There is a massive disinformation campaign about EVs, possibly funded by those with vested interest in the oil industries. The "anti" arguments cherry pick information. It's true that in the short term EVs use more resources to produce. But over the lifetime of a car, they more than compensate for that.
This in depth article is from an organisation training electricians so not the most extreme green lobbyists. It's very useful in unpicking the myths:
"EVs produce significantly more emissions during manufacturing than petrol cars, primarily because battery production is energy-intensive. That’s the “carbon debt” critics correctly point out. But during operation, EVs charged on the UK grid emit roughly 75-80% less CO2 per mile than equivalent petrol vehicles. That operational advantage pays back the manufacturing debt within 10,000-11,000 miles, roughly 1.2 years of average driving. After that break-even point, the EV is demonstrably cleaner for the remaining 12-15 years of its life."
"Current EVs use primarily virgin materials because there aren’t enough retired batteries to recycle yet. By 2035-2040, as the first wave of mass-market EVs reaches end-of-life, recycled battery materials will increasingly replace virgin mining. Lifecycle studies project that by 2040, 30-40% of battery materials could come from recycled sources, reducing mining impacts proportionally.
This doesn’t eliminate mining, new battery production for fleet growth still requires virgin materials, but it dramatically reduces the mining intensity per vehicle as the circular economy develops."
It's also striking that the people who are most concerned about lithium mining don't seem to be that bothered about other environmental issues, Generally they are supporting the status quo (oil fuelled economy, continue to fly etc) rather than campaigning against environmental damage more widely.
Environmental Impact of Electric Cars in the UK: The Full Truth - Elec Training