Paraphrasing:
OP: Pharmacies exist just to give medication. Some people seem to use them as just a shop! Using them to buy makeup or cuddly toys or hair dye or whatever else is insulting to the pharmacists that went for years to uni and got educated. You can’t use it as a corner shop!
Posters: well actually we can also use them to buy other things, and if I’m in there anyway, might as well take advantage of that and stock up on other things or buy that box of hair dye. .It has multiple uses. You can’t even get something diagnosed and prescribed without seeing a GP .
OP: You are all insulting pharmacists and I never used a pharmacy in that way. Well, I did, but I still thought of it as a pharmacy , not a corner shop.
Posters: well actually, my pharmacy is on the way to work and it’s handy to stop by. After all, if they didn’t want us to buy those items, why would they sell it? It is just convenience and a secondary use , but we can’t ignore the fact that it exists.
OP: You’re all awful people. I’ve learned people use pharmacies as normal shop.
Flounces!
As I said , the pure definition of a circular argument. Nevermind the fact that using your (wrong) premise to prove that exact same premise is highly frowned upon in academic circles (and frankly, in primary schools too).