Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask how you think this divorce may look?

124 replies

Questionstoask · 03/01/2026 19:48

  • 3 children under the age of 6
  • DH earns £260,000 per year roughly. This has increased since our relationship began.
  • Married for 2 years
  • Relationship of 10 years in total
  • Property equity of £400,000
  • SAHM since our youngest was born
  • House deposit came entirely from DH
  • DH works abroad for 1 week per month.
  • savings of approx £100k.

I know I need to speak this through with a solicitor.
Extremely likely DH will give near enough full custody to me (6 days per week).

Looking for thoughts and experiences of anyone else who’s been in a similar position.

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · 04/01/2026 09:50

ThereAreOnlyShadesOfGrey · 04/01/2026 06:06

I love how posters point things out as fact which they know nothing about.

I know plenty of high earners who don’t have high pensions because they’re so confident in their earnings that they say they’ll invest elsewhere, and then don’t.

Absolutely . My exh moved abroad to avoid paying CM . Very high earner but invested money in other stuff which went tits up .
Retired back home ( once DC were independent adults) and has a very modest life on State Pension.

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 09:52

Also people are assuming it’s the OP asking for/wanting the divorce but it could be her husband. She may not have much choice about getting divorced at this moment in time.

Elektra1 · 04/01/2026 09:52

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 09:50

Ah okay. How did you get a mortgage if you weren’t earning? Was it based on the maintenance payments? So you did get term spousal maintenance (ie not open ended). To clarify, that’s what I think the OP would get too but with a newborn I really don’t see how anyone can expect her to immediately go back to work. I think it would be expected within a few years though. I’d expect term maintenance and enough to buy a house. Which doesn’t sound a million miles from what you got when you divorced. I’d definitely not envisage her getting spousal maintenance for a long period of time.

Yes I got the mortgage on the basis of court ordered maintenance. It was hard to find a lender and in fact there was only one who would lend, and only on unfavourable terms (a 5 year fixed term at 5%, which was higher than normal at the time and especially a couple of years later when the Lehman Brothers crash happened and rates tumbled but I was locked in for another 2-3 years.

With a 1 year old and uncertainty as to whether I’d be offered a job on qualification as a lawyer, I did argue that the SM should be for longer than 2 years but the judge thought differently.

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 10:04

Elektra1 · 04/01/2026 09:52

Yes I got the mortgage on the basis of court ordered maintenance. It was hard to find a lender and in fact there was only one who would lend, and only on unfavourable terms (a 5 year fixed term at 5%, which was higher than normal at the time and especially a couple of years later when the Lehman Brothers crash happened and rates tumbled but I was locked in for another 2-3 years.

With a 1 year old and uncertainty as to whether I’d be offered a job on qualification as a lawyer, I did argue that the SM should be for longer than 2 years but the judge thought differently.

Yes I bet it was hard to find a mortgage and I think the OP would struggle to get one which is why I think they would give her enough to get something mortgage-free, which there is enough liquid capital for her to do. Sounds like you had quite a harsh judge as 2 years is not a lot of time at all but I’m glad it worked out for you.
The CMS minimum would be nearly 30k per annum so if she gets a mortgage free house she’d likely be fine although it’s in her interest to get back to work soon as, like you found, her husband might lose/quit his job.

Blushingm · 04/01/2026 10:22

You need to get a job and work regardless if ‘wanting’ to stay at home til the youngest is 5

lizzyBennet08 · 04/01/2026 11:28

Honestly I'd be worried for the op after such a short marriage . Depending on how shitty he wants to be he could argue that the majority of the equity in pension/house was built up outside of the relationship and should be ring fenced. Judges seem to hate sm these days and is awarded very rarely. I think any judge would probably expect the op to work once's youngest is 2 in his settlement calculations.
Op, if you think there's any chance he will play hardball then I would try and stick it out for another couple of years.

FortnumsWeddingBreakfastTeaPlease · 04/01/2026 11:39

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 09:50

Ah okay. How did you get a mortgage if you weren’t earning? Was it based on the maintenance payments? So you did get term spousal maintenance (ie not open ended). To clarify, that’s what I think the OP would get too but with a newborn I really don’t see how anyone can expect her to immediately go back to work. I think it would be expected within a few years though. I’d expect term maintenance and enough to buy a house. Which doesn’t sound a million miles from what you got when you divorced. I’d definitely not envisage her getting spousal maintenance for a long period of time.

She got spousal maintenance 20yrs ago.

You may as well tell OP she'll find a nice house for £60k if we're advising on what happened in 2005.

As PP says, mesher orders and spousal maintenance aren't a thing anymore. Yes, once in a blue moon. These aren't particularly exceptional circumstances. OP is going to be told to get a job. Not tomorrow, no. But by the time the divorce goes through? Yep. She'll get given a little house, which all four of them will have to live in. She'll live off a mix of child support, benefits and then whatever she does to support herself. Plus, spousal maintenance is deducted from UC pound for pound. She'd actually be quite silly even to apply for it.

Again, as PP says, if the divorce is her idea it's a pretty daft one. If it's not her idea, she needs to start working out what she's going to do to support herself because divorce is no longer the gravy train it was for women once upon a time. Courts want clean breaks and independence as priorities.

Frankly, I'd be shitting myself in OPs position. Unless she's far North/Scotland, £300k buys very little house. And this has to have three kids and an adult in it. Living in it Vs being squeezed into it will make a lot of difference to daily lives. Then she's got to run it. And support 3DC. He could quit his job tomorrow and go self employed, so she can't bank on living off child maintenance for the next decade, and even at the potential current amount, £2k a month is less than what someone on minimum wage earns. Again, never say never, but unless GP are on the doorstep to have the kids a lot, she's not got the option of getting out to start dating and meeting someone, and then they need to want to become a SD to three small children. Although the ex has offered 1 night a week, maybe that will help.

Circumstances as to how all this came about are fairly critical.

WhatdoIkno · 04/01/2026 11:49

The other question I would have is how are the £260k earnings made up? Is a large chunk of that commission/ non guaranteed bonus? As an example, in a sales job £90k base with a £180k OTE (not guaranteed) but reaching £260k would not be unusual, but the only part of that you can really count on is the £90k. Though if you were below about £150k regularly, you’d probably be getting sacked. If the full £260k is the actual salary, that may well make things different.

TalulaHalulah · 04/01/2026 13:03

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 09:52

Also people are assuming it’s the OP asking for/wanting the divorce but it could be her husband. She may not have much choice about getting divorced at this moment in time.

There is a post somewhere where the OP says they want to see their position before deciding what to do.
If divorce is one among a range of options, I would personally be looking at all the other options first. I say that as a single parent for many years. I do like my autonomy, but I have a salary which supports me and DC. In OP’s position, I would start to work towards a level of financial autonomy first. Amicable may become not so amicable when the husband realises how much he financially will lose - he may be financially illiterate but his solicitor will not be. The winners will be the lawyers.

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 13:16

FortnumsWeddingBreakfastTeaPlease · 04/01/2026 11:39

She got spousal maintenance 20yrs ago.

You may as well tell OP she'll find a nice house for £60k if we're advising on what happened in 2005.

As PP says, mesher orders and spousal maintenance aren't a thing anymore. Yes, once in a blue moon. These aren't particularly exceptional circumstances. OP is going to be told to get a job. Not tomorrow, no. But by the time the divorce goes through? Yep. She'll get given a little house, which all four of them will have to live in. She'll live off a mix of child support, benefits and then whatever she does to support herself. Plus, spousal maintenance is deducted from UC pound for pound. She'd actually be quite silly even to apply for it.

Again, as PP says, if the divorce is her idea it's a pretty daft one. If it's not her idea, she needs to start working out what she's going to do to support herself because divorce is no longer the gravy train it was for women once upon a time. Courts want clean breaks and independence as priorities.

Frankly, I'd be shitting myself in OPs position. Unless she's far North/Scotland, £300k buys very little house. And this has to have three kids and an adult in it. Living in it Vs being squeezed into it will make a lot of difference to daily lives. Then she's got to run it. And support 3DC. He could quit his job tomorrow and go self employed, so she can't bank on living off child maintenance for the next decade, and even at the potential current amount, £2k a month is less than what someone on minimum wage earns. Again, never say never, but unless GP are on the doorstep to have the kids a lot, she's not got the option of getting out to start dating and meeting someone, and then they need to want to become a SD to three small children. Although the ex has offered 1 night a week, maybe that will help.

Circumstances as to how all this came about are fairly critical.

I don’t think anyone has said anything about a Mesher order. Do you even know what one is?

Morepositivemum · 04/01/2026 13:28

Op I just saw you’re only married two years, what happened in the marriage?

HoskinsChoice · 04/01/2026 13:46

Eggybreadwithnuts · 04/01/2026 08:20

ALOT of money involved here. You NEED to search out a specialist lawyer. Even a barrister.

Or she could accept she has contributed fuck all in terms of finance to the relationship, get a job and amicably agree a reasonable monthly allowance to pay his share of the costs of having children instead of her being grabby and trying to screw him for every penny?

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 13:50

HoskinsChoice · 04/01/2026 13:46

Or she could accept she has contributed fuck all in terms of finance to the relationship, get a job and amicably agree a reasonable monthly allowance to pay his share of the costs of having children instead of her being grabby and trying to screw him for every penny?

Well the three children will, inconveniently, need a roof over their heads and their father who spends one quarter of his time abroad will be unable to provide care for them.

Questionstoask · 04/01/2026 13:54

HoskinsChoice · 04/01/2026 13:46

Or she could accept she has contributed fuck all in terms of finance to the relationship, get a job and amicably agree a reasonable monthly allowance to pay his share of the costs of having children instead of her being grabby and trying to screw him for every penny?

Screw him for every penny?

I may have contributed fuck all in terms of finance but DH would not have been able to do his job and earn the money he does if it weren’t for me staying at home with our (very much wanted by us both) children. His job would not accept any kind of flexible working and he would not use a nanny.

I’m certain that if it comes to it, we would be able to agree on something together. He isn’t someone who will start hiding money away. I just wanted to know what should happen in an absolute worst case scenario that things became less amicable and it went to court. I don’t actually think this would happen.

My main thought was that there isn’t enough equity to buy two small houses. So what would be awarded? As the children would stay with me but the money would come from a house owned by DH. Would we be expected to pay for rent out of the maintenance from DH?

Nothing to do with trying to screw every penny.

OP posts:
Questionstoask · 04/01/2026 13:57

WhatdoIkno · 04/01/2026 11:49

The other question I would have is how are the £260k earnings made up? Is a large chunk of that commission/ non guaranteed bonus? As an example, in a sales job £90k base with a £180k OTE (not guaranteed) but reaching £260k would not be unusual, but the only part of that you can really count on is the £90k. Though if you were below about £150k regularly, you’d probably be getting sacked. If the full £260k is the actual salary, that may well make things different.

I used £260k as a round number. It’s a £150k base with a monthly bonus. The past 10 years his full year’s earnings ranged from £220-320k

OP posts:
Questionstoask · 04/01/2026 13:58

HoskinsChoice · 03/01/2026 23:57

Get a job then you won't have to worry about housing the children?

And what do you mean by seeing what position you're in before making a decision? If you want to leave him you should leave him. It's not fair on him to stay with him just because you want to be a SAHM whilst he funds your lifestyle.

Perhaps we BOTH want me to be a SAHM?

OP posts:
Questionstoask · 04/01/2026 13:59

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 08:15

Was your husband on 260k per annum? Because this makes a significant difference. Realistically with a current newborn she won’t be able to work immediately and won’t be expected to. Within the next few years, yes, but not immediately.

This will be a case that is entirely focused on the relationship-generated needs of the primary carer. While it’s a short marriage, there are three children, whose welfare is the courts first consideration. It’s not a case about 50/50 division (ie the sharing principle) because it’s a short marriage with unequal contributions and in any event 50/50 would not produce a fair result and would place the children in hardship. The primary carer will need a house (owned not rented) and can’t get a mortgage at present due to not working. She needs to get a mortgage free property. She will also likely need a period of spousal maintenance to enable her to take steps to get back to work in the next few years. I’d expect something like 5 years with the option of applying to extend the term. I wouldn’t expect a pension sharing order given the unequal split of liquid capital, young ages and short marriage.

I am fairly confident in this as I worked as a lawyer in this area for many years and now teach would-be solicitors how to deal with these cases. It’s discretionary so there’s never a right or wrong answer but this is what I’d expect and if I was sitting as a judge, what order I would make (assuming of course all figures given on asset value were accurate and husband doesn’t have a load of other assets stashed away somewhere).

Thanks, this is really helpful.

OP posts:
FortnumsWeddingBreakfastTeaPlease · 04/01/2026 14:27

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 13:16

I don’t think anyone has said anything about a Mesher order. Do you even know what one is?

Try reading the thread...

Funnily enough, yes. As do most people.

Glowingup · 04/01/2026 14:34

Questionstoask · 04/01/2026 13:54

Screw him for every penny?

I may have contributed fuck all in terms of finance but DH would not have been able to do his job and earn the money he does if it weren’t for me staying at home with our (very much wanted by us both) children. His job would not accept any kind of flexible working and he would not use a nanny.

I’m certain that if it comes to it, we would be able to agree on something together. He isn’t someone who will start hiding money away. I just wanted to know what should happen in an absolute worst case scenario that things became less amicable and it went to court. I don’t actually think this would happen.

My main thought was that there isn’t enough equity to buy two small houses. So what would be awarded? As the children would stay with me but the money would come from a house owned by DH. Would we be expected to pay for rent out of the maintenance from DH?

Nothing to do with trying to screw every penny.

The first consideration will be the children and the need to house them. If there’s not enough capital to buy two properties outright, the court will also take account of mortgage capacity. I think you’d really struggle to get a mortgage based on maintenance payments and it would have to be long term and court-ordered for the bank to see it as income. Having a mortgage would also increase your income needs and therefore need for spousal maintenance in the short term. So I’d expect for you to get enough to buy a mortgage free house (assuming this can be done for around 400k) and he can get a mortgage for his house. You could make some enquiries with mortgage brokers to check but I think it would be hard. You would need to take steps to get back to work though, unless he’s happy to pay for you to stay at home or unless you can manage on child maintenance only.

The guiding principle in this sort of case would be needs, with priority given to the housing needs of the party with care of the children.

FortnumsWeddingBreakfastTeaPlease · 04/01/2026 14:45

Questionstoask · 04/01/2026 13:54

Screw him for every penny?

I may have contributed fuck all in terms of finance but DH would not have been able to do his job and earn the money he does if it weren’t for me staying at home with our (very much wanted by us both) children. His job would not accept any kind of flexible working and he would not use a nanny.

I’m certain that if it comes to it, we would be able to agree on something together. He isn’t someone who will start hiding money away. I just wanted to know what should happen in an absolute worst case scenario that things became less amicable and it went to court. I don’t actually think this would happen.

My main thought was that there isn’t enough equity to buy two small houses. So what would be awarded? As the children would stay with me but the money would come from a house owned by DH. Would we be expected to pay for rent out of the maintenance from DH?

Nothing to do with trying to screw every penny.

You'll get a small house. There's not much of a pot to divvy up and provide for 3 children's housing. So yes, unless you live in the Highlands, a pretty small house that you all fit in but not much more. You'll live on child support, benefits and the job you're going to have to get unless you want to seriously struggle. Bear in mind, the child support can disappear overnight.

He'll keep whatever left over and probably put it down as a deposit on whatever house he wants to buy for himself.

If he likes the flash life and burns through pay packet to pay packet so he can be seen in a nice car or go on luxury holidays, see how long things stay amicable when your child maintenance payment starts cramping his style. The fact only £150k is salary, is bad news too. You'll have to apply for variations through CMS or he could just have his bonus diverted to car schemes etc.

You need to get a grip of what's happening here, because you've sat at home for 6yrs, no judge will care about you thinking you should carry that on for the next 18. You can live a comfortable life in a small house, the bills will be small, you'll get plenty of benefits because of your 3 children, but you won't be driving anything fancy. Just a very normal life.

Nessiesfoodprovider · 04/01/2026 14:53

Lovely, you have a newborn and two more who are not much older. Your hormones are going to be all over the place at the moment, plus sleep deprivation etc and perhaps not feeling that you have your own identity any more.
I would give things time to settle down before you progress anything. I would also be thinking about what it is about him / his behaviour that makes you want to leave him. If he's not aware then it's impossible to fix.
I would be looking to establish yourself in a career with your own earning potential so that you aren't as dependent on him.

Wingingit73 · 04/01/2026 15:11

Solicitor will request full.financial disclosure so get as much evidence as you can.
Child support will.be calculated based on earnings and id guess savings and equity in house split fairly. A solicitor will.calculate. id suggest you get a job in the meantime, for your.own peace of mind.

Crushed23 · 04/01/2026 16:43

HoskinsChoice · 04/01/2026 13:46

Or she could accept she has contributed fuck all in terms of finance to the relationship, get a job and amicably agree a reasonable monthly allowance to pay his share of the costs of having children instead of her being grabby and trying to screw him for every penny?

WTF is with the hostility? OP has facilitated her exH’s career by raising the children full time. He wouldn’t have half of what he has if she didn’t sacrifice her career.

Anyway, back to the OP, @Questionstoaskyou haven’t gone into detail of the marriage breakdown, but could you wait at all? You do seem to be in a very vulnerable position with very young children including a newborn. Divorces take a long time to go through and you’re going to lose access to your husband’s salary. Is there a possibility of staying together a couple more years while you get back on your feet in your career and build up some personal savings to see you through the divorce process? Any family nearby who could support you?

Elektra1 · 05/01/2026 07:50

FortnumsWeddingBreakfastTeaPlease · 04/01/2026 11:39

She got spousal maintenance 20yrs ago.

You may as well tell OP she'll find a nice house for £60k if we're advising on what happened in 2005.

As PP says, mesher orders and spousal maintenance aren't a thing anymore. Yes, once in a blue moon. These aren't particularly exceptional circumstances. OP is going to be told to get a job. Not tomorrow, no. But by the time the divorce goes through? Yep. She'll get given a little house, which all four of them will have to live in. She'll live off a mix of child support, benefits and then whatever she does to support herself. Plus, spousal maintenance is deducted from UC pound for pound. She'd actually be quite silly even to apply for it.

Again, as PP says, if the divorce is her idea it's a pretty daft one. If it's not her idea, she needs to start working out what she's going to do to support herself because divorce is no longer the gravy train it was for women once upon a time. Courts want clean breaks and independence as priorities.

Frankly, I'd be shitting myself in OPs position. Unless she's far North/Scotland, £300k buys very little house. And this has to have three kids and an adult in it. Living in it Vs being squeezed into it will make a lot of difference to daily lives. Then she's got to run it. And support 3DC. He could quit his job tomorrow and go self employed, so she can't bank on living off child maintenance for the next decade, and even at the potential current amount, £2k a month is less than what someone on minimum wage earns. Again, never say never, but unless GP are on the doorstep to have the kids a lot, she's not got the option of getting out to start dating and meeting someone, and then they need to want to become a SD to three small children. Although the ex has offered 1 night a week, maybe that will help.

Circumstances as to how all this came about are fairly critical.

As I said in my earlier post, yes I got spousal maintenance after my first divorce 20 years ago; and I ALSO got spousal maintenance after my second divorce which was finalised last year (after we split in 2023). After the first divorce I was in a similar situation to the OP. After the second divorce I was earning 6 figures. In both scenarios I got spousal maintenance for a short time. The basis for it in both instances was that I had been the primary carer, had made career sacrifices to be the primary carer, and needed a period of grace to get my career back onto the faster track for progression.

Spousal maintenance is a thing. It can be avoided by giving the financially weaker party more of the capital, if there is enough for that. If the paying party doesn’t want to sacrifice capital, spousal maintenance can be awarded (or agreed).

New posts on this thread. Refresh page