Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Anger at forth coming COL crisis

426 replies

MyCheekyEagle · 09/03/2026 20:27

Of course I understand that the ME war is going to have an impact on oil prices & that will get passed onto the already struggling families; but when things stabilise again & maybe oil prices reset the greedy corporatez never pass this saving back to customers fo they. They just think as we've got used to these new higher prices we'll just keep them there. This thought has given me the rage most of today!
Just needed to vent somewhere, thanks if you listened..

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 07:47

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 07:39

I've seen several Labour Governments and they always wreck the economy.

You must be ancient then @Chickenlittlesmum. I’m 72 and this is my second one since the 1970s. Far from wrecking the economy the Blair/Brown governments ran it extremely well for ten years, the deficit was low and stable and public services were improved consistently. Economists’ assessment of Brown is that he was one of the best chancellors we’ve ever had. If you want an example of wrecking the economy Truss was outstanding, she managed to bring it to its knees in seven weeks.

My age has got nothing to do with it and don't be so rude.

Have you forgot about Gordon Brown selling off the gold reserves at a cut-price and Harold Wilson devaluing the pound?

Between 1900 and 1992 there were four full-blown financial crises involving the British government, and Labour administrations were implicated in all of them. (And no, I wasn't around in 1900 and neither were my parents.)

You can read it for yourself here :
https://politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/the-economic-competence-of-the-labour-party-in-historical-perspective/

The Economic Competence of the Labour Party in Historical Perspective

What are the historical roots of the relationship between the Labour Party and economic competence?

https://politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/the-economic-competence-of-the-labour-party-in-historical-perspective/

piscofrisco · 12/03/2026 07:59

Whatwerewetalkingabout · 10/03/2026 01:12

I have no problem with net zero, (and the reason our emmissions are low is because we exported our manufacturing industry to Asia so any manufacturing that is done on the UKs behalf should be counted as our emmissions not China and India's) my problem is that governments haven't invested in the infrastructure to support it! There should be solar on every single new build by law and a hell of a lot more money available for people to insulate and get solar installed.

However also agree that true col inflation is massively outstripping wages, I'm getting 1-3% pay rises yet food, mortgage, energy, council tax etc has gone through the bloody roof year on year!

ive never understood why there isn’t a law ensuring that all new builds have solar panels. The rate they are going up we would be so much more self sufficient and there would be no planning concerns or people complaining about the look of them as they would all look the same. It would be so simple to do this. It’s just infuriating that it’s never even spoken of.

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 08:03

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 07:47

My age has got nothing to do with it and don't be so rude.

Have you forgot about Gordon Brown selling off the gold reserves at a cut-price and Harold Wilson devaluing the pound?

Between 1900 and 1992 there were four full-blown financial crises involving the British government, and Labour administrations were implicated in all of them. (And no, I wasn't around in 1900 and neither were my parents.)

You can read it for yourself here :
https://politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/the-economic-competence-of-the-labour-party-in-historical-perspective/

I wasn’t being rude. Of course your age is relevant or you wouldn’t have “seen several Labour governments”. No Labour politician got anywhere near power until 1923. The 1970s saw changes of government so often that it’s close to impossible to attribute blame for the economic disaster that ran through the entire decade. Six of one and half dozen of the other.

Despite selling the gold reserves, Brown oversaw a decade of economic stability and rising living standards accompanied by a steady improvement in public services. If that’s wrecking the economy, please can we do it again?

Gladioli7 · 12/03/2026 08:08

cloudtreecarpet · 11/03/2026 22:10

You know as well as I do that there has been and still is exploitation of the customer base to achieve that level of profit increase.

I honestly don't get why no one else thinks it's both bizarre and outrageous to go from £72 million to £3.5 billion in less than five years. During a crisis

But there is always someone ready to explain it away like it's just normal and "that's how private businesses work".

It's a national disgrace that companies like British Gas are allowed to get away with it while also providing less than stellar customer service.
They certainly aren't alone but they stand out with their blatant profiteering.

British Gas is the retail arm of the publicly listed Centrica group. As such, there is a lot of publicly available information about their financial performance that will explain this to you (and the BG results specifically in their segmental analysis). If you are not satisfied with the level of disclosure you could consider a complaint to the Financial Reporting Council.

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 08:09

@blossomtoes "I wasn’t being rude. Of course your age is relevant or you wouldn’t have “seen several Labour governments"

Just because I was around in the 70's that doesn't make me "ancient" as you claim. And even if I was "ancient", it doesn't mean I'm too stupid or senile to know whether of not a government isn't making a complete arse of things.😏

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 08:13

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 08:03

I wasn’t being rude. Of course your age is relevant or you wouldn’t have “seen several Labour governments”. No Labour politician got anywhere near power until 1923. The 1970s saw changes of government so often that it’s close to impossible to attribute blame for the economic disaster that ran through the entire decade. Six of one and half dozen of the other.

Despite selling the gold reserves, Brown oversaw a decade of economic stability and rising living standards accompanied by a steady improvement in public services. If that’s wrecking the economy, please can we do it again?

https://goldbank.co.uk/insights/gordon-browns-gold-sale-what-happened-learned/

Please read the paragraph entitled "What happened to gold prices...." and you'll see it paints a very different picture to the one you've described.

thecatsgotyourtongue · 12/03/2026 08:17

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 07:47

My age has got nothing to do with it and don't be so rude.

Have you forgot about Gordon Brown selling off the gold reserves at a cut-price and Harold Wilson devaluing the pound?

Between 1900 and 1992 there were four full-blown financial crises involving the British government, and Labour administrations were implicated in all of them. (And no, I wasn't around in 1900 and neither were my parents.)

You can read it for yourself here :
https://politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/the-economic-competence-of-the-labour-party-in-historical-perspective/

Edward Heath in the early 70s strikes 3 day weeks
ERM crisis - 15% Interest rates
&
Liz Truss - a trebling of gilt yields and an emergency £65 billion by the BoE, pensions wrecked, which we are still paying for.

Thats 3 in about half the period you mention.

Brown sold off a very small proportion of our Gold reserves and it made diddly squat to the nations finances, we actually ran a budget surplus under Labour, something not done since by the Tories.

HopSpringsEternal · 12/03/2026 08:18

hattie43 · 12/03/2026 07:27

Because people can’t afford the costs and aren’t convinced they work . If they are such a holy grail I can’t understand why you wouldn’t expect everyone to be buying electric cars , solar panels , heat pumps etc and just what is the point when half our housing stock is not compatible with these green options . The only people rushing to champion this is red ed and the chattering middle classes . No one else gives a stuff because they are too busy trying to exist and put food on the table .

I'm not arguing for individuals to front the costs. The costs it should be funded through government schemes for initial capital costs and supported by decent buy back tarrifs.

If there had been decent loan schemes and a decent tarrif many people could have had these on their properties at no cost to themselves and paid back via selling back electricity for decades. If houses are sold the costs can pass on with the house sale.

I live opposite council housing several of which have had panels on for over 10 years thanks to a scheme back in noughties. The residents have really low bills, and are still tied into to the old (good) tarrif.
In countries that have done this well. It has benefited the poor far more than it has the rich. Rich people don't have to worry so much about utility bills. Because there's such a small proportion of their household bills. But for poorer people after housing, utility bills are generally the biggest cost.

Additionally much greater investment could have been made into off shore wind.

We all show should have done much more for retrofitting through relatively low cost schemes around insulation and led lighting.

However, in the UK we didn't do this on scale.
Instead we pandered to the oil companies who gave huge donations to poltitcal parties to not do this. In particular, the Tory party have been given anywhere between ten and twenty million pounds from companies and individuals with fossil fuel interests. That sort of money comes with conditions and expectations.

I should add I have never been in a financial position to be able to afford solar panels!

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 08:27

@thecatsgotyourtongue Brown sold off a very small proportion of our Gold reserves and it made diddly squat to the nations finances, we actually ran a budget surplus under Labour, something not done since by the Tories.

Your response shows you haven't bothered to read the article I posted which highlights many more Labour financial cock-ups.

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 08:57

chaosmaker · 10/03/2026 07:20

Wasn't academisation under blair? or privatising education.... also wanting everyone to go to university.... that meant a lack of people that probably shouldn't have gone and who would have done better/less debt gaining more physical type apprenticeships.

Absolutely.

Everyone was encouraged to go to uni because "everyone was entitled to a degree" or some other Leftie crap.
So Unis obliged by dumbing down degrees and people were taking degrees in 'Media Studies', 'Textiles' and 'Outer Mongolean Pottery' that were as much use a a chocolate teapot.
I've just moved house again and proper time-served tradesmen around here are like hen's teeth.

thecatsgotyourtongue · 12/03/2026 08:57

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 08:27

@thecatsgotyourtongue Brown sold off a very small proportion of our Gold reserves and it made diddly squat to the nations finances, we actually ran a budget surplus under Labour, something not done since by the Tories.

Your response shows you haven't bothered to read the article I posted which highlights many more Labour financial cock-ups.

Yes i did read the article but thanks for being able to tell me what i have or haven't read.

On Financial crisis, the Tories have also caused many more than i mentioned, one more recent one was unemployment at 8% in the early 2010s.

Sunak wasting billions on giving away money to Covid fraud (Dwarfs Brown's Gold sale)

The wider point here, which you might not accept, is all Governments mess up, but i don't go around saying "Labour is always financial competent" they are not and neither are the Tories.

Often due to World events but sometimes down to local policy - Privatisation, Right to Buy, ERM, PFI, Truss and Austerity

Snakebite61 · 12/03/2026 08:58

MyCheekyEagle · 09/03/2026 20:27

Of course I understand that the ME war is going to have an impact on oil prices & that will get passed onto the already struggling families; but when things stabilise again & maybe oil prices reset the greedy corporatez never pass this saving back to customers fo they. They just think as we've got used to these new higher prices we'll just keep them there. This thought has given me the rage most of today!
Just needed to vent somewhere, thanks if you listened..

Right wing policies don't help the ordinary man/woman in the street. Just the rich
At least trump has stopped the media bringing up the Epstein files, which is the whole point of this needless war. Watch the rich get richer because of it.

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 09:04

thecatsgotyourtongue · 12/03/2026 08:57

Yes i did read the article but thanks for being able to tell me what i have or haven't read.

On Financial crisis, the Tories have also caused many more than i mentioned, one more recent one was unemployment at 8% in the early 2010s.

Sunak wasting billions on giving away money to Covid fraud (Dwarfs Brown's Gold sale)

The wider point here, which you might not accept, is all Governments mess up, but i don't go around saying "Labour is always financial competent" they are not and neither are the Tories.

Often due to World events but sometimes down to local policy - Privatisation, Right to Buy, ERM, PFI, Truss and Austerity

Please note Labour's term in government ended in a recession,

fullfact.org/economy/unemployment-under-Labour/

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 09:23

Chickenlittlesmum · 12/03/2026 09:04

Please note Labour's term in government ended in a recession,

fullfact.org/economy/unemployment-under-Labour/

As the result of a global financial crisis which the UK weathered better than most of the rest of the world.

user1493379562 · 12/03/2026 11:15

BeAvidHiker · 09/03/2026 22:19

Idiotic net 0.

What is the point in trying to achieve Net ) when Trump, Israel and Putin are blowing up everything right left and center. I shudder to think what they are contributing to global warming!

Nutmuncher · 12/03/2026 11:23

ohfourfoxache · 09/03/2026 22:04

What’s the threshold for a “crisis”?

I only ask because it seems that we’re already in a CoL crisis and have been for a considerable time

(I’m not being arsey btw - im genuinely curious)

Exactly this. What is our tolerance threshold when ‘living’ is simply economic survival and not getting by for a huge segment of the population? When EVERYTHING gets more expensive where on earth does the extra money come from?

In 2026 with all the incredible technological advances civilisation has made we’re still stuck in a COL crisis loop. It beggars belief.

Badbadbunny · 12/03/2026 12:24

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 07:39

I've seen several Labour Governments and they always wreck the economy.

You must be ancient then @Chickenlittlesmum. I’m 72 and this is my second one since the 1970s. Far from wrecking the economy the Blair/Brown governments ran it extremely well for ten years, the deficit was low and stable and public services were improved consistently. Economists’ assessment of Brown is that he was one of the best chancellors we’ve ever had. If you want an example of wrecking the economy Truss was outstanding, she managed to bring it to its knees in seven weeks.

National debt rose from 29% of GDP in 2002 to 37% of GDP in 2007. That is definitely not "low and stable"! It had risen by 28% BEFORE the financial crash! That was during a period where Brown self-proclaimed he'd ended boom and bust and claimed the economy was thriving!

persephonia · 12/03/2026 12:31

user1493379562 · 12/03/2026 11:15

What is the point in trying to achieve Net ) when Trump, Israel and Putin are blowing up everything right left and center. I shudder to think what they are contributing to global warming!

China pollutes a lot, and still does.
But over the last few decades they put loads of resources into green energy. Such that they are now the top electricity provider from green energy sources. They still burn a lot of fossil fuels and likely will for a while but they are now leaders in the technology and manufacturing of renewable infrastructure like wind farms. And they are on track to gradually make it their primary source of energy, meaning they don't depend on fossil fuels and have energy sovereignty. Also it's good for the environment.

The UK had massive lobbying against spending on developing renewable alternatives. There was far less government subsidies in wind etc than on fossil fuels. As a result it's been much slower to get of the ground which means:

  1. We don't have the capacity to build wind turbines here**. We have to get it from China/other places
  2. We are still hugely exposed to shocks in the market like the current Iran war. As long as we need fossil fuels we will be at the mercy of global events and other countries

The irony that 20 years ago the main talking point against renewables was "China" and yet they are the ones forging ahead. They are not doing it to be woke. They are doing it because it makes strategic sense. I don't think we should turn off all the traditional power stations overnight. But working towards a future where we are less dependent on them makes sense and should have been prioritised a long time ago.

**Realistically we could never have completed against China without subsidies partly because it's cheaper to make things in China and also because China subsidises those industries themselves. But now all of it is outsourced when maybe some spending before would have created jobs now. Or at least not forced startups overseas.

persephonia · 12/03/2026 12:33

Badbadbunny · 12/03/2026 12:24

National debt rose from 29% of GDP in 2002 to 37% of GDP in 2007. That is definitely not "low and stable"! It had risen by 28% BEFORE the financial crash! That was during a period where Brown self-proclaimed he'd ended boom and bust and claimed the economy was thriving!

What was the national debt at the end of the last Tory government?

thecatsgotyourtongue · 12/03/2026 12:39

Badbadbunny · 12/03/2026 12:24

National debt rose from 29% of GDP in 2002 to 37% of GDP in 2007. That is definitely not "low and stable"! It had risen by 28% BEFORE the financial crash! That was during a period where Brown self-proclaimed he'd ended boom and bust and claimed the economy was thriving!

Twisting the figures there! 28% indeed!

Between 2010 ands 2020, before Covid, the debt to GDP went 65% to 87% (34% by your workings) BEFORE Covid but perhaps more importantly, despite record borrowing, they trashed public services, took unemployment to over 8% too.
Plus lumbered our young people with eye watering debt, as they took tuition fees from 3k to over £9000 per year.

Its indefensible

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 12:52

persephonia · 12/03/2026 12:33

What was the national debt at the end of the last Tory government?

Time for this tired old bar chart again.

Anger at forth coming COL crisis
usernamealreadytaken · 12/03/2026 12:56

lazyarse123 · 09/03/2026 23:05

The greedy big businesses aren't helping. Fuel has gone up near us at least 3 times in the last week and it can't all be new stock. Greedy bastards cashing in.

Over 50% of the cost of fuel at the pumps goes to the government. Who are the "greedy bastards cashing in"?

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 13:00

usernamealreadytaken · 12/03/2026 12:56

Over 50% of the cost of fuel at the pumps goes to the government. Who are the "greedy bastards cashing in"?

The suppliers who put prices up 10p a litre overnight on the same fuel that was in the pumps the day before. They’re not spending it on the common good, are they?

lazyarse123 · 12/03/2026 13:04

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 13:00

The suppliers who put prices up 10p a litre overnight on the same fuel that was in the pumps the day before. They’re not spending it on the common good, are they?

Exactly. Thank you.

thecatsgotyourtongue · 12/03/2026 13:47

BIossomtoes · 12/03/2026 13:00

The suppliers who put prices up 10p a litre overnight on the same fuel that was in the pumps the day before. They’re not spending it on the common good, are they?

Yes the day of the attack, that evening, the ASDA near me, put prices up 6p, by the morning it went up another 3p.

Tesco, tbf, did not do this, by the following day, had gone 2p.

But both increased prices on fuel bought under the older pricing scheme.

When wholesale fuels fall, who would like to bet on them being equally so quick to drop the price?

Swipe left for the next trending thread