The problem with wider societal arguments against AI, whilst enormously important, is that very few people care enough to change their own behaviour in order to be part of a societal shift. Like climate change generally.
People seemingly don't give a shit about their own data, or the very real potential of mass surveillance, which astonishes me. The growing use of facial recognition tech, plus AI should give pause, but usually doesn't. How many use use a VPN, Tor browser, or temporary email addresses to sign up to things?
The only arguments that people seem to hear are 'it will give you wrong answers' (true, but not always and perhaps just infrequently enough that we start believing it) and 'it does you personally damage'. Which not everyone seems to get. There is already evidence that having Google available (phone in your pocket, or a computer) makes people overestimate what they actually know or remember.
A huge danger of LLMs (and this is already happening, due to the internet generally) is growth of radical cynicism. When you can't trust previously-trusted forms of news or data or information, and we are completely bathed in endless streams of information, it becomes more likely that you believe and trust nothing. That way lies conspiracy mindedness and political radicalisation. Its not a new trend, but AI risks speeding this exponentially, as it does everything else.
The argument of 'if you don't use it, you'll be left behind' is insane. It is literally designed for dummies. You don't have to get 'good' at using it. You have to get good at critically analysing the output - and the skills for this aren't learnt by using AI.