Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Distressing thread titles.

83 replies

itsmeafterall · 05/02/2026 16:07

I don't think iIABU but there seems to have been a recent sharp rise in really distressing thread titles -without a trigger warning. By the time I've read them it's too bloody late.

There is so much terrible content on the internet at the moment - especially with the Epstein shit in spades so, sadly, plenty of grim material to discuss. Not saying it shouldn't be raised, but a TW should be used.

AIBU in asking people to be a lot more
Thoughtful when posting - MN can't be asked to be in top of editing with immediate turnaround.

TW coming up of a recent example below.

Im referring to titles like the one I just saw about a woman having her spine broken on video. Seriously grim.

@mnhq please can I ask you to issue a reminder to people to be more careful?

OP posts:
MyThreeWords · 06/02/2026 17:47

The thread title mentioned in the OP is indeed distressing. I hid it, and I hardly ever hide threads.
But not in a million years would I think that the person who started that thread should have avoided the distressing words.
It is in the nature of a public place that there will be people whose sensitivities and tolerances are different from yours, and that you will encounter things that are upsetting, disturbing, offensive, etc.
It is amazing how much more censorious people are than they were just ten or twenty years ago.

Alltheyellowbirds · 06/02/2026 18:02

I just don’t see how this would work. You can warn people that the contents of the thread might be disturbing by putting TW in the title so they have a choice not to open it. But as you can’t pre-warn them not to look at the title itself the only way to avoid upset is to keep it so bland and vague we wouldn’t know what the thread was actually about.

No-one’s got time to be opening random threads on the off chance they might be of interest so these threads would end up with no traffic. The title’s the hook, without that… Which would be a shame for threads raising awareness of important topics, or by posters who really need support.

There are a lot of subjects I find upsetting, conception for instance, and various types of bereavement. I scroll quickly past these posts quickly and don’t open them - and I hide them if they keep appearing. But if they were actually medically triggering to me so that the very sight of the title would be too much to bear, then I wouldn’t be scrolling around on a general forum or frankly on the internet at all.

It’s not on the world to edit itself to protect me from my personal issues, it’s on me to stay away until I’ve worked on ways to deal with them.

Alltheyellowbirds · 06/02/2026 18:03

duplicate post.

Alltheyellowbirds · 06/02/2026 18:11

pinkdelight · 06/02/2026 06:57

Disagree with the ‘sensitive topics’ area. Makes us like women from an era who needed smelling salts for when we fainted at anything beyond embroidery and kittens. It’s a site for adults about the whole spectrum of matters. If someone is sensitive, they can stay in Chat or stay in their cotton wool away from the site. It’s ridiculous and patronising to have a sensitive topic section of a women’s site in 2026. Like we shouldn’t be discussing the state of the world and leave it to the men with their cigars.

Hard agree. Please, please no.

BlimeyOReillyO · 06/02/2026 18:17

Alltheyellowbirds · 06/02/2026 18:11

Hard agree. Please, please no.

Same

Alltheyellowbirds · 06/02/2026 18:20

BauhausOfEliott · 06/02/2026 16:19

Trigger warnings aren't supposed to warn people that they might see an upsetting word. They are supposed to warn people with PTSD about specific subjects which they might want to avoid reading about in more detail.

Your trigger warning, which was "TW coming up of a recent example below" is meaningless and therefore unhelpful because it doesn't actually tell people what the triggering subject matter might be.

If someone has PTSD about (eg) child abuse, they are helped by a trigger warning that says 'TW - child abuse' because they then know that a post is going to be about a subject they would rather avoid.

But if someone just says 'TW, distressing' that is of zero help to anyone, because it doesn't tell someone whether it might trigger them or not and they have no idea whether they can read it.

Also, people really need to know that merely being upset, sad or disgusted about something isn't being 'triggered'. Being 'triggered' is specifically about seeing something that induces PTSD symptoms because it reminds someone of something that happened to them - eg soldiers being extremely agitated by the sound of fireworks because it reminds them of guns or shelling.

All of this.

”Triggered” doesn’t mean “I found that a bit gross” or “it made me feel squeamish or sad”. It’s so undermining to those with actual PTSD to bandy the word around any time something makes you feel a bit uncomfortable.

And slapping “trigger warning” on everything the way people do now is of absolutely no use anyway! You have to actually SPECIFY what the trigger is that you’re warning about.

MoonWoman69 · 06/02/2026 22:27

Are you always this oversensitive? Life isn't all pink and fluffy. I think you need to stay away from the Internet, maybe watch daytime fluffy dramas instead?

echt · 07/02/2026 07:08

A Sensitive Topics area on MN would only result in such posters coming back to AIBU because no-one would go on that topic. They wouldn't get the attention.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread