Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Poor life planning..

369 replies

pocketpairs · 26/11/2025 12:01

With the upcoming budget seen many "poor me" posts, particularly from high/middle earners. I find it frustrating that rather than blame themselves for thier life (& financial planning) choices, they blame some arbitrary government policy changes, such as upcoming introduction of new council tax bands.

Example: Sister & hubby earn £14k net p/m. But their choice to buy a nearly £x.xm house in SE & send DCs to private school means they have £3k (approx) to spend on everything else. They could have taken different choices...£1m houses &/or move to grammar school areas.

Clearly this is an extreme example, but I really don't understand why a family can't survive on £4-6k p/m, especially outside of London. Up until recently, I survived on much less and managed to put myself a firmer financial footing in 40s.

Sure this means some sacrifices, but it seems everyone wants to 'have their cake and eat it'.

OP posts:
Benjithedog · 27/11/2025 22:34

Etatauri · 27/11/2025 22:31

It does seem like it's the norm to live right at the edge of your means. Have friends who are financially very similar to you, earn imo an insane amount of money yet are very cash poor.

Large reason of why DH and I just moved to a cheaper part of the country, as we both WFH so income isn't reducing, just going further. Given that we're now about to pay more in tax it feels like a wise choice.

I think this is very true

Tarteaucitronmerinquee · 27/11/2025 23:12

Newbutoldfather · 27/11/2025 22:32

Taxes are really high on any objective basis now.

It is true the ‘middle’ are getting hit very hard to pay for a massive welfare state, whereas the properly rich weren’t meaningfully touched.

At the bottom end there was no tackling of the absurd ‘triple lock’ or any real attempt to get to grips with the epidemic of mental health incapacity.

And, at the top end, the house tax was the only meaningful extra tax. They left CGT unchanged, which is how the rich generally get paid, and they left EIS and VCT reliefs unchanged.

There was a big sigh of relief amongst the wealthy.

Of course wealth is mobile and maybe real measures would have been counterproductive, but if you are on 200k and taxed at 45% income tax plus a raft of other taxes, it must be hard to see people paying 24% on share option gains, and that is before real avoidance, such as offshore trusts kick in.

Umm the absurd triple lock… most elderly people at some point need care of some sort and they have to pay for it all themselves if they have any capital meanwhile they get no tax relief whatsoever for doing that ( even if they have terminal illness like dementia) this money is generally being paid to private entities and not to state managed care organizations, so that might be worth looking into but in the meantime leave them their triple lock they’ll need it if they live long enough

attichoarder · 27/11/2025 23:26

I think that people tend to budget so they have little in reserve which means they are more vulnerable to the economic downturn. That is poor budgeting agreed, however they are living within their means and are entitled to be worried about additional taxes. Equally those who are the breadline often make choices - having many children is one of these which causes initial strain.

Starzinsky · 27/11/2025 23:30

If you earn £14k per month then you already pay alot of tax at the higher rate.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 28/11/2025 01:28

Do l hear to he so called "Squeezed Middle Classes" whingeing again?

Ttry to cut down on wine, after school clubs, cleaners, shopping at Waitrose, local delicatessens etc Before you started whingeing about money

Yes you may do work hard. But then again so do lots of decent working class people who just earn normal wages.

And don't have money from Welfare benefits thrown at them and getting everything paid for them. You know the ones who have loads of kids they can't afford to keep and expect the state to look after them.

If your can't afford them don't have them.

But it seems to be their god given divine right.

Was really let down by Rachael Reeves to see that the two children UC limit had been scrapped in the budget. Taking children out of poverty my arse

Very cynical. Just another vote winning attempt to get former Labour Voters back from Reform?

hazelnutvanillalatte · 28/11/2025 03:04

Beesandhoney123 · 27/11/2025 20:53

I do agree with this. There is not a huge amount of incentive for continuous education, aspiration, saving so the dc have a better life than if we didn't, saving money into a pension only to see it decrease in value and taxes go up!

What on earth is the point, if I can't enjoy it? I don't mean swan about living the life of Riley. I mean go out for dinner once jn a while, take the dc to cinema. Put petrol in the car and have a day out and not have to take cheap snacks.

Charity begins at home, not at the treasury.

Not only that, but you can see that achievement, self-reliance and financial responsibility are actively sneered at! For some reason these things are seen as negative, as 'privileged,' as a target for exploitation because they deserve it. A person on benefits is seen as morally superior to someone who works hard in a skilled profession. It's completely backwards.

My parents were from immigrant families who both worked (and still work) incredibly hard to give their children a good life. Further degrees from Oxbridge, insane work schedules, mental and physical stress, the sacrifice of freedom and family time.

I think we will suffer massive brain drain from those who still want to achieve, and those who stay here will just choose not to.

BunnyMcDougall · 28/11/2025 06:38

shuggles · 27/11/2025 22:21

@Umbrella15 If I was to get a pay raise, I would be put into the higher tax bracket.

Does your workplace have a salary sacrifice scheme for a pension?

If you are slightly into the higher tax bracket, the most sensible thing to do is to salary sacrifice the additional money into a pension pot. Then all of your income will only be taxed at the 20% rate.

Er…someone obviously didn’t watch Labour’s autumn budget on Wednesday!

Lovehascomeandgone · 28/11/2025 08:46

pbdr · 26/11/2025 12:36

I think there is some growing resentment that a small minority of high earning taxpayers (top 10% contributing over 60% of tax receipts) are increasingly keeping everything afloat by contributing most of the country’s tax receipts, while being means tested out of most of the benefits they are funding, and are still often being accused of not “paying their fair share” while the majority of individuals (~53%) in the UK are net recipients.

Our high earners are more steeply taxed than most European countries, while our low earners are taxed far less than most (the tax free allowance is particularly unusual), and yet there is so much public anger directed towards our majority taxpayers if they express any frustration at their proportionate share of taxation going up and up at just about every budget. Everyone wants better public services and benefits, but they only want a very small proportion of the population to pay for it for everyone else, and then balk at the idea of those same taxpayers also having equal access to the benefits and services they are funding.

Totally agree 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Goddessoftheearth · 28/11/2025 08:59

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 28/11/2025 01:28

Do l hear to he so called "Squeezed Middle Classes" whingeing again?

Ttry to cut down on wine, after school clubs, cleaners, shopping at Waitrose, local delicatessens etc Before you started whingeing about money

Yes you may do work hard. But then again so do lots of decent working class people who just earn normal wages.

And don't have money from Welfare benefits thrown at them and getting everything paid for them. You know the ones who have loads of kids they can't afford to keep and expect the state to look after them.

If your can't afford them don't have them.

But it seems to be their god given divine right.

Was really let down by Rachael Reeves to see that the two children UC limit had been scrapped in the budget. Taking children out of poverty my arse

Very cynical. Just another vote winning attempt to get former Labour Voters back from Reform?

Ok. So I am one of the squeezed middle classes. Yes I shop in Waitrose because I care about where what I put in my mouth comes from (ie not shit meat from countries with no animal welfare standards); yes my ONE son plays football and we pay for him to be part of the local club; it’s good for his physical and mental wellbeing - he does go state school so I can’t get bashed for that. We do drink wine at the weekends and bloody well enjoy it! We have had one holiday abroad in 3 years. When I buy clothes I buy a few key pieces from reputable UK brands or Vinted. Clothing and shoes are bought to last.

We don’t have Disney +, Sky Sports etc. Our cars are about 15 years old. I don’t buy shed loads of shit off Temu and Shein that is the discarded after Halloween/ Christmas/ Easter or after a couple of wears because it is going out fashion or falling apart.

I pointed this out further up post to the OP who then didn’t respond. If we - the despised middle classes - stop spending in the high street (rather than supporting cheap shite from China), the hospitality and entertainment industries, the housing market and tourism, the economy will take a downturn. Basic economics - you need a thriving economy to drive growth.

So yes, we are pissed off that we are carrying the can for the benefit sector of the country (as in those who are just too f@cking lazy to get off their arses and work) but we can also see that by us spending less in the economy as a whole, the situation is just going to get worse!!

randomchap · 28/11/2025 09:03

Goddessoftheearth · 28/11/2025 08:59

Ok. So I am one of the squeezed middle classes. Yes I shop in Waitrose because I care about where what I put in my mouth comes from (ie not shit meat from countries with no animal welfare standards); yes my ONE son plays football and we pay for him to be part of the local club; it’s good for his physical and mental wellbeing - he does go state school so I can’t get bashed for that. We do drink wine at the weekends and bloody well enjoy it! We have had one holiday abroad in 3 years. When I buy clothes I buy a few key pieces from reputable UK brands or Vinted. Clothing and shoes are bought to last.

We don’t have Disney +, Sky Sports etc. Our cars are about 15 years old. I don’t buy shed loads of shit off Temu and Shein that is the discarded after Halloween/ Christmas/ Easter or after a couple of wears because it is going out fashion or falling apart.

I pointed this out further up post to the OP who then didn’t respond. If we - the despised middle classes - stop spending in the high street (rather than supporting cheap shite from China), the hospitality and entertainment industries, the housing market and tourism, the economy will take a downturn. Basic economics - you need a thriving economy to drive growth.

So yes, we are pissed off that we are carrying the can for the benefit sector of the country (as in those who are just too f@cking lazy to get off their arses and work) but we can also see that by us spending less in the economy as a whole, the situation is just going to get worse!!

The majority of benefits to working age people go to those in work. But don't let that fact stop you ranting about benefit scroungers

Goddessoftheearth · 28/11/2025 09:10

randomchap · 28/11/2025 09:03

The majority of benefits to working age people go to those in work. But don't let that fact stop you ranting about benefit scroungers

I’m not the only one moaning about benefit scroungers - read the whole post! But this is where the system is wrong. I have managed an organisation where people refused to do more than their 16/18 hours a week (even on a once off basis) because it interfered with their benefits - and they are paying minimal if any tax. So they are being paid to work a few hours a week, plus benefits and not putting back into society!

JH0404 · 28/11/2025 09:16

People live to their means, if they are working and doing everything right of course they are going to be upset when the goalposts change and their chosen lifestyle becomes unaffordable. The way that any high earner in a household excludes child benefit is very unfair though, my husband is above the threshold so if I were to claim it we’d have to pay it back. However I’m currently not working as we have a child with a disability and I need to be available for them (I tried going back to work for a while and it wasn’t sustainable). So although my husband is in the high earning category if you were to divide it between us it’s a very average income. Households that bring in much much more are receiving the payments.

Benjithedog · 28/11/2025 09:30

hazelnutvanillalatte · 28/11/2025 03:04

Not only that, but you can see that achievement, self-reliance and financial responsibility are actively sneered at! For some reason these things are seen as negative, as 'privileged,' as a target for exploitation because they deserve it. A person on benefits is seen as morally superior to someone who works hard in a skilled profession. It's completely backwards.

My parents were from immigrant families who both worked (and still work) incredibly hard to give their children a good life. Further degrees from Oxbridge, insane work schedules, mental and physical stress, the sacrifice of freedom and family time.

I think we will suffer massive brain drain from those who still want to achieve, and those who stay here will just choose not to.

Agreed

BunnyMcDougall · 28/11/2025 09:35

JH0404 · 28/11/2025 09:16

People live to their means, if they are working and doing everything right of course they are going to be upset when the goalposts change and their chosen lifestyle becomes unaffordable. The way that any high earner in a household excludes child benefit is very unfair though, my husband is above the threshold so if I were to claim it we’d have to pay it back. However I’m currently not working as we have a child with a disability and I need to be available for them (I tried going back to work for a while and it wasn’t sustainable). So although my husband is in the high earning category if you were to divide it between us it’s a very average income. Households that bring in much much more are receiving the payments.

You need to be claiming, and setting your amount of child benefit to receive as £0 (so you don’t have to pay it back). You are not working, therefore not earning National Insurance credits for your state pension. Claiming child benefit earns you a National Insurance credit for that year. If you continue not working/not claiming CB, you will have a huge hole in your state pension.

Switcher · 28/11/2025 09:38

Your post makes no sense to me. It seems to imply that the only purpose of earning more money is to anticipate that money being taken in tax. The whole conversation is about the wrong thing. It should be about how we can grow our economy and raise average incomes, which would include raising the tip incomes and would increase the tax take without increasing the % tax paid. Instead of which you seem to be saying that people with money to spend shouldn't spend it. Ok, well, enjoy Cuba.

Benjithedog · 28/11/2025 09:43

Goddessoftheearth · 28/11/2025 09:10

I’m not the only one moaning about benefit scroungers - read the whole post! But this is where the system is wrong. I have managed an organisation where people refused to do more than their 16/18 hours a week (even on a once off basis) because it interfered with their benefits - and they are paying minimal if any tax. So they are being paid to work a few hours a week, plus benefits and not putting back into society!

Totally agree. Everyone knows someone that works the minimal amount of hours as it affects their benefits. To those who say it doesn’t happen it does and I know a fair few of them.

JH0404 · 28/11/2025 09:54

BunnyMcDougall · 28/11/2025 09:35

You need to be claiming, and setting your amount of child benefit to receive as £0 (so you don’t have to pay it back). You are not working, therefore not earning National Insurance credits for your state pension. Claiming child benefit earns you a National Insurance credit for that year. If you continue not working/not claiming CB, you will have a huge hole in your state pension.

I get a carers allowance, I should probably be wiser about these things but I assumed that would keep my NI and pension going?

Aninabertsi · 28/11/2025 10:08

randomchap · 26/11/2025 12:06

Some people just like whinging about paying tax. They don't seem to understand that they can only earn because of the state that supports them. Taxes are what we pay to live in a civilised society.

It's been especially prevalent since the private school loophole was closed. Lots of whinging that a luxury choice was being taxed as a luxury.

What are you on about!? The state can only be there because of ordinary people working their asses off and NOT the other way around. Jobs will always exist with or without the state!!

BunnyMcDougall · 28/11/2025 10:10

JH0404 · 28/11/2025 09:54

I get a carers allowance, I should probably be wiser about these things but I assumed that would keep my NI and pension going?

I believe it does earn NI credits 👍

HamptonPlace · 28/11/2025 10:11

Another amusing parody. Please note people the obvious flags laid out (e.g. ‘x’h, as well as the clearly laughable numbers. But that’s the thing about parody eh, it works because there is a kernel of ‘truthiness’ therein. Bravo!

randomchap · 28/11/2025 10:11

Aninabertsi · 28/11/2025 10:08

What are you on about!? The state can only be there because of ordinary people working their asses off and NOT the other way around. Jobs will always exist with or without the state!!

So your job doesn't rely in any way on state infrastructure? Your life doesn't? If you genuinely believe that then you're living in cloud cuckoo land

We rely on the state, it relies on us. It's symbiotic

Aninabertsi · 28/11/2025 10:12

itsthetea · 26/11/2025 12:28

No one has a right to anything beyond the most basic of food and a roof over their head, and I would say also an education and health care

no no one has a right to a posh house or nice holidays

yes people do think they deserve it but until everyone has the basics it’s a bit much to expect that you can have so much more, it’s a lot arrogant to assume you are worth so much more

As someone who was born in soviet Russia, I guarantee you EVERYONE in this country had the basics! And it should absolutely be everyone right to want more and not be taxted on the last penny!!

randomchap · 28/11/2025 10:18

JH0404 · 28/11/2025 09:54

I get a carers allowance, I should probably be wiser about these things but I assumed that would keep my NI and pension going?

The CAB should be able to give you proper advice on this. You don't want to miss out

bugalugs45 · 28/11/2025 10:32

BoyFTM645 · 26/11/2025 12:39

The problem with 100k+ salary is that you work insane hours to get it. I have worked 50-100 hours a week for the last 8 years of my career.

I work Christmas days, holidays, I even have to check my emails on a Sunday morning. I had no social life in my 20s. I can never go for a drink Monday - Friday. My friends are work friends only.

Our juniors are leaving because they don't have the hope that i did that they'll work like dogs but make partner at 40 anymore. So there is no point.

20 years ago a man in my job supported a SAHM wife and 2 kids in private schools and a house in zone 3.

I've just signed an offer for a job abroad. I'm handing in my notice and we're leaving the UK in March.

Not always insane hours, usually maybe but deffo not always .
My BIL works in finance , very flexible ,mainly working from home , never misses a child’s sports day, parents evening , or event . And never worked past 6pm or a weekend in his life . Granted it’s rare but not unheard of .

MrsBunny2018 · 28/11/2025 10:36

randomchap · 27/11/2025 19:03

That's very goady. It's their fault they are poor? That's a complete nonsense and you know it

I'm quite obviously responding to the OP's argument, saying that technically their statement can apply to both sides of the argument. Duh