Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Another fatal incident at nursery

266 replies

TJk86 · 14/10/2025 11:59

I really dislike nurseries for under 3s for many reasons but it seems that they are not even safe anymore these days. Every other week a story like this pops up on the news. To think a reform is needed to make nurseries safer (Better ratios for example)? In this instance, it’s also been decided that no one will bear the consequences of this accident which must be awful for the parents.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15177433/Toddler-allergies-died-following-medical-episode-nursery-given-dairy-yogurt-mistake-parents-say.html

OP posts:
SouthLondonMum22 · 14/10/2025 14:54

JustMyView13 · 14/10/2025 14:49

I never said it did.
The poster wanted some proof of kids dying at nursery, and so I shared it and noted that this might be what OP was thinking of.
It really stood out to me when I read it, because a child dying in nursery is (I had thought) so rare. So for another child to have died a couple of weeks after that article was reported, creates a feeling of frequency. Hence, I suspect, OPs comment.

Edited

I just looked it up and he choked but no further details have been released yet.

A feeling of frequency doesn't make it a fact though. It is rare, which is why when it does happen it makes the news.

Mapletree1985 · 14/10/2025 14:56

TJk86 · 14/10/2025 11:59

I really dislike nurseries for under 3s for many reasons but it seems that they are not even safe anymore these days. Every other week a story like this pops up on the news. To think a reform is needed to make nurseries safer (Better ratios for example)? In this instance, it’s also been decided that no one will bear the consequences of this accident which must be awful for the parents.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15177433/Toddler-allergies-died-following-medical-episode-nursery-given-dairy-yogurt-mistake-parents-say.html

Some kind of reform is needed to make it financially and professionally possible for a parent to stay at home with their children until they are old enough to go to school, without taking the kind of hit that makes having kids unviable in today's economic climate.

TwoTuesday · 14/10/2025 14:59

I was lucky enough to be able to send my kids to 2 excellent nurseries while I worked. Then to a competent and caring childminder. No situation is 100% safe for a child. And that includes being at home, travelling in a car, sharing a home with a dog, playing on a climbing frame etc.
Any death of a child in a care setting is awful, but it is just nasty scaremongering to say that "nurseries aren't safe." They are safe. Safer than many kids' homes, sadly. Maybe nursery should be mandatory for all, to save those kids from their home situations? That is crazy of course, but it makes more sense than "nurseries aren't safe."

PoliteSquid · 14/10/2025 15:00

Waitingfordoggo · 14/10/2025 12:47

I’m always curious as to why more people don’t use childminders- they are usually cheaper than nurseries and offer a ‘home from home’ environment. I was lucky enough to find really good ones for my DCs. But perhaps incidents like this are just as likely with a childminder as they are at a nursery- I don’t know any statistics on that.

But either way, no parents should be made to feel guilty for choosing nurseries or childminders or nannies or whatever they need to use to enable them to go to work, since most families cannot be financially supported on only one wage.

I didn’t because like others have said I needed reliable childcare in an inflexible job. Being a SAHM was not an option so all mine went to nursery aged 1.

At that time I met lots of childminders at various baby/toddler groups not bothered about what their charges were doing. I also wanted to know exactly where my children were… too many childminders just seemed to go about their day running errands with the children in tow. That never seemed particularly safe to me.

WindOfUserNameChange · 14/10/2025 15:03

Helenalove · 14/10/2025 14:54

Yes I am in the UK.

Our school is not nut free normally.

Thanks for replying. I thought it was standard across all UK schools. Or is it just primaries maybe?

I always thought we are lucky thst it's nuts as all schools and nurseries dx has attended were nut free. It must be so much harder if someone is allergic to milk. Much more difficult to avoid.

CrispySquid · 14/10/2025 15:04

Children are not “dying in nurseries every other week” Ridiculous scaremongering nonsense. And anyway, the number of deaths in nurseries or schools is dwarfed by deaths of children in their own homes in the company of their loving parents.

Helenalove · 14/10/2025 15:05

WindOfUserNameChange · 14/10/2025 15:03

Thanks for replying. I thought it was standard across all UK schools. Or is it just primaries maybe?

I always thought we are lucky thst it's nuts as all schools and nurseries dx has attended were nut free. It must be so much harder if someone is allergic to milk. Much more difficult to avoid.

I'm in a sixth form school.

Springflowersyay · 14/10/2025 15:06

@CautiousLurker01 when I worked in nurseries, there was a strong focus on not ‘othering’ the children with allergies.

We weren’t allowed to sit them on a table together or provide them with anything other than a placemat at mealtimes (which all children needed to have) with the allergies written and then covered with their plate.
We couldn’t have the allergies listed in a prominent place as it would breach confidentiality.

At one point we had children with allergies to:
Egg
Dairy
Egg, dairy, sesame, soya, citrus
Tomatoes

All in the same room and all under 2 years, but toddling round and wanting whatever their peers were eating.
It was a nightmare, particularly as lunchtime was when we’d have temp staff, or staff from other rooms who didn’t know the children covering for staff on break.
We did occasionally have a child eat or drink something they shouldn’t, but we always told the parents and it was never serious, luckily.

If my child had a serious allergy, there’s no way I’d send them to a nursery.

VikaOlson · 14/10/2025 15:07

WindOfUserNameChange · 14/10/2025 15:03

Thanks for replying. I thought it was standard across all UK schools. Or is it just primaries maybe?

I always thought we are lucky thst it's nuts as all schools and nurseries dx has attended were nut free. It must be so much harder if someone is allergic to milk. Much more difficult to avoid.

Schools might be nut avoiding but you definitely cannot assume they are nut free if they allow children to bring food in.
One of the problems with called schools 'nut free' is it creates a false sense of security.

CautiousLurker01 · 14/10/2025 15:09

Springflowersyay · 14/10/2025 15:06

@CautiousLurker01 when I worked in nurseries, there was a strong focus on not ‘othering’ the children with allergies.

We weren’t allowed to sit them on a table together or provide them with anything other than a placemat at mealtimes (which all children needed to have) with the allergies written and then covered with their plate.
We couldn’t have the allergies listed in a prominent place as it would breach confidentiality.

At one point we had children with allergies to:
Egg
Dairy
Egg, dairy, sesame, soya, citrus
Tomatoes

All in the same room and all under 2 years, but toddling round and wanting whatever their peers were eating.
It was a nightmare, particularly as lunchtime was when we’d have temp staff, or staff from other rooms who didn’t know the children covering for staff on break.
We did occasionally have a child eat or drink something they shouldn’t, but we always told the parents and it was never serious, luckily.

If my child had a serious allergy, there’s no way I’d send them to a nursery.

Wow. I do get the othering thing… but as a parent - like you I suspect - I’d rather they were othered than dead? I mean, we don’t hide a disabled child's callipers or wheelchair for fear of othering, do we?

Helenalove · 14/10/2025 15:09

VikaOlson · 14/10/2025 15:07

Schools might be nut avoiding but you definitely cannot assume they are nut free if they allow children to bring food in.
One of the problems with called schools 'nut free' is it creates a false sense of security.

Yes its hard to be totally nut free.

I remember when we had a student with a severe nut allergy, emails were sent to the canteen to get rid of products with nuts.

Two weeks later a student found products with nuts in the canteen. It wasnt obvious but if you looked down the list of infredients there was some nuts

WindOfUserNameChange · 14/10/2025 15:11

VikaOlson · 14/10/2025 15:07

Schools might be nut avoiding but you definitely cannot assume they are nut free if they allow children to bring food in.
One of the problems with called schools 'nut free' is it creates a false sense of security.

They send out reminders not to give anything with nuts in the packed lunch and I am not sure if the kids with packed lunch sit in the dinner hall as well. Probably they would and you are right, unless the school checks every lunch box and asks for ingredients of anything that comes without packaging you cant be sure. So I guess you are right. I think i need to have another word with the school. I think, they also dont keep dc's epi pen with them at all times (unlike nursery) but keep them in central school office, which is a bit worrying.

BaconCheeses · 14/10/2025 15:13

Grindingpoverty · 14/10/2025 13:23

Is it better to say nursery is fine because some people have to use them out of necessity, even if you think it’s not fine? Is it ‘privileged’ to say that you don’t agree with child labour or prostitution?

To me it seems pretty clear that for children with chaotic or very poor or unwell parents, being in nursery is better than being at home. For most other very small children (under 2 or 3) it’s preferable to have one primary caregiver who loves you.

Did you just put nursery, child labour and prostitution all in the same sentence while questioning your privilege?

Bravo 👏

AltitudeCheck · 14/10/2025 15:14

BayOfBucket · 14/10/2025 13:55

I agree that he shouldn’t have been given his allergen. There is also a lot of detail missing. Was his dairy allergy known to be anaphylactic? Was he prescribed EpiPens? Did he have a set with him, if so? Did the nursery recognise anaphylaxis? Did they act promptly and call 999 (and give the AAI if he had one)?

My DC is at nursery with an anaphylactic allergy. Prior to them actually going into anaphylaxis from eating their allergen, we had no idea that it wasn’t a run of the mill hives and itchy skin, avoid this food but it’s not deadly serious allergy. None whatsoever. It escalated very quickly - and while everyone should know that this can happen, it’s not necessarily something you can deal with if it does happen and you haven’t got spare AAIs, for example.

That isn’t to say at all that it’s fine to feed children an allergen if you don’t think it’s a ‘serious’ allergy - quite the opposite, because they can and do escalate rapidly into something very frightening - but I wonder whether there was a lack of understanding of this, coupled with maybe no formal diagnosis/medication for Jude, a chaotic and careless environment, and just awful, awful bad luck that Jude’s reaction this time was so catastrophic.

To me, it seems like an example of Swiss cheese theory in action - if any one of those factors had been different, the outcome could have been very different. That said, the nursery is in control of two of those factors, and there should be some accountability for that.

Exactly this.

The Daily Mail article does not give any of these details. The allergy history and if there had been previous anaphylaxis, the availability of adrenaline, if adrenaline was given, the response time of the ambulance etc. Presumably those details were available to the CPS who took the decision not to prosecute any individual.

Children have died at home due to allergic reactions, should those parents be prosecuted?

If there was a failure of the nursery to monitor, train or supervise staff or to have adequate policies in place, that should be the focus of the local authority investigation.

usedtobeaylis · 14/10/2025 15:14

That is absolutely tragic and I agree with the decision not to scramble around to find a charge to fit a mistake.

Ultimately early years needs an absolute overhaul, the amount of regulation and general pressure does not fit the pay, same as with social care.

FenceBooksCycle · 14/10/2025 15:15

It's not the low-paid nursery worker who should get the blame and be prosecuted. Someone in the nursery management decided what staffing level to set for food times. Someone decided not to have a staff member with specialist training and responsibility for allergy management ahd monitoring of the children with allergies. Those are the people who should face justice.

VikaOlson · 14/10/2025 15:16

WindOfUserNameChange · 14/10/2025 15:11

They send out reminders not to give anything with nuts in the packed lunch and I am not sure if the kids with packed lunch sit in the dinner hall as well. Probably they would and you are right, unless the school checks every lunch box and asks for ingredients of anything that comes without packaging you cant be sure. So I guess you are right. I think i need to have another word with the school. I think, they also dont keep dc's epi pen with them at all times (unlike nursery) but keep them in central school office, which is a bit worrying.

Make sure your child knows that food at school is not automatically 'safe' or nut free and they cannot ever accept food or swap food outside of their own school meal.

Skybluepinky · 14/10/2025 15:16

Shocked that a parent would put their child at risk by sending their child to nursery with so many different staff and so many children that are having milk products, they use so many apprentices as they are cheap labour, but parents pay well over the odds.
So sad this has happened.

AutumnDayswhen · 14/10/2025 15:19

spoonbillstretford · 14/10/2025 12:50

I don't agree it's every other week but I was also personally not keen on nurseries for under threes and had a wonderful childminder.

There are good nurseries and good child minders, and bad nurseries and bad childminders. And every shade in between.

The reality is with a child with allergies I knew I had to go with a nursery not a childminder, because what would happen it the child did have an anaphylactic reaction - the childminder would have had to have popped my child in an ambulance on his own because she could hardly leave a bunch of preschool children unsupervised

My children never had an anaphylactic reaction at nursery. They have had one each when in their dad's care, one at cubs, one at a friend's house, and one each at school

Simonjt · 14/10/2025 15:21

Lotsnlotsoflove · 14/10/2025 14:37

I find this so insulting. Do you think those of us with allergic children want to rely on nursery workers/school dinner ladies to keep our kids alive? Do you not think we would prefer to care for them ourselves? I cannot afford to stop working because my child has allergies any more than I could afford it if I had a child without an allergy. We would lose our home. We would never be able to go on holiday, she would miss out on clubs and days out - not to mention learning how to stay safe in an environment outside of the home. This idea that you can just opt out of society because your child is at high risk is not feasible...

I imagine that poster is longterm unemployed, so doesn’t consider the need to pay for things.

AutumnDayswhen · 14/10/2025 15:21

WindOfUserNameChange · 14/10/2025 15:11

They send out reminders not to give anything with nuts in the packed lunch and I am not sure if the kids with packed lunch sit in the dinner hall as well. Probably they would and you are right, unless the school checks every lunch box and asks for ingredients of anything that comes without packaging you cant be sure. So I guess you are right. I think i need to have another word with the school. I think, they also dont keep dc's epi pen with them at all times (unlike nursery) but keep them in central school office, which is a bit worrying.

Yeah, you need to have another chat. Parents aren't all going to follow the instructions
The EpiPen is no use if it's elsewhere in the building.
Also make sure they know not to move the child if they are having a reaction. I have had to explain this over and over to schools/teachers. Standing up, or walking around, can make a bad reaction much worse. In all the fatalities from allergies at school that I have read about teachers did stupid things like send the child to walk to the first aid room

AutumnDayswhen · 14/10/2025 15:24

Skybluepinky · 14/10/2025 15:16

Shocked that a parent would put their child at risk by sending their child to nursery with so many different staff and so many children that are having milk products, they use so many apprentices as they are cheap labour, but parents pay well over the odds.
So sad this has happened.

My children's nursery staff were far more impressive than any school staff have ever been.
Not only did they have really robust procedures,.they always rang me if they had questions, and they didn't just take safety seriously they also took inclusion seriously. They were the gold standard and no school teacher /staff have come close. Perhaps we were lucky but nursery set my expectation sky high and the lack of care and complacency from teachers has shocked me again and again. As you say, given the discrepancies in pay and education you would expect the opposite!

2gummy · 14/10/2025 15:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Dancingsquirrels · 14/10/2025 15:32

Waitingfordoggo · 14/10/2025 12:47

I’m always curious as to why more people don’t use childminders- they are usually cheaper than nurseries and offer a ‘home from home’ environment. I was lucky enough to find really good ones for my DCs. But perhaps incidents like this are just as likely with a childminder as they are at a nursery- I don’t know any statistics on that.

But either way, no parents should be made to feel guilty for choosing nurseries or childminders or nannies or whatever they need to use to enable them to go to work, since most families cannot be financially supported on only one wage.

I remember chatting to a childminder who happily told me that (1) social work, or whoever inspects CM, had asked her to instal a safety gate (2) she bought one for their inspection (3) she binned it the following day, as she had no intention of using it

And a friend of a friend was a childminder. Their house was really, really dirty

I think a really good childminder probably is the best option. but some aren't that great, and in a nursery, less risk of being plumped in front of cartoons all afternoon

NikkiPotnick · 14/10/2025 15:32

Helenalove · 14/10/2025 14:29

Low pay also affects under staffing. As people wont work for the low pay. Under staffing affects children's safety

Yep. People too often confuse 'is' with 'should' on issues like this.

Swipe left for the next trending thread