Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform wants women barefoot and pregnant

829 replies

Sweetiedarling7 · 14/02/2026 07:57

Reform candidate Matt Goodwin wants women to have children early in life and introduce extra taxes as punishment for anyone who chooses not to have children.

Misogyny in plain sight.

How long till they ban abortion too?

Women voting Reform may want to consider if they are turkeys voting for christmas.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
Allisnotlost1 · 14/02/2026 11:13

ThankYouNigel · 14/02/2026 11:06

Genuinely, who do you suggest I vote for then? I believe firmly that my time has been best spent out of the workforce caring for my own two children over the past 7 years. I read all the political manifestos, nobody mentions SAHPs. The press derides them for being ‘economically inactive’, ignoring entirely their vast contributions to their children, elderly family members and to their wider communities through extensive volunteering.

I can’t find anybody who speaks for my values of children, husband, wider family and local community first? Can you?

Edited

Do you honestly think Reform care about you or your family?

StandFirm · 14/02/2026 11:15

treeowl · 14/02/2026 08:28

I think so

As many are saying in the US right now, the cruelty is the point.

Booboobagins · 14/02/2026 11:15

I cannot understand how they have so much traction. How dim is the general voting public to base their vote on the toxic press on immigration which isn't even true?

HK04 · 14/02/2026 11:15

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 14/02/2026 08:01

Reform are hateful.

However l wish id had my children earlier. In terms of energy, delivery and longevity l’ve always thought 20’s were the best age.

Agreed. I wouldn’t have the energy now.

Marmalademorning · 14/02/2026 11:16

And how do they expect younger people to be able to afford to have children? They can’t afford to get on the housing ladder, let alone rent - and how many rentals say no children or pets? Plus, reform want to abolish home working and return to the office 9-5. Hardly what I would call family friendly.

1dayatatime · 14/02/2026 11:17

The contradiction I see is that Reform are concerned about the UK population increase ( 98% from immigration) causing pressure on Infrastructure and services and yet at the same time encouraging people to have more children.

Personally I agree that a larger population means that infrastructure and services are pressured and that the quality of life is lower. Also the most cost effective means of protecting the environment and combatting climate change is through population reduction achieved through both lower immigration and a lower birth rate.

BridgertonToBe · 14/02/2026 11:19

Hereforthecommentz · 14/02/2026 11:10

You mean he wants incentives for having family's, future tax payers like a lot of countries. Not really radical.

That should be done by making having children more affordable across the board. Not by taxing non-parents more than people who have children.

Just from the top of my head, more affordable and accessible childcare, flexible working policies, better maternity pay and leave.

And then there are the issues that affect everyone, not just parents. Maybe if housing was more affordable, more people would have kids.

Teakettletrio · 14/02/2026 11:20

@CandleRigg89 I came to say something similar, but you said it better. Without a migrant workforce, you have a population imbalance with more older people dependent on a shrinking pool of younger people. Where are you going to get your cheap labour from? For the underpaid, undervalued, essential tasks like caring, teaching, cleaning, manual labour - stuff that AI can’t do? You need a working class to have an upper class for Nige to hang out with. Curb women’s career options by keeping ‘em pregnant so that after they’ve done all that unpaid child rearing they can get on with looking after the elderly and infirm for free. And the bonus of a new generation to exploit. Makes me sick.

Owlbookend · 14/02/2026 11:21

Bluntly he has suggested that people of colour are not necessarily British, even if they were born in the UK.

It takes more than a piece of paper to make somebody ‘British’.

Does it?

If someone tells you who they are, believe them.

FourCheese · 14/02/2026 11:21

RichardOnslowRoper · 14/02/2026 11:08

I did have kids fairly young- at 28- but as I am brown, I am sure my kids are not the kind Reform want.
In hindsight, would have had my kids a couple of years later.

28 is standard age, not young. That’s 10 years of adulthood. Average ftm age is 28-30 region

EarthSight · 14/02/2026 11:21

Iceandfire92 · 14/02/2026 11:04

Reform can fuck off, we are educated adult women with agency, not breeding stock. There is so much of this contradicting rhetoric about how we must have children, but also that it is thankless and gruelling plus the delightful bonus of the virtual certainty that our bodies will be wrecked. What if we don't want our bodies and vaginas wrecked full stop?

.

I think that the population growth so far across humanity has been largely dependent on -

a) Women's disempowerment
b) Religion
c) Economics

When women have reproductive agency, can be financially independent, and when societies become less religious and more prosperous, one sees a population drop.

To increase the population, ideally, governments would give women a financial safety net so that if they choose or have to leave their partner, or if they want to spend years at home looking after kids, they're not absolutely fucked as a result. I really believe this would work but it would be complicated and expensive thing to put in place. Unfortunately, that would be so radical that i can't see it happening.

Instead, their other option, which has already been tried & tested, is to take punitive action against those who don't have children, to make it so financially difficult for them that people, especially women, feel like they have to have children. A sad looking future ahead.

Wellthisisdifficult · 14/02/2026 11:22

It’s a difficult time to be a woman, Labour seem to want to do sod all about the influx of misogynistic fighting age men from cultures that have women whipped for being raped, or the preservation of British culture which holds equality as an ideal, the Green Party can’t even define a woman, let alone defend women’s rights -everything is subservient to Male whims.

As a package of rather take Reforms policies over Labours.

bemoresloth · 14/02/2026 11:23

Hereforthecommentz · 14/02/2026 11:10

You mean he wants incentives for having family's, future tax payers like a lot of countries. Not really radical.

Which countries have those incentives?

Russia, Hungary and Turkiye spring to mind.

Marmalademorning · 14/02/2026 11:24

Wellthisisdifficult · 14/02/2026 11:22

It’s a difficult time to be a woman, Labour seem to want to do sod all about the influx of misogynistic fighting age men from cultures that have women whipped for being raped, or the preservation of British culture which holds equality as an ideal, the Green Party can’t even define a woman, let alone defend women’s rights -everything is subservient to Male whims.

As a package of rather take Reforms policies over Labours.

I don’t like Labour or Reform. So I’m sticking with the Conservatives, even though I don’t think they will win. I like Kemi, and they align closest to my principles.

ThankYouNigel · 14/02/2026 11:25

Allisnotlost1 · 14/02/2026 11:13

Do you honestly think Reform care about you or your family?

TBH I don’t think any political parties do, their focus is on money and materialism. Partly why my family has refers to rely on ourselves and support each other.

RichardOnslowRoper · 14/02/2026 11:26

FourCheese · 14/02/2026 11:21

28 is standard age, not young. That’s 10 years of adulthood. Average ftm age is 28-30 region

In London, it seems young. Most of my friends had kids after 35.

Velentia · 14/02/2026 11:26

Is that nonsense Reform UK Policy or just one candidate talking through the back of his neck?
Please stop with the abortion hysteria. Can't happen so Won't happen.

exse24Londoner · 14/02/2026 11:26

try telling that to the average Nextdoor (the app) or Daily Mail reader who think that Reform are they new saviours. Here you are preaching to the choir

ThankYouNigel · 14/02/2026 11:28

rainingsnoring · 14/02/2026 10:56

They are not speaking up for women, far from it.
What policies have Reform put forward to make life easier for young women or young families. Nige was very recently criticising lazy people who work at home. Do you think that was a family friendly policy?

Their policies around 25% transferable marriage tax allowance and front loading child benefit during the first 4 years (which are the expensive ones!) are fantastic!

ObsessiveGoogler · 14/02/2026 11:28

It’s also worth pointing out that pro-natalist policies are very rarely effective and have a minimal and often temporary effect on fertility. They tend to tinker around the edges of the root causes for low fertility which are complex and deeply embedded.

CelestialCandyfloss · 14/02/2026 11:29

Fck fascist Reform, and Fck the Patriarchy!
young women need to use their power to live their lives EXACTLY how they want. The time for men dictating to us is OVER.

Goldenbear · 14/02/2026 11:30

StandFirm · 14/02/2026 10:43

They bloody well should vote themselves out of the gene pool.

😂

DeftGoldHedgehog · 14/02/2026 11:30

What about young men not wanting kids?

I guess they want young women to have kids with older men in their middle aged man fantasy world.

StandFirm · 14/02/2026 11:30

Jk987 · 14/02/2026 11:04

He can put as much pressure as wants but that still wouldn’t have magically made me meet my partner at 23! Thank god I didn’t have kids with my then boyfriend 😬

By the way where’s the link to show that he really did say this?

The point is: it's a whole ecosystem that the Christian Taliban want to build. In Project 2026, they float the idea of mandated church attendance. The whole point of girls no longer going to college would be that young marriages would be set up through the church community and church events. The social pressure would be immense.

I keep referring back to the Heritage Foundation because when it comes to the culture wars, Reform has 0 original thought in the matter - and it's the same with the other European populist parties. Look up who attends the HF conventions in Europe and you'll get the list.

I am so vocal about this because I care about my faith. I am a Christian. I go to church very regularly (no need to coerce me) - and that's the point. My little community is full of kind people who go there because it's something we enjoy doing and thinking about the Christian message is part of what we like to do. There is NO POINT and NOTHING GOOD about destroying our kids' prospects. My DDs are a part of the community. They will have to find their own way in life and I hope they're well set up to make the right choices for themselves. That's why we have free will, by the way. God does not want slaves or robots.