Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder what happens if the police DON'T bring charges

83 replies

Carycach4 · 21/02/2026 02:01

.... against Andrew? What happens if the police say that after extensive investigations they cannot find evidence of criminal wrongdoing? Has the King jumped the gun a bit, stripping and exiling his brother? Will the RF have egg on their face on the world stage?
Have many organisations, especially media and social media exposed thrmselves to defamation lawsuits from a skint Andy?

OP posts:
luckylavender · 21/02/2026 07:03

Emori · 21/02/2026 03:03

Giuffre said he assaulted her. That's illegal. The global press (as in, every media outlet of note and standing) have released emails from him to Epstein passing on confidential international trade information. Communicating confidential information gained through state office is illegal. Whether or not he eventually faces charges is immaterial - the press reporting on this is based on actual evidence that Andrew Saxe-Coburg has done these things. Defamation requires the publication of a lie. The press aren't publishing lies about him. There's no defamation because he sent the emails, reporting that he sent them is the truth and that's not up for debate.

But this has nothing to do with her. He was arrested specifically for passing on State classified documents (to a serving paedophile) whilst working for the government as a Trade Ambassador. Misconduct in Public Office.

Sesma · 21/02/2026 07:07

I think it's similar to what they are investigating Mandelson for, though he hasn't been arrested, they did search his homes and take away stuff though.

ThatFairy · 21/02/2026 07:07

HeadyLamarr · 21/02/2026 06:21

What a ghoulish thing to say about a poor woman who'd been trafficked and abused.

Perhaps it is but I believe it is a possibility. This wasn't just Epstein that did these terrible things it's a network of the rich and powerful

ThatFairy · 21/02/2026 07:10

Meadowfinch · 21/02/2026 06:29

No. I think a severely traumatised woman was facing a very difficult home life after years of dealing with a brutal international press, and simply couldn't face the future any more. There was nothing to be gained by her murder, the secrecy around the Epstein affair was already crumbling and other women were coming forward.

Edited

It wasn't just Epstein though was it. Many rich and powerful people involved. And she was a mother. It's quite unusual for a mother to commit suicide.

Meadowfinch · 21/02/2026 07:13

One thing that this affair has clearly demonstrated, and hopefully future governments will take on board, is that making individuals trade envoys or ambassadors representing the UK, when they do not have 20 years professional diplomatic experience is beyond stupid and must stop.

Dollymylove · 21/02/2026 07:19

Whatever happens, Andrew is and always will be, an arrogant entitled bully. His behaviour is well known to anyone who has ever crossed paths with him. He has done it to himself Im afraid and whether or not he is actually charged, nobody will now want to be associated with him

Glaspeated · 21/02/2026 07:20

His titles were stripped before any arrest.

It’s not defamatory to report that someone has been arrested and why.

Even if it was defamatory; why would someone who presumably wants all this to go away, then drag his dirty linen through the courts, with all the attendant publicity and scrutiny?

He’s not skint in the sense you mean.

catipuss · 21/02/2026 07:25

If they can't find enough evidence they won't. If they can they will, that's it.

It was all quite a few years ago so how many records he still has is uncertain, if he was taking actual bribes his bank records may be interesting, if it was all favours and freebies it will be more difficult to prove.

catipuss · 21/02/2026 07:28

IDontHateRainbows · 21/02/2026 04:16

This is what happens when you give an important job to someone who hasn't worked for it or trained for it in any way, doesn't really want to do it and is arrogant and entitled enough to think the normal rules don't apply.

The main part of his job was to show up and be charming to important people he had a wealth of experience of doing that.

catipuss · 21/02/2026 07:32

ThatFairy · 21/02/2026 05:52

Guys, do you think Virginia Giuffre was murdered ?

Quite likely if she was going to write another book and actually name some of the other men she slept with. I'm sure some of them would be pretty dangerous to cross unlike Andrew.

Avocadabra · 21/02/2026 07:47

Can someone explain to me? I have assumed AMW was arrested rather than asked to assist with enquiries so the police could remove his devices and gain evidence. I must be wrong as it wasn’t necessary to arrest PM to gain evidence.

socks1107 · 21/02/2026 07:57

He lied publicly about his relationship with a known sex trafficker. Charles did not jump the gun

Boomer55 · 21/02/2026 08:01

He might be prosecuted for the sharing of government documents/information. The chances of anything are remote.

As might Mandelson..

AMW almost certainly won’t go to prison. 🤷‍♀️

Dollymylove · 21/02/2026 08:12

Why has Mandelson not been arrested? Answers on a postcard to 10 Downing st

WTAFIsWrongWithPeople · 21/02/2026 08:14

It’s just the equivalent of “bringing the company into disrepute” that most people have in their contracts. In this case it’s just The Company.

Meadowfinch · 21/02/2026 08:15

catipuss · 21/02/2026 07:28

The main part of his job was to show up and be charming to important people he had a wealth of experience of doing that.

But no experience of being given access to sensitive government information.

WTAFIsWrongWithPeople · 21/02/2026 08:17

Meadowfinch · 21/02/2026 08:15

But no experience of being given access to sensitive government information.

He was a member of the royal family and would have been trained FROM BIRTH on hallow to behave.

I had to sign the official secrets act with no such training and managed not to ever spill state secrets.

Jaded2023 · 21/02/2026 08:18

ThatFairy · 21/02/2026 07:07

Perhaps it is but I believe it is a possibility. This wasn't just Epstein that did these terrible things it's a network of the rich and powerful

tes 100%

Emori · 21/02/2026 08:53

Charles sacked him to save himself and preserve the monarchy. He's basically like Paulie turning his back on Jimmy at this point.

4babiesforever · 21/02/2026 09:12

He’s already been caught out in so many lies and still associating with someone who had been found guilty - so I don’t think the King has jumped the gun.
also although he is 8th in line, he is one of the four over 21 who would all step in if the king lost capacity to make decisions etc so unless he is kicked out of the line he could end up helping with decisions one day if something happened to the King and that wouldn’t be good because who can even trust him or his lack of moral compass

EasternStandard · 21/02/2026 09:14

Avocadabra · 21/02/2026 07:47

Can someone explain to me? I have assumed AMW was arrested rather than asked to assist with enquiries so the police could remove his devices and gain evidence. I must be wrong as it wasn’t necessary to arrest PM to gain evidence.

I wondered why they arrested to get evidence for AMW but not Mandelson so far, the latter having his home searched anyway.

Sesma · 21/02/2026 09:17

EasternStandard · 21/02/2026 09:14

I wondered why they arrested to get evidence for AMW but not Mandelson so far, the latter having his home searched anyway.

Edited

Maybe one was more helpful with the enquiries than the other.

CommonlyKnownAs · 21/02/2026 09:34

If he's not charged, I think he'll just be made to stay out of the way. The goal for the rest of the RF in that scenario must be for him to become a recluse. He obviously has been very resistant to that, but has less agency now than he did even a couple of years back. Notwithstanding he may still have enough information about skeletons in non-Epstein related closets to make it worth working with him to keep him secure, fed and quiet.

FoxLoxInSox · 21/02/2026 09:43

ThatFairy · 21/02/2026 07:10

It wasn't just Epstein though was it. Many rich and powerful people involved. And she was a mother. It's quite unusual for a mother to commit suicide.

Sorry but I have to point out two important points here:

  • The term ‘commit suicide’ is deeply problematic and stems from when suicide was an illegal act. It is deeply stigmatising and is no longer seen as an acceptable term. Instead: ‘end their life’ / ‘took their life’.
  • Not true at all that mothers don’t / won’t take their lives. Such myths prevent mothers coming forwards for help and perpetuate myths in the minds of professionals who often overlook women’s risk of suicide by dint of the fact they’re mothers. Leading to catastrophe. The taboo around mothers’ suicidality is unhelpful and harmful.
PrizedPickledPopcorn · 21/02/2026 09:46

ThatFairy · 21/02/2026 07:07

Perhaps it is but I believe it is a possibility. This wasn't just Epstein that did these terrible things it's a network of the rich and powerful

I think it’s important to remember that the life she had often leads to a disfunctional adulthood. A traumatic past often leads to death by suicide, trauma is damaging.

To say ‘she must have been murdered’ almost undermines the negative impact of the abuse she experienced, imo.

We shouldn’t gloss over the long term consequences of that kind of life.