Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's a bit harsh to say people who've never worked shouldn't get benefits?

645 replies

DonaldBiden · 25/09/2025 20:03

Was reading another thread where many were saying if someone has never worked they shouldn't get any benefits but couldn't comment because it had reached 1000 comments.

I know this might be an unpopular opinion but I don't agree because that would include young mums who can't work because they have a baby to look after. Most of them will get a job when their child is a little older. Why are they any different from older mums who've fallen on hard times and need help?

And I know people will say it's because they've never worked and haven't proven themselves unlazy etc and could be on the dole forever but why should they have their lives ruined just because of something people think MIGHT happen.

OP posts:
TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:03

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:00

Why the free labour?

To pay for the free money.

Job seekers is £400pm, and less if you are under 25 I think.
How many hours of work is that a week? It will have to be min wage?
Would they get holiday pay? sickness pay? Pension? If not then why not?
If they do the labour with none of the benefits then that is not right.

IneedtheeohIneedtheeeveryhourIneedthee · 25/09/2025 22:04

DonaldBiden · 25/09/2025 20:48

Quite common for parents to kick their pregnant daughters out even in this day and age

then they have choices. Find a way of supporting the child, and if not possible, have it adopted into a home which can provide for it or terminate.
Harsh but true. Wanting something is not always enough.

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:06

Problem is it's often middle class lefties that think everybody is a poor victim that couldn't possibly do a day's work - not always but often. Many have not had much exposure to the kind of people that take the piss.

It's near impossible to sort the grifters from the genuinely needy but I'd bet that if benefits were stopped tomorrow a fair few might suddenly find the ability to work.

My mate's brother certainly did when his mum finally told him he had to move out at 35. He'd been smoking weed and playing Playstation for years whilst she grafted long shifts as a nurse.

Shadowfacs · 25/09/2025 22:06

DrPrunesqualer · 25/09/2025 22:03

PIP bill £15 million 2019/20

rising to £18.9 million 2022/23

An increase in recipients of 29% from 2019/20to 2022/23. That’s in 3 years !

Average cost to the tax payer of PIP appeals is £40million every year

These are yearly unknowns rising exponentially that cannot be sustained.

I wouldn't like to be in Ms Reeves' shoes when she has to announce her budget.

Mind you, giving a big dollop of cash to the train drivers (without a productivity agreement) didn't help.

No wonder she was crying in the HOC.

Papyrophile · 25/09/2025 22:07

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:01

I am sorry. I was rubbish at English at school and struggle a lot as an adult.
Other people will know what I meant. No need to be so pedantic and nasty. You added to nothing to my comment really.
He broke her spine. Happy with that explanation?

I hope he's serving a very long sentence.

DrPrunesqualer · 25/09/2025 22:07

Plastictreees · 25/09/2025 22:02

Well what do you consider a ‘good’ reason? I don’t think shaming people in order for them to ‘earn’ their benefits is acceptable.

Doing community work isn’t shaming people. It’s doing community work and has been suggested by politicians in the past.

It’s not an unusual suggestion

Alphabetmuddle · 25/09/2025 22:07

Plastictreees · 25/09/2025 22:02

Shaming people isn’t going to make them ‘try’ harder.

No but withholding money might.

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:07

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:03

Job seekers is £400pm, and less if you are under 25 I think.
How many hours of work is that a week? It will have to be min wage?
Would they get holiday pay? sickness pay? Pension? If not then why not?
If they do the labour with none of the benefits then that is not right.

God forbid they do a few hours a week even.

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:08

Papyrophile · 25/09/2025 22:07

I hope he's serving a very long sentence.

No. He has joint custody of their kid. Not ideal but not my life to make decisions about either. It is very tough for her.

Bonden · 25/09/2025 22:09

DonaldBiden · 25/09/2025 21:08

Not every one can bring themselves to have an abortion especially when you're young and have stronger emotions

Stronger emotions hahahahaha oh the arrogance of youth

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:10

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:03

Job seekers is £400pm, and less if you are under 25 I think.
How many hours of work is that a week? It will have to be min wage?
Would they get holiday pay? sickness pay? Pension? If not then why not?
If they do the labour with none of the benefits then that is not right.

A business wouldn't be providing all that if it wasn't making a profit or being funded somehow.

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:11

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:07

God forbid they do a few hours a week even.

People on job seekers have to prove they are doing so many hours of work search activities each week.
Maybe if they were struggling to do the hours then some volunteer work might be an option. But they are allowed to find their own volunteer work to do and that counts towards the hours anyway.
No need to publicly shame them with hi-viz vests. Why do the public need to know they are on benefits?

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:13

Alphabetmuddle · 25/09/2025 22:07

No but withholding money might.

Withholding money wont make peoples disabilities vanish and it wont make people magically employ them.

Some people go on about people they know who are smoking weed and gaming. Who is going to employ them? Be realistic

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:13

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:11

People on job seekers have to prove they are doing so many hours of work search activities each week.
Maybe if they were struggling to do the hours then some volunteer work might be an option. But they are allowed to find their own volunteer work to do and that counts towards the hours anyway.
No need to publicly shame them with hi-viz vests. Why do the public need to know they are on benefits?

Have you ever interviewed somebody who doesn't actually want the job?

DonaldBiden · 25/09/2025 22:13

IneedtheeohIneedtheeeveryhourIneedthee · 25/09/2025 22:04

then they have choices. Find a way of supporting the child, and if not possible, have it adopted into a home which can provide for it or terminate.
Harsh but true. Wanting something is not always enough.

Too bad it's not the Victorian days and I chose neither of those. Tell me you never did anything reckless or stupid when you were 15 ? I love my child and have no regrets and have had a job my whole life since he was a couple years old. So not the terminal sponge people think all young parents become or set out to be

OP posts:
Catterbat · 25/09/2025 22:14

I’m almost jealous of how neat and uncomplicated some people’s lives are. 16 year olds should be living with their parents; they shouldn’t be having sex; they should get abortions; if their parents throw them out they should move in with the father.

It’s like some of you are living in a pristine, middle class, immaculately shiny bubble. Do you even fart?

JLou08 · 25/09/2025 22:15

I hope they're just being thoughtless rather than us having so many psychopaths in society. Someone would need to be completely devoid of empathy to think people who don't work should be left on the streets starving to death.

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:15

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:13

Withholding money wont make peoples disabilities vanish and it wont make people magically employ them.

Some people go on about people they know who are smoking weed and gaming. Who is going to employ them? Be realistic

My mate's brother got a job as a work coach for the DWP after not working for almost a decade. 🤣 Tbf he might be the perfect person for the job.

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:15

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:13

Have you ever interviewed somebody who doesn't actually want the job?

No I am not an employer
How does someone even get to interviews stage of they dont want the job?

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:17

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:15

My mate's brother got a job as a work coach for the DWP after not working for almost a decade. 🤣 Tbf he might be the perfect person for the job.

I imagine it is a very hard job to do and as far as I am aware most on are UC too as they are not paid enough. Very ironic realy.

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:18

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:15

No I am not an employer
How does someone even get to interviews stage of they dont want the job?

Edited

Maybe do a bit of research on what the job centre do.

Starzinsky · 25/09/2025 22:18

Why can't young mums work?

DiplomacyForPeace · 25/09/2025 22:18

Sparklesandspandexgallore · 25/09/2025 20:38

Surely there should be limits. How long can we keep supporting these people? What if someone keeps having children, do we keep supporting them, providing them with a free home, free council tax, free dental care and free prescriptions?
How many women can men keep getting pregnant and expect the tax payer to keep?

It is going to become what Romani Gibsies in Eastern Europe do - take communal land without asking anyone, build ramshacks, grow swine for meat and find a way to bring electricity but refuse to pay for it and when the electric companies employees try to come for the bills doors to doors, they are met with men with axes. Or they will go on boats somewhere.....people will always take what they need if they can for survival. My question is why English don't wake up a little bit more

Papyrophile · 25/09/2025 22:19

Dh has a miniscule business. It's far too small to be able to afford to make hiring errors, especially if the rules Angela Rayner was suggesting are ever enforced. Much easier not to hire at all. But that means no economic growth. Because there won't be a new job.

NotMyNigelFarage · 25/09/2025 22:20

TheSpiritofDarkandLonelyWater · 25/09/2025 22:17

I imagine it is a very hard job to do and as far as I am aware most on are UC too as they are not paid enough. Very ironic realy.

He's on £32k.

Swipe left for the next trending thread