And?
Maybe my DP would still be alive if he hadn't had so little faith in GPs taking things seriously because they're more interested in "lifestyle". Oh, I encouraged him, I gently suggested that worsening heartburn and persistent tiredness and random headaches plus a family history of throat cancer might merit a check up, and yes, fear probably played a part in his reluctance. By the time he collapsed with a brain bleed, went into a coma and died after three weeks, his throat cancer had metastasised to his liver, lungs and brain, and was diagnosed at post mortem.
Those of us in middle age are continually reminded that we're on the slippery slope to being a drain on society in our dotage, and as many chronic conditions rear their heads at this time, is it not better to try and head off the decline while one still has the will and ability to do so? And that might include visiting a GP, perhaps regularly.
And where is this Utopia where anyone can get an appointment "almost every week" ? Or are these two men demonstrating the advantage of the patriarchy?
I honestly think the original GP quoted in this thread was pretty unprofessional (if he exists) by voicing his claims.
Everyone knows that the NHS is overly bureaucratic, underfunded, and that getting the care one needs, even when desperately ill is a lottery. It's not all the fault of patients. And people seem to forget that the mismanagement of health services during Covid just doubled down on the chaos and has increased the number of people with ongoing complications from the virus itself, who might have to seek help because it's still not properly or fully understood.
And if you have children, and don't make a GP appointment for something because "it's probably nothing" you face the wrath of SS if it turns out it was "something" . Hence parents possibly taking up appointments for mundane things "to be on the safe side", also when your child is suffering for any reason, seeking reassurance is surely understandable? The horror stories of missed sepsis even in hospital settings are going to have an effect, no matter how "rational" or resilient" one tries to be.
GPs are the gateway to health provision in general, or used to be. Yes, you can be probably be seen and treated adequately by a pharmacist or practise nurse or whatever, but as related here, sometimes you get bounced round between them for various "protocol" reasons, which delays treatment and diagnosis and potentially wastes the time of three professionals as opposed to one.
So i appreciate this has turned into a bit of a rant and covers multiple issues. It's a muddle. And it reflects the muddle that dealing with GPs and the NHS in general often turns out to be.
And it can't just be bad luck, because so many people end up frustrated and have shared their stories here.
Last year I spent a large amount of time helping my elderly father, including navigating multiple strands of healthcare until he died in April. He actually started to believe that the way he was passed from pillar to post was to hasten his demise as he was no longer worth the effort. After a while, I couldn't help but wonder.
I think GPs should perhaps look at systemic issues that apparently lead to "too many" people seeking an audience with them, and also understand that most people don't want to be ill, and don't want to die prematurely because "it's probably nothing".