes and does well and therefore doesnt just sign on as their parents did

(in the minds of many on here it seems), but only with the right help. Its a long term investment in the poorest kids. Not all poor parents are feckless, stupid people who dont value education. A trip to the Cutty Sark could really help some kids, and who are you to say that they shouldnt have that? Eventually those kids that do make it out will contribute far more than they ever cost, surely that is an investment worth making?

BlueRedCat · 09/04/2026 22:54

flagpolesitta · 09/04/2026 22:50

I agree. There will always unfortunately be people that just miss out, that’s just how it is with a cut-off mark. It doesn’t mean everyone should have it taken away.

No but I think people should show sympathy to those children who miss out completely. Seems a lot of people on this thread couldn’t care less about them

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

youalright · 09/04/2026 22:49

But how does it effect you.

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 22:55

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:49

Wild.

Makes zero sense. But ok. Your discount isnt big enough i get it.

Also "hope that helps" isnt the mic drop you think it is

You don't have the absolute first clue. I'm actually a fitness instructor who when I taught classes in the community did cheap and free classes for people - because I lived in an area of high deprivation. It's got nothing to do with the discount not being high enough. It's because some people are on the bones of their fucking arse and that 25 quid a month is still beyond them given that they live on 400 pounds a month or less

PyongyangKipperbang · 09/04/2026 22:55

Sunglade · 09/04/2026 22:51

Could you provide a link for this statistic, please? I work for a local authority and have seen conflicting information..

There are several, ONS is a good place to start.

Kitte321 · 09/04/2026 22:56

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 09/04/2026 22:45

Literally couldn’t care less about this.

According to you OP, if I earn enough not to give a shit, does that mean I am working harder than you? Or somehow better and my children more entitled to a nice childhood?

Because that’s what you think about the children of those on UC.

I assume many people have mentioned that most UC recipients work - not RTFT.

They don’t. Recent DWP stats suggest 34%.

Caplin · 09/04/2026 22:56

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:47

You can agree people shouldn't be left to starve to death (as any sane person would) but also agree that people dont necessarily need a discount to the fucking cutty sark because they're on benefits

So rather than giving children living in poverty opportunities to have experiences that may widen their horizons and see beyond the poverty they live in, you just want them to kick around their estate looking at burned out cars? Because that is what the kids I see live with.You just want them to to stay in their box and never get out?

TakeTheCuntingQuichePatricia · 09/04/2026 22:56

PiMCA · 09/04/2026 22:03

Yeah, the system sucks. I do what I can but my hands are tied a lot of the time. People need more money, not signposting to charities.

Its a crazy system! I know it's not the fault of the job coaches, but my word is it frustrating. Almost scary when you're desperate and the DC are hungry.

Kirbert2 · 09/04/2026 22:56

RachelReevesFringe · 09/04/2026 22:48

My town does not even have a pool

Mine does. My disabled child can't access it though.

cadburyegg · 09/04/2026 22:56

Caplin · 09/04/2026 22:49

I will also say, families from deprived areas are less likely to visit these attractions as they feel out of place (wonder why). I remember giving a local very deprived school a family trip to a Science Festival. Free tickets, booked their shows, had helpers on hand, bus to venue. The head teacher had to go door to door because so many parents didn’t show, and they were petrified when she didn’t join them on the trip. It was too scary for them and they felt out of their depth.

Yes indeed someone posting upthread said the discounted tickets were only given to 5% of visitors. Hardly bankrupting the country. Have to say waiting in the special queue of the ToL put me off a bit, I won’t be rushing to repeat the experience

youalright · 09/04/2026 22:56

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

You are not subsidising this they are private companies this has been repeatedly stated throughout the thread. What are you not understanding

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 22:57

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

I have worked hard all my life. Working hard doesn't always translate to a good salary

RachelReevesFringe · 09/04/2026 22:57

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

It is a sad state we live in when someone in a low paid but often vital job is blamed for their own poverty.

Caplin · 09/04/2026 22:57

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

Again, this….read it… https://www.boredpanda.com/privilege-explanation-comic-strip-on-a-plate-toby-morris/

This Simple Comic Perfectly Explains Privilege, And Everyone Must Read It

Auckland-based illustrator Toby Morris perfectly summarizes what it means to be privileged with this thought-provoking comic strip. When we say privileged, we're not talking about those people who were born into royalty, or those with millionaire paren...

https://www.boredpanda.com/privilege-explanation-comic-strip-on-a-plate-toby-morris/

cadburyegg · 09/04/2026 22:57

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

I worked hard, have a professional job and still claim a bit of UC. HTH

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:58

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 22:55

You don't have the absolute first clue. I'm actually a fitness instructor who when I taught classes in the community did cheap and free classes for people - because I lived in an area of high deprivation. It's got nothing to do with the discount not being high enough. It's because some people are on the bones of their fucking arse and that 25 quid a month is still beyond them given that they live on 400 pounds a month or less

Well i won't will I when you deliberately drip feed context.

So we're talking a 20% discount?

I think that level is significant, but that's just me.

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 22:58

The air must be really thin up there on the moral high ground eh

cadburyegg · 09/04/2026 22:58

Have to say if I had a penny every time “working hard” was mentioned on this thread, I’d no longer need to claim UC at all !

cadburyegg · 09/04/2026 22:59

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:58

Well i won't will I when you deliberately drip feed context.

So we're talking a 20% discount?

I think that level is significant, but that's just me.

Oh give over. The point is that people who are given the discount still can’t make use of it because THEY STILL CAN’T AFFORD IT.

flagpolesitta · 09/04/2026 23:00

WimbyAce · 09/04/2026 22:05

Are they the poorest children now though? With the benefit packages on offer I actually doubt it.

Me and my DH both work and money is very tight each month but I’m not naive enough to believe we’d suddenly be better off claiming UC, or that benefits claimants are to blame for us finding the cost of living difficult in the current climate. Lots of posters say things like ‘we have no money at the end of month’ when it’s often because they are lucky enough to own a nice home and mortgage payments are high, have a car payment etc, The reality is they still have a standard of living that UC wouldn’t provide.

Kirbert2 · 09/04/2026 23:00

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:54

Because at what point do we stop subsidising lower earners and benefits recipients. At what point do we decide "this costs what it costs"

The core thing we teach our children is work hard to get what you want.

The message they're getting today is "its ok, the state/businesses will support this for you"

Its absolutely wild

What are you subsidising in the context of discounted zoo admissions or whatever it is? It is nothing to do with the government and everything to do with the zoo etc usually getting extra funding as part of offering discounts to those on UC.

RachelReevesFringe · 09/04/2026 23:01

Kitte321 · 09/04/2026 22:56

They don’t. Recent DWP stats suggest 34%.

UC is made of of several benefits though.
People hear UC and automatically think of someone who "can work, but wont".
Working Tax Credits was for people who work, ESA was for people who could not. Now they are combined under the umbrella of UC.
So this figure about how many people on it work does not really matter, and I fail to see what point people are trying to make when they go on about most people on UC not working.

HelenaWaiting · 09/04/2026 23:01

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 18:04

It doesn’t make them accessible for everyone as I can seldom afford these attractions full price. Where is the discount for my children to enjoy this experience?

If they gave the discount to everyone it wouldn't be a discount and the company would probably go bust. But you don't want that really, do you? You just want the discount to be taken away from the people who do get it.

Thechaseison71 · 09/04/2026 23:02

flagpolesitta · 09/04/2026 23:00

Me and my DH both work and money is very tight each month but I’m not naive enough to believe we’d suddenly be better off claiming UC, or that benefits claimants are to blame for us finding the cost of living difficult in the current climate. Lots of posters say things like ‘we have no money at the end of month’ when it’s often because they are lucky enough to own a nice home and mortgage payments are high, have a car payment etc, The reality is they still have a standard of living that UC wouldn’t provide.

Plenty of people have no money left at the end of the month despite working full time, paying rent topping up electric/gas meters and buying value food.

So maybe their standard of living wouldn't be any worse on UC

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 23:02

Sonato · 09/04/2026 22:58

Well i won't will I when you deliberately drip feed context.

So we're talking a 20% discount?

I think that level is significant, but that's just me.

Sorry what. A fiver off a gym membership is significant when someone is on 400 pounds a month. Off you go. Good for you. It's clear you have an issue with poor people

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.