Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves' plan to tax houses over 500k

1000 replies

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax

Exclusive: Treasury examines options including tax on homes sold for more than £500,000 as well as overhaul of council tax

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:13

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 12:53

How does that sentence make sense?

You need to be fairly well off and have a fairly good income to buy a house for that money. Thats a simple fact. Unless you have money given to you of course.

What is the North West to do with whether someone is wealthy or not and what are new homes being built in your village got to do with whether someone buying it is well off or not.

Ergo, you need to be fairly high earning to buy those properties no?

The sentence makes sense because it's something I know to be fact, I said I was in the NW because a) the comment I was responding to was from someone saying they are in London and b) property is considered cheaper in the NW. Hope that clears up the confusion for you

Louiestopit · 19/08/2025 13:14

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:09

Its not called that by name no, but there is often a higher pay for London based jobs, certainly public sector roles pay more, the difference depends on the LA and the job of course. And unlike the past it doesnt compensate fully for the cost of living and commuting in the capital. Im not saying it used to full compensate but it was more doable financially with the additional pay

It wasn’t the case for us at the London authority dh worked for (and I also worked for at times), or the neighbouring ones where we knew people. So many ended up leaving London when many of the London LAs sold off offices and went mainly remote, that’s when we left 5 years ago as well, it was the final push to move somewhere far cheaper where we didn’t have to rent.

it just so happened that the equivalent job came up in the LA where we live now, even they were surprised that the salary was the same here as in London.

Chenecinquantecinq · 19/08/2025 13:14

I think some people are confusing the propsed levy to replace council tax and the separate suggestion of a tax on property sale.

Alexandra2001 · 19/08/2025 13:15

Primrose86 · 19/08/2025 13:06

It will not affect 80% of the population and 50% of the homeowners in london based on the 500k threshold.

It will encourage older people to downsize when they retire and younger people can buy their homes so would help younger families.

It will replace council tax and 80% of people would pay the same or less. Owners of low value properties in the north could pay as little as £800 which is fair as my friend in a 70k shared ownership flat up north is paying only £300 less than me though I own a 2 bed flat in London.

If rich people try to sell up and leave the uk, the stamp duty levied on their properties will at least provide a source of revenue. Also the £20 million houses in my postcode on bishops avenue will be charged £156k annual property tax which would be great for my council. They currently only pay £4k per annum which is an actual joke when they pay far more for their private security!

I hope labour cam try to rush it through before the end of this Parliament.

Agree 100%....

SpaceRaccoon · 19/08/2025 13:17

Why wouldnt you pay tax on that as a theoretical query?

The Labour mantra. Apply to anything you can think of.

Badbadbunny · 19/08/2025 13:17

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 12:50

Do people not buy annuities any more?

The modern trend is draw down pensions rather than annuities.

Hoppinggreen · 19/08/2025 13:18

Labour going after an easy target (working people) again.
Our house is about worth that but are we supposed to pay the tax out of income?
Rich people won't care, poor people won't be affected and we get clobbered again
When will Labour grow a pair and go after the Multi Millionaires?

1457bloom · 19/08/2025 13:18

Inflation linked pensions are v expensive so most people don’t consider them worth it.

Onlyontuesday · 19/08/2025 13:18

SpaceRaccoon · 19/08/2025 13:17

Why wouldnt you pay tax on that as a theoretical query?

The Labour mantra. Apply to anything you can think of.

You can't answer the question, can you? Why shouldn't tax be paid on money which is unearned?

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:19

Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:13

The sentence makes sense because it's something I know to be fact, I said I was in the NW because a) the comment I was responding to was from someone saying they are in London and b) property is considered cheaper in the NW. Hope that clears up the confusion for you

You said this

A 500k home does not equate to wealth, there are new homes being built in our village going for over 400k and I'm in the North West of England

You said a 500k home doesnt equate to wealth. Well you need to be well off to buy it. No?
What are the multiples now, 5x? So you're on 80k plus, as you'd have a deposit to buy it. In what world is 80k not fairly well off.
What are the multiples for joint income, 4x? So each partner if in a couple would need to be on around 50k (assuming deposit of 100k of course)
The multiples are needing a higher income if your deposit is only 5%

You can be wealthy and livin the North West.

FatherFrosty · 19/08/2025 13:19

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 19/08/2025 12:56

Sounds very Liberal Democrat. Worked well for them didn’t it.

they got royally stitched up by conservatives not allowing them to do the things they’d promised. They never should have got into bed with them

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:19

Goldwren1923 · 19/08/2025 12:34

Where did you see a proposal to pay it annually? I don’t see it in the article

There’s a link on page 16 of the thread by Lemon

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:21

quickncncncnc · 19/08/2025 12:35

A further thought. We paid stamp duty to buy this house. And now we’d have to pay this tax to sell it - so paying twice!

According to the link on page 16. People who’ve paid stamp already would be exempt

Lifeofthepartay · 19/08/2025 13:22

So the buyer will be paying stamp duty (LBTT in Scotland- which is a lot more expensive) and the seller will be paying too? So that's a double tax if you are in a chain....

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:26

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:13

Its when you sell it.
And presumably when you sell it you'll buy something else?

Presumably also you have made a lot of money on the house, you said yourself prices have shot up. You have extra money that you havent worked for. Like many of us. Why wouldnt you pay tax on that as a theoretical query?

I'm confused.

From the link somebody provided earlier the proportional property tax replaces stamp duty (national rate) and council tax (local rate), and I get the impression there would be a monthly bill for both.

https://ukonward.com/reports/a-fairer-property-tax/

Is this a different tax?

A Fairer Property Tax | Onward

A practical alternative to replace stamp duty and council tax

https://ukonward.com/reports/a-fairer-property-tax/

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 19/08/2025 13:28

FatherFrosty · 19/08/2025 13:19

they got royally stitched up by conservatives not allowing them to do the things they’d promised. They never should have got into bed with them

Of course. Let’s see how reform and conservatives get on in the next coalition. I’m sore it will be wonderful. Thanks Labour 🙄

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:29

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:26

I'm confused.

From the link somebody provided earlier the proportional property tax replaces stamp duty (national rate) and council tax (local rate), and I get the impression there would be a monthly bill for both.

https://ukonward.com/reports/a-fairer-property-tax/

Is this a different tax?

My understanding, which may be completely pie in the sky!, is that the council tax replacment would carry on, just like, now, probably wouldnt be much difference.
The stamp duty replacement would be charged monthly, but paid on sale.

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:30

Chenecinquantecinq · 19/08/2025 13:14

I think some people are confusing the propsed levy to replace council tax and the separate suggestion of a tax on property sale.

Because in the link to the think tank it isn't a separate suggestion - they are described as two parts of the new "proportional property tax".

PetiteBlondeDuBoulevardBrune · 19/08/2025 13:31

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 12:44

You don't know the rate, or how it would impact other taxes.

Yes, and obviously nobody would move until details are published and impact assessed. I guess my point was that after 15y here, never thinking about moving elsewhere, today was the day we started considering it, purely because of the level of taxes vs what we get back.

Because yes, other countries have high taxes, but 1) the lower tranche pays more taxes than here and 2) public services are better, medical sector for ex.
In here it feels like anybody on 150k+ is seen as only good enough to pay for everybody else, not receive anything in return and shut up about it.

Letgoofmyblank · 19/08/2025 13:33

poetryandwine · 19/08/2025 13:10

@Letgoofmyblank you told me upthread that people would leave their pstents houses empty and pay for their parents’ care directly if this scheme goes through, exacerbating the housing crisis. I think not:

ONS says there are about 137,000 self funders in care homes. The average stay is between 2 and 3 years. So on the order of 50,000 self funders pa enter care.

A significant number of those will not have family members who can afford to sport their fees, which carehomeuk.com says now average over £1200 per week or £60,000 pa. I would bet that fewer than half of families can cover this expense without selling. That’s a generous estimate, IMO, of 25,000 pa. In reality I feel sure the number is far less.

Rightmove says that on the order of 1,000,000 properties change hands each year. More, actually, but I will continue tipping the numbers to you. 25,000/1,00,000 is 2.5% of all house sales. That is not going to cause any sort of crisis.

So my neighbour was asking me about this for his mother who needs to go into a care home. House worth £850k, she has investments of £200k. He has POA over finances and will inherit on her death. If she died tomorrow he’d have to pay £20k stamp duty (£1,050,000 less £1m nil rate band x 40%). If she died tomorrow and had sold her house the IHT would be £160k (£1,050,000 less £650,000 x 40%). So the choice for her care fees are to sell and use her money to pay the fees, or use what money she has to pay the fees then fund it himself. It’s a no brainer for him to do the latter.

DrPrunesqualer · 19/08/2025 13:34

FullOfLemons · 19/08/2025 12:46

paying a proportional tax toward local services on house values below £500,000 and a national levy on the value above

The local tax is capped at £500k so you do not add the 0.44% to the 0.54% on the value above this.

They should probably have made this explicit in the summary.

Also their proposal is for the threshold to go up with inflation … but in practice every Chancellor will leave it fixed, so we all pay more tax over time.

There will be lots more of this to look forward to in the run up to the budget.

Re your second paragraph re local tax
The article states the proposal is for two taxes
Local council and central Government ( added together for the yearly payout)
If we go by one amount as you say most people’s council tax will go down and the Govn will lose the stamp duty money too.

They want to increase money coming in not lose it.
The only increase on your suggestion would be taxing landlords on student lets which are currently exempt from council tax and of course single households.
of note I would see a disaster for students as rents would just rise

Perhaps as this is doing the rounds we might get more info soon on what’s being leaked

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 19/08/2025 13:34

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:26

I'm confused.

From the link somebody provided earlier the proportional property tax replaces stamp duty (national rate) and council tax (local rate), and I get the impression there would be a monthly bill for both.

https://ukonward.com/reports/a-fairer-property-tax/

Is this a different tax?

Any tax that potentially forces people out of their houses is immoral. It’s one thing to take on a known tax burden when you are purchasing a property but quite another to put a huge tax burden on someone who has resided in a property for decades and planned to stay there. Imagine being responsible for forcing tens if not hundreds of thousands of people out of their homes. All clambering for cheaper properties that no longer exist.

Merrymouse · 19/08/2025 13:36

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:29

My understanding, which may be completely pie in the sky!, is that the council tax replacment would carry on, just like, now, probably wouldnt be much difference.
The stamp duty replacement would be charged monthly, but paid on sale.

Oh I see.

That sort of explains where the money would come from (and I note that it won't apply to people who have already paid stamp duty) - but only if you make a profit on sale.

I feel it could become quite complicated.

Climbingrosexx · 19/08/2025 13:36

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:19

You said this

A 500k home does not equate to wealth, there are new homes being built in our village going for over 400k and I'm in the North West of England

You said a 500k home doesnt equate to wealth. Well you need to be well off to buy it. No?
What are the multiples now, 5x? So you're on 80k plus, as you'd have a deposit to buy it. In what world is 80k not fairly well off.
What are the multiples for joint income, 4x? So each partner if in a couple would need to be on around 50k (assuming deposit of 100k of course)
The multiples are needing a higher income if your deposit is only 5%

You can be wealthy and livin the North West.

Have you taken into account people may have started in a 2 bed terrace and worked their way up using equity? it does not mean they are wealthy and 500k does not buy much these days. You seem to be focused on first time buyers with your facts and figures. As for my original comment I was trying to say those are house prices near me which is not a particularly affluent area

Kitte321 · 19/08/2025 13:37

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 13:19

You said this

A 500k home does not equate to wealth, there are new homes being built in our village going for over 400k and I'm in the North West of England

You said a 500k home doesnt equate to wealth. Well you need to be well off to buy it. No?
What are the multiples now, 5x? So you're on 80k plus, as you'd have a deposit to buy it. In what world is 80k not fairly well off.
What are the multiples for joint income, 4x? So each partner if in a couple would need to be on around 50k (assuming deposit of 100k of course)
The multiples are needing a higher income if your deposit is only 5%

You can be wealthy and livin the North West.

I don’t think many would consider a family with a mortgage on a home worth 500k “wealthy” 🤷‍♀️
Im in the NW.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread