Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves' plan to tax houses over 500k

1000 replies

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax

Exclusive: Treasury examines options including tax on homes sold for more than £500,000 as well as overhaul of council tax

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:30

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:21

I don't know if these suggestions are correct but we absolutely do need to do something about housing, it's strangling the economy. Another poster mentioned taxing lower earners more like they do in other countries.

"The UK has housing costs 44% higher than equivalent costs in similar countries."

This is the problem and of course it disproportionately impacts younger people as they are more likely to be renting or paying a mortgage.

The very simple and easiesst thing to do is to flood the rental market with social housing

People are trapped in rentals due to not being able to move to another rental (no where cheaper) and not able to buy due to the cost of the rent meaning they cant save the deposit. They also are worse off becuase the rent is much higher than a similar mortgage might be

People are homeless because the private rental sector needs guarantors and doesnt allow (unofficially) pets, benefits, too many kids etc etc.

Both of these groups contribute to economic limitations, poorer health, more instability at school and poorer attainment.

No government seems to want to commit to this and most of the public dont want that either.

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 21:30

LoveItaly · 18/08/2025 21:27

I don’t think they are clueless, how can they be with all the advisors and economists at their disposal?

They don’t follow the advice they’ve been given. They weigh up the advice given with the focus groups and vote for what voters think they want (higher taxes to be paid by anyone but them) rather than taxes that actually work. It’s so infuriatingly spineless.

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 21:31

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:30

The very simple and easiesst thing to do is to flood the rental market with social housing

People are trapped in rentals due to not being able to move to another rental (no where cheaper) and not able to buy due to the cost of the rent meaning they cant save the deposit. They also are worse off becuase the rent is much higher than a similar mortgage might be

People are homeless because the private rental sector needs guarantors and doesnt allow (unofficially) pets, benefits, too many kids etc etc.

Both of these groups contribute to economic limitations, poorer health, more instability at school and poorer attainment.

No government seems to want to commit to this and most of the public dont want that either.

This is the solution. Would save so much on housing benefit too. But oooh we wouldn’t want to do anything to drop housing costs would we? Voters wouldn’t like that.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:32

Everything in society can’t be solved by taxing workers more

@MidnightPatrol why would this only impact workers?

1457bloom · 18/08/2025 21:33

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:28

Its not unreasonable to ask why anyone shouldnt pay more to live somewhere more desirable with its impact on resources, overcrowding, pressure on schools and health services and taking talent and money out of other areas

tbf there isnt pressure on schools. People aren't having dc & many families have moved out.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9857r973xgo.amp

But people are already paying more to live in desirable areas, now reeves wants to tax them more as well.

mumda · 18/08/2025 21:33

HermioneWeasley · 18/08/2025 20:27

It won’t affect me, but has she considered spending less fucking money or growing the economy?

This

LemondrizzleShark · 18/08/2025 21:34

reversegear · 18/08/2025 21:00

Ha ha love this post.

Lets hope so, spiteful policy’s finally impact on spiteful people.

Don’t you think the kind of people who are chippy about private school are probably also chippy about people living in big houses?

And the people who can afford £30 per child per year for private school probably also live in fairly expensive houses?

I would imagine the venn diagram of “people who are affected by VAT on school fees” and “people affected by a mansion tax” will basically be a circle…

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:34

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:29

I would wager that most people who call themselves Londoners, were not born and bred in London.

I call myself a Londoner because that's exactly what I am, born & raised. If I moved to Newcastle I don't think anyone would say I was a Geordie!

Well then you're not the person Im talking about are you!!! What a bizarre response!!

SimoneHere · 18/08/2025 21:34

hangerup · 18/08/2025 20:55

@SimoneHere I presumed the article was about England.

Yes, as did I. Not sure I get your point.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:34

@soupyspoon you are right, we need a huge social housing programme.

But it would need cross party support and as you say I don't think the public wants it. I don't know why though.

Bedtimeread · 18/08/2025 21:34

idratherbedrawing · 18/08/2025 20:36

It’s a pretty good idea. Wealth is under taxed, council tax is now regressive and the government need ££. I just hope it happens and isn’t watered down to be ineffective. I live in London btw

I agree with your comment about wealth but I live in a house valued over £500k and we are not wealthy, we do not have lots of money in the bank. The cost of everything has gone up, wealth is having millions of pounds at your disposal. We are just lucky we bought at a good time and the property value went up.

Charlize43 · 18/08/2025 21:35

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 21:31

This is the solution. Would save so much on housing benefit too. But oooh we wouldn’t want to do anything to drop housing costs would we? Voters wouldn’t like that.

What and wipe off the value of Kier Starmer's property portfolio? Not a chance. Not with all these MPs and all the houses they own (and rent out).

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:36

@Letgoofmyblank exactly the savings on housing benefit. But will the public vote for that?

Jumpthewaves · 18/08/2025 21:36

LemondrizzleShark · 18/08/2025 21:34

Don’t you think the kind of people who are chippy about private school are probably also chippy about people living in big houses?

And the people who can afford £30 per child per year for private school probably also live in fairly expensive houses?

I would imagine the venn diagram of “people who are affected by VAT on school fees” and “people affected by a mansion tax” will basically be a circle…

No, I doubt it. In lots of places £500k on a house does not mean it also a mansion.

Scarylett · 18/08/2025 21:36

hangerup · 18/08/2025 20:38

As someone who would be impacted by this I don't think it's terrible.
They have property taxes in lots of other countries and our council tax is based on completely outdated values.

Hard to believe this would affect you when you are so blasé about paying more taxes. Most people with a £500+ house are probably on a high tax bracket and paying high council taxes anyway. Why should they pay more.

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 21:36

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:28

Its not unreasonable to ask why anyone shouldnt pay more to live somewhere more desirable with its impact on resources, overcrowding, pressure on schools and health services and taking talent and money out of other areas

tbf there isnt pressure on schools. People aren't having dc & many families have moved out.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9857r973xgo.amp

I find the statistics regarding forecast school rolls in different areas of the country really interesting. The city I live in is having a real implosion of families. Yes the birth rate is declining but families also simply cannot afford to live here too.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:37

@SimoneHere well it was why I didn't reference what stamp duty would cost in Scotland...

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 21:37

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:32

Everything in society can’t be solved by taxing workers more

@MidnightPatrol why would this only impact workers?

Well, they were adamant they wouldn't tax "working people" so perhaps as they think 500k is so lofty they'll call it "professional people" tax. Tool makers exempt 😉

OP posts:
MidnightPatrol · 18/08/2025 21:37

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:32

Everything in society can’t be solved by taxing workers more

@MidnightPatrol why would this only impact workers?

I’d assume most people able to purchase a £500k+ house would be in work.

The policy suggests it wouldn’t impact people who already own properties, so pensioners could probably avoid it by staying put.

But the ‘broadest shoulders’ tax policy doesn’t work when you target so many areas - housing, childcare, income tax thresholds, child benefit etc. You do actually need a thriving middle class - and that’s not leaving them with an extra £50 a month for a trip to Nando’s.

Tinnybinnylinny · 18/08/2025 21:38

SimoneHere · 18/08/2025 20:50

£28,350 in Scotland.

And if you go a bit higher to £750k (not unreasonable in Edinburgh), stamp duty is:

£27,500 in England
£48,350 in Scotland

So it is this extra that they are after. Scotland has proven that people will pay it.

We also have top rate income tax of 48%

I don’t begrudge the income tax, but I think the property tax is poorly thought out because of the impact on the housing market. It further inflates prices.

While I don’t begrudge income tax - things like childcare subsidies falling off a cliff at 100 k seem ridiculous. It’s just not worth people working full time to say earn 120 k if they have kids.

Then NHS is also an emotive one, while it will keep you alive there are some illness’/ ailments where basically you have to be pretty well off to have a decent quality (am thinking severe mental health struggles/ major stroke.

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:38

I dont agree that a mass social housing programme would lower house prices I dont know why that always gets bandied about.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:39

@soupyspoon but wouldn't everyone who lived in London pay the tax or are you saying londoners should be exempt as they didn't move?

Puzzledandpissedoff · 18/08/2025 21:40

Typical Labour Hmm

Had to smile, though, at suggestions this could replace stamp duty, when it's entirely possible they'll charge both - after all the new proposed tax would be paid by the vendor and stamp duty by the buyer, so that's a noce little wheeze right there

WonderingWanda · 18/08/2025 21:41

So I've just paid £26k in stamp duty to buy a bigger house and when I want to downsize once the kids have left home I'll have to pay it again...just for the pleasure of having a crippling mortgage which extends beyond my retirement age and working as a fucking teacher till I'm 67 (so kids can live here as adults because they won't be able to afford to rent or buy)....no doubt they'll raise the retirement age again because they've probably spent my bloody pension already so will be hoping I just die....which is likely given how fucked the NHS is. People who are buying and selling 500k houses are not wealthy, this is not what people mean when they say tax wealth. I live in the south west and that's the price of a normal sized family home.

TheFateNdoftheWedge · 18/08/2025 21:41

Our small three bed terrace will be brushing 500. It's only three bed because the large front bedroom was divided into two.
One room downstairs ,one bath and loo and a kitchen too small to have a table in.

South east I dont get my hair cut my DH does it ,all self care is DIY ,i cut my girls hair etc we have no fripperies ,old cars we keep going.
Is it really our house wealth that needs tapping ??
What wealth !!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.