Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that the mansion tax breaks the principles of taxation

159 replies

NorthXNorthWest · 29/11/2025 10:26

Most taxes fall into:
Income you receive
Profit you realise
Spending you choose

Council tax sit outisde of this. Its more like levy based valuation bandings and was a quick and dirty fix after the poll tax fiasco. It is effectively a service charge not a wealth tax.

Whereas mansion tax is the government estimating the value your actual house, then treating this valuation as pure profit then taxing you on this. Given the majority of homes are purchased with mortgages and paid for by already taxed money:

Why is

Mansion Tax = Estmated value × %

More reasonable than

CGT = Profit * % (Profit = Actual sales price - (Purchase price + actutal costs)

With actual costs being renovations not stamp duty or interest paid on your mortgage

I am not in the mansion tax bracket. I do accept that some taxes need to rise but I don't believe this is the solution.

OP posts:
Starzinsky · 29/11/2025 15:14

I don't think it was thought out. Expensive houses aren't selling already because of stamp duty threshold it almost becomes a double tax on wealth, and it will trap some people in homes they can't sell. I'm not anywhere close to the threshold for mansions tax but you do wonder if it will be one of those taxes where the thresholds don't change and in 20 years every home owner will have to pay it.

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 29/11/2025 15:23

NorthXNorthWest · 29/11/2025 10:26

Most taxes fall into:
Income you receive
Profit you realise
Spending you choose

Council tax sit outisde of this. Its more like levy based valuation bandings and was a quick and dirty fix after the poll tax fiasco. It is effectively a service charge not a wealth tax.

Whereas mansion tax is the government estimating the value your actual house, then treating this valuation as pure profit then taxing you on this. Given the majority of homes are purchased with mortgages and paid for by already taxed money:

Why is

Mansion Tax = Estmated value × %

More reasonable than

CGT = Profit * % (Profit = Actual sales price - (Purchase price + actutal costs)

With actual costs being renovations not stamp duty or interest paid on your mortgage

I am not in the mansion tax bracket. I do accept that some taxes need to rise but I don't believe this is the solution.

There is only one principle of taxation:

Extract as much as possible under threat of force without people noticing, refusing to pay, and ultimately rebelling.

We've had taxes on property, windows (a proxy for the value of your house), and beards.

Interesting though that commercial buildings, or residential buildings owned by a company, are not subjected to the tax, nor people that rent a high value property.

I'm therefore waiting for some mortgage company to come up with some elaborate hire purchase scheme to replace a standard mortgage.

.

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 17:56

I don't think it was thought out. Expensive houses aren't selling already because of stamp duty threshold it almost becomes a double tax on wealth, and it will trap some people in homes they can't sell.

Similar to people who can't sell their fleecehold clad flats then.

JamesClyman · 29/11/2025 17:58

There are no "principles of taxation".

The government demands. The taxpayer pays. End of.

LlynTegid · 29/11/2025 18:00

I would have preferred more council tax bands and only having the single person's discount for lower bands.

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 18:01

JamesClyman · 29/11/2025 17:58

There are no "principles of taxation".

The government demands. The taxpayer pays. End of.

"No taxation without representation" as the colonial tax dodgers got their dupes to shout.

LaraLiving · 29/11/2025 18:03

Morons in Labour.
socialism does not work

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 18:10

LaraLiving · 29/11/2025 18:03

Morons in Labour.
socialism does not work

Define "work".

LaraLiving · 29/11/2025 18:13

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 18:10

Define "work".

Pretty sure you know what Google is right?
but I’ll bite. It destroys aspirations.

dottiehens · 29/11/2025 18:15

user1471538275 · 29/11/2025 11:30

I was very glad to hear that Royal residences will also be incurring the tax!

I'm a big fan of property taxes, land taxes.

I think the biggest issue we have is related to our housing, and who is holding so much of it.

It needs redistribution - I'd personally start with one of the excess palaces being turned into very basic apartments for key workers in London.

Hahaha yeah wouldn’t you like that.

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 18:20

LaraLiving · 29/11/2025 18:13

Pretty sure you know what Google is right?
but I’ll bite. It destroys aspirations.

Socialism worked for me.

Feudalism worked for centuries.

Once again (if you can ?). define "work". Or at the very least what "works" for you.

dottiehens · 29/11/2025 18:20

mellicauli · 29/11/2025 14:00

My friend lived in Durban. Property taxes were 0.9% of the value of the property each year. So if you had a £2m house you've be paying £15k per month. When you look at through that lens, £200 per month which can be deferred til you sell or die seems quite reasonable.

I think the tax is OK: the baby boomer generation who I think are by far the biggest owners in this bracket didn't pay enough tax through their lifetime and are now creating big NHS expenses. So the wealthiest of them - and the millionaires who put their wealth away from the reaches of our state while enjoying all the benefits of it - can fund it out of their unearned wealth.

I think it also has the added benefit of curbing house price rises and starting gently deflating the housing market, which is needed so our young people can start to buy houses of their own but not so much that it causes a crash. It also encourages people to live in the right-sized houses.

Did you mean 1500 per month?

LaraLiving · 29/11/2025 18:28

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 18:20

Socialism worked for me.

Feudalism worked for centuries.

Once again (if you can ?). define "work". Or at the very least what "works" for you.

Why not just put your argument across WHY socialism DOES work?

Logistria · 29/11/2025 18:36

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 29/11/2025 15:23

There is only one principle of taxation:

Extract as much as possible under threat of force without people noticing, refusing to pay, and ultimately rebelling.

We've had taxes on property, windows (a proxy for the value of your house), and beards.

Interesting though that commercial buildings, or residential buildings owned by a company, are not subjected to the tax, nor people that rent a high value property.

I'm therefore waiting for some mortgage company to come up with some elaborate hire purchase scheme to replace a standard mortgage.

.

Companies which own residential properties already have to pay an annual tax on the property that is significantly higher than this new charge. And it kicks in at a much lower value.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/annual-tax-on-enveloped-dwellings-the-basics#what-you-need-to-pay

Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings

Find out about Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED), what you need to pay and how to appoint an agent or adviser to act on your behalf.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/annual-tax-on-enveloped-dwellings-the-basics#what-you-need-to-pay

TheGrimSmile · 29/11/2025 18:59

HostaCentral · 29/11/2025 14:53

It also encourages people to live in the right-sized houses

Crickey. That sounds a bit Soviet

Not really. It's bonkers that lots of boomers live in 4 bed houses with huge gardens and their grandkids, who are working, cant even afford a flat. They need to be encouraged to live in smaller houses.

HostaCentral · 29/11/2025 22:58

Well I'm GenX and I'm staying in my big house. We are the smallest generation, so don't worry, all the boomers will die, and then there will be plenty of free houses and lots of inheritance to buy them (unless the government snaffles it all).

Mslak · 29/11/2025 23:08

I don’t agree with the mansion tax at all.

My house would have to triple or quadruple in value to be anywhere near the mansion tax, so it’s not a problem for me personally.

However, it is just a “fuck the rich” IMO. I do actually know someone who will be subject to it. They are people who started a business about 30 years ago, at huge risk to themselves (home as security). Worked guts out, took risks (that would be unacceptable to me) and finally sold business after decades of slog and sacrifice. Now own a property worth over 2 million and aged almost 60 as a result. All relevant taxes on earnings/sale paid and this home is bought from taxed income.

I just don’t think the govt should be able to essentially do a heist on people like this. Where will it end? Sweeping 1% of everyone’s bank account contents?

Mslak · 29/11/2025 23:09

JamesClyman · 29/11/2025 17:58

There are no "principles of taxation".

The government demands. The taxpayer pays. End of.

So can the govt demand 1% of everyone’s bank balance?

StrawberrySquash · 29/11/2025 23:27

SerendipityJane · 29/11/2025 11:09

Original English taxes for English people !

They were French invaders! To be fair, taxing their own a fair amount as they'd taken all the land.

NorthXNorthWest · 30/11/2025 01:02

GeneralPeter · 29/11/2025 11:02

With tax you are basically looking for the least-bad option.

A property value tax is far preferable to SDLT and CGT, which discourage transactions. That makes the property market far less fluid, people don’t up-size/down-size/move for work.

They should have abolished SDLT and made it all a property value tax. Most wealth taxes are a bad idea partly because it’s easy to move wealth, but that doesn’t apply to property value tax in the same way.

It is sold as freeing up homes, but in a country with a chronic housing shortage it does not free up anything for ordinary families or create homes for downsizers. The difference between the mansion tax and SDLT is only the delivery. SDLT hits you once at the point of moving. A mansion tax is like council tax on steroids, its an annual drain on wealth for simply staying put. Different method, same outcome. Homes wont be freed up for ordinary families because these homes are now significantly more expensive to live in year after year + deposits and mortgage rates/ affordability still remain a significant barrier for most people. This is not the rich being dealt with. It is ordinary long-term homeowners being shaken down until they break. The genuinely rich do not lose from this. Thet have liquid wealth or access to other funds so they will hoover up the fire sale stock, and come out owning more of the country than they did before, all whilst paying less tax. Call it fairness if you like, but the end result is simple. The rich get richer, and everyone else gets forced out.

OP posts:
NorthXNorthWest · 30/11/2025 01:03

ShesTheAlbatross · 29/11/2025 10:56

Inheritance tax falls outside your principles (it’s not tax on income received because the estate can’t avoid it by leaving a tiny amount of money to a large number of people).

Road tax? That’s not income, spending, or profit.

Council tax as you acknowledge is another exception.

There’s no rule that tax has to fall into those categories.

I think there are coherent arguments to be made against the mansion tax. I just do not think this is one of them.

What are those arguments?

OP posts:
NorthXNorthWest · 30/11/2025 01:05

LaraLiving · 29/11/2025 18:03

Morons in Labour.
socialism does not work

Agree socialism doesn't work.

OP posts:
Genevieva · 30/11/2025 01:09

Council tax and stamp duty were originally a fee for a service. Council tax should be called a local council services fee and stamp duty should be called a land registry fee.

Savoury · 30/11/2025 01:17

It’s a shocking tax because it kills aspiration dead. It was actually what drove the recovery from the dark days of the 1970s - the chance to work hard, acquire wealth and do better for your family.

Anyhow this is just the start. It’ll be lowered to £1 million next, dragging in most London houses, many across the South East and some areas of the big cities. More wealth tax than mansion tax.

We shouldn’t be surprised when the Resolution Foundation have taken over the Treasury. Many Londoners hate this as they see themselves being dragged into the net. The same Labour MPs who failed seats will be kicked out at the next election.

strongermummy · 30/11/2025 01:58

Mslak · 29/11/2025 23:09

So can the govt demand 1% of everyone’s bank balance?

Yes they could