Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be fed up with colleagues repeatedly off sick?

323 replies

IngridsLittleToe · 16/03/2026 19:48

I'm going to get my arse handed to me and I don't care. Sick staff....I'm so over feeling sympathetic. I'm not talking really sick staff...I'm talking repeated back ache/gynae problems/migraine/back ache/sore throat/cold/depression/back ache/sinusitis/cold/sore big toe....

They have been on repeated sickness absence management and pull it back from the brink each time. Only to start all over again. Years and years of this. The rest of the team have to pick up the pieces, cancel their jobs to cover someone else's and the sickie doesn't have any loyalty at all.

The whole time they are sick they manage to socialise and do a voluntary role. Any attempt to manage the sickness is met with claims of bullying and then they go sick with anxiety.

All on full pay.

AIBU to think they are shamelessly playing the system and should be sacked

OP posts:
XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 21:25

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 21:12

But if you're too ill to take your annual leave when off sick, so you can replace it later, why don't you also have to replace the work you were too ill to do? Seems like a bit of imbalance there.

Eh? replace the work you were too ill to do? How does that work? Not everyone has a desk job.

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 21:26

TheRightMissy · 17/03/2026 21:18

Of course! Absolutely get signed off work, take your salary and go and live the best life! It’s your right!! And if the colleagues picking up your work aren’t doing with with glee and aplomb? They’re clearly evil and well and truly jel!

Edited

I didn't say any of that.

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 21:47

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 21:25

Eh? replace the work you were too ill to do? How does that work? Not everyone has a desk job.

How about you come in extra for the number of days you were off sick?

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 21:57

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 21:47

How about you come in extra for the number of days you were off sick?

That is not how it works though. And people can't help being off sick. You are in effect punishing them for being off sick.

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:02

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 21:57

That is not how it works though. And people can't help being off sick. You are in effect punishing them for being off sick.

I was drawing comparison with retaking the days of annual leave that fell during the period of sickness. Why should the business have to replace that for the staff member but the staff member not have to replace the days lost to sickness? Surely you lose the annual leave just like you lose the opportunity to work if you're off sick.

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 22:05

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:02

I was drawing comparison with retaking the days of annual leave that fell during the period of sickness. Why should the business have to replace that for the staff member but the staff member not have to replace the days lost to sickness? Surely you lose the annual leave just like you lose the opportunity to work if you're off sick.

I am not sure if it would be legal to deny accruing annual leave when someone is off sick.

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:06

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 22:05

I am not sure if it would be legal to deny accruing annual leave when someone is off sick.

Doesn't matter. I'm pointing out the imbalance.

Isittimeformynapyet · 17/03/2026 22:06

xPenelopePitstop · 16/03/2026 22:42

Of course it’s about me. I have to have long term sickness MULTIPLE times a year.

None of my colleagues are aware of my chronic health condition or diagnosis. Because it’s none of their business. Only my line manager and HR are aware of why I am off sick.

I suspect many of my colleagues share your opinions, and think them about me.

Just mind your own business. It’s hard enough trying to get medical professionals trying to listen to us and take us seriously. We don’t need grief from the workplace too.

It's NOT ABOUT YOU.

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 22:07

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:06

Doesn't matter. I'm pointing out the imbalance.

Well, that is nothing to do with the employee who is off sick. They have no say in the policies of their workplace.

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:09

XenoBitch · 17/03/2026 22:07

Well, that is nothing to do with the employee who is off sick. They have no say in the policies of their workplace.

Doesn't make any difference. It's still an imbalance.

Isittimeformynapyet · 17/03/2026 22:14

I had a friend who'd had 1 x 6 months off then another 1 x 6 months

@Squirrelchops1 I keep seeing this odd way of writing and I don't know where it's suddenly come from. Why wouldn't you just say "6 months off and then another 6 months"?

Do people order "one times a flat white" these days?

It's not wrong, so I'm not being pendantic - it's just strange. It's a genuine question.

xPenelopePitstop · 17/03/2026 22:23

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 21:47

How about you come in extra for the number of days you were off sick?

Farage, is that you?

xPenelopePitstop · 17/03/2026 22:25

Isittimeformynapyet · 17/03/2026 22:06

It's NOT ABOUT YOU.

I’ll ask again, because no one has answered my questions:

How do you differentiate me to someone who is “playing the system”?

Also, if it’s not about me then why did the OP describe my chronic health condition in the OP, where I suffer from “repeated gynae issues” and “repeated back pain”.

Wiseplumant · 17/03/2026 22:29

IngridsLittleToe · 16/03/2026 19:48

I'm going to get my arse handed to me and I don't care. Sick staff....I'm so over feeling sympathetic. I'm not talking really sick staff...I'm talking repeated back ache/gynae problems/migraine/back ache/sore throat/cold/depression/back ache/sinusitis/cold/sore big toe....

They have been on repeated sickness absence management and pull it back from the brink each time. Only to start all over again. Years and years of this. The rest of the team have to pick up the pieces, cancel their jobs to cover someone else's and the sickie doesn't have any loyalty at all.

The whole time they are sick they manage to socialise and do a voluntary role. Any attempt to manage the sickness is met with claims of bullying and then they go sick with anxiety.

All on full pay.

AIBU to think they are shamelessly playing the system and should be sacked

I feel your pain. I work for NHS and can't believe the rate of staff absence.There is nothing management ( who are often off sick themselves!) can do that isn't a long involved process with HR) Sometimes I feel like throwing in the towel and walking away. There seems to be no resilience and a culture that seems to encourage turning up for work as an option. One girl I work with hasn't been in all week because her puppy keeps her up at night!

Isittimeformynapyet · 17/03/2026 22:32

xPenelopePitstop · 17/03/2026 22:25

I’ll ask again, because no one has answered my questions:

How do you differentiate me to someone who is “playing the system”?

Also, if it’s not about me then why did the OP describe my chronic health condition in the OP, where I suffer from “repeated gynae issues” and “repeated back pain”.

If you are unlucky enough to have struggled with endometriosis and all its related conditions then it's not about you.

If you have been making it up in order to play the system and get money for nothing then it is about you.

You're actually the one who decides whether it's about you or not.

ETA it's been repeatedly stated that the timings of people's long term sick leave shows a recognised pattern, so it's unlikely that your absences and surgeries follow those patterns. Also, if your bosses know and understand your history then your colleagues will know that it's genuine without knowing any of the details.

Newyearawaits · 17/03/2026 22:33

CynthiaRothrock · 16/03/2026 20:31

Mind your own. I had someone target me after I had been off with gyne issues. "Oh all women have periods, get over it, have some paracetamol" or "you dont look ill" etc. Hmmm, had 14 tumours, adenomyosis and a twisted ovary. I was fighting with Dr's for YEaRS to get treatment. I dont need advice from Susan in HR who doesn't have a clue. Just like you dont. Yes SOME people maybe playing the system but you can't judge everyone.

Your situation is not as example of thp.
I hope you have recovered and are well

Wiseplumant · 17/03/2026 22:33

BreadInCaptivity · 17/03/2026 00:29

Rather predictably we see posters accusing the OP of being rude and goady whilst also doing the same in reverse when they made clear that genuine sickness wasn’t the issue.

Unfortunately some people use certain conditions that are more easily self certifiable (such as migraines, stress/anxiety and gynaecological issues) to play the system. Saying this is not meant to demean people who genuinely experience these conditions.

I worked for decades in the private sector before moving to the public sector and my goodness it has been an eye opener.

There are absolutely a (not insignificant) number of people for whom “sickness” is a perk of the job and who do not give any thought whatsoever to the impact to their team or the tax payer.

These people are not difficult to spot.

It is not a situation where people lack compassion or understanding of genuine illness.

These people are utterly predictable in when, for what and for how long they claim sickness.

Their phased returns to work are timed to perfection and they stay “well” enough only long enough to re-start the clock or sit below the (ridiculously high) annual threshold of sickness that triggers any (usually lacklustre) intervention from HR.

There are two such members of my team. The detrimental impact is significant in wider team morale and staff retention when other team members burn out as a result of working at 120% to cover their absence. We lose brilliant experienced staff, incur avoidable recruitment costs and have a work backlog that’s proving impossible to address.

Saying “it’s a management issue” is an oversimplification. Many managers are hugely frustrated and impacted but also hidebound by HR policies (at a national or LA/trust level) that just beg to be exploited combined with skeleton staffing of a HR function that renders it ineffectual.

It just wouldn’t fly in the private sector and it’s incredibly frustrating.

Perfectly put, thank you!

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:33

xPenelopePitstop · 17/03/2026 22:23

Farage, is that you?

Mine's a pint please

Newyearawaits · 17/03/2026 22:33

Newyearawaits · 17/03/2026 22:33

Your situation is not as example of thp.
I hope you have recovered and are well

Ttp

xPenelopePitstop · 17/03/2026 22:47

Newyearawaits · 17/03/2026 22:33

Your situation is not as example of thp.
I hope you have recovered and are well

It’s an incurable condition, so sadly not but thank you.

BrickBiscuit · 17/03/2026 22:48

BreadInCaptivity · 17/03/2026 00:29

Rather predictably we see posters accusing the OP of being rude and goady whilst also doing the same in reverse when they made clear that genuine sickness wasn’t the issue.

Unfortunately some people use certain conditions that are more easily self certifiable (such as migraines, stress/anxiety and gynaecological issues) to play the system. Saying this is not meant to demean people who genuinely experience these conditions.

I worked for decades in the private sector before moving to the public sector and my goodness it has been an eye opener.

There are absolutely a (not insignificant) number of people for whom “sickness” is a perk of the job and who do not give any thought whatsoever to the impact to their team or the tax payer.

These people are not difficult to spot.

It is not a situation where people lack compassion or understanding of genuine illness.

These people are utterly predictable in when, for what and for how long they claim sickness.

Their phased returns to work are timed to perfection and they stay “well” enough only long enough to re-start the clock or sit below the (ridiculously high) annual threshold of sickness that triggers any (usually lacklustre) intervention from HR.

There are two such members of my team. The detrimental impact is significant in wider team morale and staff retention when other team members burn out as a result of working at 120% to cover their absence. We lose brilliant experienced staff, incur avoidable recruitment costs and have a work backlog that’s proving impossible to address.

Saying “it’s a management issue” is an oversimplification. Many managers are hugely frustrated and impacted but also hidebound by HR policies (at a national or LA/trust level) that just beg to be exploited combined with skeleton staffing of a HR function that renders it ineffectual.

It just wouldn’t fly in the private sector and it’s incredibly frustrating.

Although I see your point and agree, we should note the other side. There are people who are genuinely ill who also time their sickness absence to perfection. They stay below the radar because they want to keep their jobs and contribute the best they can despite their illness. This can be a real struggle and at great personal cost.

The difference can still be possible to spot; the CFs will show it in their general attitude - inflexibility, sense of entitlement etc - while the genuine ones might be conscientious and positively aligned.

In both cases though, performance is an issue. The inability to meet a standard of attendance is the same, and the procedural remedy can be the same.

Newyearawaits · 17/03/2026 22:56

Like many posters, I work in the public sector and it has never ceased to amaze me how some people play the system, with seemingly little regard for the impact on the service or their colleagues.
I have also managed people's sickness absence and have spent considerable amounts of time writing management cases for HR meetings etc.
I am appreciate of the fact that there is a generous sick pay system and have availed of this myself when I was in hospital. I was incredibly relieved that my mortgage was paid.
I am referring to those whose sickness patterns and reasons for sickness follow a clear pattern.
In some industries, if you don't work due to sickness (irrespective of reasons), you don't get paid.
Very unfair.
A good peace of advice from a very senior manager was not to let it keep you awake at night.

LakieLady · 17/03/2026 23:01

The OP dismissing migraines like that shows they've never had one. I feel for you teaching because I work at a computer and literally vomit and nearly pass out if I've got one.

I very rarely get migraines since my menopause, thankfully, but I get really annoyed when people dismiss them as "just a headache".

When I got one, I would vomit so frequently and violently that for days afterwards I would feel like I'd been kicked in the gut by a horse. I was unable to keep down even a few sips of water for hours on end and was twice admitted to hospital to be rehydrated via a drip. The blinding headache and visual aura that meant I couldn't see properly were actually the least of my problems.

They became less frequent when I was able to identify some of my triggers and eliminate them, but some of them were hard to avoid. I could avoid using fluorescent lighting and manage with a desk lamp in my office, but not in other buildings if I had meetings there, and it was damn near impossible to avoid some of the smells that triggered them, eg some paints and perfumes.

Anyone who thinks taking a day's sick leave for a migraine is swinging the lead deserves to get a migraine, frankly.

hedgheog · 17/03/2026 23:26

SkibidiSigma · 16/03/2026 20:31

Oh god I feel your pain. I managed one like this (NHS) and it was a nightmare. The whole team were frustrated by her, and her attitude and them regularly having to cover her work just lowered morale. Not going into specifics but there were several episodes of blatant piss taking, she was so brazen about it. HR were useless as she knew exactly how to play the system

Seen this firsthand with NHS, surprised anything runs in there. Really lowers morale.

OonaStubbs · 17/03/2026 23:37

Why is the NHS (in particular) so soft on it? You think they would come down the hardest since they deal with people who are legitimately sick and/or dying.