Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Middle earners punished

1000 replies

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:18

I am feeling so disheartened and frustrated by how middle earners are constantly suffering at the hands of ridiculous government priorities. My husband and I have a greater household income than other families we know but have less cash in hand due to increased taxes coupled with the fact we receive zero benefits like child benefit or tax free childcare etc. ZERO. If they want middle earners to fund the country thought tax then at least support us with childcare costs. It’s a joke that two parents earning £99k each get childcare funding but parents with one £101k salary and one £25k salary receive nothing. I just need to speak to people who understand the burden of raising a family amidst the current financial climate and then the potential of further tax rises!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
YourAmplePlumPoster · 26/11/2025 10:56

Income tax was originally started to fund wars and Britain was in a lot of them!

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 10:56

If you can’t afford children, use contraception or the withdrawal method.

Just a thought.

BlakeCarrington · 26/11/2025 10:57

Labour care far more about subduing their backbenchers than doing anything at all to control spending. Contemptible liars.

Croakymccroakyvoice · 26/11/2025 10:57

Christmaspuddingsss · 26/11/2025 10:44

A tiny percentage of the population chooses to pay school fees thus paying more tax and frankly those of us who don’t are sick of hearing about it. I personally am paying exactly the same proportion in tax as I did in December 2023.

Your tax situation is not relevant.

It's the politics of envy plain and simple.

Many children in private schools are in small schools where they get help if they are SEND. Their parents are / were struggling to afford it in the first place. Many parents are on modest incomes but made huge sacrifices to send their child to a school where their needs would be helped.

Those who are very wealthy won't notice much difference with VAT if they can afford £60K pa for Eton etc. and they will already be paying a lot of tax.

However, it's the parents lower down the earnings scale who suffer. And don't forget that those parents are paying TWICE for education- they don't get a tax break if they take their child out of the state system. They're paying for it whether they use it or not.

RR has accrued very little from this VAT on school fees. In addition, many parents have taken their children out of those schools and some have found it very hard to find a school with places available.

Edited

Labour VAT raid to raise more than expected

"Labour’s private school VAT raid is on track to raise more revenue than forecast after schools burdened middle-class families with higher fee rises than expected."

Labour VAT raid to raise more than expected

Labour’s private school VAT raid is on track to raise more revenue than forecast after schools burdened middle-class families with higher fee rises than expected.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/labour-raise-more-expected-private-125444027.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFENDygeq2FN9wEivCdPeIiRTfuX8kfjWIYMvQB00lvTLRniQtZAAOokOenDk0Sd8UCwfGtj_4YL7n1fWyWJK98-E29BZG1QpxCa2QVu9kzUVc0GbBCKoWKzHuHGI0joCBYIfP_l9ED4Arr8sFI4dG0daSeCDeLkf29k40aEDsvt

Legolava · 26/11/2025 10:57

Christmascarrotjumper · 26/11/2025 10:37

PP is a well off pensioner....

Edited

The previous poster is on a public sector pension. Thus protected. Point proven.

LostInTheDream · 26/11/2025 10:58

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 10:52

Another person thinking the lifting of the 2 child benefit cap is madness. The ONLY people this policy appeals to is their own rebel MPs. Thats about 5 votes guys, compared to 65% of the UK voters against this policy.

Why though? Studies show that keeping it in place puts children in poverty and impacts their life chances. Is that really what people want. You can say the parents are feckless or that they shouldn't have had children, but again, not the child's fault is it? In an ideal world people wouldn't need means tested benefits but they do, and often through no fault of their own

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 10:58

I don’t wish to fund other people’s poor lifestyle choices or lack of family planning.

lifting the two child benefit cap is also bad for productivity as well as it will disincentivise working!

Pandersmum · 26/11/2025 10:58

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 08:14

How can you be proud to contribute to a welfare state that pays people more to stay at home on UC than work full time. That’s the issue! If the welfare state was fair everyone would be fine with it. It’s not. It’s an abomination and Labour are too gutless to do anything about it.

Agree

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 10:59

LostInTheDream · 26/11/2025 10:58

Why though? Studies show that keeping it in place puts children in poverty and impacts their life chances. Is that really what people want. You can say the parents are feckless or that they shouldn't have had children, but again, not the child's fault is it? In an ideal world people wouldn't need means tested benefits but they do, and often through no fault of their own

Studies show that investing in sure start instead provides 5 x more benefit per £ invested, that’s why.

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 10:59

LostInTheDream · 26/11/2025 10:58

Why though? Studies show that keeping it in place puts children in poverty and impacts their life chances. Is that really what people want. You can say the parents are feckless or that they shouldn't have had children, but again, not the child's fault is it? In an ideal world people wouldn't need means tested benefits but they do, and often through no fault of their own

Then give them other kind of support I.e. at schools or food vouchers, free school uniforms etc. anything but giving away free money to lifestyle benefit cheats

Kirbert2 · 26/11/2025 10:59

PodMom · 26/11/2025 09:39

I think that's unfair actually. I'd have no problem in paying more income tax to help someone short term as a safety net or someone long term who is disabled. No problem if it means the nhs is improved so I can see a dr.

I do like others have said have a major issue with people using benefits as a lifestyle choice. You say its tiktok hype but I know for a fact people like this. I know a couple who don't work, both on long term sick and claiming every benefit going. He gets carers allowance to look after her, she gets carers allowance to look after him. They get get carers allowance for the teen dd who goes to school fulltime.

They get so much benefit they live in a 4 bed semi detached house where the rent is £1600 a month. My friend is their landlord. She also has 3 bed properties which she rents out for £780.

But God forbid they have a smaller house when the taxpayer will fund a much nicer house than I live in. This is a fact, not hype. And yes they have had a foreign holiday this year because they told my friend they were off to Spain for 2 weeks. I haven't been abroad for 7 years!!!!!!

I'm not saying people on benefits should be living on gruel and in rags at all. But there is something fundamentally wrong with the system when some people can live like this and other people on benefits are having to use food bank. An overhaul would surely benefit the people most in need?

Because if you multiply that wasted excess rent £9600 a year which is been paid out to them when they could be in a cheaper, smaller house up and down the country for all the people in a similar situation that's a lot of wasted taxpayers money which could be better spent elsewhere.

As I said earlier I'm on a bit under 50k a year. I'm supporting dd through uni which is costing me a fortune as her 9k a year maintenance loan doesn't even pay the rent. She's gone back to uni after being made redundant after the NI rise and her company went bust. She wasn't eligible for a penny in benefits, etc as she's sensibly saved too much (hoping for a house deposit) and instead was expected to spend thousands of her house deposit supporting herself.

So far this year I have spent - £300 on a private rheumatology appt due to a waiting list of over a year so I could start medication for Ankylosing Spondylitis which I got diagnosed with. Crippled in pain but can't start biologics until I see a specialist and have to wait a year. £120 for a scan to diagnose a frozen shoulder because it was a 4 month waiting list. £200 for an injection for my shoulder as I was in agony and not sleeping and the wait for that was weeks. I've spent around 1k on physio as there is nothing on the NHS.

Yes, I'm pissed off and I'm struggling financially. And I do see with my own eyes my taxes going to fund people to have a better lifestyle than me.

You don't get extra money for carers allowance if you care for more than one person.

Carers allowance is also deducted from UC.

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 11:00

Labour are basically the party for benefits.

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 11:01

Croakymccroakyvoice · 26/11/2025 10:57

Labour VAT raid to raise more than expected

"Labour’s private school VAT raid is on track to raise more revenue than forecast after schools burdened middle-class families with higher fee rises than expected."

How many of the promised 6.5k teachers have been recruited?

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 11:01

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 10:52

Another person thinking the lifting of the 2 child benefit cap is madness. The ONLY people this policy appeals to is their own rebel MPs. Thats about 5 votes guys, compared to 65% of the UK voters against this policy.

Totally. None of that money will benefits the kids. We'll still hear about the same number of kids in poverty next year. The feckless parents will spend it at the bookies and the off licence.

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 11:01

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 11:00

Labour are basically the party for benefits.

Yes.

They want to create a welfare state.

justalittlethought · 26/11/2025 11:01

Slothisavirtue · 26/11/2025 09:11

I don't mind paying tax.
I do mind working in a highly responsible/stressful public sector job but having a lower net income than someone who has made it a lifestyle choice to never work more than 16 hours a week

I don't disagree with you.

I think there should be an incentive for working and certainly I don't think someone having worked 16 hours or less for the entirety of their career should get the full state pension.

I also think that lots of benefits e.g. the energy £300 (can't remember name), attendance allowance etc should be means tested.

With AI/digital, the amount of work required to establish whether over a certain threshold of earnings should not be significant.

I also think that we have a HUGE issue with a hidden economy where people are working on the black market and never paying any tax or very little. We need ID cards (or digital IDs) to be able to track these.

Legolava · 26/11/2025 11:01

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 10:52

Another person thinking the lifting of the 2 child benefit cap is madness. The ONLY people this policy appeals to is their own rebel MPs. Thats about 5 votes guys, compared to 65% of the UK voters against this policy.

It is. I see where the money goes in deprived communities - every day. The lifting of the cap is to pull children out of poverty academically. It will do nothing in reality. Just more money for drugs and booze. Socialists can pat themselves on the back and say well done. It will make zero difference. If they were really serious, they’d give the money to schools or community hubs.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:02

It’s the cash handout basis of all benefits for long term unemployed adults that the issue. If you stopped giving cash handouts for PIP and instead provided therapy / equipment and other medical goods and services the claim rates would plummet. People are seeking ways to avoid working. Cash benefits foot the bill.

Limered · 26/11/2025 11:03

Croakymccroakyvoice · 26/11/2025 10:57

Labour VAT raid to raise more than expected

"Labour’s private school VAT raid is on track to raise more revenue than forecast after schools burdened middle-class families with higher fee rises than expected."

Oh brilliant news, thanks!

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 11:04

Legolava · 26/11/2025 11:01

It is. I see where the money goes in deprived communities - every day. The lifting of the cap is to pull children out of poverty academically. It will do nothing in reality. Just more money for drugs and booze. Socialists can pat themselves on the back and say well done. It will make zero difference. If they were really serious, they’d give the money to schools or community hubs.

No because their constituents want the cold hard cash for themselves.

As you say.

Limered · 26/11/2025 11:09

Do people really want to see children - who didn’t ask to be born - begging in the streets and scavenging for food? This happens in many countries. It’s always been thought of as wrong. But many here seem to be advocating for this eventuality. It’s sad. The UK used to be about community and society and now it’s been sucked into the American ‘me me me’ mentality.

There will be some big winners. And very many more losers. Which many on this thread will experience when they lose a job or their industry goes bust due to AI. All of a sudden your ‘studying’ and ‘working’ might amount to nothing. And I’ll bet you want some help then.

People certainly wanted the hand outs during Covid didnt they - furlough anyone?

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 11:09

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 11:01

Yes.

They want to create a welfare state.

Rather maintaining one…

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 11:10

Limered · 26/11/2025 11:03

Oh brilliant news, thanks!

You realise state schools won’t see a penny, right?

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 11:11

Klipspringer · 26/11/2025 10:37

But it’s ok because the PP has not been adversely impacted, so the rest of us can swivel.

You mean the 7% of parents of school age children who choose to be affected by that particular tax. Nobody in the country is paying a bigger percentage of their income in tax via PAYE, that’s the vast majority not just me. Maybe stop making it personal and address the facts?

Caps44 · 26/11/2025 11:12

Only 3 more years of pain and Reform will be here to reduce our taxes

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.