Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

1dayatatime · 11/11/2025 23:47

StrikeForever · 11/11/2025 23:32

That cohort didn’t have the same employment or pay for decades after they started work. Even after the Equal Pay Act, women were still paid a fraction of what men were paid for work of equal value. It was a long time before that was tidied up.

Black people and Irish people also faced discrimination and didn't have the same employment or pay for decades - should they also have lower retirement ages?

Ijwwm · 11/11/2025 23:51

When I started working life, there were often restrictions on being part of a pension scheme as a woman.

One job, had to have been there x number of years. Another two, couldn’t apply to join until 25 or 30 years old.

Whilst not totally up to date on this scenario, it’s really bloody annoying the rhetoric of “women of a certain age should have planned better”. There is a real undercurrent of vitriol on this site towards “older” people in various scenarios and it’s really not pleasant. We are approaching the point where it’s going to become less effective to throw out the “boomer” slur as their numbers decline. Can only guess there’ll be a new slur coined about Gen X so that people can carry on moaning about the “older” generations.

BashfulClam · 11/11/2025 23:55

My mum falls in that age range and she knew and she didn’t really keep that up to date on things like that. As someone who will probably not get to retire until 70 if at all and not have much retirement due to probable Alzheimer’s I have little sympathy tbh.

Oilofeveningprimrose · 11/11/2025 23:57

I was an ignorant teenager when the changes were announced and i was aware of them and I didn't spend much time watching the news either!

StrikeForever · 12/11/2025 00:05

1dayatatime · 11/11/2025 23:47

Black people and Irish people also faced discrimination and didn't have the same employment or pay for decades - should they also have lower retirement ages?

Speaking as an Irish person. You are being ridiculous. FFS!

Redrosesposies · 12/11/2025 00:30

Well I was supposed to retire at 60 but don't get my SP until next year at 66 and one month so I suppose I have 'lost' about £50000. I will get the new pension rather than the old basic rate that I would have got at 60 but it will take around 17 years to make up the 'loss'. Hope I live that long.
I worked in banking and we were told at work at the time it was announced about the change in the qualifying age but there were some older ladies (mostly part timers on low grades) who were coming up to retirement at 60 and had planned their retirement on the expectation of getting their state pension at the same time as their small bank pension, about £2k pa as I recall, or at least when they got to 62.
They had a contracted retirement age so weren't allowed to continue working at the bank (pre EE regulations of 2011) and didn't have time to rethink their plans. Those ladies born in the early 1950's who retired before 2016 possibly deserve some compensation as they won't be getting £230pw, they will be on the old SP of £175pw.
If any is paid I think it should be means tested and anyone with income in excess of £35k should not qualify. Easy enough to do, they are doing it with the winter fuel allowance.
If they do pay compensation I won't get any. I miss out by a week.

AnneLovesGilbert · 12/11/2025 00:37

StrikeForever · 11/11/2025 23:29

This is being quoted because Starmer said. Financial experts have said it would be nowhere near this figure. This is happening because new evidence has come to light and the case will be coming to court will a likelihood that the Government wouldn’t have a case against it and would lose. Compensation for past injustices always cost a lot of money. The way to save that money is to ensure that things are done without injustice.

This is pensioners though. You lot carry on not giving a shit about them until you get there. Then it will be, oops “I wasn’t careful what I wished for”!

You lot? You don’t know how old I am.

catontheironingboard · 12/11/2025 00:41

Vaxtable · 11/11/2025 21:56

I am 1959 as well, I don’t remember seeing lots of publicity and certainly there wasn’t for those born earlier. 1959 is right at the end of the scale here

I knew about it as a very young teenager in the 1990s - it was discussed extensively in the media and press! I also simply don’t believe the women who say they didn’t know. Who doesn’t check any of their pension documentation, entitlement and qualifying years for literally decades? It beggars belief.

FiveShelties · 12/11/2025 00:44

I was born in 1956 and am surprised that anyone did not know about the changes. These were well publicised and I would not want compensation to be paid, especially with the economy in such a bad state.

devuskums · 12/11/2025 00:47

The easier the government get away with it, the easier they will do it again for us youngers

catontheironingboard · 12/11/2025 00:48

StrikeForever · 11/11/2025 23:37

Really? This doesn’t deserve a reply 🙄

Our entire economic policy for the last five decades has been dominated by catering to the interests of the boomer-age voting bloc. That’s the entire reason for the triple lock and why the housing bubble has been propped up at unsustainable levels by government after government, for example. The unsustainable pensions and healthcare time bomb has been known about for decades, but no government wanted to deal with it for fear of alienating that age group who dominated voting stats.

Negroany · 12/11/2025 00:53

Oilofeveningprimrose · 11/11/2025 23:57

I was an ignorant teenager when the changes were announced and i was aware of them and I didn't spend much time watching the news either!

Yeah, I would have been mid twenties and I can remember it being on the news and discussed by people.

socialdilemmawhattodo · 12/11/2025 01:04

HelenaWaiting · 11/11/2025 21:39

You mean giving them loads of notice, expecting them to keep themselves informed and take appropriate action, and refusing to compensate them when they do nothing and later whine about it? They should get sweet FA.

Loads of notice? For pension changes that probably needs to be 30 years, incredibly well advertised, repeatedly, direct contact and through employers as well as national media. Did that happen? I am just slightly younger so not affected by this but I watch pension info like a hawk, but I am very unusual. The communication here seems to be the issue, not the principle.

socialdilemmawhattodo · 12/11/2025 01:13

Ijwwm · 11/11/2025 23:51

When I started working life, there were often restrictions on being part of a pension scheme as a woman.

One job, had to have been there x number of years. Another two, couldn’t apply to join until 25 or 30 years old.

Whilst not totally up to date on this scenario, it’s really bloody annoying the rhetoric of “women of a certain age should have planned better”. There is a real undercurrent of vitriol on this site towards “older” people in various scenarios and it’s really not pleasant. We are approaching the point where it’s going to become less effective to throw out the “boomer” slur as their numbers decline. Can only guess there’ll be a new slur coined about Gen X so that people can carry on moaning about the “older” generations.

Yes there were. I started work full time in 1986, pre any of the major pension reforms. The restrictions i had, were not sex-based, but income based, afe related and time-served. I worked for 1 of the big 4 and clearly the company wanted to restrict access to avoid those students who would fail exams or leave having access. The 1st major reform was 1988, and there have been several other pension reforms since. I would be astonished if people working in smaller companies had any information at all. I only took an interest at my age because my mum and dad (different industry) did. I kept all the paper work for years, many folders. I didn't move a lot, so could keep it.

AnnaQuayInTheUk · 12/11/2025 01:53

I started work in 1993 so am younger than the WASPIs but I remember extensive coverage of it. I was affected insofar as when I started work my work pension age was 65 but my state pension age would have been 60 but changed to 65. I was at a stage in my life where I wasn't interested in pensions at all but remember all the publicity.

It was discussed extensively at work because it affected a few of my colleagues who were in that age group. There was a general consensus that the move to 65 was fair, and part of the equality battle women had fought. The Equal Pay Act had been in force for years, so the state pension age needed to mirror that.

Women affected by the changes had plenty of time to change their retirement plans.

CanadianCooper · 12/11/2025 02:13

RescueMeFromThisSilliness · 11/11/2025 22:16

The government didn't give anything like the level of notice they should have done. That's the issue. I think there were a few short pieces in the newspapers, which didn't even get close to explaining things properly in layman's terms, and the average person wouldn't have understood the implications. There was nowhere near enough publicity. Due to the lack of publicity, those women were not able to make alternative provision.

Letters were issued, but delayed for more than two years before they were finally sent out. As a direct cause of that delay, many women lost out financially when they should not have done.

So basically, the government fucked up and these women were adversely affected when they shouldn't have been.

Of course they deserve compensation.

100% agree

Pryceosh1987 · 12/11/2025 02:21

Compensation is awesome to recieve, but its a work to get it.

Ticklyoctopus · 12/11/2025 07:17

socialdilemmawhattodo · 12/11/2025 01:04

Loads of notice? For pension changes that probably needs to be 30 years, incredibly well advertised, repeatedly, direct contact and through employers as well as national media. Did that happen? I am just slightly younger so not affected by this but I watch pension info like a hawk, but I am very unusual. The communication here seems to be the issue, not the principle.

Nobody else will get 30 years’ notice. The entitlement is madness.

OP posts:
Ticklyoctopus · 12/11/2025 07:18

catontheironingboard · 12/11/2025 00:48

Our entire economic policy for the last five decades has been dominated by catering to the interests of the boomer-age voting bloc. That’s the entire reason for the triple lock and why the housing bubble has been propped up at unsustainable levels by government after government, for example. The unsustainable pensions and healthcare time bomb has been known about for decades, but no government wanted to deal with it for fear of alienating that age group who dominated voting stats.

I agree. Pure greed. Everyone else is forced to take hits ‘for the greater good’, the boomers (not all obviously) seem to be very vocal about everyone else ‘living within their means’ etc yet fight tooth and nail to continue to feather their already very generous nests.

OP posts:
WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 12/11/2025 07:19

Absolutely fucking unbelievable.

im sick of this country to the back teeth. Seriously considering training as a teacher and leaving to somewhere like Dubai. All the wrong people are prioritised.

Ticklyoctopus · 12/11/2025 07:19

catontheironingboard · 12/11/2025 00:41

I knew about it as a very young teenager in the 1990s - it was discussed extensively in the media and press! I also simply don’t believe the women who say they didn’t know. Who doesn’t check any of their pension documentation, entitlement and qualifying years for literally decades? It beggars belief.

Agree. It’s just opportunism dressed up as ‘wanting things to be fair’. They’re already not fair on everyone else.

OP posts:
Letskeepcalm · 12/11/2025 07:20

OmNomShiva · 11/11/2025 21:21

Anything for the boomers. Anything they want.

Im a boomer and I don't think it should be paid

Letskeepcalm · 12/11/2025 07:20

Im a boomer and I don't think it should be paid

BettysRoasties · 12/11/2025 07:23

So this and lifting the child cap. Yet we are trying to plug the black hole rather than make it bigger. Bit of a joke really. But the squished middle will pay as always 🥱

WeCouldBeNiceToEachOther · 12/11/2025 07:26

I think every single “WASPI” woman should have to stand an explain why they think their payout is more important than the NHS, our schools, and social care. Every single one should be told what their potential payout could fund (NHS treatment, school staffing etc.) and explain why they think it’s better off in their pockets. Every single one should have to explain whether they own their property mortgage free, what their current level of income is, and their lifestyle, and justify it.

expose the greed of this generation for the entire country to see it.