Meghan looks incredible! She has genuinely aged backwards

[Cordee]

Of course Meghan has access to the best doctors and treatments that money can buy. But so do a lot of celebs who end up looking disfigured with cosmetic procedures.

If you’re a fan or not you can’t deny Megan looks phenomenal. Especially in her most recent pics.

I remember thinking her skin looked a bit sun damaged in her Netflix cooking show but she’s definitely had something done recently which has made her look VERY youthful!

No pillow face whatsoever. Very tasteful work. Of course she’s still young but she genuinely looks 15 years younger than her age.

Any guesses on what has given Meghan her recent glow up?

No apostrophe required for the plural. I don't see why any woman's name is necessary?
It's quite a varied thread, it just seems strange to post a somewhat generalised criticism, when responses are so different.. I would have thought perhaps responding to individual posters would have been better. However, your choice.

It’s still so young.

You're not wrong there, that does have an impact!

Who is bullying her? Don't the majority of posters agree with the points you have just made?
It's bizarre, looking for the negatives when most of the posts have been very positive about her appearance!

Am I the only one that is ok with aging? I have not had anything done ever, not even eye lash extensions, hair extensions or even nails. Let alone any injectables or anything. I’ve invested heavily in skin care since my late teens but never anything else. I do dye my hair but that’s it. I’m happy to age and want to look natural and elegant. I wear makeup but no contour or heavy concealer. Good luck to Meghan but honestly it’s ok to look your age ladies.

And some of us don’t want to look our age and enjoy beauty procedures. Nothing wrong with that either. Freedom of choice.

No, you are not the only one. Why did you think you were?

I am 53 and have never had anything done.
I don't even believe in skin care.

Possibly because all of the comments I'm referring to are from women?
Like I said I'm referring to whoever the cap fit but as the saying goes "a hit dog will holler".
Thank you for allowing me to have a choice. That sound quite sexist 🤔

Nope. Not sexist at all. Everyone has a choice in my opinion .
I have no idea what sex you are, nor that of other posters. I suppose, it being about a woman's appearance and style one might conclude that the majority of posters are women, it's true. Quite a variety of responses on here though. Some very positive, some less so.
Which of course befits is discussion thread.

This photo appears to be make-up free. She's very pretty, but I think she looks more or less in line with her age. Nothing wrong with that.

Oil painting in the attic innit?

Yes, in fact I think she looks nice. Great skin.

20 September vs 4 October - what a difference in two weeks!

The lighting and the make up is helping with the glow. You can't compare her photo with a random 44 years old you have to compare her photo with a photo her at 29. She definitely look younger in the 29 years old one.
Not sure how much she has done in her face and I can't care about it. If she likes it and have the money good on her, but saying she is looking younger now than 15 years ago is an hyperbole.
She is pretty in my opinion but not Benjamin Button.

I was a defender of MM on previous threads, can anyone explain why she took a video while driving past the site where Princess Diana died? Or was that real. It put me off her a little.

I don't think threads inviting comments on women's looks should be allowed.

I don't feel this was started in good faith. The op is too OTT which im sure is designed to get people disagreeing so they can then say Mumsnetters are vile and bitchy blah blah.

She’s only 44 and has dark skin and has always been beautiful. Do you expect her to look like a mummy by now or something?

Is this part of the plan to reintroduce her to the British public? 🙄