Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To remind people about Highway Code rule H2?

148 replies

auserna · 02/02/2026 19:09

Because about 90% of drivers seem either to be unaware of it or just ignore it and, as a pedestrian, it's fucking irritating! I particularly object to being beeped at when I've already started crossing and a car subsequently swings round the corner.

"Rule H2 of the UK Highway Code mandates that drivers, motorcyclists, horse riders, and cyclists must give way to pedestrians crossing or waiting to cross a road into which or from which they are turning. This rule, introduced to enhance pedestrian safety at junctions, applies to both major and minor road turns."

I'd be interested to know who wasn't already aware of this.

OP posts:
EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:04

ThejoyofNC · 02/02/2026 19:55

So what do you want people to do, risk an accident so you can cross the road?

I won't be coming round a bend and then stopping dead in the road for another car to slam into the back of me. You'll have to wait.

If the pedestrian is already in the road, you should stop. And if you do not, you should not be driving.

menopausalmare · 02/02/2026 20:05

I know about the rule but it's dangerous to stop on a main road to allow a pedestrian across when they are staring down at their phone and completely oblivious to the traffic around them.

EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:07

menopausalmare · 02/02/2026 20:05

I know about the rule but it's dangerous to stop on a main road to allow a pedestrian across when they are staring down at their phone and completely oblivious to the traffic around them.

How is it dangerous? If you are driving on a main road and about to turn into a side street, you should be slowing down and signalling. If other cars, cyclists or pedestrians have right away and you turning in will cut across their path, you should be stopping. If you cannot do that. You should not be behind the wheel of a car.

The dangerous person in this scenario is you. The person who does not how to safely manoeuvre or stop.

ThejoyofNC · 02/02/2026 20:07

EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:04

If the pedestrian is already in the road, you should stop. And if you do not, you should not be driving.

Read the OP. It doesn't say only when they're already in the road. It says if they're waiting to cross.

ThisIsAGlobalPlayerOriginalPodcast · 02/02/2026 20:08

What? I’ll obviously stop if they are crossing the road but I’m not grinding to a halt if they’re still on the pavement waiting to cross (staring at their phone).

ThisIsAGlobalPlayerOriginalPodcast · 02/02/2026 20:09

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:10

ThejoyofNC · 02/02/2026 20:07

Read the OP. It doesn't say only when they're already in the road. It says if they're waiting to cross.

If they are clearly about the step into the road, which is what the rule clarifies, they have right of way and you should be slowing to a stop. Exactly the same as if they are already in the road.

Why would you not do this? I assume you slow as you approach and amber light about to turn red? Or if you see someone about to step onto a zebra crossing?

In these scenarios you are on road where the speed is 20mph or 30mph. You should also be slowing before making the turn. You do not turn at full speed into a side street.

EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I know. I made a minor typo on my phone.

The point still stands. The pedestrian has right of way in this situation.

EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:12

Middletoleft · 02/02/2026 19:11

I've known about it for ages but you have to remember that a fair percentage of drivers ignore most of the Highway Code, not just that rule.

Sadly, this appears to be true.

dudsville · 02/02/2026 20:14

I don't drive and I HATE this rule. I respect that it will offer more protection to a lot of pedestrians, but I want to wait. I don't trust the rule. I don't even like it when someone waves me across - there are cars, etc., coming the other way, I don't want to stand in the middle, and I don't want to burst into a trot with my dodgy knee and ankles, but also did you wave me across is is there a fly in your car, or are you gesturing to your own internal monologue, when the sun is hitting your windscreen I can't tell if you can see me... My grievance list is long. If I get to a corner and I look left and right and I can see a car waiting to turn across me then I check the traffic and if they're about to get a window to make their turn then I get out my phone and turn away from the crossing until they've done their bit.

soupyspoon · 02/02/2026 20:18

HeddaGarbled · 02/02/2026 19:52

It’s new and people haven’t got used to it yet. Think how long it took for drink driving and not using seatbelts and letting children roam free all over the back seat to become socially unacceptable, and they were laws not just guidance.

How long have you been driving?

Its not new.

Thewonderfuleveryday · 02/02/2026 20:21

I'm a pedestrian. I hate this rule and ignore it.

I don't want cars to slow down and make my crossing harder. I wait for them to all be out of the way before I move. I've had a couple of drivers get shitty with me at busy junctions but I refuse to risk my safety crossing between cars.

daisychain01 · 02/02/2026 20:24

CaptainCarrotsBigSword · 02/02/2026 19:20

Same - I have sat at a junction frantically signalling to a pedestrian to cross many a time!

And that's OK, it has taken you one or two nanoseconds to frantically wave. Eventually they get it and cross the road, and you've averted a nasty accident.

it can take years for changes to the Highway Code to actually get into common use and people's consciousness. Until then it's about more people reinforcing the Code to get it into use.

I noticed how quickly cars changed to give me a wider 1.5 M margin when I'm cycling, which was also a recent change in the Highway Code. it was almost overnight, so for some rules it seems to stick more than others.

Thewonderfuleveryday · 02/02/2026 20:25

dud same! When it's busy and I notice a driver slowing down for me I just think fuck 'em and step back and pretend I'm looking at my phone. I wait for the drivers to go then cross when it's safe.

soupyspoon · 02/02/2026 20:29

Thewonderfuleveryday · 02/02/2026 20:21

I'm a pedestrian. I hate this rule and ignore it.

I don't want cars to slow down and make my crossing harder. I wait for them to all be out of the way before I move. I've had a couple of drivers get shitty with me at busy junctions but I refuse to risk my safety crossing between cars.

Yes as a pedestrian I would rather wait until the road is clear so I understand that

NewPapaGuinea · 02/02/2026 20:30

Should paint zebra crossings at every junction. Would be obvious for everyone then.

ThejoyofNC · 02/02/2026 20:30

EsmeSusanOgg · 02/02/2026 20:10

If they are clearly about the step into the road, which is what the rule clarifies, they have right of way and you should be slowing to a stop. Exactly the same as if they are already in the road.

Why would you not do this? I assume you slow as you approach and amber light about to turn red? Or if you see someone about to step onto a zebra crossing?

In these scenarios you are on road where the speed is 20mph or 30mph. You should also be slowing before making the turn. You do not turn at full speed into a side street.

Why on earth should pedestrians get right of way on a road when it's drivers who pay the bloody road tax?!

Anyway I've never heard of the rule so they're not doing a very good job of making drivers aware.

TreadLight · 02/02/2026 20:35

menopausalmare · 02/02/2026 20:05

I know about the rule but it's dangerous to stop on a main road to allow a pedestrian across when they are staring down at their phone and completely oblivious to the traffic around them.

Just as it’s dangerous to stop when you are turning right into side road and there is oncoming traffic

RhaenysRocks · 02/02/2026 20:40

If you are approaching a left hand turn, you might be able to see there's someone waiting to cross the side road from the side you're approaching from, but the car behind you can't so will likely assume you're going to sweep straight round and not decelerate and risks ploughing into the back of you. I know stopping distance etc but we're talking reality here, not theory. In the end, if the aim is to avoid the most accidents for all,I still think it's safer for pedestrians to wait.

auserna · 02/02/2026 20:40

HappiestSleeping · 02/02/2026 19:32

It isn't a new addition. The rule has always been that the strong give way to the weak so to speak. The only change was that the wording was clarified to make it clearer.

I agree that it doesn't seem to have worked, either because pedestrians don't know, don't trust it (don't blame them), or trust it too much by leaping out regardless.

As a pedestrian I am always cautious as it seems a bit Brittas to do anything less, and may well end up with the phrase "I had right of way" engraved on my tombstone.

Edited

No, it's not new. I believe they just adjusted the wording slightly.

So pedestrians have always had right of way, not that you'd think that from the number of cars that don't stop when you're clearly waiting to cross.

OP posts:
NewPapaGuinea · 02/02/2026 20:41

ThejoyofNC · 02/02/2026 20:30

Why on earth should pedestrians get right of way on a road when it's drivers who pay the bloody road tax?!

Anyway I've never heard of the rule so they're not doing a very good job of making drivers aware.

What a stinky and selfish attitude. Besides pedestrians also pay “road tax” through council tax.

soupyspoon · 02/02/2026 20:43

RhaenysRocks · 02/02/2026 20:40

If you are approaching a left hand turn, you might be able to see there's someone waiting to cross the side road from the side you're approaching from, but the car behind you can't so will likely assume you're going to sweep straight round and not decelerate and risks ploughing into the back of you. I know stopping distance etc but we're talking reality here, not theory. In the end, if the aim is to avoid the most accidents for all,I still think it's safer for pedestrians to wait.

Yes Im always worried about this, someone went into the back of me once (not in this context) and its always made me wary since.

auserna · 02/02/2026 20:45

ThejoyofNC · 02/02/2026 20:30

Why on earth should pedestrians get right of way on a road when it's drivers who pay the bloody road tax?!

Anyway I've never heard of the rule so they're not doing a very good job of making drivers aware.

Well given that road tax was abolished in 1937 perhaps it's you who should make more effort to keep yourself aware. Or do you expect someone to come round and personally read the Highway Code to you?

OP posts:
HappiestSleeping · 02/02/2026 20:46

auserna · 02/02/2026 20:40

No, it's not new. I believe they just adjusted the wording slightly.

So pedestrians have always had right of way, not that you'd think that from the number of cars that don't stop when you're clearly waiting to cross.

I can't recall how it was worded, but I did my test in 1987 and it was there then.

NewPapaGuinea · 02/02/2026 20:46

RhaenysRocks · 02/02/2026 20:40

If you are approaching a left hand turn, you might be able to see there's someone waiting to cross the side road from the side you're approaching from, but the car behind you can't so will likely assume you're going to sweep straight round and not decelerate and risks ploughing into the back of you. I know stopping distance etc but we're talking reality here, not theory. In the end, if the aim is to avoid the most accidents for all,I still think it's safer for pedestrians to wait.

Then that driver is driving way too close. Can’t blame the pedestrian for their incompetence.