Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Solicitor completely effed up!

167 replies

JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 14:24

Can anybody let me know if this is ok to send to a solicitor for a complaint? Am I being unreasonable?
thanks

Dear [Solicitor’s Name or Firm],

I am writing to formally lodge a complaint regarding serious errors during the probate process of [Deceased’s Name]. Two wills were provided to your firm: a revoked will and the most recent valid will. Despite clear communication, the revoked will was initially sent to probate, delaying the process by several months. While I was understanding, the situation escalated when HMRC granted probate, but then uploaded the revoked will to the public registry. This has resulted in the previous beneficiary being aware of their inclusion in a superseded will, creating significant concern.

Although I contacted your office immediately upon discovering this error, and you acted swiftly to correct it, the fact remains that this mistake has jeopardized the integrity of the probate process and caused undue stress. Given these circumstances, I request that your firm cover any legal costs I now incur due to potential contestation of the will. I would also like a written clarification confirming whether this incident constitutes legal malpractice or gross misconduct. Should I not receive satisfactory resolution, I will have no choice but to escalate this matter.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Information]

OP posts:
Mum2Fergus · 21/02/2026 14:25

Why were 2 wills provided and not just the valid one?

SchnizelVonKrumm · 21/02/2026 14:27

I would also like a written clarification confirming whether this incident constitutes legal malpractice or gross misconduct.

Take out this sentence

Bagsintheboot · 21/02/2026 14:28

A) Why did you provide a revoked will?

B) It sounds like the error was HMRCs in uploading the revoked will despite having the current one, so in all honesty I don't know how much joy you'll get here.

GinToBegin · 21/02/2026 14:28

From a quick read, and with no comment on the rights and wrongs of your situation, I would change it to you expect the solicitors to cover your additional legal costs, rather than request.

Add dates where you can, for example when you called having discovered the error - plus who you spoke with.

Give a deadline for a response, something along the lines of ‘I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible, and in any event, no later than the close of business 10 March 2026. I have not had a satisfactory response by that date, I will escalate matters.’

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 21/02/2026 14:29

Jeopardised unless you’re in America.
The letter reads like an AI offering.

Bronext · 21/02/2026 14:30

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Alpacajigsaw · 21/02/2026 14:31

Why did you send them both wills?

Yes it sounds careless as the date should have clarified which will was which. People make mistakes though. I bet even you do at your work, would you expect hauled over the coals and sacked? What are you actually expecting out of this? Other than an awkward situation with the previous would be beneficiary what has been the detriment.

Randomchat · 21/02/2026 14:31

While I was understanding, the situation escalated

I don't know what you mean by "While I was understanding". I'd take that out.

Then it was HMRC who shared the old will, not the solicitor? Or did the solicitor send the wrong will to HMRC? I'm not clear who's responsible.

Arlanymor · 21/02/2026 14:34

Did ChatGPT write this?

First sentence is missing the word 'made' and jeopardised is the UK spelling.

I'm not sure how you can ask them to cover costs for something that hasn't happened and may still not happen.

Remove the sentence about legal malpractice and gross misconduct altogether as it's neither.

Why was the original will not destroyed? When you formally revoke the old document best practice dictates that you destroy the original to prevent any ambiguity. I would say that was your own error and without it this situation could not have arisen. That said I also don't know why the former version wasn't just returned to the you at the time.

Musicaltheatremum · 21/02/2026 14:35

Were you the executor or was the lawyer? If you are the executor then you would have had to sign the will to send it off when you apply for probate. So you should have checked then. We just did this on Thursday for my FIL estate and had to sign the tax forms and the will.

If the lawyers were the executors then they should have done this so clearly an error. I don't know why the lawyer kept both wills.

KimTheresPeopleThatAreDying · 21/02/2026 14:37

HMRC doesn’t issue grants of probate, the probate registry does.

Also why did you provide the revoked will? Wouldn’t that have just muddied the waters?

7238SM · 21/02/2026 14:38

Two wills were provided to your firm
Why? Was on found after the 1st has been submitted?

MissMoneyFairy · 21/02/2026 14:44

Why did you send them 2 wills and not just the most recent valid will, did they request both. What concern did it create if the person was already a beneficiary in the first will and is still a beneficiary in the second will. Who by and why would the valid will be contested. Why would you have to pay out if someone else contests the will . You don't ask the solicitor if it's malpractice, that's probably for a different solicitor or the SRA to determine.

Nottodaythankyou123 · 21/02/2026 14:47

Firstly, why were two wills provided? Secondly, what loss have you suffered? It may be worth bringing this to their attention, to avoid it happening in future, but at the moment you haven’t suffered any financial loss so I can’t see what you’ll otherwise gain.

Bronext · 21/02/2026 14:49

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MissMoneyFairy · 21/02/2026 14:55

It's nothing to do with HMRC so if this is a genuine complaint you need to get the facts right

JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:00

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

The company that held the wills sent them to me I just sent all the paperwork to the solicitor doing probate. I had no idea what I was doing I was grieving. The revoked will was a copy not an original. Solicitor told me it would be destroyed as not needed. Then it got sent by mistake.

OP posts:
Bronext · 21/02/2026 15:01

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:03

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Yes a revoked copy and a recent valid one. I didn’t go with the will holders as there fee was so high.

OP posts:
JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:04

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

That’s helpful.

OP posts:
JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:07

MissMoneyFairy · 21/02/2026 14:44

Why did you send them 2 wills and not just the most recent valid will, did they request both. What concern did it create if the person was already a beneficiary in the first will and is still a beneficiary in the second will. Who by and why would the valid will be contested. Why would you have to pay out if someone else contests the will . You don't ask the solicitor if it's malpractice, that's probably for a different solicitor or the SRA to determine.

They are not named in the most recent will. But because of the error of the revoked will being uploaded they went into one (rightly so) (and now know they was in a previous will) thinking they had been left out of the whole process. And had money coming there way and I had to say no and it was abit of a mess and they asking me questions I don’t know the answers too

OP posts:
MissMoneyFairy · 21/02/2026 15:07

JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:03

Yes a revoked copy and a recent valid one. I didn’t go with the will holders as there fee was so high.

Who held the 2 wills? Who were the executors of the final will. How has this affected the beneficiary and what are your concerns. Why could it be contested. I don't understand why you were sent the wills unless you were the executor.

Bronext · 21/02/2026 15:07

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:08

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 21/02/2026 14:29

Jeopardised unless you’re in America.
The letter reads like an AI offering.

It’s 100% chat gpt 🤣 is this not allowed?

OP posts:
MissMoneyFairy · 21/02/2026 15:11

JessicaRabbit23 · 21/02/2026 15:07

They are not named in the most recent will. But because of the error of the revoked will being uploaded they went into one (rightly so) (and now know they was in a previous will) thinking they had been left out of the whole process. And had money coming there way and I had to say no and it was abit of a mess and they asking me questions I don’t know the answers too

But that's not your concern, the deceased changed their will which they are legally allowed to do unless it was under duress or not legally signed. Tell them to contact the solicitor. They can't just"go into one" .without good reason.

Swipe left for the next trending thread