Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think there shouldn't be a right to *protest*

185 replies

Bathingnow · 13/01/2026 13:24

People constantly repeat that the right to protest is some kind of sacred democratic principle that must be protected at all costs. I genuinely do not understand why this is taken as an unquestionable truth. What about the rights of everyone else? What about the right to go to work, get children to school, attend hospital appointments, or simply go about daily life without being obstructed, shouted at, or intimidated?

I fully support the right to dissent. People should be able to express views that challenge the government, corporations, or any other powerful body. That is a basic part of a free society. Free expression means being allowed to say unpopular things without fear of punishment. It does not mean having a free pass to disrupt other people’s lives or hold them hostage to your cause.

If you believe for example climate change is an emergency and the government should “just stop oil”, fine. Argue your case. Write letters to newspapers. Lobby MPs. Stand in Speaker’s Corner and shout yourself hoarse. Post endlessly on social media. Organise debates, whatever. All of that is legitimate and entirely compatible with democracy. None of it requires blocking roads, gluing yourself to infrastructure, or preventing ordinary people from getting where they need to be.

The idea that making life miserable for strangers somehow advances your cause is absurd. Blocking an ambulance, stopping a parent getting to work, or preventing someone from attending a funeral does not win hearts and minds. It just creates resentment. You are not enlightening people. You are inconveniencing them and expecting applause for it.

This applies to every issue, whether it is climate change, Gaza, housing, or anything else. A cause does not become morally superior simply because the people shouting about it feel very strongly. Once a protest crosses the line into infringing on other people’s civil liberties, it stops being a protest and starts being coercion.

Democracy should protect free speech and peaceful expression. It should also protect the public from disruption imposed by self appointed activists who believe their views trump everyone else’s rights. If exercising a so called right to protest requires trampling over the freedoms of others, then that right needs serious limits. I see no reason why the ability to disrupt daily life should be treated as some untouchable democratic virtue.

OP posts:
MyLimeGuide · 15/01/2026 09:29

AncientMarina · 13/01/2026 19:59

It's this kind of erudite contribution that wins hearts and minds.

If only we could all be this compelling and erudite there would be no need for protest marches and we could win our cases with the pen alone.

Thankyou, I always aim to please and inspire 😍

crackofdoom · 15/01/2026 18:21

Elleherd · 13/01/2026 16:24

You call us wheelchair warriors, cause we dare to kick up a fuss,
And we'll keep on inconveniencing you, ‘til you let us on the bus!"

Polite protests got us nowhere. Rights and equality bills got buried or talked out of time in parliament.

We couldn't travel by buses, coaches or tube trains and could only travel by mainline trains by giving several days notice, and in the guards van (without toilet access) IF there was considered enough space, and at the guards discretion.

Ramps and accessible transport would just be too difficult to create and expensive, and even if they did, we wouldn't get far once we got off public transport, they said.

We stopped being helpless cripples asking nicely, and became an actual issue and problem for some who could access the public transport all our taxes paid for.

Chaining ourselves to public transport that we couldn't get on and had no legal right to use, and bringing trains and Westminster Bridge to a standstill by civil disobedience, finally got a spotlight shined on our futile attempts at asking nicely.

It lead to the Conservative Minister for the Disabled, Sir Nicholas Scott, having to admit to and apologise for misleading MPs over the government’s underhand attempts to kill a (Labour) private members bill, to give disabled people equal rights.

That's what it took. No one cared until we made it as inconvenient and problematic for them as it was for us. I wish it wasn't the case. I wish we could have just been treated as fellow human beings, but society preferred platitudes and to ignore us.

What do we want? What you've got!
When do we want it? Now!

It also brought into focus that few police vans could take us, very few cells could accommodate us, and we couldn't get into many courts either. We had to be manhandled out of chairs to be taken anywhere. We where expected to stay home, pay our taxes and put up with it.

What we did was illegal, and inconvenienced many for short periods of time, (a secondary result) what was being done to us wasn't at all illegal, and inconvenienced us all day every day, but we weren't counted, until we made ourselves count and got the law changed.

It was only changed because the inconvenience we caused and the optics of people like us using our wonky bodies to demand the rights everyone else had, was too uncomfortable for many.

It took serious numbers of wheelchairs blocking celebrities cars at the 'Piss on Pity' protest to make celebrities realize we where sick of 'look at the poor things' telethons and being forced to beg charity for wheelchairs and that what they did perpetuated it.
We'd been telling them nicely for years. But was the optics that made them hear us.

I don't agree with many protests but I daresay they wouldn't have agreed with ours, so generally I'll support the freedom to take things to the streets.

You're an inspiration xx

Fernsrus · 15/01/2026 19:52

Another problem is, it now seems to be a short step from “protest is wrong” to let’s send in people like ICE in the US , and let’s start shooting. This is not who we are.

Fernsrus · 15/01/2026 19:54

I worry that people who come on here with domestic arguments about buses are really helping to pave the ground for Reform to behave like that in the UK. They wouldn’t admit it, if that were the case.

LoveMySushi · 16/01/2026 08:54

People dont care when they arent inconvenienced..

FrizzyFrizbee · 16/01/2026 09:08

“Once a protest crosses the line into infringing on other people’s civil liberties, it stops being a protest and starts being coercion.”

I agree with here OP. And those who state that writing to MPs doesn’t work are wrong, however, it takes dedication to a cause and plenty of people being energised into doing it, presenting reasoned arguments. In my experience, lobbying the media and being counter argue also helps. I speak from experience.

FrizzyFrizbee · 16/01/2026 09:21

Hoardasurass · 13/01/2026 14:17

Blocking roads and causing a public nuisance, being violent and using hate speach or threats isn't part of the right to protest, nor is weekly marches.
What needs to happen is anyone organising these inappropriate protests should be prosecuted along with those taking part

Yes, I think we should keep the right to protest, and the lines need to be drawn more clearly as to what those rights are exactly.

Lightwell · 16/01/2026 10:16

crackofdoom · 13/01/2026 13:40

I dunno....I suppose it depends whether you value being able to vote, having a weekend and an 8 hour work day, the existence of gay and disabled rights and being paid as much as men.

None of which came about without protest.

I also kind of like people not being able to own slaves, and people of colour being allowed on the same bus as me. It's also nice that places which were once unfairly colonised, often by the British, can have their independence, leading to a more emancipated world generally.

Oh and I like the fact that my stupid pink makeup doesn't always include rabbits being tortured to death and my medicine, while still injuring some animals in the making, keeps that to as strict a minimum as possible.

None of those have directly affected OP's right to go to TK Max when she feels like it, though, so yeah, maybe none of it matters.

1457bloom · 16/01/2026 11:44

The right to protest is similar to the right to Freedom of Speech. Sadly both are being eroded by the government due to pressure from people who don’t like what is being said and protested about.

Fernsrus · 16/01/2026 15:34

It is. It could get far worse under other, too, sadly.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread