Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that if people can take Mounjaro forever for maintenance (which I support FAOD)

149 replies

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 08:56

Why can't everyone just buy it when they feel the need?

Basically this means that people who lost weight in a different way are denied this long term amazing support tool while those who started off on it can keep using it. But if you purposefully regained a bit of weight to become "eligible" for the injections you could take them and then have Mounjaro available for life.

This seems very unfair to me.

OP posts:
ThatCyanSheep · 18/08/2025 13:51

mamagogo1 · 18/08/2025 13:28

All medication carries risk and has costs associated (private or public purse) why should we be encouraging those who don’t need it to line the pockets of drugs companies? The message is that you are failing somehow if you don’t want to pump medication in your body to get thinner.

personally I’d qualify for it but I don’t use medication unless absolutely necessary - eg no hrt for me, didn’t have drugs in childbirth either

Congrats. Some of us want to live easier lives that are pain free.

FruitFlyPie · 18/08/2025 14:59

I've taken saxenda and I totally agree with you OP. The line to prescribe has to be drawn somewhere, but realistically there is no physical or metabolic difference between me when I started WLI with a bmi of 30, and someone with a bmi of 28-29. The only difference would be a few glasses of water or being constipated for a day.

I think in future (after the patent expires) the drugs may become a regular thing for almost anybody who feels they need it to take, similar to the contraceptive pill or PrEP for HIV prevention.

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 16:46

mamagogo1 · 18/08/2025 13:28

All medication carries risk and has costs associated (private or public purse) why should we be encouraging those who don’t need it to line the pockets of drugs companies? The message is that you are failing somehow if you don’t want to pump medication in your body to get thinner.

personally I’d qualify for it but I don’t use medication unless absolutely necessary - eg no hrt for me, didn’t have drugs in childbirth either

refusing hrt unless you have a medical reason not to take it is very foolish

OP posts:
spoonbillstretford · 18/08/2025 17:01

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 16:46

refusing hrt unless you have a medical reason not to take it is very foolish

Not everyone needs HRT. My DM never took it and never had any problems and no issue with bone density and lived to the age of 85. I expected to as I had low oestrogen symptoms from age 46/47 when I was on the progesterone only pill, and switched back to the combined pill for a short while. I've now stopped all hormonal birth control at nearly 50, my periods appear to have stopped and I feel great with no low oestrogen symptoms, so I won't be leaping onto HRT if I don't need it.

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 17:24

spoonbillstretford · 18/08/2025 17:01

Not everyone needs HRT. My DM never took it and never had any problems and no issue with bone density and lived to the age of 85. I expected to as I had low oestrogen symptoms from age 46/47 when I was on the progesterone only pill, and switched back to the combined pill for a short while. I've now stopped all hormonal birth control at nearly 50, my periods appear to have stopped and I feel great with no low oestrogen symptoms, so I won't be leaping onto HRT if I don't need it.

Edited

You won't know you needed it until your Dexa scan about a decade too late

OP posts:
ThatCyanSheep · 18/08/2025 17:26

FruitFlyPie · 18/08/2025 14:59

I've taken saxenda and I totally agree with you OP. The line to prescribe has to be drawn somewhere, but realistically there is no physical or metabolic difference between me when I started WLI with a bmi of 30, and someone with a bmi of 28-29. The only difference would be a few glasses of water or being constipated for a day.

I think in future (after the patent expires) the drugs may become a regular thing for almost anybody who feels they need it to take, similar to the contraceptive pill or PrEP for HIV prevention.

“The only difference would be glass of water or being constipated” I’m not sure I agree there - in the last day or so I’ve lost 2lbs and my bmi has only gone down by 0.3

BerryTwister · 18/08/2025 18:35

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 16:46

refusing hrt unless you have a medical reason not to take it is very foolish

@Fragmentedbrain I’m 57, menopause at age 48, and I don’t take HRT. I did try it for a month, out of curiosity, and I felt better but gained half a stone, so gave up. But I’m a GP and from a generation that was taught how closely linked HRT and breast cancer were. The “million women study” was quite clear, that risk was significantly raised beyond 4-5 years of treatment.

I’m not entirely sure what happened, because I blinked and suddenly the “million women study” is disregarded, and HRT is given out like smarties. I assume the study was found to be inaccurate, or maybe exaggerated, I’m not sure.

Of course I prescribe HRT to my patients within the current NICE guidelines, but for myself I can’t help remembering those risks. I don’t think that makes me foolish.

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 18/08/2025 18:44

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 17:24

You won't know you needed it until your Dexa scan about a decade too late

And you won't know it gave you breast cancer until a decade too late.

Yes, that's what blanket, uninformed medical advice from internet strangers sounds like.

2Jays · 18/08/2025 18:53

I went from 14 stone to 11 on Mounjaro and started having stomach trouble so came off. I checked my bmi and realised that I was still technically overweight so tried to go back on after a three month break. In that time I realised my mistake as the food noise came back and a few pounds went back on with no sign of stopping.

I was denied access to the meds because my bmi was too low even though it was still considered overweight. I hate to admit it, but I lied to get back on it.

I started again at 2.5mg and am now on 10mg and have only managed to lose another 9lbs. However, the aim is not to be super skinny, the real benefit for me is the huge reduction in food noise. If it has not been an issue in your life then dieting might be a simple calories in/calories out equation but for me and many people who use GLp-1, the reduction in food noise is a game changer. I finally feel free of food.

I wish there was more support for people who have this type of experience because it seems that most people think it's a matter of willpower when clearly it isn't.

OneNeatBlueOrca · 18/08/2025 18:58

There is a lot less risk in Mounjaro than many other things we do every day.

For example?

Edddie · 18/08/2025 19:36

OneNeatBlueOrca · 18/08/2025 18:58

There is a lot less risk in Mounjaro than many other things we do every day.

For example?

Driving a car? About 13% of all external deaths in the UK are car accidents. People drive or ride in cars every day.

OneNeatBlueOrca · 18/08/2025 19:38

Edddie · 18/08/2025 19:36

Driving a car? About 13% of all external deaths in the UK are car accidents. People drive or ride in cars every day.

How about the risk of being obese and failing to make any effort at all, to stop stuffing your mouth until expensive injections were available.

Mustbethat · 18/08/2025 19:38

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 16:46

refusing hrt unless you have a medical reason not to take it is very foolish

why?

they said that about statins. I don’t think they’re blanket prescribed any more because they turned out to not be the no side effects, all benefit panacea they were first marketed as.

i currently don’t feel the need for HRT. Why would I get it when I have no clinical issues, I’m fit, I’m healthy, I’m late into menopause (50’s and still regular), I lift weights and do impact exercise to maintain bone density.

from my pov there’s no benefit to it currently. I’ve had a look (albeit quick) and I can’t see that it should be prescribed to every single woman or the risks are unacceptably high if you don’t take it.

Edddie · 18/08/2025 19:41

OneNeatBlueOrca · 18/08/2025 19:38

How about the risk of being obese and failing to make any effort at all, to stop stuffing your mouth until expensive injections were available.

😂You can't argue with one breathe that the jabs have too many side effects and are dangerous then, with the next, argue that being obese has too many effects and is dangerous. You can't control yourself from being rude so I'm not sure why you're preaching self-control to others.

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 22:07

BerryTwister · 18/08/2025 18:35

@Fragmentedbrain I’m 57, menopause at age 48, and I don’t take HRT. I did try it for a month, out of curiosity, and I felt better but gained half a stone, so gave up. But I’m a GP and from a generation that was taught how closely linked HRT and breast cancer were. The “million women study” was quite clear, that risk was significantly raised beyond 4-5 years of treatment.

I’m not entirely sure what happened, because I blinked and suddenly the “million women study” is disregarded, and HRT is given out like smarties. I assume the study was found to be inaccurate, or maybe exaggerated, I’m not sure.

Of course I prescribe HRT to my patients within the current NICE guidelines, but for myself I can’t help remembering those risks. I don’t think that makes me foolish.

I think all the women dying from a trip in their front garden illustrate your folly. Thank God I wasn't middle aged under your generation's"care".

OP posts:
Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 22:08

I think my osteoporotic mum would murder the smug GP who denied her hrt if only the physical interaction wasn't so dangerous to her.

OP posts:
spoonbillstretford · 19/08/2025 03:30

Fragmentedbrain · 18/08/2025 17:24

You won't know you needed it until your Dexa scan about a decade too late

"Your Dexa scan" - like it's something people have by default on the NHS. I'm almost 50 now and have been reading about menopause for at least ten years, at least from when I had my first hot flush aged 39 and had what turned out to be endometriosis and bilateral endometrial cysts and rejected the proposal to have a hysterectomy or oophorectomy or drugs to put me into early menopause unless except as a last resort - which was not needed in the end. I first went to a gym and lifted weights aged 18 so it has been over 30 years of weight bearing exercise. I will have a private Dexa scan in a few years and may well take HRT if I need to. At the moment my body is having a break from 25+ years of hormonal contraception and seeing if my periods have stopped properly for 12 months which seems to be key in deciding which type of HRT to have, if any. But if I continue not to have no symptoms and feel good, I'm not going to leap into taking something that may make me feel shit and put weight on, and certainly not only 8 months into knowing whether my periods have definitely stopped.

NominatedNameOfTheDay · 19/08/2025 06:16

I agree with you OP. I am a healthy weight but the ‘food noise’ that people talk about mounjaro dulling is very loud for me. I would love to experience life without it.

NominatedNameOfTheDay · 19/08/2025 06:16

I agree with you OP. I am a healthy weight but the ‘food noise’ that people talk about mounjaro dulling is very loud for me. I would love to experience life without it.

WorriedRelative · 19/08/2025 09:52

TakeMeToAnIgloo · 18/08/2025 13:43

But what we are saying is that there are some of us who probably do need it - those who have (possibly temporarily) lost weight through other means, but really struggled both with the losing and still with the maintaining. And who potentially still have some of the conditions associated with obesity, as well as the physiological changes. If the drug would help us keep the weight off without yo-yoing back up again, that could be healthier overall. Or even if it just helped mentally. it's not just about making choices, which everyone has to do, but the constant cravings, hunger, planning, working out how to occupy the brain until you can have 200 more calories for your lunch or whatever. Running 2 hours in order to have a nice breakfast. The levels of restriction that some of us need are quite high, and it's very difficult to control the cravings and thoughts around that. I don't think the choices that people of normal weight have to make are at the same level or of the same intensity.

And yes, there are potential side effects, but so are there with obesity, and with conditions that caused the obesity in the first place, even if it's not currently there. There are also benefits that the drugs could have on these other conditions, rather than on weight loss, and I think those could be considered as part of the balance, especially as further research is done on them.

I can understand that and don't think it is a bad idea. There would probably need to be evidence of the previous obesity though and it is now very expensive so many may decide it isn't worth it.

Mustbethat · 19/08/2025 10:00

So I’ve had a think about this and have a feeling this is the logic:

obese person. The risk of obesity vs. Wld is greater, so they are prescribed.

dose, any side effects, and whether the patient tolerates it is established, they remain on it and lose weight.

now this is where the difference between an obese person who is no longer obese through conventional diet and wld matters…

both patients are now only “overweight” so the risk of the wld is higher compared to weight. The person already on wld is tolerating, few side effects, working well, so they continue. The person the same bmi who hasn’t had wld before has to establish whether they tolerate it, whether the side effects are minimal etc. the risks of wld outweigh the need to lose weight at that bmi.

does that make sense?

IDontHateRainbows · 19/08/2025 10:02

It's not just the weight loss
It's the food noise.

I had binge eating disorder, all gone now and the relief is immense.
I wasn't even particularly obese but get mj prescribed on the nhs due to diabetes.

I've lost 1.5 stone but will take it for life now.

RhaenysRocks · 19/08/2025 11:06

OneNeatBlueOrca · 18/08/2025 19:38

How about the risk of being obese and failing to make any effort at all, to stop stuffing your mouth until expensive injections were available.

Do you really think that's the case? Read any of the support threads on this and you'll find hundreds of stories about women who've tried every other method going, over decades. Metabolism is an incredibly complex thing that we are constantly learning about and witless twats who post on SM such pearls of wisdom as "eat less move more" and "get off the sofa" and "lazy" are many years behind in their understanding.

Smallsalt · 19/08/2025 11:51

I have lost a lot of weight on it which is fabulous. However the main reason that I want to stay on it that it now that I am slim ( body weight more than halved) is that it has virtually eliminated the symptoms of my auto immune disease.

From hideously swollen disfigured joints, limited mobility with chronic pain...... I now have normal looking joints, off all pain killers and able to move and exercise without pain. Last week I climbed a mountain at high speed. Next day I was fresh as a daisy with no swelling or pain, despite a very ardous day. I couldn't have done that pre MJ.

This miracle, because that's what it feels like, is not related entirely to weight loss. The effect actually happened within a month of the first injection when I had only lost a couple of pounds.

For comparison I was for over a decade on immunosupressants so toxic that I needed my blood screened every month to check that it wasnt damaging my organs. Pain meant that I was on 4 naproxen per day, another nasty drug.
These drugs did not help my condition..

MJ helped me virually over night. I don't take the nasty meds any more and havent had pain med since I started the jabs I am pain free and mobile.

It isn't licenced for this, but research shows that GLps do have a strong positive effect on inflammation. The documented MJ risks are not a patch on the risks of the horrible drugs I was on.

I will move heaven and hell to stay on it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page