Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves' plan to tax houses over 500k

1000 replies

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax

Exclusive: Treasury examines options including tax on homes sold for more than £500,000 as well as overhaul of council tax

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
reversegear · 18/08/2025 21:00

OldTiredMum1976 · 18/08/2025 20:53

Well i just watch gleefully as all these Labour policies that won’t affect me affect all those people on here who cheered on Labour for adding VAT to private school fees - not so fun now it’s you is it?

i have a child will SEN who I pay to go to a private school else she wouldn’t be able to access school at all. Due to that, I live in a shithole and have no savings so Rachel’s latest ideas won’t affect me

Ha ha love this post.

Lets hope so, spiteful policy’s finally impact on spiteful people.

MidnightPatrol · 18/08/2025 21:01

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 20:57

Yes but we can try with growth, and currently we’re not trying.

the childcare thing I agree on too. Getting rid of the high marginal bands doesn’t have to be a tax break for the wealthy. Up the higher rate of tax to pay for it. It makes so much sense to do so (but would break Labours stupid electoral pledge so they’ll not do it. They’ll introduce an overly complicated alternative which will raise a fraction of what is needed).

It’s not even about ‘a tax break for the wealthy’ - people earning over the £100k threshold already pay about 50% of all income tax.

The value of the free childcare is now so huge, there’s actually no point earning between something like £100-150k if you have a 1 year old and a 3 year old a nursery. You are no better off than if earning £50k less and claiming free hours.

And - where do you increase the tax rate on this group, they already top out at 62% between £100-162k which is a disincentive to additional work in itself!

SkiAndTravelTheWorldWithMyDog · 18/08/2025 21:01

They are an absolute shit show.

Stifling growth, punishing anyone with aspirations and those who have saved for their futures.

They are crippling the business people creating jobs.

They are utterly clueless.

Justchilling07 · 18/08/2025 21:03

OldTiredMum1976 · 18/08/2025 20:53

Well i just watch gleefully as all these Labour policies that won’t affect me affect all those people on here who cheered on Labour for adding VAT to private school fees - not so fun now it’s you is it?

i have a child will SEN who I pay to go to a private school else she wouldn’t be able to access school at all. Due to that, I live in a shithole and have no savings so Rachel’s latest ideas won’t affect me

You’re watching gleefully! That’s a horrible thing to say, want!! I don’t know anyone who hasn’t been affected by Labour’s policies, it’s not just you!
But again didn’t the conservatives do so well when they were in government, how long was it, 14 years!🙄

StrokeRecovery25 · 18/08/2025 21:03

EricInk · 18/08/2025 20:53

I voted YANBU but I read the article and it’s tax payable on selling homes, so on balance I think that’s fair as most homes changing hands at that value would be involving wealthier individuals or people who paid a lot less for the property and stood to gain £££.

I also think the welfare system needs reforming and it’s a shame the proposed changes were watered down almost to the point of making no difference

I'm in the SE, £500,000 where I live buys you a very modest 3 bed.

& no, why would it have been bought for a lot less?

Justchilling07 · 18/08/2025 21:07

reversegear · 18/08/2025 21:00

Ha ha love this post.

Lets hope so, spiteful policy’s finally impact on spiteful people.

Hmm, you don’t sound at all spiteful!🙄

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 18/08/2025 21:09

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 18/08/2025 20:57

Around here you can easily pay £500k+ for a nothing remotely special 2 bed flat, in a nothing remotely special area.

£500k will get you a 2 bed bungalow or 3 bed semi here so nothing spectacular. That's the reason we live in a 1 bed flat that we'll never be able to move from!

CharSiu · 18/08/2025 21:10

@StrokeRecovery25 My MIL has a 3 bed it’s worth about 550k as it’s in Surrey. Where we live it would be approx half that.

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:10

hangerup · 18/08/2025 20:43

What is stamp duty on a home of 550k then?

I think 17k ish if you are not a FTB

So that wouldnt be paid now by the buyer under these suggestions, but probably a similar amount paid by the seller?

TheCurious0range · 18/08/2025 21:11

Rhayader · 18/08/2025 20:47

It’s very unclear what this tax would actually be — it seems to be talking about two new taxes.

Part of the reason that house prices are inflated is that people are encouraged to sit put in large properties. If you are an elderly couple in a 5 bed, moving means paying stamp duty. Additionally, if more of your net worth is held up in your property it’s exempt from inheritance tax. Both of these factors need to be addressed.

I think we can all agree that stamp duty is an awful tax, but a tax on selling instead of buying doesn’t really help. An actual % on the value of a home makes way more sense, especially if they are replacing council tax too as the article seems to be suggesting. As houses get seriously expensive they should be paying more (this is how it works in most countries). 20m should pay more than 1.5m, this isn’t the case currently.

IMHO:

— Scrap stamp duty
— Scrap council tax
— Introduce fixed 0.5% annual tax on property prices
— Change IHT so it’s the same rate for all assets, not special rates for houses.

How will this raise extra money? For us it's a little less than we currently pay in council tax and if we move we wouldn't have to pay stamp duty under your system

Mrsbloggz · 18/08/2025 21:11

Sounds as if this is intended as a local property tax to replace council tax?

hangerup · 18/08/2025 21:11

@AMiddleClassWomanOfACertainAge

so on an individual level someone paying more in a mortgage or rent is money that could be spent on the wider economy. And we have a service economy.

On a wider level higher housing costs reduces mobility. And we have the double whammy that unlike a lot of other European countries we only really have one city with a high concentration of jobs. It's expensive for skilled workers to move to London & expensive for businesses to set up & trade.

Low interest rates meant that government and business didn't invest in employees or services and assets were inflated. You need to invest in staff to increase productivity.

Then there is the whole intergenerational inequality aspect where people who got on the ladder at the right time earn more through a house vs their job.

wavingfuriously · 18/08/2025 21:12

billysboy · 18/08/2025 20:44

I am currently buying a 3 bed house with a stamp duty of £37500 !
no doubt it be spent by the government wisely!

😲

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 21:13

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:59

It's not really gleeful is it, it's actually really sad. Anyone could see that by adding VAT to private schools would mean extra burden on state schools, especially with more SEND children as there simply isn't the money or staff instatefor their needs. Plus teachers in state leaving in their droves from stress and piling SEND issues. Very sad. Not gleeful.

  • Separate comment. Glad your son is doing well though, so many people would want to do what you can so that's lovely. School is such a tricky place for children with needs, I imagine you sleep better knowing he is well looked after.
Edited

I’m in the boat of having to pay for one of my children to be educated privately due to SEN. It’s the only way he could get an effective education. Having to pay for him to access education which should be available in a state setting is frustrating enough, but the VAT takes the biscuit. It’s incredible the difference it has made though.

Drivingmissrangey · 18/08/2025 21:14

Bambamhoohoo · 18/08/2025 20:48

Labour have a track record of transferring wealth from London - they did something not dissimilar to this is the naughties, giving companies grants and incentives to move to northern cities.
I lost my (student) job to my org moving to Manchester. It worked, tbf, Manchester etc exploded with new investment

It’s still a shit hole though.

AntiHop · 18/08/2025 21:15

Evastma · 18/08/2025 20:50

Tax and spend, tax and spend. Useless clowns. Vote Reform.

What would reform do differently?

Julen7 · 18/08/2025 21:17

hattie43 · 18/08/2025 20:52

All Labour are doing is taking from people and not growing the economy at all . Let’s make us all broke , why not .

Yes. “If we can’t all be rich let’s all be equally poor”.- that’s Labour.

Octavia64 · 18/08/2025 21:17

Stamp duty is a generally disliked tax and there is widespread agreement it stops people moving which in turn means people tend to stick around in areas where there might be fewer jobs rather than move to somewhere where there are jobs, and it also stops people downsizing and by the time you’ve paid stamp duty it isn’t worth it.

property taxes of one form or another are fairly common in a lot of western democracies. It’s genuinely not a bad idea. Obviously you do have the problem that property isn’t cash and you need cash to pay the property tax, but people manage to pay council tax, so….

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:18

MidnightPatrol · 18/08/2025 20:53

Ah good another penalty for living in an expensive part of the country.

Something needs to be done about stamp duty - it’s ludicrous in London now. Six figures for what are quite ordinary family homes. it stops people from moving.

Under this system those homes would be paying £10k+ a year in tax - so possibly better if you want to move frequently, less so if you stay put.

Perhaps there should be a penalty for living in the most expensive part of the country?

I live in the south east. None of us have to live here. The North east is under populated in many parts and needs people to move to it and housing is much cheaper

I was priced out of London which is my home town/city.

Autumn1990 · 18/08/2025 21:18

having read the article it says at least £800 a year in council tax on a £500k house. I was paying £900 as a single person 10 years ago. So it is unfair that some of us are paying a lot and in some areas they are not. But I dread any new system because no ones will go down
£500k doesn’t buy you much in parts of the north either and if they bring this in there will be plenty of us who have paid stamp duty buying a house and then the new tax to sell it. It’s not going to help economical mobility. People need to be able to move easily and cheaply for work.

brewshaw · 18/08/2025 21:18

I listened to Radical with Amol Ragan where he talks to Paul Morland about demographic shift and where things are headed very soon as the baby boomers retire and there are less and less workers to carry the financial burden of caring for the elderly and its only going to get worse. Very interesting listening BBC Radio 4 - Radical with Amol Rajan, Grey Britain: Do We Need To Have More Children? (Dr Paul Morland)

BBC Radio 4 - Radical with Amol Rajan, Grey Britain: Do We Need To Have More Children? (Dr Paul Morland)

Demographer Paul Morland says parents should pay less tax and get more benefits.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002fwr6

PersephoneSeethes · 18/08/2025 21:19

Rhayader · 18/08/2025 20:47

It’s very unclear what this tax would actually be — it seems to be talking about two new taxes.

Part of the reason that house prices are inflated is that people are encouraged to sit put in large properties. If you are an elderly couple in a 5 bed, moving means paying stamp duty. Additionally, if more of your net worth is held up in your property it’s exempt from inheritance tax. Both of these factors need to be addressed.

I think we can all agree that stamp duty is an awful tax, but a tax on selling instead of buying doesn’t really help. An actual % on the value of a home makes way more sense, especially if they are replacing council tax too as the article seems to be suggesting. As houses get seriously expensive they should be paying more (this is how it works in most countries). 20m should pay more than 1.5m, this isn’t the case currently.

IMHO:

— Scrap stamp duty
— Scrap council tax
— Introduce fixed 0.5% annual tax on property prices
— Change IHT so it’s the same rate for all assets, not special rates for houses.

This is how Australia does it and it is fairer. They still have Stamp Duty but it’s not as crazy as it is here.

Wintersgirl · 18/08/2025 21:20

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:18

Perhaps there should be a penalty for living in the most expensive part of the country?

I live in the south east. None of us have to live here. The North east is under populated in many parts and needs people to move to it and housing is much cheaper

I was priced out of London which is my home town/city.

Why should people though? I was born in the South and have no desire to move up North..

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 18/08/2025 21:20

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:18

Perhaps there should be a penalty for living in the most expensive part of the country?

I live in the south east. None of us have to live here. The North east is under populated in many parts and needs people to move to it and housing is much cheaper

I was priced out of London which is my home town/city.

I'll just leave my elderly uncle to it and move away then 🙄

MidnightPatrol · 18/08/2025 21:20

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 21:18

Perhaps there should be a penalty for living in the most expensive part of the country?

I live in the south east. None of us have to live here. The North east is under populated in many parts and needs people to move to it and housing is much cheaper

I was priced out of London which is my home town/city.

Why should there be a penalty for living in expensive areas? Areas are usually expensive because they are near hubs of economic activity ie people working, jobs etc!

And I’d query the idea the North East is short of people and needs people to move there - what jobs would these newcomers do?

I was gentrified out of the area I grew up in too - half of Britain can claim that experience now.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.