Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How the hell does this happen? Not one of them thought it was weird they were waiting?

127 replies

BornSlippie · 19/01/2026 22:24

38 passengers stood in a stairwell for 40 minutes at Manchester airport this morning. The plane left without them and their baggage was not removed which is a massive safety breach!

Don’t worry though they got a £10 voucher each 🤣 https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/the-planes-gone-passengers-left-33257487?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAPbir5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeAqOm9yuYVQTfweKxPdgDKwGxdwgjiarz8_vB55gJqJk8HncFATD-xsXorQc_aem_iBTnS8LxhFBb9b_keY9AeA#Echobox=1768825840 if its behinds pay wall (it shouldn’t be) I have another article

'Gobsmacked' passengers 'left behind' by Jet2 flight at Manchester Airport

"It's unfathomable. I don't even think this has ever happened before."

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/the-planes-gone-passengers-left-33257487?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRleAPbir5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeAqOm9yuYVQTfweKxPdgDKwGxdwgjiarz8_vB55gJqJk8HncFATD-xsXorQc_aem_iBTnS8LxhFBb9b_keY9AeA#Echobox=1768825840

OP posts:
problembottom · 20/01/2026 15:41

As a regular Manchester Airport short haul passenger, to have to wait on stairwells for ages like this isn't usual and there are never any crew around at this point.

I'm amazed the cabin crew didn't notice the missing chunk of passengers though? What happened to the headcount? What a shitshow, I'd be furious.

Presume they'll have to stick them on a flight with BA or Iberia or anyone flying to Alicante today, or nearby and bus them, unless they're lucky enough to have another Jet2 flight going there that isn't too full (unlikely).

Fends · 20/01/2026 15:47

Havanananana · 20/01/2026 15:39

Any manifest that I have ever seen has not only the exact number of expected passengers, but also their names. The initial pre-flight document is based on booking information and is used by the flight crew to calculate how much fuel is needed, and also for mundane things like how much coffee, water, snacks etc. needs to be ordered in advance. At this point the crew will not yet know how many no-show passengers there might be, but they plan according to the booking information available at the time.

Once everyone has checked in and passed the boarding gate there is a second manifest document. Modern systems track the progress of passengers as they move through the airport. Even if they have no baggage and have checked in online, their boarding passes are scanned when they enter Airside at the security point, and scanned again when they pass the boarding desk. The second document - i.e. the live manifest that is produced after everyone has passed the boarding desk - tells the crew exactly who is supposed to have boarded the flight and how many passengers should be on board. If people are delayed in traffic, a bus breaks down or they simply fall asleep in Wetherspoons, then they won't appear on the live manifest as they will not have passed the boarding desk and their boarding cards will not have been scanned. Similarly, anyone who is on stand-by and who is given a last-minute seat will not have appeared on the first manifest, but will appear on the second, live document. It doesn't matter if the flight has 50 or 500 passengers, everyone is supposed to be accounted for, and the cabin manager has the responsibilty for ensuring that they know exactly how many people are on board and should be experienced enough to be able to spot if the flight has almost 40 passengers fewer than expected.

This is important for security reasons, so that nobody can check in a suitcase with a bomb in it and then not take the flight. If a passenger checks their luggage in but then fails to pass the boarding desk, then their bag is taken off the aircraft.

They didn’t “fail to pass the boarding desk”.

Not all airlines do a headcount on the plane. 38 empty seats scattered about a plane is not necessarily immediately obvious that something has gone wrong.

What is so difficult to understand?

AnSolas · 20/01/2026 15:53

notimagain · 20/01/2026 14:26

If no staff on the plane has been given responsibility to check that the passengers who checked in a possible bomb are on the flight the airline has designed a rather large hole in the security.

The responsibility for doing exactly that has been delegated at many places to the ground staff, usually in the form of the semi-automated jetty head boarding pass swipe and TBH is probably better done by them at that stage than relying on the cabin crew using mark one eyeball on the nth rushed turn of a multi sector day..

There are also real limitations to how useful or practical headcounts are, especially when you start handling maybe 500 passengers plus on some Long Haul flights....good luck clicking that lot.

The system usually works very very well...that it got fouled up spectacularly at Manchester is down to that airport's management.

Nope-a-de-nope on down to airports management.

Its firstly the airline.
"Rush" is another term for not spending the cash needed to have safely loaded the plane

The airline is flying into multiple airports under multiple managment. So their security staff are in the position of looking at a range of weakness which each loading design may throw up by having a control to counteract any flaws.
The airlines secuity function allowed the plane to take off missing "boarded" who had loaded luggage.
The airline allowed a process to evolve which breaks the flow between the gate and the plane. So either there was no control process or the control process failed.

End of day: blaming a "subcontractor" partner should not be any kind of a get out of jail card for the airline.

The Airport and the staff involved dont get a free pass as it should not be possible to "hide" one "boaded" let alone that many.

First question is was the stairwell unsecurable or unsecured?

If it was unsecurable neither the airline nor the airport should have allowed it to be used the way it was.

If it was unsecured then it needs an investigation to find out why and how future security breaches can be prevented.

TheNightingalesStarling · 20/01/2026 15:54

It wouldn't be 38 random seats though... passengers especially on a holiday airline tend to be in groups. So it would be whole rows empty.

Havanananana · 20/01/2026 15:54

@Fends "I am not understanding your point that a flight with a possible capacity for 300 and generally flying with around 90% full seats, would be alarmingly and obviously missing passengers because 10% of its seats were empty" 🤔

The cabin manager will have been told exactly how many passengers should have boarded based on the number of scanned boarding passes. If the flight was "full" then the number of empty seats should have been noticed. If the flight was "90% full" then it should have been clear that there were 70 empty seats instead of the expected 30 empty seats (on a 300-seat aircraft). The cabin manager is the most experienced cabin crew member and should have enough experience to notice this discrepency and in any case, if the final manifest states "270 passengers" (or whatever) then the cabin manager has to be satisfied that this is the actual number of passengers actually on board.

Modern aircraft also have automatic weighing systems - i.e. the pilot can see the actual weight of the load (passengers plus baggage). If there are 38 passengers missing, then the aircraft will be showing a discrepency of around 3,200kg compared with the expected weight (38 passengers x approx 80kg). Pilots are supposed to check this, usually as a precaution against trying to take off when overweight, but should also query if the system is showing a weight that is far under the expected load weight. Either some of the passengers or luggage is missing, or the system is possibly faulty.

Do you really want to fly on any aircraft on which the crew does not know exactly how many and who is on board?

notimagain · 20/01/2026 16:02

Havanananana · 20/01/2026 15:39

Any manifest that I have ever seen has not only the exact number of expected passengers, but also their names. The initial pre-flight document is based on booking information and is used by the flight crew to calculate how much fuel is needed, and also for mundane things like how much coffee, water, snacks etc. needs to be ordered in advance. At this point the crew will not yet know how many no-show passengers there might be, but they plan according to the booking information available at the time.

Once everyone has checked in and passed the boarding gate there is a second manifest document. Modern systems track the progress of passengers as they move through the airport. Even if they have no baggage and have checked in online, their boarding passes are scanned when they enter Airside at the security point, and scanned again when they pass the boarding desk. The second document - i.e. the live manifest that is produced after everyone has passed the boarding desk - tells the crew exactly who is supposed to have boarded the flight and how many passengers should be on board. If people are delayed in traffic, a bus breaks down or they simply fall asleep in Wetherspoons, then they won't appear on the live manifest as they will not have passed the boarding desk and their boarding cards will not have been scanned. Similarly, anyone who is on stand-by and who is given a last-minute seat will not have appeared on the first manifest, but will appear on the second, live document. It doesn't matter if the flight has 50 or 500 passengers, everyone is supposed to be accounted for, and the cabin manager has the responsibilty for ensuring that they know exactly how many people are on board and should be experienced enough to be able to spot if the flight has almost 40 passengers fewer than expected.

This is important for security reasons, so that nobody can check in a suitcase with a bomb in it and then not take the flight. If a passenger checks their luggage in but then fails to pass the boarding desk, then their bag is taken off the aircraft.

Honestly,.and you're going to have to trust me on this,.I do know how this works or at least was meant to work at the outfit(s) I worked for...

The basic airside.processes and load/balance paperwork by their nature are all.pretty similar, "manifests" differ.

Edit to add: can.you please name a modern aircraft where there's active weight measuring going on..it's always been just around the corner but never considered reliable enough.

Imlyingandthatsthetruth · 20/01/2026 16:02

I wish the airlines would stop this nonsense where they hassle everyone through the gate only to stand in the stairwell, waiting to board. More than once I've been waiting while they make the "last call..." announcement and the plane isn't even there to board! I assume its all so that the airline can say everyine "boarded" on time because they had left the gate for airside, and sod the "customers", included elderly, parents with young kids, disabled, who have to stand for half an hour.

Grrr.

Miyagi99 · 20/01/2026 16:03

We’ve waited 30 minutes in a stairwell before, it was boiling but none of us thought the plane would go without us, you just do as instructed in the airport, I assume both doors were closed.

Thechaseison71 · 20/01/2026 16:09

Fends · 20/01/2026 15:47

They didn’t “fail to pass the boarding desk”.

Not all airlines do a headcount on the plane. 38 empty seats scattered about a plane is not necessarily immediately obvious that something has gone wrong.

What is so difficult to understand?

It's unlikely they'd be randomly scattered though as people travelling together would've been together in the stairwells. So there would be empty rows

Havanananana · 20/01/2026 16:22

notimagain · 20/01/2026 16:02

Honestly,.and you're going to have to trust me on this,.I do know how this works or at least was meant to work at the outfit(s) I worked for...

The basic airside.processes and load/balance paperwork by their nature are all.pretty similar, "manifests" differ.

Edit to add: can.you please name a modern aircraft where there's active weight measuring going on..it's always been just around the corner but never considered reliable enough.

Edited

I'm not going to disagree with you - I'm just stating my experience, which is different to yours.

For the avoidance of doubt, I'm not throwing Jet2 under the bus. There would appear to be any number of points at which the process for boarding and dispacthing this particular flight seem to have gone wrong.

Somehow 38 passengers ended up in a stairwell, which might have been the correct stairwell or the wrong one - either way, they should not have been able to get there or if it was the correct stair well, they should not have been abandoned there. Clearly not the fault of Jet2.

My issue with Jet2 is that this flight was a 189-seat aircraft, and if 38 passengers were missing, this should have been noticed by either the cabin manager (empty seats, or even speed of boarding) or the pilot (3,200 kg weight discrepency).

housethatbuiltme · 20/01/2026 16:29

The type of planes Jet2 uses to run this route holds approx. 190 passengers in single cabin compact formation (budget airline style).

So around 1/4th of the planes capacity checked in but was missing, you don't even need to do a head count to notice that a quarter of the plane is empty.

Tabitha005 · 20/01/2026 16:32

HeddaGarbled · 20/01/2026 00:22

Oh yeah, Ryanair staff are industry leaders in disappearing when there’s a problem.

If this had happened on a Ryanair flight, that odious little twat Michael Ryan would probably be invoicing the passengers his firm left behind for the cost of the drinks/snacks they may have consumed on board. I LOATHE Ryanair.

notimagain · 20/01/2026 16:41

Fair enough, we're in agreement on most of that, the exception being the claim that the pilots should have spotted it.

if the aircraft involved actually had an active weight measuring system and it was in use fair enough. I know such systems have been trialled over the years (especially in the cargo world) supposedly with mixed results...whether they have improved and are used to any or.an increasing degree in the airline world, don't know.

If Jet2 are now using such a system, OK, you have a point,.the 3ish tonnes should have been spotted...

if OTOH it's still being done the traditional way and their crews are still typing into the onboard systems values such as Zero Fuel Weight by hand, using the numbers off the loadsheet, then they won't trap the sort of loading error they had here.

I guess we will have wait and see if more is revealed.

beAsensible1 · 20/01/2026 17:02

Airlines focused on using staff as revenue generators rather than in a safety and operational focus like they are meant to.

poor flow and lax security it airports. Passengers should not be queueing on stairs for long periods of times it’s extremely unsafe let alone random unmanned stairwells in boarding area. What a joke.

as if ‘subcontractors’ are not subject to the same rules and scrutiny of direct staff.

OnGoldenPond · 20/01/2026 17:24

BringBackCatsEyes · 20/01/2026 03:33

If they’ve gone through the ticket check at the gate then I don’t think there is another official check, they only look at your ticket when you board to send you to the right seat. Obviously that needs to change!
We were stood in a passenger tunnel thing for ages coming back from Lanzarote last year. There was no air of “this is a long wait” or “I hope they don’t go without us”

Been travelling with EasyJet very frequently recently and not once have they checked my boarding pass when I actually got on the plane. They’ve never done this in the many years I have used them. They do, however, always walk down the gangway doing a headcount just before the doors are closed.

similarminimer · 20/01/2026 18:40

Whatever the cause - it's clearly fucking dangerous to have a loophole wherby 'boarded' passengers could hide and not get on the plane and noone notice and the plane take off with their luggage on board. And that's Jet2s problem and Manchester airports problem

HereForTheFreeLunch · 20/01/2026 18:54

40 unexpected empty seats and no one noticed!!!
The plane must have been about 2000 kilos lighter - maybe not much as a % but I thought weight was measured precisely.

HereForTheFreeLunch · 20/01/2026 18:54

Oops! Duplicate post

EasternStandard · 20/01/2026 19:03

I don’t get your thread title asking the people to realise. We’ve waited for ages in a stair well for a flight before then got on.

EasternStandard · 20/01/2026 19:04

Miyagi99 · 20/01/2026 16:03

We’ve waited 30 minutes in a stairwell before, it was boiling but none of us thought the plane would go without us, you just do as instructed in the airport, I assume both doors were closed.

Edited

Same

notimagain · 20/01/2026 19:25

HereForTheFreeLunch · 20/01/2026 18:54

40 unexpected empty seats and no one noticed!!!
The plane must have been about 2000 kilos lighter - maybe not much as a % but I thought weight was measured precisely.

The.weight has been the subject of.previous debate.

Traditionally, generally, there is has been no real time weighing of aircraft going on during loading...the overall weight needs to be known for.performance reasons but is usually derived by summing the measured weight of fuel with the known or assumed weights, as applicable, for things like the hull, cargo, passengers etc...that normally works well enough, but it's true that if passengers numbers are wrong the calculated overall weight is out and the crew may never know.

A previous poster has mentioned some aircraft can weigh themselves....now I know that has been trialled over the years but where that's got to, whether it's now widely in use or used by Jet2, don't know.

If you did have instantaneous measured weight available the underload should have been obvious, but to remphasise there's no info I've seen that it was available here, and if it was not available there's no way for the flight crew to spot the underload.

ETA: an.unknown underload of several tonnes isn"t great but not the end of the world...the bigger problem would be if the missing passengers shifted the aircraft's centre of gravity (balance point) significantly from where it was supposed to be.

BellissimoGecko · 20/01/2026 19:29

What could they have done? There are delays. You can be standing in a stairwell for a while waiting to board. The door is usually shut behind you, and you’re in a queue. If you go back to ask what’s happening, you lose your place. And you often can’t see the door out or see what’s happening outside.

i don’t think it’s fair to blame these people.

Airline is totally at fault though for not taking off the luggage OF 36 PEOPLE. That’s scary.

Imlyingandthatsthetruth · 20/01/2026 20:04

Flying luggage wiithout the owning passenger is a major security breach and there will surely be an investigation into this. It's hard to see how Jet2 aren't going to be held responsible; whatever else happened they loaded the luggage and didn't load the passengers. Someone's going to be in big trouble.

FieldInWhichFucksAreGrownIsBarren · 20/01/2026 20:10

Because this is what happens at airports, you basically get treat like shit and kept as uninformed as possible because if you dare to air your distaste you are threatened with not being allowed to travel.
Captive audience.

Topseyt123 · 21/01/2026 03:39

It's not remotely unusual to be left waiting in stairwells at airports for this length of time.

It has happened to us a number of times at the departure gate. You can't go back because the doors will be closed anyway. You can't go forward and out to board the aircraft because the airside doors are also closed and there are no staff with you in said stairwell at that point.

I've not had the experience of the aircraft actually departing and leaving this many passengers behind but I would say that Jet2 must be totally and 100% at fault here. These were checked in passengers whose boarding passes had been scanned at the required intervals throughout the airport and whose baggage had been loaded into the hold.

It's a major security risk carrying baggage without passengers without a special permission or prior arrangement for doing so. It obviously does have to happen occasionally - one of our cases was once left behind at Stansted Airport and had to be flown out to us at our destination on the next available flight to put the error right.

I hope they fully compensate these people.