Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think raising NMW is a good thing

334 replies

Kilot · 26/11/2025 12:13

The poorest in society will earn more. Companies will have to pay more, benefits will drop.

OP posts:
Imissgoldengrahams · 26/11/2025 12:27

kittywittyandpretty · 26/11/2025 12:19

I bet there’s plenty of money for the shareholders, though

Oh absolutely
I actually work in an NHS building, its crazy to think how much they are actually getting paid. Its money I could only dream of
I left a retail job as I got made duty manager, for a 20p increase in my hourly pay. Which was minimum wage.
I left a year ago, they haven't replaced me as they can't afford to so they are just running on bare bones staff and then customers wonder why retail workers are rude because we are being stretched thin 😩

Thechaseison71 · 26/11/2025 12:27

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:25

Or not run a business that cannot pay its workers a living wage.

Like the majority of shops / restaurant/ call centres etc. Or just the small businesses?

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:27

I genuinely don’t care that some businesses can’t afford to pay their workers.

Why are we more bothered by protecting business owners than the working class?

Kilot · 26/11/2025 12:27

I believe it’s rising by 50p an hour? So for a full-time, 40hr/week employee (which most on NMW aren’t) is £20 a week or under £100 a month. If a business can’t absorb that, it’s not viable and being propped up by the state.

OP posts:
ShesTheAlbatross · 26/11/2025 12:27

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:24

It’s not forcing businesses to collapse. It’s forcing the owners and shareholders to give up some of their millions of profits.

It’s not “forcing” them to do that either. There would be a number of different ways for a company to deal with increased salary costs, one of which is reducing profits, another is raising prices, another is cutting staff.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 12:27

LadyHexham · 26/11/2025 12:26

I ran a village store and post office.
There were no millions.

Exactly! It’s not all about neo-capitalists extracting billions of £ of profit by exploiting the backs of workers blah, blah, blah. It’s the garage / cafe / corner shop that employs one less person as a result.

Thechaseison71 · 26/11/2025 12:28

LadyHexham · 26/11/2025 12:26

I ran a village store and post office.
There were no millions.

This is exactly the sort of thing I mean

Cynic17 · 26/11/2025 12:28

No, it will just add more pain for small businesses, charities, care homes, arts institutions and other valuable services. So even if they don't close down altogether, they will employ fewer people or offer fewer hours of work per week.
Anyone who thinks that this is all marvellous because Big Bad Rich Companies will get a hammering is completely deluded. Everyone pays, because we either lose jobs, pay or services.

twolittles · 26/11/2025 12:29

turkeyboots · 26/11/2025 12:22

It will further damage youth employment. Who will pay £26k to someone with no experience?

I would, have always found very young and inexperienced employees to be highly motivated and grateful for the opportunity to start gaining experience.

Littlebitpsycho · 26/11/2025 12:29

The problem is that constantly raising NMW (particularly for unskilled work) is that those wages are then getting closer to those of skilled work. If those skilled workers don't also get a pay rise (as they should if they're doing a job not just anybody can do) why would they bother?

On a societal level it makes it not worthwhile to study or train, if you end up no better off than someone working in Tesco. I am NOT saying there is anything wrong with working in Tesco, I am saying if NMW keeps rising, a Tesco worker will end up on similar wages as someone who has trained for years and is really making a difference (social work for example).

Why would anyone work a stressful, skilled job if they can take home the same money working in Tesco?

I don't know what the answer is, but constantly lifting the minimum wage isn't it 🤷‍♀️

BadgernTheGarden · 26/11/2025 12:29

Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 12:26

small businesses still have a responsibility to pay staff a living wage. Or do you think the government should support those people ?

The business has to pay the minimum wage, if the business can no longer afford that some staff may well end up on benefits.

Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 12:30

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:27

I genuinely don’t care that some businesses can’t afford to pay their workers.

Why are we more bothered by protecting business owners than the working class?

yes exactly. I have worked for several hospitality businesses and it’s only right that legislation forces them to pay living wages. They won’t otherwise.

Thechaseison71 · 26/11/2025 12:30

ShesTheAlbatross · 26/11/2025 12:27

It’s not “forcing” them to do that either. There would be a number of different ways for a company to deal with increased salary costs, one of which is reducing profits, another is raising prices, another is cutting staff.

So it's better for the member of staff to have no job at all rather than however much less on minimum wage ( don't know what they are planning to raise it to)

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 26/11/2025 12:30

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:23

You don’t have a right to underpay your workers just because you’re a “small business”

What are on about?

What rights when the companies go bust?

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 12:30

Coffeeandbooks88 · 26/11/2025 12:21

Unfortunately UC also raises the AET of how much you need to earn before having no work commitments every time they raise the MW. This means less UC etc so you aren't better off.

We need to move away from taxpayers subsidising employers so yes the AET should increase and UC payment lessen.

Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 12:30

BadgernTheGarden · 26/11/2025 12:29

The business has to pay the minimum wage, if the business can no longer afford that some staff may well end up on benefits.

The business is not a viable one if it’s not paying a living wage.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:30

Littlebitpsycho · 26/11/2025 12:29

The problem is that constantly raising NMW (particularly for unskilled work) is that those wages are then getting closer to those of skilled work. If those skilled workers don't also get a pay rise (as they should if they're doing a job not just anybody can do) why would they bother?

On a societal level it makes it not worthwhile to study or train, if you end up no better off than someone working in Tesco. I am NOT saying there is anything wrong with working in Tesco, I am saying if NMW keeps rising, a Tesco worker will end up on similar wages as someone who has trained for years and is really making a difference (social work for example).

Why would anyone work a stressful, skilled job if they can take home the same money working in Tesco?

I don't know what the answer is, but constantly lifting the minimum wage isn't it 🤷‍♀️

You’re so close to getting it. So close. People across the board should be paid more.

Kilot · 26/11/2025 12:31

Littlebitpsycho · 26/11/2025 12:29

The problem is that constantly raising NMW (particularly for unskilled work) is that those wages are then getting closer to those of skilled work. If those skilled workers don't also get a pay rise (as they should if they're doing a job not just anybody can do) why would they bother?

On a societal level it makes it not worthwhile to study or train, if you end up no better off than someone working in Tesco. I am NOT saying there is anything wrong with working in Tesco, I am saying if NMW keeps rising, a Tesco worker will end up on similar wages as someone who has trained for years and is really making a difference (social work for example).

Why would anyone work a stressful, skilled job if they can take home the same money working in Tesco?

I don't know what the answer is, but constantly lifting the minimum wage isn't it 🤷‍♀️

The answer is that companies will have to increase those salaries too, or nobody will do them. This won’t happen overnight but it will in time.

OP posts:
Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 12:31

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 26/11/2025 12:30

What are on about?

What rights when the companies go bust?

Staff are expensive - that’s the reality of running a business but there is no reason to exploit people

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:31

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 26/11/2025 12:30

What are on about?

What rights when the companies go bust?

Why do you think that running a small business is the be all and end all? If your business can’t pay a living wage it’s not viable.

TallulahBetty · 26/11/2025 12:31

Halfblindbunny · 26/11/2025 12:16

Companies will employ less people. Small businesses that may have taken on an employee won't. Those lucky enough to have a secure minimum wage job will earn more. Lots of others will not have a job because of it. Companies will have to pay their staff more so will increase prices which will affect everybody. So no it's not that great actually.

If you can't pay your employees a decent wage, then you aren't sustainable and shouldn't be employing people.

WhitegreeNcandle · 26/11/2025 12:31

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:17

Bollocks. Utter bollocks. If your business isn’t making enough to pay a liveable wage, it’s not a sustainable business

I wish people would stop quoting this. It makes me so angry. I produce something most people buy weekly. The supermarkets know our cost of production down to a T. A massive part of that is wages - they cost almost every our at NMW. We are on a contract that means as our costs go up so does what the supermarket pays us. A guaranteed margin if you will.

if NMW goes up the food you buy in the supermarket goes up.

i don’t disagree thy low paid workers should earn more but don’t tell me my business isn’t viable when it’s dictated to me how much to pay my staff.

I suspect in other industries they just outsource to cheaper parts of the world as well

BadgernTheGarden · 26/11/2025 12:32

Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 12:30

The business is not a viable one if it’s not paying a living wage.

It is viable if it reduces staff. It has to pay living wage it doesn't have to employ a certain number of staff.

MincePudding · 26/11/2025 12:32

The "poorest in society" are often doing government-funded work like caring and facilities mamagement jobs like hospital porters and cleaners, administration, school admin, front line council services.

""Benefits may drop" just means the Gov will be paying more from a different Gov pot half the time and topping up non-gov jobs with benefits because, shockingly, if supermarkets are paying their staff more, they will be charging more for goods and services to cover it. So your wages will go on their wages. It's a vicious cycle.

And then people earning a bit more than minimum wage now think - why am I holding more responsibilities than my minimum wage colleague?

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 26/11/2025 12:32

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:31

Why do you think that running a small business is the be all and end all? If your business can’t pay a living wage it’s not viable.

You seem to be blinded by something.

I wonder what that is.

Swipe left for the next trending thread