Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Poor life planning..

369 replies

pocketpairs · 26/11/2025 12:01

With the upcoming budget seen many "poor me" posts, particularly from high/middle earners. I find it frustrating that rather than blame themselves for thier life (& financial planning) choices, they blame some arbitrary government policy changes, such as upcoming introduction of new council tax bands.

Example: Sister & hubby earn £14k net p/m. But their choice to buy a nearly £x.xm house in SE & send DCs to private school means they have £3k (approx) to spend on everything else. They could have taken different choices...£1m houses &/or move to grammar school areas.

Clearly this is an extreme example, but I really don't understand why a family can't survive on £4-6k p/m, especially outside of London. Up until recently, I survived on much less and managed to put myself a firmer financial footing in 40s.

Sure this means some sacrifices, but it seems everyone wants to 'have their cake and eat it'.

OP posts:
Fiddy1964 · 27/11/2025 19:50

Everyone does pay tax. If you eat/drink/travel/clothe yourself, you pay tax.

Rollerbarbie88 · 27/11/2025 19:51

Honestly the biggest 'poor life planning' as OP puts it, is not high earners having an expectation of luxury - they have worked very hard to achieve positions which warrant them a high income and are entitled to a level of opulence that that income should grant. It is only natural for them to feel resentment towards those not paying taxes.

The biggest poor life planning is people who are not in a stable financial/living position thinking they are entitled to breed, and the expectation that everyone else foot the bill and suffer for their lifestyle.

For reference, I am NOT a high earner. I am however, fully aware of my financial standing, and therefore remain very painfully childless (NTC).

I have empathy for the high earners who's wages have not significantly increased, but who's previously affordable mortgages are now crippling. I have zero sympathy for the likes of the mirror's poster child for benefits who - despite being featured several years prior discussing how hard it is to support a family when you require a UC top up, has CHOSEN to continue to grow her family?!

Goddessoftheearth · 27/11/2025 19:53

pocketpairs · 27/11/2025 19:38

It's really nothing to do with a socialist government. It's as other poster have said, we are a rapidly declining nation overly reliant on financial services. We have no vision or strategy, partly due to the way politics is organised in this country. Get elected, raise taxes, try to do as much as possible in first 3 years, then cut taxes before election.

The Conservatives increased taxes significantly during their time in office and only cut NI as a re-election bribe.

Correct. We are a rapidly declining nation alongside much of the world at the moment! But squeezing those people that do get off their arses and work hard whilst giving handouts to those who couldn’t give a crap and are quite happy sat on their backsides watching daytime tv and keeping Temu afloat is galling. Yes, we can all make sacrifices and stop spending, but by stopping spending, the economy goes into recession, ergo bigger issues all round!!

ContinuewithGoogle · 27/11/2025 19:53

Wellyoudidaskaboutit · 27/11/2025 19:48

I live well below my means so I have some wiggle room. The people complaining loudest seem to have not considered doing this.

it would be silly to wait until you are breaking point to complain. Of course you make a stand, complain and try to get a change from the start, not wait until it's too late.

Theroadt · 27/11/2025 19:55

pocketpairs · 26/11/2025 13:09

Many of the things you listed are out of your control, and many are to be applauded.

To answer you questions.

  • Try to live within my means. While we didn't anticipate covid, the direction of medium term interest rate was only going to be one way.
  • Live in a comfortable house in the best area possible, but not to the extent that it impacts my quality of life - it's just a house
  • Although private school typically have better facilities and pastoral care, they are only marginally better than grammar schools. Plus in reality just means DCs will just end up doing same job type as you..

Not sure I’d agree with you that grammar schools were “better” than private schools - or non-selective state schools for that matter, but we’d have to agree first what “better” means - not being goady, some grammars are excellent but some are meh

TheWK · 27/11/2025 20:01

randomchap · 26/11/2025 12:06

Some people just like whinging about paying tax. They don't seem to understand that they can only earn because of the state that supports them. Taxes are what we pay to live in a civilised society.

It's been especially prevalent since the private school loophole was closed. Lots of whinging that a luxury choice was being taxed as a luxury.

Not paying VAT on private schools was not a loophole….you didn’t pay VAT on education materials such as SEN provision, university courses and books.

And why the fuck should you pay a punitive tax to give your children a better education?

You already pay twice for education through general taxes and fees

Tryingatleast · 27/11/2025 20:09

What’s wrong with having cake and eating it?! As someone who earns mw and bypassed the treats section today because I literally cannot afford things like cake until payday next week I think people who are lucky/ fortunate enough and yes who worked their way up can be upset that their great wage doesn’t afford them what it should. And I’m a bit fed up of people who aren’t on good wages rolling their eyes at them or telling them they should forgo any extravagance they should be able to afford.

And honestly I’m fed up of all the perfect savers making people who find things like managing money tough (me!) feel like they are doing everything wrong. These threads that are a bashing board for anyone earning more than me are getting tedious

LIbertyCharles · 27/11/2025 20:13

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 26/11/2025 14:27

The official figures are only those that have been caught committing fraud. Do you realise just how hard it is to catch them in the first place? It requires way more staff and money to do so! They simply don’t have the money to do so! I could name at least 10 people i know personally that are committing some kind of benefit fraud and the sum total of any investigation they have had should they have been reported for fraud is a compliance interview over the phone in which they deny any wrongdoing and thats it over with! As for tax evasion its not just the very rich or big businesses…every single self employed person i know does it! Cash in hand, under reporting earnings while claiming universal credit!

my husband is self employed and does none of these things. Perhaps it's just the people you know.

BunnyMcDougall · 27/11/2025 20:15

pocketpairs · 26/11/2025 17:23

Perhaps I'm oversimplify. I agree with the premise that those that earn more should pay proportionally more, otherwise we'll be in a situation like the US.

Similarly, I don't mind the 40% / 45% tax rate, as we need a progressive tax system, but disagree with the 62% marginal tax rate at 100-125k.

While i understand the sentiment that "why am I getting penalised while they get more", the reality is it's just a few ££ per month which can be easily absorbed, and if it can't surely ones priorities must be questioned (if they are moaning).

My sister (for example) says she can't afford an annual holiday abroad (in reality she can - just not an expensive one), but there are dials she can turn down, rather than get frustrated at things outside of her sphere of influence.

Why should you get a vote in how your sister allocates her monthly budget? Her financial priorities aren’t what yours are, and she’s allowed to make her own choices.

rainbowsandraspberrygin · 27/11/2025 20:15

pbdr · 26/11/2025 12:36

I think there is some growing resentment that a small minority of high earning taxpayers (top 10% contributing over 60% of tax receipts) are increasingly keeping everything afloat by contributing most of the country’s tax receipts, while being means tested out of most of the benefits they are funding, and are still often being accused of not “paying their fair share” while the majority of individuals (~53%) in the UK are net recipients.

Our high earners are more steeply taxed than most European countries, while our low earners are taxed far less than most (the tax free allowance is particularly unusual), and yet there is so much public anger directed towards our majority taxpayers if they express any frustration at their proportionate share of taxation going up and up at just about every budget. Everyone wants better public services and benefits, but they only want a very small proportion of the population to pay for it for everyone else, and then balk at the idea of those same taxpayers also having equal access to the benefits and services they are funding.

Agree with this.

without the people paying more and more tax - the country would be more and more screwed. I think they have a right to be annoyed at funding the country and getting nothing back.

Plum02 · 27/11/2025 20:15

I agree that those who are high earners should pay more so I have no time for the “woe is me”. However I think it’s unfair to say having a massive mortgage is poor life planning - if your mortgage doesn’t take up the majority of your income it’s likely because of your age. All millennials/gen z who are home owners and live in a big city will have a huge mortgage unless they were “gifted” a large deposit by their parents.

You mention moving to area with grammar schools but the grammar schools massively push up house prices in those areas. We live in a grammar school area - our modest 3 bed terrace cost £750,000 leaving us with a huge mortgage despite saving for years for a deposit.

We have twins who were conceived naturally - we’d only planned to have one baby. DH earns over £100k which means we’re not entitled to any free childcare hours or child benefit. Nursery fees at my local nursery for 2 children are more than my net pay. I’ve dropped down to 3 days per week for that reason - I’m literally paying to work. Fees for 3 days per week for both children are £2300 per month which is a massive hit to our income.

As a result we probably do have less disposable income than a lot of people who earn much less - we have to live very frugally to afford the mortgage and childcare. We both work long hours in the NHS so I really do feel we earn our pay - I know lots of people earn a lot less and work extremely hard too. I also know lots of people who work from home and have very relaxed jobs in the civil service who will have more disposable income than us because they get free childcare and people who earn a lot more because both partners earn just under £100k meaning they’re still entitled to free childcare.

Ultimately anyone who can pay their bills and feed their family should be grateful and willing to pay more to support those who can’t. But it doesn’t mean all those people will feel wealthy or be living extravagant lifestyles. There are a lot of outside influences and it’s natural to look at others and feel a sense of injustice when earning more means you’re worse off. Unfortunately there is a “cliff edge” at £100k which is why many people react like this.

DeedsNotDiddums · 27/11/2025 20:18

pocketpairs · 27/11/2025 19:12

Claiming tax break for supposed charitable status was disingenuous.

This is factually wrong. They didn't claim any tax breaks because of charitable status.
Schools that were charities and those that were not were legally exempt from paying VAT. Legally exempt.. not claiming anything under any loophole.

Papyrophile · 27/11/2025 20:20

If I were 47 rather than 69, you can bet that I would have been taking an opportunity overseas rather than funding the welfare budget.

BunnyMcDougall · 27/11/2025 20:20

Only on Mumsnet—the people with good careers, who have bought nice homes, who want to send their kids to good schools—these are the people who haven’t made good life choices. Mumsnet never ceases to amaze me.

NET145 · 27/11/2025 20:24

No one wants to pay tax but everyone wants to complain about crime and safety issues which are hugely exacerbated by inequality. Losing hope for humanity

Umbrella15 · 27/11/2025 20:28

Op, im not a high earner like the people you are referring to, however I do earn 48k a year. My husband is on the minimum wage. To do this I work 13 hour shifts 4 days a week. I work bank holidays, weekends, xmas. I live in a morgaged terrace house that needs work doing to it. Between us my husband and I have enough to pay the bills, buy food and run 2 cars. We have teenage children. At the end of each month we have a bit to save (for a 49 yr old, I dont have much savings), and we have 1 holiday a year to Spain or Portugal. I dont go out much due to the cost of things. If I was to get a pay raise, I would be put into the higher tax bracket. I would then have a choice, save or have my 1 holiday a year. I know people who earn less than me, who have houses in a perfect condition, a few foreign holidays a year, brand new cars, and 1 of these people is a single mum of 3, with whose kids have diffetent fathers and hs never worked a day in her life. Yet I am expected to pay more out of my hard earned wages to support her lif style, and your wondering why people are getting angry ?

PersephonePomegranate · 27/11/2025 20:29

And yet who is their money going to be funding? Not moderately to severely disabled people and their full time carers, who are criminally 'underpaid' for the job they do, often into old age, and keeping their loved ones out of institutions (which would otherwise have to be funded by the government). Oh no, they're supporting other people who have planned poorly and made shit life decisions.

lifeonmars100 · 27/11/2025 20:30

phantomofthepopera · 26/11/2025 22:19

We can be all those things, and still be lucky.

You’re lucky if you have an IQ higher than average. You were lucky to be born where you were, and not on the streets of Mumbai. You were lucky if you were raised by loving parents. There are a million and one ways that we can be lucky, and cumulatively those things will have an impact upon our success.

True, so much of life depends upon who we born to, where we were born and how we were parented and educated during our formative years. .

BufferingAgain · 27/11/2025 20:30

itsthetea · 26/11/2025 12:28

No one has a right to anything beyond the most basic of food and a roof over their head, and I would say also an education and health care

no no one has a right to a posh house or nice holidays

yes people do think they deserve it but until everyone has the basics it’s a bit much to expect that you can have so much more, it’s a lot arrogant to assume you are worth so much more

So no one in this country should ever have any goals? No one should say I want to achieve X, then work to get X?

What if someone dreamed of going to France and pulled 50 extra factory shifts so they could go to France, should they not be able to go to France?

RollOnSunshine · 27/11/2025 20:31

A lot of peoples problems comes down to financial illiteracy. It usually follows that higher wages = higher spending but no thoughts towards generating passive income or building up a buffer for a rainy day.

SwirlingAroundSleep · 27/11/2025 20:33

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Miaminmoo · 27/11/2025 20:33

Benjithedog · 26/11/2025 12:08

If you are a taxpayer you can have an opinion on it.

100%

Bringemout · 27/11/2025 20:34

I mean if we are critical of people who make poor choices why not people who have kids when they clearly can’t afford it? People who didn’t finish school or imporve themselves in any way? People who use payday loans or spend stupid amounts at xmas, people who seem incapable of working full time hours ever they. Plenty of people make silly choices.

Earning lots of money through hard work and then being a bit miffed that you are getting shaken down even more to sub people who make really really bad choices doesn’t seem unreasonable to me tbh. Your sister didn’t make bad choices but she’s now hostage to other peoples bad choices.

Papyrophile · 27/11/2025 20:36

BunnyMcDougall · 27/11/2025 20:20

Only on Mumsnet—the people with good careers, who have bought nice homes, who want to send their kids to good schools—these are the people who haven’t made good life choices. Mumsnet never ceases to amaze me.

Not really. I had an excellent career and I was equally good at being self-employed for 20-odd years. But if the then version of me had been in the same situation now, I would definitely just have gone offshore. I worked, I saved, bought a home, put money into a pension... Right now to little personal benefit because my taxes are being used to finance the incompetent and inadequate. I don't mind paying my due tax share for schools, hospitals, roads and justice at all.

Miaminmoo · 27/11/2025 20:40

itsthetea · 26/11/2025 12:28

No one has a right to anything beyond the most basic of food and a roof over their head, and I would say also an education and health care

no no one has a right to a posh house or nice holidays

yes people do think they deserve it but until everyone has the basics it’s a bit much to expect that you can have so much more, it’s a lot arrogant to assume you are worth so much more

North Korea will welcome you with open arms 🙄