Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves' plan to tax houses over 500k

1000 replies

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax

Exclusive: Treasury examines options including tax on homes sold for more than £500,000 as well as overhaul of council tax

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:37

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:26

I'm confused.

From the link somebody provided earlier the proportional property tax replaces stamp duty (national rate) and council tax (local rate), and I get the impression there would be a monthly bill for both.

https://ukonward.com/reports/a-fairer-property-tax/

Is this a different tax?

Agree and they’d get rid of stamp duty

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:39

Mini2025 · 19/08/2025 12:48

Unfair:

A 3-bed house in London might cost £1 million+.
The same house in Manchester might be £350k.
But both homeowners have the same living space, utility, and housing needs

It’s not like the London homeowner:

  • Has triple the income,
  • Uses triple the services,
  • Or lives a triple-luxury lifestyle.

As usual, Labour just target the part of society that looks to be wealthiest - but actually isn't.

The cost of living is cheaper out of the capital. Where do they think we are going to get this money from??

No wonder so many people are leaving.

Exactly

Bumblebee72 · 19/08/2025 13:39

I think it would need to be applied regionally based on the increase over the average market price.

Comefromaway · 19/08/2025 13:39

I'm in the North West and consider myself to be wealthy. I couldn't afford a £500k home (mine is worth about £380-400k.

I'd consider a family in a £500k home to be rich.

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:39

Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:36

Have you taken into account people may have started in a 2 bed terrace and worked their way up using equity? it does not mean they are wealthy and 500k does not buy much these days. You seem to be focused on first time buyers with your facts and figures. As for my original comment I was trying to say those are house prices near me which is not a particularly affluent area

Equity is money for free though isnt it? Aka wealth development. So whether you're a FTB or whether you've gained money for free (untaxed) on your previous property, you still need to be fairly well off and doing ok to buy a property of that price. Its a fact, I dont know why you're so resistant to it

It doesnt need to be an affluent area either. We live in the SE, we live in a really cheap part of our town, but the town itself has some very expensive properties. Its still one of the top deprived areas in the whole of Europe. Unfortunately.

Hoppinggreen · 19/08/2025 13:41

We bought our house (Yorkshire) over 20 years ago for £150k, that was less than 3 times joint salary at the time
Now its worth £550K, we don't earn £180k so while we have a house worth a reasonable amount we couldn't afford to buy it now with a mortgage

poetryandwine · 19/08/2025 13:42

Letgoofmyblank · 19/08/2025 13:33

So my neighbour was asking me about this for his mother who needs to go into a care home. House worth £850k, she has investments of £200k. He has POA over finances and will inherit on her death. If she died tomorrow he’d have to pay £20k stamp duty (£1,050,000 less £1m nil rate band x 40%). If she died tomorrow and had sold her house the IHT would be £160k (£1,050,000 less £650,000 x 40%). So the choice for her care fees are to sell and use her money to pay the fees, or use what money she has to pay the fees then fund it himself. It’s a no brainer for him to do the latter.

So he is one of the lucky ones who can afford to do this. Any fiscal policy is going to have implicit loopholes benefitting a few. I stand by my belief that not many families will find it sensible to pay average fees of £1200 per week out of pocket whilst holding on to a parent’s house.

snowmichael · 19/08/2025 13:43

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

> AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

That has been Labour's plan since the days of Blair

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:45

poetryandwine · 19/08/2025 13:42

So he is one of the lucky ones who can afford to do this. Any fiscal policy is going to have implicit loopholes benefitting a few. I stand by my belief that not many families will find it sensible to pay average fees of £1200 per week out of pocket whilst holding on to a parent’s house.

I wouldnt call that a loophole as such.

Its simple money management. You need to pay care home fees and the client has cash. So you use the cash. Why wouldnt you.

You would only sell the property if and when the cash dries up. Your asset is worth more sitting there than money in the bank (usually)

I wont be making payments for my parents for care home fees as I wouldnt be able to afford it. Once any cash dries up, the house would have to be sold and what is paid in IHT, is paid in IHT, if I lose it I lose it. Hope my sibling agrees! If not they can pay the monthly fees!

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:46

Primrose86 · 19/08/2025 13:06

It will not affect 80% of the population and 50% of the homeowners in london based on the 500k threshold.

It will encourage older people to downsize when they retire and younger people can buy their homes so would help younger families.

It will replace council tax and 80% of people would pay the same or less. Owners of low value properties in the north could pay as little as £800 which is fair as my friend in a 70k shared ownership flat up north is paying only £300 less than me though I own a 2 bed flat in London.

If rich people try to sell up and leave the uk, the stamp duty levied on their properties will at least provide a source of revenue. Also the £20 million houses in my postcode on bishops avenue will be charged £156k annual property tax which would be great for my council. They currently only pay £4k per annum which is an actual joke when they pay far more for their private security!

I hope labour cam try to rush it through before the end of this Parliament.

The article states it would take a second term of Labour to work through

twistyizzy · 19/08/2025 13:46

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:46

The article states it would take a second term of Labour to work through

Well as that's not happening it won't ever be enacted

Bumblebee72 · 19/08/2025 13:46

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:46

The article states it would take a second term of Labour to work through

Well that not going to happen then!

snowmichael · 19/08/2025 13:47

Decoart · 18/08/2025 20:46

Council Tax is a joke - in my village two new builds opposite each other 4 bed sold £850k put in band F and other 5 bed worth sold £750k put in band G, bungalow turned into a house recently sold for 1.25 million still in Band E. All should be band G.
Plenty of people appealing being in too high a band but nobody checking of people are in too low a band the £££ council missing out on.

Council tax bands are not based on property values, father rentable values (it's an archaic tax that assumes only the wealthy landlord class own property, needs to be completely scrapped and a new one created)

Obviously a five-bed property rents for more than a four-bed or a bungalow

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:49

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:36

Oh I see.

That sort of explains where the money would come from (and I note that it won't apply to people who have already paid stamp duty) - but only if you make a profit on sale.

I feel it could become quite complicated.

And also I missed that bit that its only due on profit. Well thats not going to bring in much is it

The reality is, we have a low tax economy overall, we need more people paying in. A lot of us have benefited from 'free money' on house price inflation, its not unethical to consider whether that should be taxed, I like the CGT suggestion earlier on.

But no one wants to consider it should apply to them. Everyone wants someone else to pay, better services for less money. They want public services run like private businesses and then they wonder why the country has gone to shit. If we want America, then we'll get America and good luck to you who think you can cope under such an economy. I know I wouldnt. I need the NHS, I need education for the grandchildren. I need community resources and safety on the streets.

poetryandwine · 19/08/2025 13:49

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:45

I wouldnt call that a loophole as such.

Its simple money management. You need to pay care home fees and the client has cash. So you use the cash. Why wouldnt you.

You would only sell the property if and when the cash dries up. Your asset is worth more sitting there than money in the bank (usually)

I wont be making payments for my parents for care home fees as I wouldnt be able to afford it. Once any cash dries up, the house would have to be sold and what is paid in IHT, is paid in IHT, if I lose it I lose it. Hope my sibling agrees! If not they can pay the monthly fees!

I said ‘implicit loophole’ because I agree with you. Admittedly it is not a perfect phrase.

I meant that the neighbour quoted is able to do something HMG would pretty clearly rather he didn’t. Yet legislating against it would be ridiculous, and likely to be challenged in court.

TheQuirkyMaker · 19/08/2025 13:50

Swiftie1878 · 19/08/2025 12:19

The world is struggling along with the UK right now. If Brexit was the cause, how does that work?
You’re making absolutely no sense. If we hadn’t left the EU, everything would be brilliant? We’d be growing faster than the rest of the whole world? Ridiculous.

Brexit did not affect the whole world, it just pointlessly damaged the UK. Admittedly, it adversely affected many of our fellow European countries as it made trade more difficult but it mostly just affected the UK by making it more isolated, less relevant to Europe and made the UK reliant on immigration from all around the world. It was just a stupid thing to do as the only result was only going to be harmful to the UK.

Bambamhoohoo · 19/08/2025 13:50

snowmichael · 19/08/2025 13:47

Council tax bands are not based on property values, father rentable values (it's an archaic tax that assumes only the wealthy landlord class own property, needs to be completely scrapped and a new one created)

Obviously a five-bed property rents for more than a four-bed or a bungalow

“assumes only the wealthy landlord class own property”

if it wasn’t for the IHt and wealth tax people profess to hate paying this would still be the case

Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:50

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:39

Equity is money for free though isnt it? Aka wealth development. So whether you're a FTB or whether you've gained money for free (untaxed) on your previous property, you still need to be fairly well off and doing ok to buy a property of that price. Its a fact, I dont know why you're so resistant to it

It doesnt need to be an affluent area either. We live in the SE, we live in a really cheap part of our town, but the town itself has some very expensive properties. Its still one of the top deprived areas in the whole of Europe. Unfortunately.

Fairly well off and doing ok is not the same as wealthy, you are clearly against anyone who has worked their ass off over the years to have a nice home, I stand by my comment

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:52

Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:50

Fairly well off and doing ok is not the same as wealthy, you are clearly against anyone who has worked their ass off over the years to have a nice home, I stand by my comment

Oh Im against myself now!

How funny.

I have consistently used the phrase well off. You used the words wealthy to refer to the 500k property.

Bambamhoohoo · 19/08/2025 13:54

Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:50

Fairly well off and doing ok is not the same as wealthy, you are clearly against anyone who has worked their ass off over the years to have a nice home, I stand by my comment

If this tax has been introduced sooner, we likely would’ve limited the property inflation that has led to this inequality.

my parents bought a house for £28k and sold it 31 years later for £475k.

cab you really justify that untaxed wealth/ income? They didn’t work hard, all they did was work the same as anyone else does, bought a house and paid off a mortgage. What’s so outstanding about that?

MidnightPatrol · 19/08/2025 13:54

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:19

You said this

A 500k home does not equate to wealth, there are new homes being built in our village going for over 400k and I'm in the North West of England

You said a 500k home doesnt equate to wealth. Well you need to be well off to buy it. No?
What are the multiples now, 5x? So you're on 80k plus, as you'd have a deposit to buy it. In what world is 80k not fairly well off.
What are the multiples for joint income, 4x? So each partner if in a couple would need to be on around 50k (assuming deposit of 100k of course)
The multiples are needing a higher income if your deposit is only 5%

You can be wealthy and livin the North West.

The average salary is something like £35k.

For an adult aged 40-49 the average salary is £42k.

So to have a household income of c. £80k is really very average, rather than wealthy.

Bufftailed · 19/08/2025 13:55

Letgoofmyblank · 19/08/2025 06:24

Well if the tax works by gathering up and applying on the sale (which I think is a terrible idea. People would just sit tight) you don’t pay it unless you move.

But the economist in me says you can’t afford where you live and so must move. We shouldn’t NOT put tax on property because some can’t afford to pay. Like the little old lady in a £2m house. We can’t increase council tax apparently cause she can’t afford it. She is wealthy. We should tax her. If it means she has to sell so be it.

It’s a tough call. But houses where I live, you can guess, have gone from just affordable 15 years ago to almost 2-3 x the price. So those of us been here a while would mostly find it v difficult

Musicaltheatremum · 19/08/2025 13:55

hangerup · 18/08/2025 20:43

What is stamp duty on a home of 550k then?

I think 17k ish if you are not a FTB

£28350 in Scotland

SinisterBumFacedCat · 19/08/2025 13:55

There are a lot of homes over £500k in the SE and they are not mansions, many ordinary semidetached terraced 2-3 bedroom family houses, some ex council, and the people living in them aren’t especially well off, the just bought them a few years ago when they could afford them (I’m talking mid 2000’s, not back in the 80’s). These people have normal jobs and aren’t that well off, the SE isn’t brimming exclusively with millionaires.

WatermelonGatorJerky · 19/08/2025 13:56

Labour are more incompetent that I could ever had imagined. They are a government without any ideas and a bunch of lefty’s trying to enact socialist policies.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread