"The chances of the OW having a life threatening STI are next to none and if he’s at least a little bit sensible, he’ll he using protection anyway."
The man is obviously not sensible in any way, since he's quite happy to take the high risk of blowing up his kid's life because he likes fucking a younger woman and having his cake and eating it.
And the majority of male cheaters don't wear condoms, because they're thinking with their small head and how it feels. If the AP doesn't make him wear one, this idiot will be in there bare in a flash. He doesn't care a damn about anything but himself.
This carelessness is why married men are 4.6 times more likely to test positive for an STD in an emergency department than married women (12% vs 2.6%). Because the guys DO NOT wrap it up if they can get away with it.
And the statement "The chances of the OW having a life threatening STI are next to none" is utter rubbish. STD rates in the UK are high ("shockingly high" was the term used by the June 2024 press release about the UKHSA data) and they are rising. There were 400,000 new STD diagnoses in England alone in 2023, particularly for gonorrhoea and syphilis. And antibiotic resistance to gonorrhea is increasing.
Let's look at the life-threatening STD of human papilloma virus. HPV infections literally cause cancer in women, they cause 99% of cervical cancer cases. There are 3300 new cervical cancer cases in the UK annually, and 890 women die from cervical cancer every year. There is now a vaccine against HPV that prevents these infections - but is OP's SIL vaccinated? Most older women are not. OP's SIL hasn't been given the chance to protect herself from HPV and cervical cancer and premature death, because her fucking husband doesn't care.
Let's look now at the pain and suffering caused by STDs. In general, STDs hit women MUCH harder than men physically. Women are three times more likely to get infected from unprotected sex with a infected partner than men. They are much more likely to become infertile because of STIs. And untreated STIs - many of which are silent, especially in women - can cause very significant LONG TERM health problems in women such as pelvic inflammatory disease and chronic pain: on average, women lose 44 TIMES more quality-adjusted life years to chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and trichomoniasis than men.
And that's not even considering bacterial vaginosis, which is very common, bothersome, can be recurrent, and is increasingly antibiotic resistant. Condoms can help prevent reinfection - but does OP's SIL know that she's at risk of it? No, because of her fucking husband sneaking behind her back.
And then there's vaginitis caused by exposure to another woman's vaginal flora. It can include yeast infection and trichomoniasis, which can be exceedingly itchy and painful and difficult to treat, sometimes requiring many re-treatments. It can take dozens of medical appointments while feeling significant pain and itch for weeks to months to YEARS before the woman feels OK again. How very kind of OP's brother to expose SIL to this.
The risk of OP's SIL getting an STD, including HPV, and/or having her vaginal flora fucked up is not small, and the consequences will ONLY BE FELT BY HER.
This is not fucking fair, and it's abominable to downplay this risk to her health and well-being.