Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to let motability pursue a claim

70 replies

ForTicklishHam · 28/12/2025 04:42

I have a Motability car for my health needs, which my husband and I both drive. From time to time I give a friend and her 11-year-old son a lift home from karate, along with my own son who attends the same class. I have asthma and use a nebuliser in the car, which plugs into a socket that was fitted specially for my medical use.
My friend’s son has ADHD and other difficulties, and I do try to be understanding. However, his behaviour in the car can be very challenging. My friend often excuses it by saying it is because of his conditions and does not set firm boundaries. She allows him to use the socket to charge his devices, even though I have explained I may need it for my nebuliser and would prefer it be kept free as it's harder to take away what he has once he has got something then say no in the first instant.
On one journey recently I became unwell and had to use my nebuliser. My husband was driving at the time. The boy became very upset because he could not charge his iPad and ended up smashing a heavy toy against the car window, breaking it. My friend did not take this seriously and suggested it would have been easier if we had just let him have his way. Not even an apology.
We reported the damage to Motability to arrange a repair and were told as it was deliberate it would need to be paid for. I was honest with them about the circumstances, they suggest I talk to my friend about agreeing to pay. I spoke to her about this, but she dismissed it and said it was our fault for not letting him use the socket and insinuated I should call motabilities bluff as they won't charge me because they pay for everything. Motability also confirmed the socket should not have been used for charging devices at all as it was fitted by a charitable grant for the nebuliser only.
In the end, I was told my choices were to pay the full cost or pay the excess and let Motability pursue the matter which may involve charges been brought, I assumed they meant her but have since came to realise the child is above the age of legal prosecution. I cannot afford the full amount, and I do not feel it is right that I should pay for damage caused by someone else. I have also been advised not to give them lifts again, as it could risk my vehicle if further damage was to happen. Which didn't go down well either.
My friend is now telling others that I am taking her to court over a car I get for free, which is not true the letters have came from Motability who gave her 14 days to pay. She also claims a police officer terrified her son by threatening to arrest him for the damage and that the will now have this on his record. All this was done by motability as I just provided their details and the camera footage. I feel very upset by the situation, but I believe I have done the right thing. I am asking whether I am being unreasonable for paying the excess and allowing Motability to deal with the rest, even if it has consequences for her. I understand parenting a child like this is hard but she won't say no to anything if he asks even when it's not hers to give.
I think she has been led to believe that motability provide everything regardless of how the vehicle is looked after but this is not the case and especially recently they are now tighter with money and reluctant just to pay for repairs that are not normal wear and tear.

OP posts:
CarefullyCuratedFurniture · 28/12/2025 11:17

LadyKenya · 28/12/2025 09:34

Such a reasonable, considered response.Hmm

That poster has been pinging around all morning "telling it like it is". I'd like to blame school holidays but I think they might just be a nob.

Heathotstuff · 28/12/2025 11:17

Your friends needs to pay!

DobryWieczor · 28/12/2025 11:23

OP your friend sounds awful, you are well shot of her! If she truly didn’t have the money and apologised profusely that would still not be great but it’d be something, but her biggest issues are a major attitude problem and being a crap parent.

1apenny2apenny · 28/12/2025 11:24

I can’t see how motability will pursue this. Your friend surely will just deny it and how can they prove it - it’s your word against hers. I also thought there were quite strict rules about how you use the vehicle. Frankly I’m surprised you continued to give them a lift when his behaviour is so bad.

Bushwoolie · 28/12/2025 11:25

Sounds like motability/police have decided the responsibility falls on the child from the evidence you have provided. So it's out of your hands now anyway

Mrsclausemunchingonamincepie · 28/12/2025 11:26

Maybe ask her if he gets benefits for his condition and to use that to pay.... She is a piss taking free loader....

SexyFrenchDepression · 28/12/2025 11:29

YABU to allow him to use the charger port when it explicitly is for your medical device. She IBVU by not accepting that she is partly to blame for this. She should be offering to pay towards it at the very least, you kind of allowed it to happen knowing he would be unhappy though.

SexyFrenchDepression · 28/12/2025 11:30

Sorry that should have said really she should pay all of it but at the least offer to pay towards.

RafaistheKingofClay · 28/12/2025 11:30

ForTicklishHam · 28/12/2025 04:42

I have a Motability car for my health needs, which my husband and I both drive. From time to time I give a friend and her 11-year-old son a lift home from karate, along with my own son who attends the same class. I have asthma and use a nebuliser in the car, which plugs into a socket that was fitted specially for my medical use.
My friend’s son has ADHD and other difficulties, and I do try to be understanding. However, his behaviour in the car can be very challenging. My friend often excuses it by saying it is because of his conditions and does not set firm boundaries. She allows him to use the socket to charge his devices, even though I have explained I may need it for my nebuliser and would prefer it be kept free as it's harder to take away what he has once he has got something then say no in the first instant.
On one journey recently I became unwell and had to use my nebuliser. My husband was driving at the time. The boy became very upset because he could not charge his iPad and ended up smashing a heavy toy against the car window, breaking it. My friend did not take this seriously and suggested it would have been easier if we had just let him have his way. Not even an apology.
We reported the damage to Motability to arrange a repair and were told as it was deliberate it would need to be paid for. I was honest with them about the circumstances, they suggest I talk to my friend about agreeing to pay. I spoke to her about this, but she dismissed it and said it was our fault for not letting him use the socket and insinuated I should call motabilities bluff as they won't charge me because they pay for everything. Motability also confirmed the socket should not have been used for charging devices at all as it was fitted by a charitable grant for the nebuliser only.
In the end, I was told my choices were to pay the full cost or pay the excess and let Motability pursue the matter which may involve charges been brought, I assumed they meant her but have since came to realise the child is above the age of legal prosecution. I cannot afford the full amount, and I do not feel it is right that I should pay for damage caused by someone else. I have also been advised not to give them lifts again, as it could risk my vehicle if further damage was to happen. Which didn't go down well either.
My friend is now telling others that I am taking her to court over a car I get for free, which is not true the letters have came from Motability who gave her 14 days to pay. She also claims a police officer terrified her son by threatening to arrest him for the damage and that the will now have this on his record. All this was done by motability as I just provided their details and the camera footage. I feel very upset by the situation, but I believe I have done the right thing. I am asking whether I am being unreasonable for paying the excess and allowing Motability to deal with the rest, even if it has consequences for her. I understand parenting a child like this is hard but she won't say no to anything if he asks even when it's not hers to give.
I think she has been led to believe that motability provide everything regardless of how the vehicle is looked after but this is not the case and especially recently they are now tighter with money and reluctant just to pay for repairs that are not normal wear and tear.

You are doing what she asked you to and letting motability sort it since they ‘pay for everything’. This is a lesson for her in finding out that they don’t. Don’t give her any more lifts and be quite honest about correcting people if they are repeating what she had said. I’d imagine the truth might get out pretty quickly and people will understand. This is unlikely to be the first time she’s blamed something her child has done on someone else.

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 28/12/2025 11:35

Deleted duplicate post

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 28/12/2025 11:35

Point out to everyone she is talking to about this that your friend is expecting you, as a disabled person who was already doing her a favour, to shell out £600 for damage her son did, and ask whether that is fair.

Minty25 · 28/12/2025 11:40

very odd. You say this child comes into your car " from time to time" but then your post makes it sound like it's very frequent. And he needs to charge his devices almost every time he's in the car ? Why on earth aren't they charged at home previously. Why can't he mange for what sounds like a short journey without a device? Why haven't you just refused to give them a lift when you are clearly not well yourself and I imagine don't need the stress of another child's meltdowns. Just say no and all this could have been avoided. isn't there rules against using motorbility cars to transport others anyway ?

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 28/12/2025 11:46

Passaggressfedup · 28/12/2025 09:01

No it dorsnt matter indeed, but still very wrong and another reason why the motabilty scheme needs to end.

Odd thing to say from someone who claims elsewhere that she prides herself on always trying to be kind, thoughtful and empathetic.

Namechange568899542 · 28/12/2025 11:47

Kid sounds like an arsehole and so does she. Tell her to get off her arse and learn to drive so she can ferry her own rotten son about, see how she enjoys having her car wrecked because her son can’t manage without gormlessly staring into an iPad for a few minutes.

MaidOfSteel · 28/12/2025 11:55

ForTicklishHam · 28/12/2025 07:57

Thank you to those who replied. I think some people are hugely disillusioned about what Motability do. She expected them to put in a claim but then just to pay out for the repairs no investigation or questions asked etc. She's told me I can just book it in for repair as though they'll foot the cost without question.

Yes, many people have no idea about Motability and it upsets me, too, OP. Especially when they aren’t prepared to learn. All the recent bad press hasn’t helped, and you even see them getting slagged here on MN by ill informed people. They’re a wonderful organisation and, were it not for them, hundreds of thousands of people like you & me would be pretty much housebound. But they are a charity and I believe they’re right to pursue costs for damage that should never have been allowed to happen.

I’m bloody astonished at your ungrateful ‘friend.’ Does she even give you any money for the fuel it costs for all these lifts? She doesn’t even seem to care that a nebuliser is your life-saver! She’s no friend to you; she’s a parasite. As well as a rubbish parent. And I’m sure other people in your circle have noticed this.

Do not pay for this damage. Leave Motability to do what they need to and ditch this hanger-on. Please don’t fret about it anymore. You’ve done nothing wrong.

x2boys · 28/12/2025 12:03

1apenny2apenny · 28/12/2025 11:24

I can’t see how motability will pursue this. Your friend surely will just deny it and how can they prove it - it’s your word against hers. I also thought there were quite strict rules about how you use the vehicle. Frankly I’m surprised you continued to give them a lift when his behaviour is so bad.

No you can use the vehicle as a family car
So like any family car you, can use it to go shopping, go to work give lifts etc, etc
Also the person whose car it is doesn't have to be in it as long as they benefit from it.

MaidOfSteel · 28/12/2025 12:03

Passaggressfedup · 28/12/2025 09:01

No it dorsnt matter indeed, but still very wrong and another reason why the motabilty scheme needs to end.

I rest my case re my previous mention of ill informed people commenting.

Motability have contracts with individual organisations for things such as insurance, glass repair, tyre repair & replacement and car servicing. I would imagine such a large scale contract would attract sizeable discounts for them.

x2boys · 28/12/2025 12:05

Minty25 · 28/12/2025 11:40

very odd. You say this child comes into your car " from time to time" but then your post makes it sound like it's very frequent. And he needs to charge his devices almost every time he's in the car ? Why on earth aren't they charged at home previously. Why can't he mange for what sounds like a short journey without a device? Why haven't you just refused to give them a lift when you are clearly not well yourself and I imagine don't need the stress of another child's meltdowns. Just say no and all this could have been avoided. isn't there rules against using motorbility cars to transport others anyway ?

No ,posters on mumsnet like to make their own rules up regarding mobility cars
But it csn be used as a family car.

grinchmcgrinchface · 28/12/2025 12:10

1apenny2apenny · 28/12/2025 11:24

I can’t see how motability will pursue this. Your friend surely will just deny it and how can they prove it - it’s your word against hers. I also thought there were quite strict rules about how you use the vehicle. Frankly I’m surprised you continued to give them a lift when his behaviour is so bad.

No rules against giving people lifts! The user was in the car so its fine.

FollowSpot · 28/12/2025 12:15

"Friend"?

She prioritised her Dc's iPad over your acute health needs.
She is dismissive and ignorant about the terms of a Motability car - I hate this pathetic 'for free' resentment by non-disabled people - and doesn't believe you.
She thinks you should end up with a bill for damage her child caused?

Not my definition of friend.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page