Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

As Rachel Reeves struggles to balance the books, the Royal Family should forgo a £46 million increase in their funding. AIBU?

287 replies

User198174 · 12/11/2025 10:25

Due to an increase in Crown Estate profits, the government is set to increase its grant to the Royal Family from £ 86.3 million to £132.1 million.
As the Royal Family appear to be getting by at present on an £86.3 million grant, AIBU to say that they should share in the pain of the national squeeze on finances?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy5lzq94gqo.amp

King Charles in the foreground of the image looks away to the left of the frame, whilst his younger brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is seen behind him, slightly out of focus.

Royal finances: Where does the King get his money? - BBC News

The language of Buckingham Palace's statement is "very brutal", royal historian Kelly Swaby tells the BBC.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy5lzq94gqo.amp

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
AlphaApple · 12/11/2025 10:34

I’d go a step further and disestablish the royal family altogether, nationalise the Crown Estate and their inherited assets. The whole notion of royalty is an anathema.

User198174 · 12/11/2025 10:48

AlphaApple · 12/11/2025 10:34

I’d go a step further and disestablish the royal family altogether, nationalise the Crown Estate and their inherited assets. The whole notion of royalty is an anathema.

I agree, but I don’t think that will happen in the near future. It would be great to even get to a place where state financial support went only to the monarch.

OP posts:
UnhappyHobbit · 12/11/2025 13:26

I don’t believe in getting rid of the royals. This does seem like a huge increase to them however, it depends on how much they are making back for the government/economy as a whole.

User198174 · 12/11/2025 13:27

2 and a half hours in, not one person has jumped in to the thread to say that the Royal Family deserves or needs a £46 million increase in funding!

Rachel Reeves should take note - there’s an easy £46 million boost to the national piggy bank, which will be noticed by nobody except for the royals!

OP posts:
BorgQueen · 12/11/2025 13:34

I doubt £46million would run the NHS for an hour.

More troubling is that Charles didn’t have to pay Inheritance tax and I doubt William will either. ‘Cos it’s all tied up in lovely Trusts that the plebs don’t know about.
We’ll never get to see HMQ Elizabeth’s Will, not in my lifetime anyway, despite Wills being public documents.

QuenchedSquirrel · 12/11/2025 13:36

The cost of property upkeep and official business done by working royals is not going to increase by £40+ million.

Unless they decide that they may as well do some renovations somewhere. And do extra, more expensive state visits, and walkabouts.

It's ludicrous that the amount they receive is linked to profits, therefore they can increase their expenditure on property and official work to fit the amount.

It would be more sensible to allocate a set amount, that rose with inflation.

Bagsintheboot · 12/11/2025 13:39

I don't particularly care if they get the £46m or not, but £46m is absolute peanuts compared to the money this country needs.

It would run the NHS for approximately two hours @BorgQueen !

User198174 · 12/11/2025 13:41

BorgQueen · 12/11/2025 13:34

I doubt £46million would run the NHS for an hour.

More troubling is that Charles didn’t have to pay Inheritance tax and I doubt William will either. ‘Cos it’s all tied up in lovely Trusts that the plebs don’t know about.
We’ll never get to see HMQ Elizabeth’s Will, not in my lifetime anyway, despite Wills being public documents.

Agreed. That £46 million royal funding increase (on top of obscenely lavish pre-existing state funding) might not go far in the NHS, but would definitely help with local transport initiatives for example. It could also save many libraries, or swimming pools, or help with school estate maintenance. In short, there are multiple better ways of spending £46 million.

OP posts:
Cleikumstovies · 12/11/2025 13:42

Leaving aside whether the monarchy should or should not exist. Should those with large wealth bail out a government who has mismanaged their country or bailout a government who has been voted in to govern a mismanaged country by predecessors?

didntlikeanyofthesuggestions · 12/11/2025 13:45

How ungrateful! After all the royal family do for us this is the least the government should be doing. I know Prince Andrew has had some bad publicity recently but let's not punish the others .

User198174 · 12/11/2025 13:47

Cleikumstovies · 12/11/2025 13:42

Leaving aside whether the monarchy should or should not exist. Should those with large wealth bail out a government who has mismanaged their country or bailout a government who has been voted in to govern a mismanaged country by predecessors?

The Tories salted the earth, and Labour is a deer in the headlights. But if the answer is that those with broadest shoulders should take the strain, why are the royals exempt?

OP posts:
User198174 · 12/11/2025 13:48

didntlikeanyofthesuggestions · 12/11/2025 13:45

How ungrateful! After all the royal family do for us this is the least the government should be doing. I know Prince Andrew has had some bad publicity recently but let's not punish the others .

Love it! 🤣

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · 12/11/2025 13:50

£46m is chicken feed. Less than a pound per person living in the UK.

Hadalifeonce · 12/11/2025 13:51

Isn't the funding from the crown estates,not the tax payer? Apologies if I have got that wrong. I thought the crown estates is effectively, a property company, and its profits determine the sovereign grant.

lemonraspberry · 12/11/2025 13:52

AlphaApple · 12/11/2025 10:34

I’d go a step further and disestablish the royal family altogether, nationalise the Crown Estate and their inherited assets. The whole notion of royalty is an anathema.

Get rid of the crown you also need to get rid of the church. The two work side by side. Another man made entity which decides how people should, should not live and known for endless quests for power it does not deserve.

jumpingthehighjump · 12/11/2025 13:53

didntlikeanyofthesuggestions · 12/11/2025 13:45

How ungrateful! After all the royal family do for us this is the least the government should be doing. I know Prince Andrew has had some bad publicity recently but let's not punish the others .

What do they do for us?
For me?

A 48% increase in the sovereign Grant whilst people are struggling so much is a joke

slowsakura · 12/11/2025 13:54

Yanbu.
If they can't afford to maintain their assets they should donate them to the state.

New land for housing , hospitals or even just new parks for people to enjoy as the rest of the country gets built on

It's disgusting that everyone else is asked to tighten their belts but royals don't have to do the same.

Mammut · 12/11/2025 13:54

Badbadbunny · 12/11/2025 13:50

£46m is chicken feed. Less than a pound per person living in the UK.

But each every person living in the Uk needs that pound more than the royals surely?

slowsakura · 12/11/2025 13:55

The crown estate is a very aggressive landlord and lots of it's "profits" will be money collected from public bodies

User198174 · 12/11/2025 13:57

Got to work now (those royal handouts won’t pay for themselves! 🤣) I will be back later.

OP posts:
slowsakura · 12/11/2025 13:58

Hadalifeonce · 12/11/2025 13:51

Isn't the funding from the crown estates,not the tax payer? Apologies if I have got that wrong. I thought the crown estates is effectively, a property company, and its profits determine the sovereign grant.

They make vast profits from tax payers though, they are often the landlord to public bodies and a very robust and commercial landlord at that.

They also get any property bona vacantia property and really that should go to the government and I think that's a ripe area for reform.

slowsakura · 12/11/2025 13:58

User198174 · 12/11/2025 13:57

Got to work now (those royal handouts won’t pay for themselves! 🤣) I will be back later.

Grin
Mercurial123 · 12/11/2025 14:03

didntlikeanyofthesuggestions · 12/11/2025 13:45

How ungrateful! After all the royal family do for us this is the least the government should be doing. I know Prince Andrew has had some bad publicity recently but let's not punish the others .

Lol seriously this has to be a joke. Why should anyone be grateful to a dysfunctional family who live in immense wealth with shady tax policies, suitcases full of cash and a disgraced ex Prince. But you keep doffing your cap.

eqpi4t2hbsnktd · 12/11/2025 14:04

Off with their heads! Peado Andy first

JacknDiane · 12/11/2025 14:05

Im sorry this is sickening

Swipe left for the next trending thread