Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question criticism of a female MP’s outfit in maiden speech?

302 replies

Browningpers · 13/03/2026 20:52

Spectator article asking whether Hannah Spencer’s outfit detracted from her maiden speech. Seen similar elsewhere too.

I can’t ever recall the same being asked of a male politician.

Article by a woman too.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Browningpers · 15/03/2026 00:00

I think the Green Party is nuts but I am enjoying the extent to which they clearly terrify the right wing Reform crew.

OP posts:
MasterBeth · 15/03/2026 00:05

Alltheprettyseahorses · 14/03/2026 17:08

It doesn't matter how she presented herself. She has a responsible position that comes with a massive duty to her constituency and to the UK and her outfits should show a level of respect for that honour. If she can't even manage the basics of not dressing like a clown then there can be no confidence in her ability to do the rest, no matter how many people say she's brilliant with no evidence whatsoever to back that up. It's just not good enough.

a) She's not dressed like a clown.

b) Your outmoded view on what style of dress constitutes a level of respect for the role is irrelevant as the Speaker has deemed her outfit perfectly acceptable.

c) The outfit she chose had absolutely no bearing on her ability to do the job of delivering her speech.

Allisnotlost1 · 15/03/2026 00:29

Alltheprettyseahorses · 14/03/2026 23:27

Did he? I'm not in the constituency so why would I know or care who the runners-up were? And considering I've repeatedly said she looks like a scruffy meff I have no idea how you've misunderstood that and said I've acknowledged she's smart and professional, that's just weird. Unless you've got me mixed up with someone else?

I don’t think you’ve once said she looks like a ‘scruffy meff’ (mess maybe?) but you’ve said a few times she looks like a clown, that she’s dressed inappropriately etc.

She doesn’t look scruffy by any measure, the outfit is a bit marmite because of the clashing colours but you (not exclusively but quite extremely) have determined it means she doesn’t have respect for her position or is unsuitable for the role. I think if you’re going to conclude that based on zero knowledge about the constituency, her positions on anything etc, just simply the fact she’s wearing bright clothes, then the only ‘meff’ is your critical thinking.

sadmillenial · 15/03/2026 00:36

Is wearing a colourful scalloped waistcoat with another colourful shirt somehow unprofessional?
is it more or less unprofessional than a previous PM not tucking his shirt in or brushing his hair??
I know which one i feel projects disrespect, and its not the former...

I dont think anyone who actually cares about MPs doing their job cares about what they are wearing.

And anyone pretending this is important has a (not very well hidden) alternate agenda to belittle women with left-leaning political beliefs.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 02:34

Browningpers · 15/03/2026 00:00

I think the Green Party is nuts but I am enjoying the extent to which they clearly terrify the right wing Reform crew.

I don't think they terrify Reform. The Greens won't be taking any of their votes. They probably terrify Labour though.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 02:35

Allisnotlost1 · 14/03/2026 11:22

Oh dear, I regret responding to you seriously now. She is clearly not dressed like a child, even if it’s not to your personal taste.

We will have to agree to disagree on that one.

MissingSockDetective · 15/03/2026 02:43

MasterBeth · 15/03/2026 00:05

a) She's not dressed like a clown.

b) Your outmoded view on what style of dress constitutes a level of respect for the role is irrelevant as the Speaker has deemed her outfit perfectly acceptable.

c) The outfit she chose had absolutely no bearing on her ability to do the job of delivering her speech.

I'm more interested in how MR'S behave and what they say than how they dress. I can't stand the braying often seen from many of the ignorant people in there. She's in trousers, shirt and waistcoat, just of brighter colours than often seen. Hardly the same as turning up in her pyjamas or something.

Reform are so transparently sexist, rude and ignorant and this is just a further example of their poor manners and behaviour. I'd be so embarrassed to openly side with them on anything.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 02:45

Allisnotlost1 · 14/03/2026 11:19

The court analogy is not a good one. Barristers and judges wear robes and wigs to disidentify themselves. In court they are there to represent the law, and so they dress to erase their personal characteristics, which includes a specific requirement to wear dark clothing (in criminal law at least. In the Supreme Court where robes are not worn, the dress code is different.) This is both traditional and a formal requirement.

And school uniform is an even worse analogy, given it requires children to dress identically.

That’s not the case in the Commons, where Members are both adults and there to represent their party and constituents, and the formal dress code doesn’t specify colours. Many wear the red, blue, yellow, green or turquoise of their party. Many women also wear other bright colours, or even white. Just as many women in business do.

The ultimate guardian of the rules is the Speaker, who could refuse to allow Hannah Spencer to speak if she dressed or behaved inappropriately. They did not, so anyone else’s opinion on her clothing is irrelevant, and any journalist writing about it is scrabbling around for pebbles to throw.

The court analogy is a good one, actually. When I worked in the law I didnt feel the need to dress in particularly garish colours or wear my hair like Vicky Pollard. Definitely not in court as we would be dealing with serious matters, often involving death, where it was respectful to dress appropriately (as in Parliament). Not all people in court are barristers or judges so not all people were in gowns and wigs, but everyone seemed to avoid overt fashion shows or making "statements" using their clothes. Somehow.

It's a shame the Green MP is now known by most people for her outfits rather than what she says (apart from her supporters).

OhWise1 · 15/03/2026 03:04

Why do some people have to make everything about gender? The dress code for the house of commons is 'business attire'.
Anyone male or female should be adhering to that.

MissingSockDetective · 15/03/2026 03:15

OhWise1 · 15/03/2026 03:04

Why do some people have to make everything about gender? The dress code for the house of commons is 'business attire'.
Anyone male or female should be adhering to that.

Sex not gender. And she is wearing business attire, many people who work in business probably wear similar nowadays. There's no need for everyone to look exactly the same. Trousers, shirt and waistcoat make a perfectly sensible outfit.

newornotnew · 15/03/2026 07:04

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 02:34

I don't think they terrify Reform. The Greens won't be taking any of their votes. They probably terrify Labour though.

It isn't primarily about whether party A takes votes directly from party B - when any party loses a seat, they have to think about which party won and why, and what that might mean across all the other seats.

mrswomblesbusy · 15/03/2026 07:07

BauhausOfEliott · 13/03/2026 21:03

She doesn’t have to choose her clothes in accordance with your personal taste.

No, but she isn't going to be taken seriously when she dresses like a clown.

Underthinker · 15/03/2026 07:43

Browningpers · 15/03/2026 00:00

I think the Green Party is nuts but I am enjoying the extent to which they clearly terrify the right wing Reform crew.

If you agree they're nuts you should also be a little concerned if they continue gaining popularity.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 08:43

newornotnew · 15/03/2026 07:04

It isn't primarily about whether party A takes votes directly from party B - when any party loses a seat, they have to think about which party won and why, and what that might mean across all the other seats.

Not really. Greens voters are highly unlikely to vote for a right wing party so their voters will make no difference to the Conservatives/Reform. But they will take Labour votes. So Im not sure why you picked out Reform rather than Labour as being the party that would be scared by the Greens.

Although TBF any normal person, on the left or right, would be pretty worried about this country if the Greens got in.

Allisnotlost1 · 15/03/2026 08:48

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 02:45

The court analogy is a good one, actually. When I worked in the law I didnt feel the need to dress in particularly garish colours or wear my hair like Vicky Pollard. Definitely not in court as we would be dealing with serious matters, often involving death, where it was respectful to dress appropriately (as in Parliament). Not all people in court are barristers or judges so not all people were in gowns and wigs, but everyone seemed to avoid overt fashion shows or making "statements" using their clothes. Somehow.

It's a shame the Green MP is now known by most people for her outfits rather than what she says (apart from her supporters).

Since you worked in law you’ll know that the rules and culture are different. A maiden speech is clearly not the same as dealing with a death.

It’s a shame that some people are so shallow that they allow a person’s outward appearance to blind them to what’s being said, I agree.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 08:51

MissingSockDetective · 15/03/2026 02:43

I'm more interested in how MR'S behave and what they say than how they dress. I can't stand the braying often seen from many of the ignorant people in there. She's in trousers, shirt and waistcoat, just of brighter colours than often seen. Hardly the same as turning up in her pyjamas or something.

Reform are so transparently sexist, rude and ignorant and this is just a further example of their poor manners and behaviour. I'd be so embarrassed to openly side with them on anything.

"I'm more interested in how MR'S behave and what they say than how they dress"

Yes it's a shame that most people will be more interested in what she is wearing than what she is saying from now on. That's the trap she has fallen into; thinking Parliament is a fashion show. Her clothes are a distraction and are doing the talking for her.

I don't think her critics are confined to Reform either.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 08:52

Allisnotlost1 · 15/03/2026 08:48

Since you worked in law you’ll know that the rules and culture are different. A maiden speech is clearly not the same as dealing with a death.

It’s a shame that some people are so shallow that they allow a person’s outward appearance to blind them to what’s being said, I agree.

Yes I agree. She has made her clothes the thing that is most interesting about her for most people. Shame really.

She was in Parliament. There were discussions about Iran. Quite serious, no? It wasn't all about her.

mrswomblesbusy · 15/03/2026 08:57

Allisnotlost1 · 15/03/2026 08:48

Since you worked in law you’ll know that the rules and culture are different. A maiden speech is clearly not the same as dealing with a death.

It’s a shame that some people are so shallow that they allow a person’s outward appearance to blind them to what’s being said, I agree.

Being 'blinded to what's being said' is quite appropriate in this instance when the speaker chooses to dress in 'dayglo' colours that assault the eye.

quantumbutterfly · 15/03/2026 10:11

Pineneedlesincarpet · 15/03/2026 08:43

Not really. Greens voters are highly unlikely to vote for a right wing party so their voters will make no difference to the Conservatives/Reform. But they will take Labour votes. So Im not sure why you picked out Reform rather than Labour as being the party that would be scared by the Greens.

Although TBF any normal person, on the left or right, would be pretty worried about this country if the Greens got in.

If they had a majority, yes.. As an individual this candidate seems sincere about uniting her community. I liked her outfit & would wear it myself when in the right mood. I hope she survives the reality of parliamentary process.

I wish the greens had solid plans for environmental issues, but at least one of them needs to address overpopulation, ( rather by educating women than sterilising unhappy children though). It used to be a core policy for them but it's not a vote winner. I think Hannah is an admirable role model for young women for her achievements so far.

MasterBeth · 15/03/2026 10:16

OhWise1 · 15/03/2026 03:04

Why do some people have to make everything about gender? The dress code for the house of commons is 'business attire'.
Anyone male or female should be adhering to that.

Business attire in 2026 is not confined to a grey suit from Next.

MunicipalDarwinism · 15/03/2026 10:16

mrswomblesbusy · 15/03/2026 07:07

No, but she isn't going to be taken seriously when she dresses like a clown.

The people of G&D took her seriously.

MasterBeth · 15/03/2026 10:20

mrswomblesbusy · 15/03/2026 08:57

Being 'blinded to what's being said' is quite appropriate in this instance when the speaker chooses to dress in 'dayglo' colours that assault the eye.

You must find life quite difficult if you can't follow a conversation because someone is wearing colourful trousers.

mrswomblesbusy · 15/03/2026 10:22

MasterBeth · 15/03/2026 10:20

You must find life quite difficult if you can't follow a conversation because someone is wearing colourful trousers.

You know I never said that, so stop being silly.

mrswomblesbusy · 15/03/2026 10:24

MunicipalDarwinism · 15/03/2026 10:16

The people of G&D took her seriously.

That says a lot more about them than her.

Her campaign literature exhorted voters to "Punish Labour for Gaza", so I'm not sure what they think she will achieve on their behalf ?

Swipe left for the next trending thread