Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Schools admission criteria......

715 replies

LookingforMaryPoppins · 18/10/2025 23:01

So, my youngest has her heart set on the same grammar school as her sister. She has worked hard and successfully passed the 11 plus. Really proud off her, she is dyslexic so no mean feat.... having just checked the admission criteria, having a sibling at the school makes no difference. Passing the 11 plus is the first criteria followed by children in care, pupil premium and then distance - she is bottom of the pile. If she doesn't get a place, which with that criteria is likely., the option is a sink failing school..... how is that fair?

OP posts:
Tiswa · 22/10/2025 13:36

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 22/10/2025 13:20

Feeling grateful to live in a city with no grammar schools!

Imagine that, everyone has to go to the "sink" school except those who can afford private of course

To be fair the non grammar schools around us are pretty good as well

Larryfell · 22/10/2025 14:35

Cl3arDay · 22/10/2025 12:20

It always was.

No, that’s not true. I’m 40 and went to a nice private day school for a hell of a lot less money than they’re charging these days even accounting for inflation.

private school fees have vastly outstripped inflation and now with the VAT it’s the nail in the coffin for many hard working families.

PMohmywtf · 22/10/2025 14:46

Cl3arDay · 22/10/2025 12:20

It always was.

Nope.

My kids were at private school until recently. We aren't Uber rich but the vat increase alongside cost of living pushed us over the edge and we had to withdraw them. As did several other parents. Sad and difficult decision.

Cl3arDay · 22/10/2025 16:22

PMohmywtf · 22/10/2025 14:46

Nope.

My kids were at private school until recently. We aren't Uber rich but the vat increase alongside cost of living pushed us over the edge and we had to withdraw them. As did several other parents. Sad and difficult decision.

Average school fees are £24k. That is more than many earn and only the rich could afford that for one child let alone 2 or 3. 20% of that is only £4800. If you can afford £24k £4880 is peanuts. So blaming not being able to afford private education on VAT is ludicrous.

PMohmywtf · 22/10/2025 18:24

Cl3arDay · 22/10/2025 16:22

Average school fees are £24k. That is more than many earn and only the rich could afford that for one child let alone 2 or 3. 20% of that is only £4800. If you can afford £24k £4880 is peanuts. So blaming not being able to afford private education on VAT is ludicrous.

Not ludicrous, just honest. Our fees were not £24k but were only affordable by making sacrifices others may not make (cars, holidays, size of house etc). And adding 20% on to it was just too much for us, we couldn't cut further to accommodate it.

Cl3arDay · 22/10/2025 18:27

PMohmywtf · 22/10/2025 18:24

Not ludicrous, just honest. Our fees were not £24k but were only affordable by making sacrifices others may not make (cars, holidays, size of house etc). And adding 20% on to it was just too much for us, we couldn't cut further to accommodate it.

That’s hysterical. Only the rich would think £24k can be found by having a smaller car and no holiday. Not.got.a.clue!

Readyforslippers · 22/10/2025 18:59

Cl3arDay · 22/10/2025 18:27

That’s hysterical. Only the rich would think £24k can be found by having a smaller car and no holiday. Not.got.a.clue!

Indeed.

SheilaFentiman · 22/10/2025 19:14

It is true that anyone paying school fees prior to VAT being added was rich.

It is not true that adding 4-5k a year, especially for those with multiple children, is a negligible amount for all fee payers . The fees will rise 5-10% pa from this higher base too. With 7 years of this in prospect, I do think more (still well-off!) people will move from “yeah, we can make that work” to “no, too much of a stretch”

Bushmillsbabe · 22/10/2025 19:25

Y7mum · 22/10/2025 13:09

We could have afforded tutoring but my daughter was adamant she didn't want to and that if she passed she passed. Many schools in our area have free 11+ tutoring as well

What area is that? Our school said the local council doesn't allow them to support.

Bushmillsbabe · 22/10/2025 19:29

SheilaFentiman · 22/10/2025 19:14

It is true that anyone paying school fees prior to VAT being added was rich.

It is not true that adding 4-5k a year, especially for those with multiple children, is a negligible amount for all fee payers . The fees will rise 5-10% pa from this higher base too. With 7 years of this in prospect, I do think more (still well-off!) people will move from “yeah, we can make that work” to “no, too much of a stretch”

My brother and I both got in with a bursary (I didn't end up going as didn't like idea of girls only), my brothers school fees after scholarships were maybe 4k per year. However, with the VAT, that would have then been more than doubled - as the bursary was for a fixed amount discount. Affording 4k was one thing (my mum upped her min wage hours to cover it) , affording 10k would have been far beyond their ability to pay

jmh740 · 22/10/2025 20:28

LookingforMaryPoppins · 19/10/2025 03:18

no, I don't .... I think all children should have the opportunity of a decent education.

In a selective system so don't understand why children from normal families should be the lowest priority and the most likely to be deprived of decent schooling because they happen to have parents who work.

What on earth is a normal family, so disadvantaged children should just know their place and not try to better themselves. I work in a school in a deprived area we have just over 1000 students 200 are PP and about 20 in care. So about 40 in each year such a small portion and then if you factor in they actually need parents/carers who value education and want them to take the 11+ that will be an even smaller amount.
You are coming across and entitled and condescending.

Y7mum · 23/10/2025 07:33

Bushmillsbabe · 22/10/2025 19:25

What area is that? Our school said the local council doesn't allow them to support.

In London when she was in y5 there and medway where we moved for y6

Thankyourose · 23/10/2025 07:41

LookingforMaryPoppins · 18/10/2025 23:01

So, my youngest has her heart set on the same grammar school as her sister. She has worked hard and successfully passed the 11 plus. Really proud off her, she is dyslexic so no mean feat.... having just checked the admission criteria, having a sibling at the school makes no difference. Passing the 11 plus is the first criteria followed by children in care, pupil premium and then distance - she is bottom of the pile. If she doesn't get a place, which with that criteria is likely., the option is a sink failing school..... how is that fair?

It’s unusual - in our town other criteria ‘ looked after’ etc come first THEN sibling before distance. Though you still have to be in catchment.

ladyamy · 23/10/2025 22:51

LookingforMaryPoppins · 19/10/2025 03:14

not unfair that hardworking families are lowest priority?

What exactly do you mean by ‘hardworking families’?

Schoolchoicesucks · 23/10/2025 23:11

About 8% of grammar school pupils nationally are on pupil premium. So if your daughter's school has double that, it's 16% meaning 84% of places are not. Have you looked up the furthest distances for pupils admitted in the last few years in the same category as your daughter will be in? Why are you so adamant that she won't get a place?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page