Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To realise very few people care about road rules or the Highway Code any more

185 replies

JacquesHarlow · 24/09/2025 13:08

AIBU here - is anyone on Mumsnet like me, and thinks about the Highway Code or bothers to follow its guidance? Please join me if so!

For my job I have to drive a LOT. I drive pretty much all over the UK.

Yes, the standard of driving is far better than many countries around the world. But something I have noticed increasingly (and especially since the pandemic) is this:

  1. Very few people indicate right on a roundabout. You get this bizarre situation where someone approaches a roundabout in a right hand lane, doesn't indicate, careers around the roundabout for 270 degrees, then once at their junction, they indicate off left to show they're taking the exit!!
  2. Middle lane hogging is now third lane hogging On any four lane motorway in the UK, I find the vast majority of drivers have moved to the third lane and sit there at 60 or 65mph. The first and second lane have been re-designated as a lorry lane, and as a lorry overtaking lane. Again, this is not the Highway Code.
  3. Phone driving is an absolute epidemic. On the school run people drive off holding their phones and checking messages... next to a SCHOOL where children are still walking and crossing the road.
  4. Merge in turn is completely ignored - instead you see bizarre behaviour like road captains who sit straddling two lanes, a mile before the merge, to stop "queue jumpers". This goes completely against the road rules and the Code but once again, British drivers know best and no one can tell them otherwise
  5. Give way if parked cars are on your left again seems to be ignored. I've seen plenty of fellow women do this one, where they barrel through hoping the other person will concede, and then when asked to reverse their car, go into a complete blind panic and start swearing and shouting for the other person to reverse instead.
  6. Give way to traffic already on the motorway when joining Again, forget it. When I'm in lane 1, and I see a slip road ahead, I try and move over. I can't straightway because middle lane hoggers, however I wait for a gap and then move in time. Only to find the car that is joining isn't happy I've made a space...because they want to slalom across two lanes and barrel their way into lane 2 or 3 in one quick glide! WTF.

Yeah I've shared too many examples, but I could share dozens more.

It's like the Highway Code is irrelevant to most drivers. They decide "what is fair". So if they feel they don't want to wait and there's an obstruction on their left? Barrel on through!

The only way around this is either

  • increased traffic policing of road offences, which we all know won't happen because we have fewer police
  • mandatory driving retraining, which everyone would hate

Is this just me? Does anyone else care about this or notice this, or am I a lone female voice in this space and actually it's fine to just make up the rules as we go along?

Thanks in advance

OP posts:
rwalker · 24/09/2025 16:56

Colourpurplepalette · 24/09/2025 16:54

The car on the inside is the one in the right here though. The one in the outside lane is overtaking no one so needs to move in.

I don’t deliberately overtake but drive on the inside as you are supposed to and go 70 there if the road is clear. If someone is in lane 3 going slower than me I hardly think I’m ‘undertaking’.

Rest my case

Pashazade · 24/09/2025 16:59

It’s seemed that Covid caused everyone to forget what indicators were for and oh dear lord the third lane hoggers have got so bad, there is talk of it being clamped down on as it is dangerous. We can only hope!

LlamaNoDrama · 24/09/2025 17:16

Ace56 · 24/09/2025 15:38

Sorry but I’m what you would call a ‘middle lane hogger.’ Lane 1 is full of trucks going at 60 - why would I constantly want to weave in and out of them, going back and forth from Lane 1 to Lane 2, when I can comfortably sit in Lane 2 at 70mph? It doesn’t make sense. Lane 1 = trucks/slow drivers, Lane 2 = normal drivers at 70mph, Lane 3 = dickheads in Audis/BMWs going more than 70. Always the way and always will be.
You can use your own brain, and don’t have to follow rules blindly just because ‘they’re the rules.’ Agree with pp that in some cases it also does make sense to undertake - shock, that’s not in the rule book either!

It's literally illegal to lane hog. What other laws do you break because you think you're exempt?

HerewardtheSleepy · 24/09/2025 17:19

Can't say I've noticed it getting worse. I passed my test in the 70s.

dynamiccactus · 24/09/2025 17:39

Colourpurplepalette · 24/09/2025 13:11

As a cyclist and driver the lack of use of indicators drives me mad. It doesn’t cost anything. There may or may not be other cars around, but other road users need to know what you are doing.

Yep this one. And pedestrians need to know what you are doing too, thought he magic indicator doesn't mean they can disappear if they are already in the middle of a road you want to cross.

On the indicating at roundabouts point, I find that a lot of people do indicate, but they indicate right - but then keep indicating right as they go round, rather than switching to left as they approach their exit. I think I'd actually prefer the no indicating and then indicating left!

The ones that annoy me are people who overtake cyclists when a car is coming towards them. And pavement parking. When I am Queen people who park on pavements will have their SUVs crushed and will be made to drive Smart cars instead. On The Roads.

dynamiccactus · 24/09/2025 17:49

Namechange73467892 · 24/09/2025 16:07

As a new driver I don’t proclaim to be perfect and have definitely made mistakes, but I’ve been astounded by just how dangerous other drivers can be. Have had people nearly cause a collision to overtake me when I’m doing 20 on a 20 road by a busy high street/school area only to end up sat next to me at the same red light 🤨

The lack of indicators on roundabouts is another one that drives me barmy. Equally when the car behind you beeps because a car you’re giving way to at a roundabout hasn’t got their indicators on so you hold back and it turns out to be unnecessary because they take the first exit. Why are you beeping me?!

On the other hand, I was indicating right to go the whole way round a roundabout the other day. Roundabout was clear when I got there, however a speeding motorbike appeared once I was already on it and flew down the hill through the give way of the exit I was passing and thankfully I was able to slam my brakes on. He did put his hand up and mouth “sorry”, but for the love of god, when people ARE signalling at roundabouts… check them before you go 🤦‍♀️

The beeping thing drives me mad.

If you time to beep you have time to brake and you should only beep if someone is going to actually drive into you.

The other day I sw a van driver beep a car that went across the roundabout in front of him. He wouldn't have even needed to take his foot off the gas. But he was able to beep for no reason of course.

TheNightingalesStarling · 24/09/2025 17:57

Also, in standing traffic,if an emergency vehicle needs you to move to create an extra lane for them to get through... don't move back into your old position afterwards because rheres likely to be more following. The sooner the emergency vehicles get through, the sooner the accident will be cleared.

Bundleflower · 24/09/2025 17:58

I’m not convinced it’s a new thing. Remember we had TV adverts telling us to wear a seatbelt?

Bundleflower · 24/09/2025 18:01

Ace56 · 24/09/2025 15:38

Sorry but I’m what you would call a ‘middle lane hogger.’ Lane 1 is full of trucks going at 60 - why would I constantly want to weave in and out of them, going back and forth from Lane 1 to Lane 2, when I can comfortably sit in Lane 2 at 70mph? It doesn’t make sense. Lane 1 = trucks/slow drivers, Lane 2 = normal drivers at 70mph, Lane 3 = dickheads in Audis/BMWs going more than 70. Always the way and always will be.
You can use your own brain, and don’t have to follow rules blindly just because ‘they’re the rules.’ Agree with pp that in some cases it also does make sense to undertake - shock, that’s not in the rule book either!

But it takes literally next to no physical energy to change lanes. Imagine being so pleased with yourself for breaking the law and inconveniencing everyone else because you’re simply too lazy to look, indicate and tilt your steering wheel a little bit.

ChipsnGraveee · 24/09/2025 18:02

Bluevelvetsofa · 24/09/2025 13:13

I thought that if there are parked cars on your left, but you’ve already started to move past them, you have the right to continue.

I was actually going to use this as an example that so many people don’t seem to know and then get angry and try and force their way through, even though they were nowhere near the row of cars when you started to go through!!

hindsightisuseful · 24/09/2025 18:09

vivainsomnia · 24/09/2025 14:58

It's merge in turn at the point of the closure and NOT "half a mile before"
So you think that because some people don't understand the rules, decide to act fairly, it gives the higher above who know the rules the right to avoid the queue, avoid the frustration of waiting, making it 20 second quicker to their destination?

I know the rules, but I still don't think it gives the right to cross before many people who have been patiently waiting. Just like I don't pass middle lane huggers on the left, or rush from the back of the queue in a supermarket when a new till opens, because rightly or wrongly, it is rude and entitled to think you shouldn't wait when others do.

Yes totally agree

those who dash into open lane at last minute are selfish and too important to wait their turn.

see this on M25 slip road where they go in RH lane which goes the other direction say then purposefully barge into lane going South at last minute because they couldn’t possibly wait their turn

rwalker · 24/09/2025 18:10

Ace56 · 24/09/2025 15:38

Sorry but I’m what you would call a ‘middle lane hogger.’ Lane 1 is full of trucks going at 60 - why would I constantly want to weave in and out of them, going back and forth from Lane 1 to Lane 2, when I can comfortably sit in Lane 2 at 70mph? It doesn’t make sense. Lane 1 = trucks/slow drivers, Lane 2 = normal drivers at 70mph, Lane 3 = dickheads in Audis/BMWs going more than 70. Always the way and always will be.
You can use your own brain, and don’t have to follow rules blindly just because ‘they’re the rules.’ Agree with pp that in some cases it also does make sense to undertake - shock, that’s not in the rule book either!

I think there’s a dickhead in lane 2

randomchap · 24/09/2025 18:19

I've found that on motorways more and more people speed up when you're overtaking them. People doing 65 in the left lane speed up to 70 when you're going past. Forcing you to either speed to finish your manoeuvre, or drop back behind them.

hindsightisuseful · 24/09/2025 18:23

I do question whether some of the drivers on the road have passed a driving test

Cutecattoes · 24/09/2025 18:30

Or people who are going straight over a roundabout who dont actually go around the roundabout and just barrel straight over. Nearly had an accident yesterday because some idiot behind me assumed i was turning left as I kept in the left hand lane to go straight over and didnt straddle the middle lane.

Cutecattoes · 24/09/2025 18:38

Need to add people using blue badge spaces without a blue badge. These people need to lose their licence how selfish can you be?

Boogiemam · 24/09/2025 18:52

I feel like you would enjoy watching BigJobber's videos on social media. He describes these people (and there are a few in the comments) as human bungalows (nothing going on upstairs)

dynamiccactus · 24/09/2025 21:39

LlamaNoDrama · 24/09/2025 17:16

It's literally illegal to lane hog. What other laws do you break because you think you're exempt?

Also illegal to go over 70 but nobody seems to worry about that one.

For me a middle lane sitter is someone who stays there for miles even when the inside lane is free. Not someone who moves over to let someone join the motorway, not someone who moves over because they don't want to leave the motorway if the inside lane becomes a slip road and not someone who stays put because there's a line of traffic they want to overtake.

Actual middle lane sitters are comparatively rare. Mainly because there's inevitably someone more slow-moving to overtake!

EBearhug · 24/09/2025 23:12

Please can we stop flashing lights at people to say thank you? Blinding me is not a thankful action, it means I have less visibility of the road ahead and its surroundings for a few seconds, and accidents can happen in that time.

I just assume everyone is glad I let them pass, or whatever i did. Life's easier that way.

Icon15 · 24/09/2025 23:27

vivainsomnia · 24/09/2025 13:22

I agree with all but number 4. The usual signs encourage people to get onto one lane much sooner than just when the lanes merged.

Yes merging sooner means a very slight longer time, depending on how long the queue is, but those who decide to pass everybody queuing are assholes.they don't do it because they like to.folliw the rules, they do it because they have a sense of entitlement and think others should just make way to their more important self.

That's not the motivation in my case. I stay in my lane (usually the left) until about 100 metres away from the beginning of the lane closure, then merge into the other lane when safe to do so, because it's better use of the road.

The lane closure warning signs are usually every 200m and start at 800m before the closure point, or even more than that. To switch lanes 800m away from the closure is ridiculously too early. It causes the other lane to snarl up and there's then a massive tailback of near stationary traffic in one lane and none in the other. That's not an efficient use of road space. It's far better for the traffic to use both lanes and then merge just before the closure point.

JacquesHarlow · 25/09/2025 13:25

Icon15 · 24/09/2025 23:27

That's not the motivation in my case. I stay in my lane (usually the left) until about 100 metres away from the beginning of the lane closure, then merge into the other lane when safe to do so, because it's better use of the road.

The lane closure warning signs are usually every 200m and start at 800m before the closure point, or even more than that. To switch lanes 800m away from the closure is ridiculously too early. It causes the other lane to snarl up and there's then a massive tailback of near stationary traffic in one lane and none in the other. That's not an efficient use of road space. It's far better for the traffic to use both lanes and then merge just before the closure point.

To switch lanes 800m away from the closure is ridiculously too early. It causes the other lane to snarl up and there's then a massive tailback of near stationary traffic in one lane and none in the other. That's not an efficient use of road space. It's far better for the traffic to use both lanes and then merge just before the closure point.

This is wonderfully put @Icon15 thank you. Completely agree.

It's a needless introduction of "etiquette" in a road system that already has rules in place to help traffic flow correctly.

OP posts:
Liverpool52 · 25/09/2025 13:39

JacquesHarlow · 25/09/2025 13:25

To switch lanes 800m away from the closure is ridiculously too early. It causes the other lane to snarl up and there's then a massive tailback of near stationary traffic in one lane and none in the other. That's not an efficient use of road space. It's far better for the traffic to use both lanes and then merge just before the closure point.

This is wonderfully put @Icon15 thank you. Completely agree.

It's a needless introduction of "etiquette" in a road system that already has rules in place to help traffic flow correctly.

It's like when people give way to the left at roundabouts or stop to let pedestrians cross at crossing points controlled by lights and the pedestrian lights are still on red and the vehicle lights green. Disrupts the flow and is also dangerous because it's the opposite behaviour of what people can reasonably expect you to do i.e. stopping suddenly when it's your right of way.

FriendlyGreenAlien · 25/09/2025 13:55

I was taught “mirror, signal, mirror, manoeuvre“ so you’ve got a really good awareness of what’s going on around you before you change lanes, turn, etc.

You’d be amazed how many drivers get annoyed that I indicate and pull up to a standstill so I can reverse on to my drive. It’s a busy road (30 limit) and I’m doing what the Highway Code recommends. I certainly don’t want to reverse off my drive into traffic!

The one I’m puzzled about is:
cars going uphill tend to have priority,
cars with parked cars on their side don’t have priority.

So, when you are going uphill but there are cars parked on your side, do you have priority or not?!

TY78910 · 25/09/2025 14:07

Agree with all points but something I’ve realised for point 1:

UK is one of 4 countries in Europe to drive on the left. The rest drive on the right which means that their roundabout rules are different. They don’t indicate to signal intent, but rely more on lane discipline instead and signal on exit. Not an excuse not to familiarise yourself with the Highway Code of the country you’re in, but it’s not so much laziness, just not understanding the rule.

Zoopet · 25/09/2025 15:30

Come to North Yorkshire.
Speed limits appear to be optional here, especially when they are for 50mph on a dual carriageway (for safetyreasons.)

I've lost count of the number of irate drivers steaming up behind me then zipping into the overtaking lane whilst disappearing into the distance way over the speed limit.
Just why?

Swipe left for the next trending thread