Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To refuse to pay this nursery charge

412 replies

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 07:17

2 children in nursery. Been really happy there. A few niggles but nothing major. This month's bill had a £40 per child charge for an activity that they only do in winter. It usually kicks in in December through to April but this time they've charged it early. The issue is that they've not actually done the activity yet. I spoke to the manager about it and she was very abrasive and came out with some absolute nonsense about why it was on the bill. She lied and expected me to just suck it up. I'm livid but the conversation is over as far as she's concerned and if I push it any further, I risk being asked to leave. Do I just write it off for the sake of peace and my blood pressure?

OP posts:
gamerchick · 29/11/2025 13:15

Just make sure that the end month isn't added on and it evens out. I'd get clarification for it.

IAmKerplunk · 29/11/2025 13:15

YourOliveBalonz · 29/11/2025 13:11

Although you pay on 1 November for your November childcare fees, it sounds like this activity needs to be paid further in advance. That makes sense - if they have someone coming in from early December it’s probably too much of a risk for them to only be getting the funds from that from you on 1 December, and they would likely be out of pocket now if they need to pay the facilitator in advance.

I think you are therefore unreasonable to threaten to take the money out of the 1 December bill, because that money will therefore cover the cost of this activity in January. If you end up charged an extra month by the end of it all that’s a different matter of course. I also think you’re unreasonable to call the manager a liar, perhaps she didn’t explain things well when put on spot - sound familiar? 😂

🤦🏽‍♀️ the op has been quite clear that paying for the activity on Nov 1 was for the activity to go ahead in Nov. The manager didn’t say oh Nov invoice is for Dec. The manager admitted the activity didn’t go ahead but didn’t give a clear reason as to why not.

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 29/11/2025 13:15

Didimum · 29/11/2025 12:12

Are you for real? You condone nurseries adding imaginary charges to bills to cover ‘inadequate’ funding?

Yikes.

No, I absolutely don't condone them having to do this - and as I said in my earlier post, they've communicated it very badly.

It may be that they've previously told parents 'with a wink' on numerous occasions what the stated charge is really needed for and haven't twigged that OP wasn't present at any of those times. Possibly they believe that she knows very well that it's a cover to make up for the funding shortfall and are irritated at her for, as they maybe see it, trying to make trouble for them and refusing to play ball?

What I don't condone most of all is successive governments making providers charge less for a service than is viable and insisting that it is 'free' because they've paid for it in full - and thus leaving them no alternative but to either charge extra in a roundabout/underhand way or just to close down.

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 13:19

Emerald95 · 29/11/2025 10:11

Did the Nursery manager actually lie? Because you've said her response was speedily delivered word salad. Was her explanation unclear / not to the point or did she actually tell lies? And if she did tell lies, how do you know its a lie?

Both.

OP posts:
Ella31 · 29/11/2025 13:25

It makes sense what you are saying. Have you spoken to any other parents about this?

Greggsit · 29/11/2025 13:40

I'm wondering why you're spending an additional £40 a time for an activity that doesn't cost the nursery any additional money, staff or resources. How did they justify the additional charge for it in the first place? Why did all the parents agree to pay it?

NewName123456789 · 29/11/2025 13:41

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 13:19

Both.

Reminds me of my story described upthread with £1000 requested to be paid just to get on the waiting list. Word salad followed. They should have just called it the admin charge - meaning “we need more money so take it or leave it”.

Didimum · 29/11/2025 13:48

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 29/11/2025 13:15

No, I absolutely don't condone them having to do this - and as I said in my earlier post, they've communicated it very badly.

It may be that they've previously told parents 'with a wink' on numerous occasions what the stated charge is really needed for and haven't twigged that OP wasn't present at any of those times. Possibly they believe that she knows very well that it's a cover to make up for the funding shortfall and are irritated at her for, as they maybe see it, trying to make trouble for them and refusing to play ball?

What I don't condone most of all is successive governments making providers charge less for a service than is viable and insisting that it is 'free' because they've paid for it in full - and thus leaving them no alternative but to either charge extra in a roundabout/underhand way or just to close down.

Most nurseries have incompetent financial management is the bigger issue. Those directing the budgets day to day are not trained in finance or business. They are excellent childcare staff who have risen the ranks to manager but don’t have the skills to competently handle the finance.

Summercocktailsgalore · 29/11/2025 13:52

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 07:40

I paid my November bill in advance. The £40 charge was on it. I paid it assuming that they were starting the activity early this year. It usually only kicks in in December. It's now come to light that it hadn't happened at all in November. So I expect a refund for it but when I challenged it, I was lied to and shut down.

The will be the same for other parents there. So ask them what they are doing,

TonyHallintheTardis · 29/11/2025 14:09

As others have suggested, I would write to the nursery/accounts dept in the guise of checking you've understood properly to get the reasoning in writing. Then I suppose it is a matter of either sucking it up, or making a stand. It does seem out of order, but some people/companies do out of order things when they think they can get away with it. Good luck.

MaurineWayBack · 29/11/2025 14:19

luckylavender · 29/11/2025 07:47

You’re not making any friends here OP. Trying being a little less abrasive. Nobody is clear what you are saying.

Or maybe people need to learn how to read.

@Jeronnemo you’ve been very clear.

elfendom1 · 29/11/2025 14:34

101Alsatians · 29/11/2025 08:32

Do you always communicate so aggressively or is this a keyboard warrior thing?

@CheeseIsMyIdol 'I’m a professional, lifelong editor with plenty of experience parsing others’ writing. And I have no idea what the basis of your complaint is. You aren’t explaining as clearly as you think you are.'

You are obviously not very good at your job. This is not hard to understand.

MandyAndLola · 29/11/2025 14:42

elfendom1 · 29/11/2025 14:34

@CheeseIsMyIdol 'I’m a professional, lifelong editor with plenty of experience parsing others’ writing. And I have no idea what the basis of your complaint is. You aren’t explaining as clearly as you think you are.'

You are obviously not very good at your job. This is not hard to understand.

We can differ on opinions without making a personal insult. Some of the responses have been way too abrasive for an anonymous forum.

I understand what is being said, I just think we are missing key details that would help us understand more fully where the root cause is.

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 14:45

PigeonsandSquirrels · 29/11/2025 11:29

Her explanation was clear as glass… people are just acting thick and can’t seem to understand OP when she says things in a really obvious way because it’s not how their nursery bills them.

Honestly it’s been baffling to read the replies and I’d have been a lot more ‘abrasive’ than OP has been.

She’s paid in November for November. There’s an added charge for an activity on her November bill. They have not done the activity. She has been told they will do it in December but will be billed the amount for the activity again on her December bill. As it is November she likely doesn’t know if they will do the activity in March and not be billed for it as she doesn’t have those bills yet. The manager has said they didn’t do the activity, that was paid for, because of x… but x is a lie so OP is annoyed.

Thank you. I luffs you 😍

OP posts:
Nottodaythankyou123 · 29/11/2025 14:45

HoppingPavlova · 29/11/2025 07:55

I don’t understand either and you saying 50 times that you have been clear, does not make it so.
I would think the payment is:
You pay in November for the activity to occur in December.
You pay in December for the activity to occur in January.
You pay in January for the activity to occur in February.

So, the only issue would be if you were made to pay in February and the activity did not occur in March. There is no issue now, at this point, unless the activity will not occur in December. Yet you have said it will occur in December, so there is no issue. It seems clear to me?

She pays for the month ahead on the 1st. She paid on the 1st Nov for November, the charge was on there, but the activity didn’t happen. She’ll pay 1st Dec for Dec, and again pay the charge but hopefully they will do the activity. She’s asks nursery if she can deduct the £40 from 1st Dec payment as she paid it for Nov when the activity didn’t happen at all (and they seemingly lied about it)

I don’t really understand how people aren’t getting this..

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 14:47

zingally · 29/11/2025 11:41

Personally, if this is a nursery you're otherwise happy with, I'd call this £40 the cost of keeping you cool, calm and collected. At the end of the day, the nursery years are mercifully short.

To me, it doesn't seem unreasonable to be charged in the bill for December, for an activity that will take place in December.

It's not unreasonable. Of course it's not but this isn't what I'm disputing.

OP posts:
Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 14:49

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 29/11/2025 11:43

All the other things about lack of government funding etc (whilst true) are irrelevant in this case.

How are they irrelevant, though? IF a nursery is basically forced to make up an excuse to charge for the extra funding that plugs the gap, whilst not being allowed to explicitly state the truth, how else do they go about it?

Have the other parents not complained because they haven't noticed, don't want to rock the boat or have understood the tacit reality?

Of the ones I know, it's about not rocking the boat and having your card marked as a troublemaker. Some have challenged it, same as me but have been told the same bullshit.

OP posts:
MyrtleLion · 29/11/2025 14:51

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 14:47

It's not unreasonable. Of course it's not but this isn't what I'm disputing.

But charging in November and not doing it is not OK.

It's also worse if you are unable to challenge it, in case they deny your child a place, because that's extortion.

I am a principled person and if it happened to me and I was able to afford the consequences of complaining, I would absolutely be taking this to court. If they can get away with this then what's next? Blatantly saying that there is an extra fee for blowing noses and if you don't pay, tough?

And if they denied my kid a place if I did that, I'd take them to court over that too.

Blueuggboots · 29/11/2025 14:52

How have you been lied to?

Soontobe60 · 29/11/2025 14:58

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 07:44

I'm really not sure how I can be any clearer. I've said multiple times it's about November.

What about ‘November’?

Soontobe60 · 29/11/2025 15:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You’re right OP. We’re all a bunch of incompetent readers who can’t make head nor take out of your posts because we’re stupid.

IchiNiSanShiGo · 29/11/2025 15:00

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 14:49

Of the ones I know, it's about not rocking the boat and having your card marked as a troublemaker. Some have challenged it, same as me but have been told the same bullshit.

Did the others get a clearer explanation from the manager than you got?

Soontobe60 · 29/11/2025 15:08

Jeronnemo · 29/11/2025 08:32

Quite. I'm perfectly capable of understanding a basic pricing structure unlike most of the contributors on here

You really are being pretty shitty here OP.

Soontobe60 · 29/11/2025 15:09

IAmKerplunk · 29/11/2025 13:15

🤦🏽‍♀️ the op has been quite clear that paying for the activity on Nov 1 was for the activity to go ahead in Nov. The manager didn’t say oh Nov invoice is for Dec. The manager admitted the activity didn’t go ahead but didn’t give a clear reason as to why not.

Not initially. It was about her 7th post when it became much clearer.

LAMPS1 · 29/11/2025 15:19

Nurseries have to make up a short fall in funding from the government.
It’s a terrible position that the government put early years providers in by making them sign a contact which says they won’t charge a top up fee if the child is funded. The government want to maintain the ‘we provide free childcare’ mantra which is completely false. They only partly subsidise the child. The shortfall has to come from somewhere.
Nurseries therefore have to get the understanding of potential parents over this matter before they sign up for a place. Most parents don’t understand this awful anomaly. It’s very difficult to explain because of the contract providers are forced to sign with the County Council through whom the funding goes to the provider,
That’s why a lot of providers have closed over recent years. They are caught between a rock and a hard place. It is impossible to provide quality care for the funding provided by government.

Do you maybe think that this could have been the reason for the word salad lie ?