Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Director of Education privately educates their children

114 replies

Thattennis · 28/10/2025 22:30

Recently I met our local councils director of education through a social event. He has 2 children who are primary aged and I know these children are privately educated and his wife also works at this private school. I do know he has worked within several of the schools in our council and he does have a good reputation if a little under experienced/young. His children would have started school after he took on the role.

However something about the director of education choosing to privately educate his own children doesn’t fully sit well with me. If he is supposed to be championing the system for our children then it reads bad to me that he doesn’t even believe in the system enough to place his own children in it? Our council area is massively mixed with some wealthier areas but also an abundance of council estates and economically deprived rural areas. The entire council only has one private school and it’s not particularly large.

AIBU to feel a little uncomfortable that the director of education doesn’t believe in the schools he is responsible for enough to place his own children in them?

OP posts:
botheredandbewilderedagain · 29/10/2025 22:09

Thattennis · 28/10/2025 22:39

I do understand all the positives of private schools and understand why someone would pick them. My
issue isn’t with their existence or that for some people it is a genuinely better choice.

I guess I just feel like if someone’s entire job centres around ensuring the state schools in our area are of a high quality, they should in theory send their children to one of these schools.
I guess I view at as the chef refusing to eat his own food which is hardly a vote of confidence.

Your reasoning seems to be along the lines of...someone works in quality control at Lidl, therefore there is something wrong with Lidl if they shop elsewhere?

And if the chef who works at a steak restaurant is a pescatarian so doesn't eat the food they cook, this must be attributed to a lack of confidence in the food?

People are allowed to choose where they spent their money.

Redpeach · 29/10/2025 22:38

botheredandbewilderedagain · 29/10/2025 22:09

Your reasoning seems to be along the lines of...someone works in quality control at Lidl, therefore there is something wrong with Lidl if they shop elsewhere?

And if the chef who works at a steak restaurant is a pescatarian so doesn't eat the food they cook, this must be attributed to a lack of confidence in the food?

People are allowed to choose where they spent their money.

You're equating steak to childrens education?

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 29/10/2025 22:43

I don't think you are being unreasonable to feel as you do, but it comes down to whether or not he is good at his job.

It may be private schooling is a non-negotiable for his wife, that his kids have additional needs, or the state schools he could get into really were shite. Or it may just be he wants to do whatever he thinks is best for his kids.

HedwigEliza · 29/10/2025 22:45

Of course. Why is this surprising? Not many people wouldn’t, if they could afford it.

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 29/10/2025 22:45

TillyTrifle · 29/10/2025 18:17

I think sadly it tells us all we need to know about the state education sector that someone who knows it inside out is paying through the nose not to have his children in it.

Well not especially - plenty of people teach in tricky state schools, but make sure their kids go to better performing ones. It's not a uniquely state v private situation.

Pjnow · 30/10/2025 13:44

In the last Borough I worked in the Director of Education lived 120 miles away, wfh most of the time and had no intention of moving.

Even on £100k+ salary it was only filled at the 3rd round of recruitment.

Chess101 · 30/10/2025 13:54

Ficklebricks · 29/10/2025 15:03

You are absolutely right OP, but you won't get much sympathy on Mumsnet. Half the parents here are either privately educating their kids or saving up with a plan to do so.

What’s wrong with that? If you don’t believe private is better then going state shouldn’t bother you as you are making the better choice?

Epiduralady · 30/10/2025 18:14

HostaCentral · 28/10/2025 22:42

It's fine. It doesn't mean he isn't too committed to the job he does. Maybe he wants all children to have the same standard as his own.

Many NHS trusts have private healthcare as a benefit. No different. Indeed many consultants work across both NHS and private, as do GP's. Doesn't make them any less committed.

I’ve never heard of NHS staff getting private healthcare as a perk. Where is this?
Hospital managers maybe?
GMC provide it for their employees though.

Redpeach · 30/10/2025 18:16

Chess101 · 30/10/2025 13:54

What’s wrong with that? If you don’t believe private is better then going state shouldn’t bother you as you are making the better choice?

Private education bothers lots of people

LondonPapa · 30/10/2025 18:28

Epiduralady · 30/10/2025 18:14

I’ve never heard of NHS staff getting private healthcare as a perk. Where is this?
Hospital managers maybe?
GMC provide it for their employees though.

I think PP got the benefits package mixed up, you’re offered a discount via one of the staff discount schemes but you’re not offered private healthcare as a direct benefit. I can’t see the publicity of such a benefit going down well. The same applies to the Civil Service as we get a discount through Edenred but not a direct healthcare benefit.

My OH gets the direct healthcare benefit and I absolutely rinse it for all I can.

FKAT · 30/10/2025 18:30

This entire thread encapsulates the 'bring your whole self to work' thinking in a nutshell. How the guy chooses to educate his kids is absolutely none of your business. Does he do his job well? Hit budgets and targets? Motivate and retain good quality employees? Work well with the schools within his remit? Would you be happy with a poor performing DoE as long as they sent their kids to state school?

knowingmekniwingyou · 30/10/2025 18:32

And who gives two fucks. Good on him.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2025 08:14

keeptalkinghappytalk · 28/10/2025 23:23

Just so obvious ... the state schools are good enough for us but not for him. OP is entirely right to be unsettled. And the ' choice' he makes is a choice available only to a very small number of people. He s given his state primaries ( which must include some great, some not) a big fat vote of no confidence.

Or, one could be very happy that the Director of Education had done a great job at enabling the education services in their area to deliver great results across a number of schools, but accept that they want something different for their children. And by them choosing something different, they have freed up a space for someone else with a greater need for it.

Ace56 · 01/11/2025 10:29

The state system is, by and large, shit. I don’t blame him at all. Just because he’s working on trying to make something better doesn’t mean it’s not shit.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page