No. Protesting the law would be protesting outside congress or the senate. It involves lobbying your elected officials.
Protesting the law has never only meant standing outside Congress and politely lobbying politicians. A lot of protest has always been about stopping harm where it’s actually happening. If the harm comes from how a law is enforced, then protesting enforcement makes sense.
”Officials” - is a stretch. It implies ICE are some properly vetted, properly trained law enforcement body. Plenty of evidence that this is not the case, not least their complete inability to de-escalate a situation.
‘Their job’ - some examples of which (all easily verifiable from credible sources):
- Detained a 5-year-old child despite no warrant, no removal order and no legal necessity, raising clear due process concerns under the Fifth Amendment. Look up Liam Ramos
- ICE removed a 2-year-old child, Chloe Renata Tipan Villacis, from Minnesota to a Texas detention facility in direct violation of a federal judge’s order, undermining judicial authority and due process
- Too many examples to list where ICE has detained US citizens after failing to verify identity, holding them without legal basis. These have been recognised as unconstitutional seizures under the Fourth Amendment. Look up Marco-Antonio Lopez Garcia
- Federal courts have ruled that ICE agents carried out warrantless home entries and arrests without probable cause, violating Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Examples here
- Judges have found ICE actions violated First Amendment rights by detaining, pepper-spraying or intimidating peaceful protesters and legal observers engaged in constitutionally protected activity.
- ICE has detained people lawfully present in the US, including asylum seekers with active cases and no removal orders, despite lacking statutory authority to do so
Did you see the size of the protests in Minnesota? Have you listened to the first person accounts coming out from there? The people setting up food pantries to feed neighbours too scared to go food shopping? The volunteers standing outside kindergartens and elementary schools to try to ensure ICE don’t pick up any more children on the basis of brown skin and not much more? Have you heard the stories of those who have been detained?
Do you really think they’re still at a point where politely emailing their representative is going to do anything.
Do you honestly think ‘comply or get shot repeatedly in the head’ is a fair enough state of play.
Worth pointing out that I’ve tried to give examples where ICE have acted outwith their legal mandate and detained people legally entitled to be there, but EVEN if these people were not legally there it’s still not ok to treat them this way. Your concern for following the democratic process and acting within the correct legal framework is somewhat misplaced here don’t you think? It’s not only on ‘the people’ to follow the law , where’s your concern for what these so called ‘officials’ are doing?