Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Angela Rayner tax fail

1000 replies

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 03/09/2025 12:56

But it’s ok because she was just badly advised.
I’ll remember that excuse next time I fill in my tax return.

But still confused about one can have 2 main homes?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
RoseGlass7 · 03/09/2025 23:30

So can we all put our house in a trust to avoid IHT?

I had to pay the 3% stamp duty surcharge when I couldn't sell my old flat, didn't know it was avoidable tbh, I guess as housing secretary she knows all the loopholes.

PropertyD · 03/09/2025 23:31

IdaGlossop · 03/09/2025 23:28

She didn't raid the trust. The trust bought her share of the house using the compensation money received for her son. Th trust is a way of providing security for her son, who will not be able to be independent when he reaches adulthood, no matter what may happen to his parents.

She could have left her share of the house to her son in her will. Why use his money to ensure that she could start somewhere new with what seems to be a very precarious relationship. I presume Sam Tarry is the partner and that has been off and on.

tramtracks · 04/09/2025 00:03

IdaGlossop · 03/09/2025 23:28

She didn't raid the trust. The trust bought her share of the house using the compensation money received for her son. Th trust is a way of providing security for her son, who will not be able to be independent when he reaches adulthood, no matter what may happen to his parents.

Hmmmm. Was increasing her sons share of the house from 50% to 75% in his best interests.. that’s the interesting point in this..

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 00:05

RoseGlass7 · 03/09/2025 23:30

So can we all put our house in a trust to avoid IHT?

I had to pay the 3% stamp duty surcharge when I couldn't sell my old flat, didn't know it was avoidable tbh, I guess as housing secretary she knows all the loopholes.

Do you have a disabled child with a compensation payment and so specific needs to be accommodated?
Thought not

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 00:07

tramtracks · 04/09/2025 00:03

Hmmmm. Was increasing her sons share of the house from 50% to 75% in his best interests.. that’s the interesting point in this..

Yes it was

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 00:09

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 03/09/2025 23:16

I have not read the full thread but I can’t believe someone who is so senior in the government could have got this so wrong and is blaming it on the legal advice she received. She is either full of BS or is rather stupid either way, she is not suitable for the position she currently holds which is the same for the majority of politicians.

It will come down to the advice she got
If she got specialist advice and answered questions thoroughly she's fine ( and probably can sue), if not then that's her failing

tramtracks · 04/09/2025 00:12

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 00:07

Yes it was

Why

Sunholidays · 04/09/2025 00:18

tramtracks · 04/09/2025 00:03

Hmmmm. Was increasing her sons share of the house from 50% to 75% in his best interests.. that’s the interesting point in this..

Nope. He already had the house, then the trust gave Rayner cash in exchange for a % of the house that was not really needed. The cash can be spent on carers or other services/goods that the son may need. Angela is still using the house as her main residence even though she’s sold it.

3tumsnot1 · 04/09/2025 00:25

olderandnonthewiser · 03/09/2025 13:23

It’s really not hard to pay stamp duty on a second home. I know. I’ve done it.
sounds to me she’s put a house in a Trust as a way to avoid tax now, and in the future (inheritance etc)and has fell flat on her face.
Theyre all as bad as one another: every party.
She does need to go, irrespective of your political leanings, as all those before her who haven’t been squeaky clean.

Sorry I don’t agree. It is not always that clear cut. I should know I was on the call to HMRC today finding out if I should pay second rate tax. When it’s your home you are replacing you should not and technically if the other house is in trust to her kids then the lines are blurred…. The governments own stamp calculator online is simple and only covers standard situations.

after speaking with HMRC today, I came off a 45min phone call none the wiser… they didn’t seem to know if I should pay second home tax or not either and my solicitor is defaulting to me… I can see how easy it is to screw this up…

ANON20241 · 04/09/2025 00:42

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 00:05

Do you have a disabled child with a compensation payment and so specific needs to be accommodated?
Thought not

Edited

I thought anyone could set up a trust for their children? Genuinely interested as well. Bet you tax advisors will be getting loads of requests from people wanting to do the same thing. In anycase, when you 'put' your house in a trust, normally i would assume the trust would need to pay stamp duty as well. As its considered a property sale.

Plantatreetoday · 04/09/2025 01:06

Hominim · 03/09/2025 23:13

I wondered about this - it seems she is using money given as a payment for her child

@NoJamSlags
The injuries weren’t sustained at birth. She went into Labour at 23 weeks and her son was born weighing less than one pound.
He spent 6months in intensive care and at one point had a bleed on the brain. He wasn’t expected to survive and told three times he wouldnt. Something must have happened in those three months as Raynor and her ex husband spent 11years fighting for compensation from the hospital . That’s the trust money

Plantatreetoday · 04/09/2025 01:10

3tumsnot1 · 04/09/2025 00:25

Sorry I don’t agree. It is not always that clear cut. I should know I was on the call to HMRC today finding out if I should pay second rate tax. When it’s your home you are replacing you should not and technically if the other house is in trust to her kids then the lines are blurred…. The governments own stamp calculator online is simple and only covers standard situations.

after speaking with HMRC today, I came off a 45min phone call none the wiser… they didn’t seem to know if I should pay second home tax or not either and my solicitor is defaulting to me… I can see how easy it is to screw this up…

You pay it if you own another property. If you sell your other property you get the second property tax back. But only if you sell within 3 years and declare your second purchase as your primary residence

Nevertheless you must pay it up front and claim it back if you sell the first property. You can’t not pay first.

Our conveyancer has always been able to tell us how much we needed to pay. No problems

hamstersarse · 04/09/2025 06:40

Angela Rayners financial affairs are murky, let’s face it. If you look at her intentions they just aren’t good - trusts to avoid IHT, getting advice to minimise stamp duty, and let’s not forget her gifts scandal less than 12 months ago. All those designer clothes she ‘needed for work’.
She’s a classic out to get what she can type.
My main issue is the staggering hypocrisy. I’ve had to spend years listening to her uncouth, aggressive, non compromising criticisms of opposition politicians, often for much more minor issues, yet here she is, trying to play the “these past few days have been awful for my family…..and my disabled son” card. And no resignation, no apology.

She is often accused of being thick, that may be true but she definitely thinks we are all thick.

EasternStandard · 04/09/2025 07:16

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 03/09/2025 23:16

I have not read the full thread but I can’t believe someone who is so senior in the government could have got this so wrong and is blaming it on the legal advice she received. She is either full of BS or is rather stupid either way, she is not suitable for the position she currently holds which is the same for the majority of politicians.

So far advisors have distanced themselves from Rayner in a statement. I doubt there is anyone who got it wrong bar Rayner. Which is a big lie there.

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 04/09/2025 07:17

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 00:09

It will come down to the advice she got
If she got specialist advice and answered questions thoroughly she's fine ( and probably can sue), if not then that's her failing

It really is not hard to work out what tax is required for house buying. Given she is the deputy PM and her intense objective to tax working people to death, it is unacceptable and the passing of the responsibility to someone is not on. We could all do this and use the excuse “but they told me to do it”. She needs to resign or firing.

HairyToity · 04/09/2025 07:36

I do wonder whether NHS should be fighting to save every premature baby. I have a friend who's kid was born at 24 weeks with lifelong disabilities, little quality of life and also has a compo trust. Her marriage also ended over the stess of it. Years ago these kids died and no lifelong care and no comp payable. I know you'll all think I'm evil for thinking this, nevermind saying it. I think we should save prem kids born with a viable chance of a normal life, but some of them don't have a viable chance and we save them anyway.

sleepwouldbenice · 04/09/2025 07:37

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 04/09/2025 07:17

It really is not hard to work out what tax is required for house buying. Given she is the deputy PM and her intense objective to tax working people to death, it is unacceptable and the passing of the responsibility to someone is not on. We could all do this and use the excuse “but they told me to do it”. She needs to resign or firing.

Edited

Aah so you recommend not getting specialist advice as its all easy and straight forward? Ok then

Alexandra2001 · 04/09/2025 07:45

hamstersarse · 04/09/2025 06:40

Angela Rayners financial affairs are murky, let’s face it. If you look at her intentions they just aren’t good - trusts to avoid IHT, getting advice to minimise stamp duty, and let’s not forget her gifts scandal less than 12 months ago. All those designer clothes she ‘needed for work’.
She’s a classic out to get what she can type.
My main issue is the staggering hypocrisy. I’ve had to spend years listening to her uncouth, aggressive, non compromising criticisms of opposition politicians, often for much more minor issues, yet here she is, trying to play the “these past few days have been awful for my family…..and my disabled son” card. And no resignation, no apology.

She is often accused of being thick, that may be true but she definitely thinks we are all thick.

Even for you, thats a load of rubbish.

The trust is to protect her children after a divorce, set up by the court....you are accusing her advisors of tax evasion..... which is what evasion of SLDT is.

Lets all hope you are never asked to serve on a jury....

Gifts declared by MPs of any party are perfect legal and above board, we all know as they have been declared or is it rather that Tory gifts = Good, Labour Gifts = fraud.

hamstersarse · 04/09/2025 07:48

Alexandra2001 · 04/09/2025 07:45

Even for you, thats a load of rubbish.

The trust is to protect her children after a divorce, set up by the court....you are accusing her advisors of tax evasion..... which is what evasion of SLDT is.

Lets all hope you are never asked to serve on a jury....

Gifts declared by MPs of any party are perfect legal and above board, we all know as they have been declared or is it rather that Tory gifts = Good, Labour Gifts = fraud.

“even for you”
that’s the sort of pathetic attack that is typical of your type of leftie

I’ve heard Angela Rayner do similar, I can see why you defend her - kindred spirits

flightissue · 04/09/2025 07:52

I’m a lawyer. Her lawyers won’t have got this wrong if all the info was provided. She didn’t seek the correct advice - other than to make sure her iht was minimised. She is also housing minister. It’s literally her job to understand taxes related to housing.

Hominim · 04/09/2025 07:54

Today we know she consulted three people. I do wonder if she consulted them in a professional capacity and paid for their advice or just talked to people she knew/worked with in a corridor

EasternStandard · 04/09/2025 07:56

hamstersarse · 04/09/2025 07:48

“even for you”
that’s the sort of pathetic attack that is typical of your type of leftie

I’ve heard Angela Rayner do similar, I can see why you defend her - kindred spirits

Agree. And with @flightissueno professional got this wrong.

’Three people’ could be the next door neighbour, whoever.

Namechange4466543 · 04/09/2025 08:02

Ooohjustalittlebit · 03/09/2025 13:23

I don’t think she’s giving it to her ex, she has said it’s in trust for their kids: one of their children is disabled after some kind of incident as a premature baby which resulted in a payment - so maybe that’s what funded the house and/or adaptations. She and her kids are entitled to some privacy about this arrangement!

I actually don’t think taxation systems (with all this primary and secondary home business) fully takes into account complications like parents divorcing but keeping a family home for the kids, the whole system needs to be updated.

So she can put her house in a trust for the benefit of her disabled child because she wants to avoid that child paying inheritance tax so they can maintain the house with the adaptions or so they can use the money to pay for care, one would assume.

On the face of that iv got no problem with except for the fact that she is housing minister and she is always harping on about the terrible people who dont pay their required dues.

Your average person doesnt have the means to pay shoesmiths (her top toer lawyers) to put their estate in trusts and recommend the best trusts to use. So why is a labour minister doing this?

Yes, she has come out and admitted her error but only because of the hounding of the press. If this story hadn't been leaked she never would have 'identified' her error and wouldn't be paying the tax.

If a tory minister hadn't paid the tax, would she be at all sympathetic? Did she not call for Boris Johnston to quit because he had a small birthday party? She has at best accidently avoided paying £40k tax.

If this was a genuine mistake id have some sympathy but every step she has taken seems to go against the grain of what she seemingly stands for. She even claims this is her first high paying job, if thats the case how has she managed to save the deposit to buy an £800k flat in such a short time given that she is a one income household? Where is this £40k going to come from?

I dont this lightly but she is literally responsible for the housing rules, she should be sacked. If she doesnt understand the rules or think they are fair then what hope do the rest of us have?!

tramtracks · 04/09/2025 08:02

flightissue · 04/09/2025 07:52

I’m a lawyer. Her lawyers won’t have got this wrong if all the info was provided. She didn’t seek the correct advice - other than to make sure her iht was minimised. She is also housing minister. It’s literally her job to understand taxes related to housing.

I thought this too. I was a lawyer - you just don’t get this sort of thing wrong.

LovelyLuluu · 04/09/2025 08:03

The issue is she has form for this.

There was the issue with the use of a New York flat last year she used where she took her boyfriend (Sam Tarry) on a freebie and didn't declare it properly. She also accepted £3500 clothes from Lord Ali and didn't declare them. Goodness knows what else she may have done and it's under the radar.

The total picture is she avoids scrutiny until caught out.

For someone who has literally made a living out of her 'working class credentials' (and nothing much else) and 'standing up for the little people' it looks like she's only really interested in buttering her own bread.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.