Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have been “racially” profiled by HR

496 replies

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:10

I don’t have a British name (like at all), so HR assumed I needed a right to work code, so asked for one, rather than asking if I was a citizen or not.

As a UK citizen I only need to provide my passport, so the whole thing took me completely by surprise!

Its the first time in my whole life that it was assumed that I wasn’t a citizen. I’ve

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:35

catipuss · 16/03/2026 10:32

It can be very bad for companies to give a job to someone who doesn't have a right to work here now so it's quite possible everyone gets asked. Is it the sort of job that uses a lot of casual workers? Taxis, takeaways, restaurants, car washes, etc, etc have been targeted for employing people without the right to work so (some at least) are being a lot more careful. You could have a perfectly English name and get asked for proof.

Was it an actual an HR department or just the person doing the hiring who may know nothing?

Edited

No, it’s a professional job. And like I’ve said a few times already, I know it’s normal to ask for right to work, what’s odd is that they jumped straight to asking for a code (as opposed to passport or code).

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 16/03/2026 10:35

Did it definitely say code? Asking for right to work should be standard. There are so many different names out there it is odd that they’d assume based on it.

Megifer · 16/03/2026 10:35

catipuss · 16/03/2026 10:32

It can be very bad for companies to give a job to someone who doesn't have a right to work here now so it's quite possible everyone gets asked. Is it the sort of job that uses a lot of casual workers? Taxis, takeaways, restaurants, car washes, etc, etc have been targeted for employing people without the right to work so (some at least) are being a lot more careful. You could have a perfectly English name and get asked for proof.

Was it an actual an HR department or just the person doing the hiring who may know nothing?

Edited

Ops point is she was asked to give a share code which only non-British citizens will have. So it was assumed she is a non British citizen.

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:36

Chersfrozenface · 16/03/2026 10:34

I doubt they'd ask John Smith for his code.

And they'd be very silly not to. John Smith might be American or Australian or South African or a New Zealander, to list the most likely. Jack Lang is a French politician, Adam Price is a Danish screenwriter.

But then said John Smith would reply saying they don’t have a passport, and provide their code.

The politically correct way to do this is for ask for passport or code, not just one. You

OP posts:
Hoolieghoul · 16/03/2026 10:36

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:26

Exactly, that’s my point!

Yeah, this isn't on at all. I recently got a new job and was asked for proof of my right to work, but not for anything specific. They've made a massive assumption there, I think you'd be well within your rights to ask them to explain.

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:37

EasternStandard · 16/03/2026 10:35

Did it definitely say code? Asking for right to work should be standard. There are so many different names out there it is odd that they’d assume based on it.

Yes! They even supplied the link and the instructions to get the code.

OP posts:
OchonAgusOchonOh · 16/03/2026 10:38

BillieWiper · 16/03/2026 10:17

But being British isn't a race? Which race were they profiling you as?
I can see what you mean though.

It does seem odd not to just always ask for either passport or right to work code (whatever it is they need) rather than leaping to the assumption you weren't British.

If you think HR are acting racist before you've even started it's not a great sign is it?

The legal definition of racism includes colour, nationality, citizenship, or ethnic/national as well as race so yes, this would count as racism.

The correct request would be to ask for proof of right to work and list what types of proof are acceptable based on the different categories.

Megifer · 16/03/2026 10:38

Chersfrozenface · 16/03/2026 10:34

I doubt they'd ask John Smith for his code.

And they'd be very silly not to. John Smith might be American or Australian or South African or a New Zealander, to list the most likely. Jack Lang is a French politician, Adam Price is a Danish screenwriter.

Quite. Which is why it should be "Please provide proof if your right to work in the UK as per this link/doc/whatever"

xanthomelana · 16/03/2026 10:39

Asking for the share code straight off says to me that they definitely didn’t think you were British.

EasternStandard · 16/03/2026 10:40

Megifer · 16/03/2026 10:38

Quite. Which is why it should be "Please provide proof if your right to work in the UK as per this link/doc/whatever"

Yep

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:41

xanthomelana · 16/03/2026 10:39

Asking for the share code straight off says to me that they definitely didn’t think you were British.

Exactly which is odd to say the least.

OP posts:
Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 16/03/2026 10:44

Someone in HR has obviously messed up. You should email back saying you have passport details but not a share code. If it were me in a new job (I have a foreign first name) I probably wouldn’t make a huge deal out of it.

SeekOIt · 16/03/2026 10:45

So just tell them you don't have or need a share code, you have a British passport and here's the copy..

Chersfrozenface · 16/03/2026 10:46

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:36

But then said John Smith would reply saying they don’t have a passport, and provide their code.

The politically correct way to do this is for ask for passport or code, not just one. You

But they shouldn't ask for just a passport on the basis of a name.

Nor, as in this case, just a code.

ReadingCrimeFiction · 16/03/2026 10:46

Everu job I've ever had I've had to prove I have the right to work in this country. It's often on the application form: Do you have the right to work in the UK? We may ask for documents to prove this.

It's a bit odd if they went straight to asking for the code, as usually one of the application question is nationality so I assume if you put British it then just asks you to prove that and ifyou put something else, it asks you to prove you have the right to work.

BillieWiper · 16/03/2026 10:46

OchonAgusOchonOh · 16/03/2026 10:38

The legal definition of racism includes colour, nationality, citizenship, or ethnic/national as well as race so yes, this would count as racism.

The correct request would be to ask for proof of right to work and list what types of proof are acceptable based on the different categories.

Yeah you're right.

Alpacajigsaw · 16/03/2026 10:46

CoffeeCakeAndALattePlease · 16/03/2026 10:19

Some places do this for ALL employees…. My work asked me and I’m a white British citizen.

I do some interviews and checks and have to ask everyone.

They do have to do checks of course on everyone

But they’ve made an assumption based on her name that she must be an overseas national

Dancingsquirrels · 16/03/2026 10:54

OP, I'm banging my head on the desk in frustration at the number of responses who are not understanding your point at all !

Yes, totally inappropriate for an employer to assume you need a share code based on your name, rather than requesting evidence of your right to work in UK

Ariela · 16/03/2026 10:57

We check everyone too. You have to be so careful these days to ensure right to work. We say 'Please provide proof of your right to work in UK.'

Twooclockrock · 16/03/2026 10:57

I am not excusing it but many businesses do hire a lot of workers from outside Britain, my workplace is predominantly people who are not UK nationals.
I have also worked in businesses where the HR team are not UK nationals themselves.
I would hope this is a human error rather than some sort of passive agressive racial profiling.

Waterbaby41 · 16/03/2026 11:04

Obviously not the job for you. Move on.

YorksMa · 16/03/2026 11:05

Donotfitin · 16/03/2026 10:23

Yes, but it’s either a passport (if a citizen) or the share code.

they didn’t ask for my passport, just the share code

I think a few people have missed the point. I agree with you. If they only asked for your share code, they think you aren't a citizen. Whether that's racism or caused by an error in the paperwork somewhere is another matter. Hope you get it sorted. It sounds very annoying.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 16/03/2026 11:09

I’m white. With a “British” name. I’ve been asked this.
It’s just a box to tick.

OVienna · 16/03/2026 11:13

MightyFlow · 16/03/2026 10:31

To all the posters saying "but my employer checks everyone's right to work status" - yes, correct, but the OP is saying that they were asked for their share code (the code used for the Home Office portal to check visa conditions) on the presumption that OP's foreign name meant OP is foreign and not a British Citizen.

In my company's RTW check guidance it explicitly states not to assume anyone's nationality and to ask the person's status first and then follow up with passport check or Home Office share code, whichever is applicable.

OP: is your company's HR department very small? Perhaps they aren't as clued up as they should be.

This ^

crumpet · 16/03/2026 11:14

I also had to confirm my right to work in the UK as part of the recruitment process. am British.

Swipe left for the next trending thread