Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Driving over 70

253 replies

Veryveryconcerned · 01/08/2025 15:36

It took me time to decide but after getting other people’s opinions I reported an over 70 driver to the DVLA due to poor eyesight. Prior to the person’s 70th birthday they had said they were getting rid of their 3.5 tonne van as they said they would not pass the test to be able to continue driving it. The person is virtually blind in one eye and the eyesight is not good in the other. They do not get their eyes tested because they do not want to have to stop driving. My concern is the other people on the roads.
Does anyone know how long it takes and what exactly the DVLA do when they receive a report. I have reported it anonymously but it was about 8 weeks ago which is very concerning.
Am I worrying unnecessarily?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
mintydoggyv · 04/08/2025 14:11

Allseeingallknowing · 04/08/2025 14:01

There is no need for over 70s to retake their driving test. If they wish to be assessed on their competency that’s their choice. What we do need, is evidence of eye test and a health questionnaire completed when they renew their licences. It should be mandatory for GPs and opticians to inform the DVLA of any conditions affecting the patient’s driving, as some may be economical with the truth. In fact every driver should have to produce evidence of a satisfactory eye test, as health conditions, trauma etc can affect any driver of any age.

They do , gp informs dvla of Amy health issues that affect driving and also people like specsavers ,and in certain cases there licence is suspended the same day , but if people ring up / e mail etc dvla have to check on a driver , also if the report of a bad driver or eye sight if anonymous say with reg . Plate can take weeks as dvla have to check with gps and eye people reports can take time to come back from gps etc in some cases anonymous reports can be false ,I.e. report sent by someone who hates the person driving there car .

dynamiccactus · 04/08/2025 16:43

Flossflower · 02/08/2025 22:04

People under 25 have the most car accidents but per mile driven it is older people. Young people will improve. Old people will not. I am over 70. I want to be tested.

Well nobody is stopping you, presumably you go for your annual eye test? I think it's annual once you are over 60?

dynamiccactus · 04/08/2025 16:45

Kittyfur · 03/08/2025 09:24

its not an ageist post!!

its a well know fact that the over 70,s have slower reactions, reflexes.

their vision is poorer, their muscles and joints are stiffer and they find the increase in traffic stressful.

also many are on medications which may cause drowsiness.

I think anyone of any age finds the increase in traffic stressful.

And with sleep, what about parents with young babies or indeed menopausal women who no longer sleep as well as they did. Do you want to get them off the roads as well?

Kittyfur · 04/08/2025 17:27

dynamiccactus · 04/08/2025 16:45

I think anyone of any age finds the increase in traffic stressful.

And with sleep, what about parents with young babies or indeed menopausal women who no longer sleep as well as they did. Do you want to get them off the roads as well?

no obviously not

I have worked with the elderly for decades; i know what i'm talking about

Yabberwok · 04/08/2025 18:08

RigIt · 04/08/2025 12:29

What are you talking about? Plenty of people with limited walking mobility drive and are perfectly safe to. I’ll tell my friend with MS in her adapted car that she didn’t be driving because she can only walk slowly. Don’t be so ableist and ridiculous.

And I can’t believe you said that to your doctor. How fucking rude. You have no idea how many people that particular doctor reports or not.

What your friend would be able to stamp on the break if a child ran out in front of them? If you lived near me you would understand why I said that. It's a town which had massive growth in the 1970s those people have aged and stayed. There are also 6 retirement complexes and another on the way. Many of these people drive dreadfully. So I expect doctors to prevent injuries and death of road users by telling people not to drive.

grumpygrape · 04/08/2025 20:28

Yabberwok · 04/08/2025 18:08

What your friend would be able to stamp on the break if a child ran out in front of them? If you lived near me you would understand why I said that. It's a town which had massive growth in the 1970s those people have aged and stayed. There are also 6 retirement complexes and another on the way. Many of these people drive dreadfully. So I expect doctors to prevent injuries and death of road users by telling people not to drive.

I have to assume you are not aware that cars can be adapted for their brakes to be operated by hand ? No need to stamp on them.

Veryveryconcerned · 04/08/2025 20:32

DataMum88 · 03/08/2025 16:50

I think that eye tests and repeat driving tests (every few years) should be enforced for over 70s. I know older people rely on their cars, but in reality, there are a lot of people who shouldn't be allowed to drive, behind the wheels of what are effectively massive weapons - there is nothing that excuses that.

Until recently my grandmother (who is disabled and can has had deteriorating vision for the past decade) had a valid license, and my husband's grandmother had several accidents (luckily with empty, parked cars) before her car was removed.

We live in an area with an older population and it's terrifying how poor the driving is - overtaking on blind corners, turning without indicators, pulling out when cars are coming, slowing to a stop completely unnecessarily. It's really just incredibly dangerous.

Well done for reporting OP.

Thank you

OP posts:
WunTooThree · 04/08/2025 20:33

Yabberwok · 04/08/2025 18:08

What your friend would be able to stamp on the break if a child ran out in front of them? If you lived near me you would understand why I said that. It's a town which had massive growth in the 1970s those people have aged and stayed. There are also 6 retirement complexes and another on the way. Many of these people drive dreadfully. So I expect doctors to prevent injuries and death of road users by telling people not to drive.

Cars can be adapted.
I have a friend with MS who has one useless leg (from an accident), but her other is fine. Her car is adapted to reflect that.
Another can't stamp on any pedals as he is less than 4ft tall. His car is adapted to have everything operated by hand.

Yabberwok · 04/08/2025 21:14

WunTooThree · 04/08/2025 20:33

Cars can be adapted.
I have a friend with MS who has one useless leg (from an accident), but her other is fine. Her car is adapted to reflect that.
Another can't stamp on any pedals as he is less than 4ft tall. His car is adapted to have everything operated by hand.

That's not what I am talking about, I am on about the old men in particular who insist on driving normal cars. I have come across a guy driving a manual car using his walking stick to depress the clutch. Several men with dementia driving...I've seen one get in the passenger seat of his own car and wait to be driven....not people who have made their cars driveable to suit their physical situation

Flossflower · 05/08/2025 17:12

dynamiccactus · 04/08/2025 16:43

Well nobody is stopping you, presumably you go for your annual eye test? I think it's annual once you are over 60?

Of course I have eye tests every year. I want to be tested for fitness to drive.
Everybody thinks they are fine, even when they are not.

grumpygrape · 05/08/2025 21:19

Flossflower · 05/08/2025 17:12

Of course I have eye tests every year. I want to be tested for fitness to drive.
Everybody thinks they are fine, even when they are not.

Edited

But that applies for 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 70, 80, 90 year olds.

Define ‘fitness’.

Veryvulture · 06/08/2025 09:37

mintydoggyv · 02/08/2025 10:49

So sorry to hear this it s dreadfull , the rules for driving over 70 do need lighting. I am over 70 and working in the civil service and the tests yearly are eye tests , fitness to drive reaction times and so much more which l passed one hundred per cent my point being this needs doing for not only over 70 s but all drivers

Agree it does need doing for everyone regardless of age on at least a few yearly basis, maybe more for older people. I certainly was not claiming all older people are like this, I know many that are better and safer drivers than people half their age!

I also know how awful it is to be threatened with the loss of your licence, I have to declare a medical condition to the DVLA, and one yearly crap result could lose me my licence.

munch58 · 08/08/2025 16:31

OliveWah · 02/08/2025 00:44

My Dad was diagnosed with Alzheimer's on Monday, and the Dr told us there and then that he was no longer allowed to drive. I don't know if this is always the case though, but he was told that if he felt his driving was still up to standard, he could pay to take a driving test which would allow him to continue to drive if he were to pass. I was shocked that he was told to stop driving immediately, but I have to admit it was a relief to have a professional deliver the news, rather than me having to tell him myself.

If the doctor has only just diagnosed your father then they can only advise that he no longer drives so maybe you need to check that's what the GP actually said. My mother-in-law drove for a couple of years before her children took her keys away as it became obvious that she was no longer safe to drive. The issue was that because the three "children" lived 70, 150 and 200 miles away they had to rely on friends and neighbours to say how her driving was as when we visited one of us would always drive. The issue was they all said she was okay until she was caught by a granddaughters husband driving at 10 miles and hour with the windscreen fully misted up. When one of her sons took the keys away and sold the car even with the Alzheimers for the nest two years she still remembered what he'd done! Friends and neighbours then changed their tune and said "thank heavens" that the car had been taken away as she her driving had become appalling but didn't speak up because they didn't want to take away her independence! If you do allow your father to carry on driving there has to be a point before it goes too far that you have to be honest and mercenary and stop him driving. As with the mother-in-law she "promised" not to drive at night but she did which as with the misted windscreen (because she forgot how the operate the blowers and air conditioning) were the final straws but the family should have stopped her a few months before.

OliveWah · 11/08/2025 23:06

munch58 · 08/08/2025 16:31

If the doctor has only just diagnosed your father then they can only advise that he no longer drives so maybe you need to check that's what the GP actually said. My mother-in-law drove for a couple of years before her children took her keys away as it became obvious that she was no longer safe to drive. The issue was that because the three "children" lived 70, 150 and 200 miles away they had to rely on friends and neighbours to say how her driving was as when we visited one of us would always drive. The issue was they all said she was okay until she was caught by a granddaughters husband driving at 10 miles and hour with the windscreen fully misted up. When one of her sons took the keys away and sold the car even with the Alzheimers for the nest two years she still remembered what he'd done! Friends and neighbours then changed their tune and said "thank heavens" that the car had been taken away as she her driving had become appalling but didn't speak up because they didn't want to take away her independence! If you do allow your father to carry on driving there has to be a point before it goes too far that you have to be honest and mercenary and stop him driving. As with the mother-in-law she "promised" not to drive at night but she did which as with the misted windscreen (because she forgot how the operate the blowers and air conditioning) were the final straws but the family should have stopped her a few months before.

No, the Consultant was very clear that with the score my Dad got in the testing, he was not allowed to drive with immediate effect. He actually has "Mixed Dementia"; a combination of Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's, which is not something I'd heard of before, so I wonder if it was that, or that coupled with how low he scored on the testing that resulted in the immediacy of the decision.

He's actually coping better without his car than I had thought he would so far, he's finally making use of his free bus pass!

Goldeh · 11/08/2025 23:46

In my experience, the two groups who I've had the most issues with on the road are young lads aged 18-25ish and elderly men aged c.75+. I live in a rural village and many of our roads are single carriageway country lanes, lots of them are NSL and unlit at night to boot. The young lads tend to come speeding up behind, sit up your arse for a half mile or so, and then go roaring past at 90mph, around the bend and away. The elderly men on the other hand, they tend to pootle along at 20-25mph, randomly brake, stop dead just around blind bends so you can practice emergency stops when you encounter them, swerve from side to side so they're either about to go in the ditch or are partially over the centre line, and treat give-way markers as a sign to "please go without looking and don't indicate either". Most recent encounter was a man who decided to reverse back up the slip-road of the dual carriageway because he didn't realise it was a slip-road and thought it was a continuation of the country road he'd just been on. How do I know this? Because when he realised I was behind him and was not willing to also reverse up the slip-road to let him continue, he got out of his car and started shouting at me that needed to go back up the slip-road.

There are far two many drivers who shouldn't be on the roads full stop but two particular demographics are statistically more likely to be involved in accidents which is why it's only right that there should be more driving controls targeted at them.

patooties · 12/08/2025 00:00

‘Spritely 96 year old’. I despair.

Lifestooshort71 · 12/08/2025 01:47

patooties · 12/08/2025 00:00

‘Spritely 96 year old’. I despair.

Why?

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 12/08/2025 02:02

prelovedusername · 04/08/2025 14:10

While we’re banning people from driving on the basis of their potential for causing accidents what about all the obese people
at risk of a heart attack at the wheel?

Maybe we should be checking people’s blood pressure and BMI too.

Age is not the determinant for bad driving.

Perhaps we should just do away with the OAP too - if older people are just as healthy and capable as anyone else they don't need to retire from work do they?

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 12/08/2025 02:13

grumpygrape · 03/08/2025 11:40

Do you have any evidence of that or is it perceived evidence?

If you think the over 70s are a danger on the roads you can check the figures; you will see the over 60s (which is a wider age group than the others) have much lower numbers of collisions, especially fatalities caused than those in their 20s and 30s.

I’m sad I know but I found the information interesting.

My 80+ year old husband has Alzheimer's and is still a good driver (I wouldn’t get in the car with him if he wasn’t). Never had or caused an accident. He does take more care nowadays when pulling out, especially roundabouts and has reduced his speed a little, maybe 10%, because he knows his reactions aren’t as good as they were 40 years ago.

Unlike a lot of drivers he knows which side of the road to drive on as soon as we drive off a ferry or the Eurotunnel.

I agree with a pp there are two issues being discussed here.

Age – the figures speak for themselves.
Medical capacity – eyesight and other health issues and I agree there are problems here and I think they are more hubris than age related. I think all Opticians and GPs should report to the DVLA if they believe a patient lacks capacity to drive.

This is outrageous. An 80+yo man with Alzheimer's should not be driving.

Why aren't you driving the both of you around? If it's because you can't drive then you're no judge of whether he's fit to.

aniloD · 12/08/2025 05:49

BrightLightTonight · 01/08/2025 15:41

Not sure why you had to mention their age - surely the issue is an eyesight problem and nit an age problem.

From 70 onwards you have to renew your licence every 3 years and have to sign to say you have had a (satisfactory) eye test in within the previous 3 years. So age is relevant here

grumpygrape · 12/08/2025 09:30

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 12/08/2025 02:13

This is outrageous. An 80+yo man with Alzheimer's should not be driving.

Why aren't you driving the both of you around? If it's because you can't drive then you're no judge of whether he's fit to.

How does that phrase go?

Tell me you know very little about Alzheimer's without telling me you know very little about Alzheimer's.

saveforthat · 12/08/2025 10:51

munch58 · 08/08/2025 16:31

If the doctor has only just diagnosed your father then they can only advise that he no longer drives so maybe you need to check that's what the GP actually said. My mother-in-law drove for a couple of years before her children took her keys away as it became obvious that she was no longer safe to drive. The issue was that because the three "children" lived 70, 150 and 200 miles away they had to rely on friends and neighbours to say how her driving was as when we visited one of us would always drive. The issue was they all said she was okay until she was caught by a granddaughters husband driving at 10 miles and hour with the windscreen fully misted up. When one of her sons took the keys away and sold the car even with the Alzheimers for the nest two years she still remembered what he'd done! Friends and neighbours then changed their tune and said "thank heavens" that the car had been taken away as she her driving had become appalling but didn't speak up because they didn't want to take away her independence! If you do allow your father to carry on driving there has to be a point before it goes too far that you have to be honest and mercenary and stop him driving. As with the mother-in-law she "promised" not to drive at night but she did which as with the misted windscreen (because she forgot how the operate the blowers and air conditioning) were the final straws but the family should have stopped her a few months before.

You can't stop another adult driving and you can't take their keys away or sell their car without their permission.

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 12/08/2025 11:46

grumpygrape · 12/08/2025 09:30

How does that phrase go?

Tell me you know very little about Alzheimer's without telling me you know very little about Alzheimer's.

Not going to answer the question about why he's doing the driving instead of you?

mintydoggyv · 12/08/2025 12:01

Goldeh · 11/08/2025 23:46

In my experience, the two groups who I've had the most issues with on the road are young lads aged 18-25ish and elderly men aged c.75+. I live in a rural village and many of our roads are single carriageway country lanes, lots of them are NSL and unlit at night to boot. The young lads tend to come speeding up behind, sit up your arse for a half mile or so, and then go roaring past at 90mph, around the bend and away. The elderly men on the other hand, they tend to pootle along at 20-25mph, randomly brake, stop dead just around blind bends so you can practice emergency stops when you encounter them, swerve from side to side so they're either about to go in the ditch or are partially over the centre line, and treat give-way markers as a sign to "please go without looking and don't indicate either". Most recent encounter was a man who decided to reverse back up the slip-road of the dual carriageway because he didn't realise it was a slip-road and thought it was a continuation of the country road he'd just been on. How do I know this? Because when he realised I was behind him and was not willing to also reverse up the slip-road to let him continue, he got out of his car and started shouting at me that needed to go back up the slip-road.

There are far two many drivers who shouldn't be on the roads full stop but two particular demographics are statistically more likely to be involved in accidents which is why it's only right that there should be more driving controls targeted at them.

So agree , the first thing is the younger age group should not have driving licence untill they are 25 , they are thinking of it in Australia and Canada and fully agree with older people being tested for driving reflexes time and eyesight , all road users should have eye tests every 2 years even cyclists this is safe for every one . I was at a local supermarket and a lady tried to park her suv bus and could not do it she was mid thirty dvla need everyone to be tested for there eye sight every 2 years and a doctors check once a year for safety ,

patooties · 12/08/2025 12:29

Lifestooshort71 · 12/08/2025 01:47

Why?

Do you mean spritely for someone who is almost a century old?
or ‘comparable with a 40 year old’ kind of spritely?