Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The autumn budget should cut benefits before increasing tax

1000 replies

Leett · 25/09/2025 05:39

There is talk of Labour breaking their election pledge and increasing income tax by 2p. I doubt they'd do that because voters will revolt. However they need to do something with the state pension due to increase by 4.7% next year.
I really hope they cut benefits / pensions before the deciding to increase taxes.

OP posts:
PropertyD · 25/09/2025 16:50

The cleaner is likely to often be working cash in hand. Fine until you cannot clean anymore but then they get pension credit at the same level as the state pension.

TheClaaaw · 25/09/2025 16:51

padso · 25/09/2025 16:50

@TheClaaaw Well MNs does skew quite old so lots will be thinking about themselves.

I genuinely think this is why Reform has become so popular, they are promising lower taxes and better services. It's bullshit, most of the people who vote for them will know it's bullshit but they rather bullshit than accept reality.

Absolutely agree. The unicorn voters.

BigAnne · 25/09/2025 16:53

Linenpickle · 25/09/2025 07:35

Need to stop free prescriptions, elderly care and university fees in Scotland and Wales. It comes out of one pot and is discriminatory,

We have higher levels of IT in Scotland.

padso · 25/09/2025 16:53

As though the solutions to start fixing complex economic problems are possible to express in a little three word slogan.

@TheClaaaw I mean people are shocked labour hasn't turned things around in 2 years despite almost 2 decades of low growth.

padso · 25/09/2025 16:56

@PropertyD problem with that is wage stagnation and a shortage of workers

IAmNotASheep · 25/09/2025 16:56

padso · 25/09/2025 16:46

@IAmNotASheep As I said plenty can't afford to stay in the schemes and you realise how many employers pay 4%.

Thats a huge benefit to taking care of those later years in life

No the benefit was the existence of DB pension schemes.

Agree re The past benefit ie the DB schemes, especially for public sector workers which is costing the tax man now.
Only a few are still remaining in the 15% range I understand.

Most people were never offered this
It was mainly some large private corporations and mainly public sector workers

The figures on those are distorting what most pensioners are living on

Bumblebee72 · 25/09/2025 16:56

padso · 25/09/2025 16:53

As though the solutions to start fixing complex economic problems are possible to express in a little three word slogan.

@TheClaaaw I mean people are shocked labour hasn't turned things around in 2 years despite almost 2 decades of low growth.

I think the shock is more they haven't done anything to even start to turn things around, and if anything have taken actions which have made it worse.

TheClaaaw · 25/09/2025 16:58

padso · 25/09/2025 16:53

As though the solutions to start fixing complex economic problems are possible to express in a little three word slogan.

@TheClaaaw I mean people are shocked labour hasn't turned things around in 2 years despite almost 2 decades of low growth.

It is delusional. That said, everything Labour have done since taking office has made the situation worse and suppressed productivity and growth further; precisely the opposite of what they said they’d do during the election campaign. They are just as economically illiterate as the Conservatives, but not quite as much in the realms of fantasy and dreaming of unicorns and a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow as Reform, of course.

It’s absurd that we don’t have a single political party setting out anything resembling a functional and evidence-based, coherent economic plan. There is nobody for sensible, moderate, reasonable and rational people to vote for.

padso · 25/09/2025 17:00

@TheClaaaw absolutely, we need long term, cross party solutions in we want any hope n

IAmNotASheep · 25/09/2025 17:01

padso · 25/09/2025 16:34

its only since 2018 !!! that all employers had to pay into a private pension.

workers can opt out though & many do as they can't afford it. Then employers don't have to contribute.

I disagree with workers being given the option to opt out.
I also think something should be put in place to ensure the self employed all pay into a pp as well.

Birth rates continue to go down so this isn’t a problem that will go away
and
if we continue to lose more net providers to more tax friendly countries we need to prepare and not dig are head in the sand as we have been doing since the birth years of todays boomers

padso · 25/09/2025 17:02

@IAmNotASheep you are still
misunderstanding. Despite auto enrolment younger generations will not have better private pensions.

AgitatedGoose · 25/09/2025 17:02

Why do you assume everyone who is state pension age wants to receive what is deemed as a benefit. I’m not at that age yet but intend to carry on working and kick back at what has become an increasingly ageist society. I actually dread getting old and having to tolerate benevolent ageism and baby talk language doesn’t give me any reason to carry on. I certainly intend to refuse treatment for any conditions which would otherwise kill me and will take steps to ensure I don’t get to the stage where I’ll need care. The government can’t have it both ways. People are living longer often with an appalling quality of life because every ailment is treated.

padso · 25/09/2025 17:03

@IAmNotASheep again nuance. A newly qualified teacher can easily struggle to pay tax, student loan, rent & pension out of there salary.

ShanghaiDiva · 25/09/2025 17:04

padso · 25/09/2025 16:50

@TheClaaaw Well MNs does skew quite old so lots will be thinking about themselves.

I genuinely think this is why Reform has become so popular, they are promising lower taxes and better services. It's bullshit, most of the people who vote for them will know it's bullshit but they rather bullshit than accept reality.

I think virtually everyone just thinks about themselves. That’s clear from this type of thread: take it from them, not from me because I deserve it /have worked hard/been sensible…etc etc.
Do I want to pay more tax? Of course not, particularly when this money is being used to service debt: govt borrowing this financial year is over 83 billion, 16 billion more than the same time in 2024. However, I do recognise that unpopular economic decisions will need to be made.

padso · 25/09/2025 17:05

@ShanghaiDiva disagree, I have dc so think of them.

IAmNotASheep · 25/09/2025 17:05

PropertyD · 25/09/2025 16:49

Dare I say we also need to review the public sector pensions? They are guaranteed unlike DH which dropped in value by 10% after last budget

Absolutely Agree
Completely unacceptable how us in the private sector are at the mercy of the markets
Many pensioners have lost everything in a crash!

Rosscameasdoody · 25/09/2025 17:05

lindyloo57 · 25/09/2025 16:38

What i don't understand is, pension credit is made up to £3 pounds just under the full state pension ( so someone said on here recently, so that must mean you need at least that money to live on, I think the pension if you have paid up full should be more than pension credit, it make it feel not worth it, we might as well pay in a little less and get all the benefits.

The way pension credit works is on a set amount of money you need to live on according to your circumstance. If you claim disability benefits it’s slightly more to help cover the extra costs. If your pension and other income is below the minimum threshold, pension credit is paid to top it up to that level. Many pensioners are on the old state pension, which is much less that the current one, so pension credit tops that up to the required level.

padso · 25/09/2025 17:06

I would love to retire at 65 with triple lock state pension but i'm not an idiot.

Wadadli · 25/09/2025 17:06

Postapocalypticcowgirl · 25/09/2025 07:29

Yes, agreed - as a teacher, when there were strikes over pay, there were lots of graphs circulating, showing how our pay had been eroded in real terms since the early 2010s - I am sure lots of other jobs are the same or in an even worse situation. We are lucky to be getting 4% this year but that doesn't really compensate for years when we've had below inflation pay rises and pay freezes.

Increasing taxes obviously also erodes any pay rise people might get.

I do think everything should be shared evenly across society - I wouldn't want to cut support for the poorest, but realistically there are a lot of well off pensioners who don't really need the triple lock in order to survive.

I have to say the pensioners I know seem pretty comfortable, whilst the people I know who are finding things very tight/difficult tend to be working age with young children who need childcare.

“I have to say the pensioners I know seem pretty comfortable, whilst the people I know who are finding things very tight/difficult tend to be working age with young children who need childcare.”

These pensioners may well have gone without for years and may have found things very tight/difficult with no childcare themselves in order to be “comfortable” now - why should they be living uncomfortably in their older years?

Kitte321 · 25/09/2025 17:06

TheClaaaw · 25/09/2025 16:47

@padso I’ve just read the next two pages of people squabbling about things saying “but this, but that…” which really evidences this point! Nobody seems to be prepared to accept that things are such a mess that a cohesive and coherent plan that reforms all of these areas of spending and taxation is needed, to generate productivity growth (without which living standards cannot rise).

Sadly pretty much everything any of our Governments over the last couple of decades have done has had precisely the opposite effect. It’s becoming a bit like a game of hot potato, waiting to see which political party is going to get burned hands when the music stops.

The fact that you were the only one that replied to my post also makes me realise it’s probably not worth bothering to try to communicate this stuff to people. Perhaps people couldn’t be bothered to read it because it was long?… As though the solutions to start fixing complex economic problems are possible to express in a little three word slogan.

I think the dolphins may be right. I should get my towel, put my thumb in the air and hope a spaceship is passing (preferably not the Vogons; I hate slugs). 🐌

I was just replying to it. Agree on many of the points. The first step is to reform the tax system and address cliff edges to increase productivity.
On pension, how would you communicate to those who have paid in (via NI) that they were not eligible for a state pension (if it was to be tapered).

charliehungerford · 25/09/2025 17:06

LlynTegid · 25/09/2025 06:58

I think the first change to benefits should be that some age related ones start at a later age. Free bus passes and free prescriptions say at 70.

I would replace the triple lock by a double one, of inflation or 2.5%.

I’d replace it with inflation only. I would also limit all annual pay rises in the public sector to the same inflationary rise. Everyone gets the same, nurses, police, teachers etc, level playing field. This would stop different sectors playing off against each other.

padso · 25/09/2025 17:08

These pensioners may well have gone without for years and may have found things very tight/difficult with no childcare themselves in order to be “comfortable” now - why should they be living uncomfortably in their older years?

Why should they automatically live comfortably though. And many have just got very lucky nothing to do with hard work, going without. But if you want to go down that road young people are going without secure housing & decent wage growth, forgoing dc, when do they get a break?

24karatPalamino · 25/09/2025 17:09

LillyPJ · 25/09/2025 07:39

I wish they'd increase income tax. An extra 1p or 2p really wouldn't make much difference to most people and if the government used that money to make obvious improvements, people would soon stop moaning about it. If we want good services and a civilized society, we need to pay for it.

It is noticeable.

It’s not everyone paying an extra 1-2p.

It’s 1-2 percentage points. For my husband and I, that would likely equate to around £90 a month EACH, which I can assure you we’d miss.

Rosscameasdoody · 25/09/2025 17:09

Bumblebee72 · 25/09/2025 16:41

Which is exactly the attitude lots of people take. There needs to be a marked difference between what you get if you contribute to the system and what you get if you don't.

Thereby creating a two tier system and the gap between rich and poor just gets wider. How do you differentiate between someone who has spent a life on benefits and doesn’t want to work, and someone who hasn’t contributed NI through work because they’ve spent a lifetime caring for someone disabled ?

IAmNotASheep · 25/09/2025 17:10

padso · 25/09/2025 17:03

@IAmNotASheep again nuance. A newly qualified teacher can easily struggle to pay tax, student loan, rent & pension out of there salary.

Didn’t we all when we were newly qualified.
Actually even in my 30s ( dh and I had to move to a completely new area to afford to buy when I was 33 and he was 38 ) Just like all our friends really
and I was lucky enough not to have to pay for my bachelors or masters.

Crashes in the construction industry and recessions screwed us over

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread