Struggling to work out whether I’m overreacting or my husband is being inconsiderate. Basically had an argument over something small that turned into a bigger tiff
We agreed to go for a walk together after dinner. We had dinner and it was about 6:30. I said shall we go and he said he was watching something first, I said ok shall we do 7? He agreed. 7 comes and goes, he says let’s go at 7:15. Ok I say, 7:15. 7:15 comes and he still isn’t ready. I ask how much longer and he says the tv programme isn’t over til 8 and I said sod it I’ll go myself so I went out. I phoned him after about 10 mins asking if he’s sure he doesn’t want to join as I wasn’t too far from home, he said not unless I come back for him. It’s getting quite dark at this point so I said I’ll carry on. But I was a bit surprised he wasn’t worried about me being out in the dark on my own as well.
When I came home I told him I was disappointed that he wasn’t ready for when we agreed. He said if I let him finish his sentence he would have said he was just getting changed and lost track of time and he would be ready in 5 minutes but I stormed off. He said as I didn’t have any other plans this evening it shouldn’t matter whether we got at 7, half 7 or even 8pm as it’s not like we made commitments to meet anyone or be anywhere and that my time isn’t that important that we have to leave at that exact minute and that I need to be more flexible. Whereas I think if you say you’ll be ready for a certain time, you should be ready for a certain time, otherwise what’s the point of agreeing a time in the first place? Or is this no longer a thing??
Just feeling a bit miffed especially as he said he’s not apologising for that as being late for a walk is ridiculous and that I’m coming across as controlling. Or am I just a stickler for timing? Also he asked if I was going for a shower because I had been on 3 walks today and I smell a bit, so that was charming!